Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 12801–13000

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusP. RAVIKUMAR @ RAVI ETC.

2018 INSC 716Dismissed

The State of Karnataka appealed the acquittal of accused No.2 (P. Ravi Kumar) and accused No.3 (D.B. Savitha) in a murder case where the deceased, Mohan Kumar, was allegedly killed by a conspiracy involving accused No.1, accused No.2, and accused No.3, who were said to have an illicit relationship. …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSRINIVASA

2018 INSC 703Dismissed

The State of Karnataka charged Srinivasa, the husband, with murder of his wife Rajashree, alleging he strangulated her and staged a hanging, motivated by an alleged illicit relationship with a second accused. The trial court convicted Srinivasa under Section 302 of the IPC, but the Karnataka High …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusA. B. MAHESHA ETC.

2018 INSC 702Dismissed

The State of Karnataka appealed the acquittal of A.B. Mahesha and others, who had been convicted by the trial court for murder based on circumstantial evidence that the deceased Jagdeesha was last seen with the accused, the recovery of his car, and the seizure of a gold chain, watch and ring from …

IMTIYAZ RAMZAN KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 712Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered two unrelated special leave petitions challenging convictions under Section 302 IPC, both of which had been affirmed by respective High Courts. The petitioners argued that the convictions were unsafe, but the Court found the evidence of eye witnesses reliable and saw no …

SIDDALINGversusTHE STATE, THROUGH KALAGI POLICE STATION

2018 INSC 684Dismissed

The appellant was married to Kavitha, who committed suicide within four months of their marriage, allegedly due to dowry harassment and the husband's illicit relationship with another woman. The prosecution presented documentary evidence of a Panchayat agreement in which the husband admitted …

DR. SR. TESSY JOSE AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KERALA

2018 INSC 667Appeal(s) allowed

The victim, a minor at the time of rape, became pregnant and delivered a child at a hospital where three staff members – a gynecologist, a pediatrician and a hospital administrator – were later charged under Sections 19(1) and 21(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, and …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusGANGABISHAN @ VISHNU & ORS.

2018 INSC 644Dismissed

The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted nine accused for the death of Rajesh, who was shot in the left thigh during a dispute over cattle and crop damage. The trial court convicted all under sections 302/149, 325/149, 147, 148 and 440 IPC, but the High Court acquitted eight of them, retaining only a …

HETCHIN HAOKIPversusSTATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS.

2018 INSC 628Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was detained under the National Security Act, 1980 on 12 July 2017, and the District Magistrate reported the detention to the State Government only on 17 July 2017, a five‑day delay. The petitioner challenged the detention on the ground that the report was not made "forthwith" as …

TEHSEEN S. POONAWALLAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 617Directions issued

The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition under Art. 32 filed by a social activist seeking directions to curb cow‑vigilantism, lynching and mob violence. It held that such acts are unlawful, violate fundamental rights and the State has a constitutional duty to protect life and human dignity. The …

MOTIRAM PADU JOSHI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 594Dismissed

The case arose from a factional clash in which the deceased, Machindra Joshi, was attacked with swords, knives and a motorcycle chain by the appellants Motiram Padu Joshi, Ratan Maruti Vaskar, Devidas Maruti Vaskar and Ramnath Joshi, leading to his death. The trial court acquitted all accused, …

VINAY SHARMA & ANR.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2018 INSC 591Dismissed

The petitioners, Vinay Sharma and Pawan Kumar Gupta, filed review petitions challenging the Supreme Court's order dismissing their criminal appeals in the Nirbhaya gang‑rape case. They raised numerous grounds, including the abolition of the death penalty, alleged errors in the assessment of …

LALIT YADAVversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2018 INSC 585Dismissed

The petitioner was convicted by the trial court and affirmed by the High Court for offences under Sections 376 and 342 of the IPC. In both judgments, the victim (PW‑2) was named throughout, which the Supreme Court held to be inconsistent with Section 228‑A of the IPC that protects the identity of …

COMMON CAUSE (A REGD. SOCIETY) & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 568Disposed off

The petitioners, including Common Cause, challenged the appointments of K.V. Chowdary as Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) and T.M. Bhasin as Vigilance Commissioner (VC) on the ground that the selections violated the constitutional principles of impeccable and institutional integrity. They …

DEVIDAS LOKA RATHODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 560Appeal(s) allowed

Devidas Loka Rathod was convicted under Sections 302 and 324 IPC for assaulting several persons with a sickle, resulting in one death. He pleaded unsound mind, asserting that a pre‑existing psychotic disorder rendered him incapable of understanding his acts. The trial and appellate courts rejected …

SONVIR @ SOMVIRversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2018 INSC 562Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sonvir, was convicted along with two others for a double murder under Sections 302, 392 and 34 of the IPC based largely on circumstantial evidence such as recovered jewellery, a blood‑stained knife, a blood‑stained shirt, a Maruti van, and fingerprint matches. The appellant challenged …

MS. XversusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR.

2018 INSC 529Disposed off

The accused, a film producer, was charged with rape, kidnapping, criminal intimidation, and related offences under the IPC. He had earlier obtained anticipatory bail, which was cancelled for not disclosing a pending 2G Spectrum case, but later secured regular bail under Section 439 of the CrPC by …

VINUBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATELversusRAJIVBHAI DUDABHAI PATEL & OTHERS

2018 INSC 521Disposed off

The case concerned an attack in which three persons were killed and five injured, allegedly committed by a group of seventeen accused. The Sessions Court convicted four accused and acquitted the rest, but the charges were found to be improperly framed under CrPC sections 211‑213, lacking specific …

MANOJ KUMAR V. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2018 INSC 515Disposed off

The case arose from a long-standing land dispute in Himachal Pradesh where the deceased, Prem Dass, was attacked by a group of seven accused while returning from a nearby village. The assault with weapons caused a scalp injury that later led to hemorrhage and death. The trial court convicted all …

RUPINDER SINGH SANDHUversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS

2018 INSC 514Disposed off

In 1988 a road‑rage incident in Patiala resulted in the death of Gurnam Singh after alleged fist blows by Navjot Singh Sidhu (A‑1). Rupinder Singh Sandhu (A‑2) was also alleged to have been present. The Sessions Court acquitted both accused; the Punjab & Haryana High Court reversed the acquittal, …

SHEILA SEBASTIANversusR. JAWAHARAJ & ANR. ETC.

2018 INSC 494Dismissed

The appellant alleged that the accused, with the help of an imposter, forged a Power of Attorney (PoA) to obtain a mortgage deed over her late mother’s property. The trial court convicted both accused under Section 465 IPC for forgery, a decision upheld by the Sessions Court. On appeal, the High …

KUMARversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2018 INSC 497Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Kumar was convicted by the trial court and the Madurai High Court for murder (IPC s.302) and voluntarily causing hurt by a dangerous weapon (IPC s.324) after the death of Sakthivel during a scuffle that allegedly stemmed from a prior verbal spat. The prosecution relied on several …

GURWINDER SINGH @ SONU ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2018 INSC 457Case Partly allowed

Two families assembled near a tubewell to settle a land dispute when a verbal altercation escalated into a scuffle. Gurwinder Singh fetched an axe from an adjacent room and, while Satnam Singh restrained the victim, struck Harbhajan Singh on the head, causing severe head injuries; both accused also …

TULARAMversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2018 INSC 444Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Tularam was convicted of murder for stabbing Bhadri Lodhi with a spear during a sudden quarrel that escalated into a violent altercation. The key issue was whether Tularam had the intention to cause death or only knowledge that his act could likely cause death. The Supreme Court …

MURUGANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2018 INSC 440Dismissed

The appellant Murugan was convicted under Sections 364 and 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the murder of his father-in-law, Murugan, after the main accused Kumar, who had a motive to marry Kumar's daughter, invited the victim for dinner and killed him. The prosecution proved a motive, the …

CHANDRA BHAWAN SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2018 INSC 435Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Satyawati, who was allegedly killed by her in‑laws for refusing to pay dowry. Four family members were tried; Jwala Singh was acquitted while Tribhuwan Singh, Makoi Devi and Chandra Bhawan Singh were convicted by the trial court. The High Court upheld the convictions …

BHASKARRAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 419Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra alleged that sixteen accused, including Bhaskarrao and others, murdered Shamrao by assaulting him with weapons and amputating his hand, invoking sections 147, 148, 452 r/w 149, 302 r/w 149 and 506 of the IPC. The trial court acquitted all accused after finding the …

NARESH & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2018 INSC 417Disposed off

The accused Naresh, Suresh, Ashish and Rajendra were charged with attempting to murder and causing hurt by attacking Tej Singh with an axe in 1998. The Sessions Court acquitted them, but the High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted them under IPC sections 307/34, 323/34, 324/34 and 504, …

KAVITA CHANDRAKANT LAKHANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2018 INSC 402Dismissed

The appellant, Kavita Chandrakant Lakhani, filed an FIR alleging that her former boyfriend, Respondent No.2, forcibly took her to his house, beat her and later molested her. The charge sheet included offences under Sections 363, 342, 324, 354, 323, 506(ii) and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. …

SEEMA SINGHversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.

2018 INSC 364Dismissed

Seema Singh, the mother of Sara Singh, filed a criminal complaint alleging that her son‑in‑law (respondent No.2) murdered his wife and staged the incident as a road accident. The case was transferred to the CBI, which produced expert reports from CRRI, AIIMS, CFSL and IIT. The High Court of …

SHANKERversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2018 INSC 359Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the murder of Sanjay Sorle at a marriage ceremony, for which eleven persons were charged, including appellants A‑3 (Suresh) and A‑5 (Shanker). The trial court convicted the five remaining accused under Sections 148, 149 and 302 of the IPC, a decision affirmed by the High Court. On …

NAVANEETHAKRISHNANversusTHE STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2018 INSC 343Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for the murder of a driver, John Bosco, and his companion Madhan, based largely on circumstantial evidence, including the testimony of a taxi driver who claimed to have last seen the accused with the victims, a retracted confession by one accused, and the recovery of a …

K. K. MISHRAversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

2018 INSC 341Appeal(s) allowed

K.K. Mishra, a Congress spokesperson, allegedly made three statements about the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh during a press conference. The State Government sanctioned the public prosecutor to file a complaint under Section 199(2) of the CrPC on the same day, leading to Mishra's conviction under …

STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.versusUTILITY USERS’ WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS.

2018 INSC 329Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether Section 84(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 obliges a High Court Judge to be appointed as Chairperson of a State Electricity Regulatory Commission and whether a member of law is required on the Commission. By interpreting the statutory language, the Court held that …

SMT. SUVARNAMMA & ANR.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.

2018 INSC 328Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased was killed when a tractor, driven rashly by its owner, struck him as a pedestrian on a footpath. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held both the tractor's owner and the insurer jointly and severally liable for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and awarded Rs.4,31,000 …

MUNSHIRAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. ETC.

2018 INSC 315Appeal(s) allowed

The father of a deceased man filed an FIR under Section 306 IPC alleging that his son’s wife and her family had harassed the son, leading to his suicide. The High Court quashed the FIR, holding that the alleged abetment was not made out. The appellant challenged this order before the Supreme Court, …

HARITA SUNIL PARABversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 290Dismissed

Harita Sunil Parab, a practising advocate in Mumbai, filed FIRs in Delhi and Ghaziabad alleging offences under various IPC sections and later sought to have those cases transferred to Mumbai, claiming threats from the accused, fear of a biased investigation and personal inconvenience. The Supreme …

SHIVAWWA AND ANRversusTHE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR.

2018 INSC 285Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Chanabasayya, was killed when he fell from a tractor‑trailer owned by respondent No.2 while returning from unloading maize at Holealur. His father filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation from the insurer (respondent No.1), the vehicle owner …

GANAPATHI & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

2018 INSC 271Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Murugan and his sister Poomari following marital discord between Murugan and his wife Muthulakshmi. Four accused—Ponnu, Ganapathi, Chitravelu, and Muthulakshmi—were charged under IPC s.302 and s.302/34. The trial court convicted all four; the Madras High Court upheld …

MANJU SURANAversusSUNIL ARORA & ORS.

2018 INSC 278Matter referred to larger bench

The appellant filed a complaint under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 alleging corruption in a drinking‑water project and sought investigation and FIR registration against several public servants, including the first respondent who was incorrectly described as Principal Secretary, PHED. The …

SHAKTI VAHINIversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 266Disposed off

The petition sought directions to the Union and State governments to prevent honour crimes, including honour killings, by mandating a national and state plan of action, special cells, and prosecution of offenders. The Court held that any torture or interference with an adult's choice of marriage, …

BHARATKUMAR RAMESHCHANDRA BAROTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2018 INSC 263Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced by the Sessions Court to ten years' rigorous imprisonment, which the State appealed under Section 377 of the CrPC for enhancement. The High Court, after serving notice and appointing an amicus curiae, enhanced the sentence to …

GORUSU NAGARAJU S/O APPARAOversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2018 INSC 257Dismissed

Gorusu Nagaraju was convicted of murder under IPC s.302 and of concealing the offence under s.201, based primarily on circumstantial evidence linking him to the victim's death. The trial court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court both upheld the conviction, relying on seven material circumstances, …

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusOM PAL & ORS.

2018 INSC 252Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh charged Om Pal and two others with murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC for the death of Mahipal on 25‑03‑1993. The trial court convicted them based primarily on the testimony of the complainant (PW‑1) and two eyewitnesses (PW‑2 and PW‑3). On appeal, the Allahabad High …

DR. SUBHASH KASHINATH MAHAJANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2018 INSC 248Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan, a senior government official, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for refusing sanction to prosecute two senior officers who had made adverse entries in his service record. He sought anticipatory …

P. SREEKUMARversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2018 INSC 246Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a chief executive trustee of a charitable trust, was accused by a fellow trustee of defrauding the trust, leading to the registration of an FIR against the appellant, the trust treasurer and three bank officials. The appellant subsequently lodged a separate FIR against the treasurer …

SRI RAMESHWAR YADAV & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

2018 INSC 239Appeal(s) allowed

The second respondent lodged a complaint under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against her husband and his parents. The accused filed an application under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking exemption from personal appearance, citing the 1,750 km …

BIMAL GURUNGversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 240Dismissed

Bimal Gurung, president of the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking the transfer of investigation of all FIRs (over 100 cases) lodged against him and other GJM members to an independent agency such as the CBI or NIA, alleging political bias and threat to life. The …

DEV KANYA TIWARIversusTHE STATE OF U.P.

2018 INSC 228Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Brij Bhushan Tiwari, was found dead and his brother alleged that he was murdered by his wife and in‑laws. The accused, Dev Kanya Tiwari (mother‑in‑law), claimed the death was a suicide by ingestion of sulfas tablets, a version also supported by a prior complaint filed by the deceased's …

BANNAREDDY & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2018 INSC 231Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Bannareddy and others, were convicted by the Karnataka High Court for offences under Sections 148, 341, 504 and 326 read with 149 of the IPC arising from an alleged assault on three victims during a village fair. The trial court had acquitted them, finding that the prosecution’s case …

COMMON CAUSE (A REGD. SOCIETY)versusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2018 INSC 223Disposed off

The petitioner, Common Cause, a registered society, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a declaration that the right to die with dignity is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and for directions to recognize 'living wills' or advance directives. The case was referred …

VISHNU CHANDRU GAONKARversusN.M. DESSAI

2018 INSC 214Dismissed

Vishnu Chandra Gaonkar, a legal heir, alleged that advocate N.M. Dessai forged the thumb impression of a deceased appellant, Shaba Manju Velip, to withdraw a civil appeal and related execution proceedings. Gaonkar filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the Criminal …

RAJENDRA RAJORIYAversusJAGAT NARAIN THAPAK AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 191Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a criminal complaint alleging cheating, forgery and offences under the SC/ST Act, which the Judicial Magistrate dismissed for lack of evidence. The appellant sought revision before the Sessions Court, which held that the appellant belonged to a Scheduled Caste, found a prima …

PANKAJ JAINversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2018 INSC 198Disposed off

Pankaj Jain, accused in a CBI case involving serious offences under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, was issued a non‑bailable warrant and proceedings under sections 82 and 83 of the CrPC. He voluntarily appeared before the Special Judge, CBI, and sought release on a bond under section …

SHAJAHANversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2018 INSC 158Case Partly allowed

The appellants were convicted under Section 396 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity with murder after a robbery at a pawn‑broking shop in 2002, during which one victim was strangled. The trial court sentenced them to ten years' rigorous imprisonment, but the High Court enhanced …

DINESH KUMAR KALIDAS PATELversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2018 INSC 133Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dinesh Kumar Kalidas Patel, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 498A and 201 of the Indian Penal Code after his wife allegedly committed suicide by hanging. The High Court acquitted him of the 498A charge but upheld the conviction under Section 201, relying …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusDINESH

2018 INSC 109Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra charged two accused with murder and destruction of evidence, alleging that the second accused cut the victim's corpse into pieces. The trial court convicted both, but the High Court acquitted them, prompting the State to file three criminal appeals. The Supreme Court …

DATARAM SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2018 INSC 107Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was charged under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 506 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheating a complainant of over Rs. 37 lakh. During a seven‑month investigation he was never arrested, and when he sought to quash the FIR the High Court granted him time to …

MADAN @ MADHU PATEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 104Dismissed

The appellant, Madan (also known as Madhu) Patek, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly pouring kerosene on the deceased, Latabai, and setting her on fire. The conviction was based primarily on two dying declarations recorded by a Special Executive Magistrate and a police constable, both …

LATESH @ DADU BABURAO KARLEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 70Disposed off

On December 10, 2006, six accused assaulted Vitthal Hingane and his brother Jagdish, resulting in Jagdish's death. The trial court and High Court convicted all six under sections 302 and 307 IPC, among other charges. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution proved the guilt of …

SUBHASH CHANDER BANSALversusGIAN CHAND AND ORS

2018 INSC 59Dismissed

In 1988 the accused used a hockey stick to inflict injuries on Om Prakash and Ravinder Kumar. The trial court acquitted all five accused, but the High Court convicted four of them under Section 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, crediting the period they had already spent in custody …

ISSAC @ KISHORversusRONALD CHERIYAN AND ORS.

2018 INSC 48Dismissed

The case involved the murder of a widow, Brijitha, during a robbery. Accused No.1 (the appellant) was living with the deceased and was arrested after giving a disclosure statement that led to the arrest of Accused No.2, who was later convicted of murder and robbery. The trial court acquitted Accused …

LACHHMAN DASSversusRESHAM CHAND KALER AND ANR.

2018 INSC 50Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from FIR 205/2015 alleging murder, attempted murder and offences under the Arms Act in a land‑dispute incident, with Resham Chand Kaler, a British national, alleged to be the kingpin. The trial court rejected his bail application, but the Punjab & Haryana High Court later granted …

DASHRATH @ JOLO & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2018 INSC 51Dismissed

On 3 August 2008, PW‑19 Birichram went to a neighbour's house for a child's birth celebration when the appellants, armed with battleaxes and sticks, threatened and assaulted him. The assault escalated, resulting in the deaths of three persons (Chedilal, Bablu, Bhuru) and injuries to two others, with …

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusNANDE @ NANDKISHORE SINGH

2018 INSC 47Dismissed

The State of Madhya Pradesh charged Nande (also known as Nandkishore Singh) with murder and attempted murder after he allegedly hurled a burning cow‑dung cake at women attending a marriage ceremony, causing severe burns that later led to the deaths of two victims. The trial court convicted him under …

ATUL THAKURversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ETC. ETC.

2018 INSC 37Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Atul Thakur, attacked Hitesh Thakur with a knife during a sudden quarrel at a drink party, inflicting six injuries that later caused Hitesh's death. The trial court convicted him of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part‑II IPC and sentenced him to five …

ANIL & ORSversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS

2018 INSC 40Dismissed

The case involved a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act after a tractor allegedly ran over Ram Kanwar, resulting in his death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs. 21,38,000 to the claimants, finding the tractor driver negligent, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court …

MAUVIN GODINHOversusSTATE OF GOA

2018 INSC 28Disposed off

The case arose from a series of power‑tariff rebate notifications issued by the Government of Goa, some of which were allegedly promulgated without Cabinet approval. The appellant‑Minister of Power, the Chief Electrical Engineer and senior officials of two private companies were accused of …

LAVGHANBHAI DEVJIBHAI VASAVAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2018 INSC 20Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Lavghanbhai Devjibhai Vasava, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for striking his wife, Shakuben, with a wooden object during a sudden altercation over delayed lunch preparation, leading to her death ten days later. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the facts …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusRAJ KUMAR

2018 INSC 9Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Meena Devi lived with her two children and her brother‑in‑law Raj Kumar in a joint family house. On the night of 23 August 2007, Raj Kumar, in a drunken state, assaulted Meena Devi, took her to another accused’s house, and she was later found dead, hanging from a tree. The trial court …

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ORS.versusPRADEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 10Appeal(s) allowed

The Union Territory of Chandigarh Administration sought to appoint candidates as constables, but two respondents were denied employment after a Screening Committee found them unsuitable despite their acquittal in criminal cases under IPC sections 323 and 506. The respondents challenged the …

DINESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2018 INSC 5Disposed off

The complainants, members of a Rathore family, alleged that Dineshbhai Patel and others fraudulently obtained bogus powers of attorney and transferred their jointly owned land in Surat. Three separate complaints led to the registration of an FIR on 6 June 2016, charging offences under the IPC and …

TEESTA ATUL SETALVADversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2017 INSC 1239Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the police could lawfully freeze the bank accounts of Teesta Atul Setalvad, Javed Anand and related trusts under Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) without prior notice to the account holders. The investigation, stemming from an FIR alleging …

HALAPPAversusMALIK SAB

2017 INSC 1249Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a 28‑year‑old agriculturist, suffered total paralysis when a tractor at a demonstration turned turtle and fell on him. He claimed compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded Rs.8,66,000 based on his disability and loss of earning capacity. The insurer …

MADAN MOHANversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2017 INSC 1233Appeal(s) allowed

Madan Mohan filed an application under Section 193 CrPC seeking the summoning of Ashish Meena and Vimal Meena as accused in a case already pending against two other persons. The Sessions Judge issued non‑bailable warrants against the two respondents. They filed a revision under Section 197 CrPC in …

JOSEPHversusSTATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE .

2017 INSC 1227Disposed off

The case arose from a violent clash between two factions at a funeral in Perumanal village, where eleven accused attacked the complainant party, resulting in the death of the deceased (son of PW‑2). The trial court and the Madras High Court convicted all the accused under Section 302 IPC read with …

STATE OF U.P.versusRAGHUVIR AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

2017 INSC 1223Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Prem Bhujva, Raghuvir, Mehngu and Prem Yadav for the murder of Lallu Singh, alleging an ambush and shooting on 30 July 2003. The trial court, relying on two eye‑witnesses, recovery of a pistol from Prem Yadav and a ballistic report linking the weapon to …

ASHARFIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2017 INSC 1205Case Partly allowed

Asharfi was convicted by the trial court and the Allahabad High Court for rape (IPC s.376(2)(g)) and for an offence under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the latter attracting a life sentence. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the evidence of the prosecutrix, a …

PRABHU DUTT TIWARIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2017 INSC 1200Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a private complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 468, 471 and 120B against five respondents concerning a disputed land transaction. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, after reviewing the complaint, oral evidence under sections 200 and 202 of the CrPC and …

MOHAMMED ABDULLA KHANversusPRAKASH K.

2017 INSC 1168Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, owner of the Kannada daily "Jaya Kirana", was charged under Sections 500, 501 and 502 of the Indian Penal Code for publishing a news item that the appellant claimed was defamatory. The appellant filed a private complaint, which led to criminal proceedings; the respondent sought quash …

CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORMSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 1091Dismissed

The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Supreme Court to constitute a Special Investigation Team, headed by a retired Chief Justice of India, to probe an FIR (RCIO(A)/2017‑AC.III) alleging conspiracy and bribes …

MANOHAR LAL SHARMAversusSANJAY LEELA BHANSALI & ORS.

2017 INSC 1156Dismissed

The petitioner, Manohar Lal Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a direction that the film "Padmavati" not be exhibited abroad without a certificate from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) and that the CBI register an FIR against the film's producers under Section 7 of …

ISHWAR PRATAP SINGH & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2017 INSC 1155Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were originally charged under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. Two years later, following a complaint to the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, the Commission directed the police to add an offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, resulting in a …

NIKESH TARACHAND SHAHversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2017 INSC 1137Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, which imposes two additional conditions for granting bail when the offence involves a scheduled offence punishable with imprisonment of more than three years under Part A of the …

KUNA@ SANJAYA BEHERAversusTHE STATE OF ODISHA

2017 INSC 1124Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant KUNA@ SANJAYA BEHERA and co‑accused Pravati Behera were convicted under IPC s.302 read with s.34 for the murder of Santosh Behera, the prosecution alleging an extra‑marital relationship as motive. The sole eye‑witness, PW‑1 (Niranjan Behera), claimed to have seen the murder and to have …

ANIL KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR.

2017 INSC 1111Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by six accused, including Anil Kumar Yadav, against the cancellation of bail granted by the Sessions Court in a murder‑related case (Sections 302, 308 IPC read with 34 IPC). The Court held that the Sessions Court had improperly merged the framing of charges with …

STATE OF UTTARAKHANDversusJAIRNAIL SINGH

2017 INSC 1105Dismissed

The State of Uttarakhand appealed a High Court order acquitting Jairnail Singh of charges under IPC s.307 (attempt to murder) and Arms Act s.25(1‑A). The Session Court had convicted Singh, but the High Court set aside the conviction, citing material infirmities such as the failure to forensic‑test …

ROHIT TANDONversusTHE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE

2017 INSC 1096

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Rohit Tandon challenging the denial of regular bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The Court held that the threshold conditions of Section 45 of the PMLA were not satisfied, as the prosecution presented substantial evidence of the …

MANAGEMENT OF BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.versusM. MANI

2017 INSC 1088Appeal(s) allowed

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) dismissed two drivers, M. Mani and the late T.A. Mathivanan, after a departmental enquiry found them guilty of theft of a heavy machine while on duty. The employees were later acquitted of the theft charge in a criminal trial under IPC s.379. They challenged …

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusTRIBHUWAN & ORS.

2017 INSC 1078Case Partly allowed

In 1980 a violent altercation in Azamgarh resulted in the death of Ram Lagan and injuries to Baij Nath. Six persons, including Tribhuwan, were tried; Tribhuwan was convicted under Section 325 IPC read with Section 149 and sentenced to four years rigorous imprisonment by the Sessions Court. The …

SENIOR MANAGER (P&D), RIICO LTD.versusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

2017 INSC 1074Dismissed

The appellant, a senior manager of RIICO Ltd., filed an FIR alleging that a letter dated 10‑04‑1992, addressed to Respondent No.2, was forged and that the forgery constituted offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The police final report, relying on Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the CrPC, …

DINUBHAI BOGHABHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2017 INSC 1063Disposed off

The murder of environmental activist Amit Jethwa, who had filed a PIL against illegal mining near Gir Forest, led to the arrest of Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki and his nephew. After a lackluster police investigation, the case was transferred to the CBI, which filed a charge‑sheet. During trial, 105 of …

POORANLAL & ANRversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2017 INSC 1051Dismissed

The case arose from the beating of Hariya on 30 August 1990 by five persons, including Pooranlal and Gaya Prasad, who later died after 14 days of injuries. The trial court acquitted all five accused, but the High Court set aside the acquittal of Pooranlal and Gaya Prasad, convicting them under …

INDEPENDENT THOUGHTversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2017 INSC 1030Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined whether Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, which exempts a husband from rape liability when his wife is aged 15‑18, violates the Constitution and conflicts with the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The Court held that the exemption …

SANTOSH S/O DWARKADAS FAFATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2017 INSC 1027

Santosh was accused under Section 408 IPC read with Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for receiving misappropriated food grains. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the trial court and the Nagpur High Court. After depositing the alleged amount, he obtained interim …

RAJESH KUMAR C. K. JAINversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

2017 INSC 1019Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute involved a settlement recorded on a bond paper of Rs.100 filed with the Assistant Commissioner, Yadgiri. The accused, Rajesh Kumar C.K. Jain, was alleged to have taken the bond paper from the court file on 16 July 2010, leading to an FIR and his conviction under Section 379 IPC by the …

STATE (NCT OF DELHI)versusBRIJESH SINGH @ ARUN KUMAR AND ANR.

2017 INSC 1018Appeal(s) allowed

The State of NCT of Delhi appealed against the discharge of Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar and others by a Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). The key dispute was whether charge‑sheets filed in courts outside Delhi could be counted towards the "continuing unlawful …

BIRBAL CHOUDHARY@ MUKHIYA JEEversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2017 INSC 1012Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of eleven accused in a kidnapping‑for‑ransom case in Bihar, finding that the prosecution proved the elements of Section 364A IPC, including abduction, confinement and demand for ransom. The Court held that Section 368 IPC is a deemed offence under Section …

M/S. METERS AND INSTRUMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.versusKANCHAN MEHTA

2017 INSC 1009Disposed off

The appellants, M/s. Meters and Instruments Private Ltd. and others, were charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque to the complainant, Kanchan Mehta. The complainant refused to accept a demand draft, while the accused offered to pay the cheque …

S. MOHAMMED ISPAHANIversusYOGENDRA CHANDAK & OTHERS

2017 INSC 999Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, landlords of a commercial premises, were not named in the charge sheet filed under Sections 379, 427, 341 r/w 34 IPC and Section 3(1) Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992, although they were mentioned in the FIR. After the trial evidence was recorded, the …

OM PRAKASHversusRELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE AND ANR.

2017 INSC 1001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant insured a truck with Reliance General Insurance, which was stolen on 23 March 2010. While assisting police in the search, the appellant delayed filing the insurance claim until 31 March 2010, citing an eight‑day gap due to police involvement. The insurer rejected the claim on the basis …

SHANTANU SITARAM @ ANIL DIVEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2017 INSC 981Dismissed

Shantanu Sitaram (also known as Anil Divekar) was convicted along with two co‑accused for the murder of his wife Supriya, whose body was found in a car with ligature marks. The prosecution proved that gold ornaments worn by the victim were recovered from a neighbour of Shantanu and that a rope, …

GANPAT SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2017 INSC 956Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ganpat Singh, was convicted for the murder of Shantabai, whose body was discovered in a dry well and identified as the mother of a minor. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence: the deceased was last seen with the appellant, silver ornaments allegedly lent to her were …

RATANLALversusPRAHLAD JAT & ORS.

2017 INSC 954Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a murder trial where the charge sheet under IPC sections 302, 201, 342 and 120B was filed against two accused. Twenty‑eight witnesses, including PW4 (Sawarmal) and PW5 (Chandri), had given statements that supported the prosecution. After about fourteen months, PW4 and PW5 filed …

STATE OF U P THR. ITS SECRETARY & ORSversusMERAJ AHMAD

2017 INSC 869Disposed off

Meraj Ahmad was appointed temporarily as a Livestock Development Assistant in 1983 and was terminated in April 1984 after an FIR under Section 302 IPC was lodged against him. He was acquitted of the murder charge in October 1985 and, in February 1989, voluntarily sought a fresh appointment, …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusAVINASH

2017 INSC 871Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal appeal against Avinash, who had been arrested in connection with a fraud involving Rs 2.74 crore. While on bail, Avinash’s bank accounts were attached under Section 102 of the CrPC. He first sought to quash the FIR and have his accounts de‑frozen before a …

AMIT VASHISTHAversusSURESH AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 836Appeal(s) allowed

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner lodged a complaint under Section 228 of the Indian Penal Code alleging that the respondent, Suresh, assaulted the presiding officer during an adjudication proceeding under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The …

AHSANversusSTATE OF U.P.

2017 INSC 819Dismissed

On 8 October 2004, three accused, including the appellant Ahsan, entered the house of the victim's uncle armed with country‑made pistols and fired at family members, causing the death of a still‑born child and grievous injuries to others, including a head wound to Shahzad inflicted by Ahsan. The …

SAMIR SA.HAY @ SAMEER SAHAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 812Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Samir Sahay, was charged under Section 420 IPC for allegedly cheating a depositor after his father, Major P.C. Sahay (Retd.), gave false assurances that money deposited in Aneja Consultancy would be safe. The FIR alleged that the father, not the son, made the fraudulent promise, and …

GIRISH SHARMA & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS.

2017 INSC 797Disposed off

An FIR was lodged for corruption and a charge‑sheet was filed against 16 persons, while three individuals—Girish Sharma, Arvind Singh Dhruv and Jeet Ram Yadav—were recorded as witnesses under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC and not named as accused. Some of the accused applied under Sections …

LT. COL. PRASAD SHRIKANT PUROHITversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2017 INSC 784Appeal(s) allowed

Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit, a serving Army officer, was accused of conspiring with others to plant a bomb in Malegaon in 2008, resulting in six deaths. The case was investigated first by the Anti‑Terrorist Squad (ATS) and later by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), leading to divergent …

STATE OF GOAversusJOSE MARIA ALBERT VALES @ ROBERT VALES

2017 INSC 776Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Goa filed a complaint under Section 340 of the CrPC alleging that a prosecution witness, Jose Maria Albert Vales, gave false testimony under oath in a Sessions trial, constituting an offence under Section 193 IPC. The trial magistrate, without conducting a full inquiry, framed a charge …

RAKESH KUMAR PAULversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2017 INSC 754Disposed off

Rakesh Kumar Paul was arrested under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and remained in custody for more than 60 days without a charge‑sheet. The State argued that because the offence could attract imprisonment of up to ten years, the 90‑day period under clause (i) of proviso (a) to Section …

SURESH CHANDRA JANAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2017 INSC 1296Disposed off

The victim, Saraswati Guchhait, was allegedly raped by Purnendu Kumar Patra and later, while the rape case was pending, Patra and Rabin Jana threw acid on her. She was taken to a hospital, where she could not file a police complaint herself; a neighbour (PW‑7) wrote her statement and mailed it, …

MAHENDRA SUBHASHBHAI VANKHEDEversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ETC.

2017 INSC 716Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a 19‑year‑old male, was convicted under Sections 363, 366 and 376 IPC for kidnapping and raping a girl who was under sixteen. The girl had voluntarily left her home and stayed with the appellant for about ten days, and the sexual intercourse was described as consensual. The trial …

MONICA KUMAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2017 INSC 713Disposed off

Petitioners Monica Kumar and her brother alleged that police officers, acting under the influence of a medical college chairman, assaulted them while they were serving a dasti notice and later harassed them by forcing them to withdraw cases, filing a false FIR and chargesheet. The Supreme Court, …

SANJAY KHANDERAO WADANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2017 INSC 704Dismissed

The appellants Sanjay Khanderao Wadane and others were convicted for the murder of Ravindra Kale, who was beaten to death with swords and iron pipes during a long-standing dispute. The appellants challenged the conviction on the ground that a prosecution witness (PW‑8) claimed to have eaten "Bhel" …

NEERA YADAVversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATON

2017 INSC 698Case Partly allowed

Neera Yadav, while serving as Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA), filed ante‑dated and incomplete applications to obtain residential plots for herself and her daughters, manipulated the layout plan to enlarge her plot, and secured shop …

RAJIV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

2017 INSC 699Case Partly allowed

The case involved the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of NOIDA, Rajiv Kumar, and the Chairperson‑Chief Executive Officer, Neera Yadav, who were accused of conspiring to illegally convert a government guest‑house plot into a residential plot and allot it to Kumar at a substantially lower premium, …

RAJKISHORE PUROHITversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 691Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a politically motivated attack on a Congress Sewa Dal president who was campaigning against the removal of a mayoral candidate. Four accused, including the nephew of one accused, arrived together in a car; one accused (A‑2) fired a revolver at the deceased while the others …

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusM. SIVAMANI

2017 INSC 695Appeal(s) allowed

The CBI filed a charge sheet alleging a false insurance claim and charged several persons, including advocate M. Sivamani, under IPC sections 182, 120‑B, 420, 468, 471 and the Prevention of Corruption Act. Sivamani moved a petition invoking CrPC s.195(1)(a)(i), contending that the court could not …

RAJESH SHARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2017 INSC 683Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined a criminal appeal challenging the summoning of the husband’s relatives under Section 498A of the IPC in a dowry‑harassment case. It observed that a large number of 498A cases are filed in the heat of the moment, often without bona‑fide evidence, leading to uncalled‑for …

STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEversusK. N. NEHRU ETC.

2017 INSC 659Appeal(s) allowed

The State filed a criminal appeal against the discharge of K.N. Nehru, a former minister, and his wife under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The FIR alleged that they had amassed assets disproportionate to their known income, with the investigation also focusing on the income and assets of …

MS. EERA THROUGH DR. MANJULA KRIPPENDORFversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

2017 INSC 658Disposed off

The appeal concerned the interpretation of Section 2(d) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, where the appellant, a mentally retarded adult, argued that "age" should include mental age so that she could be treated as a child. The Court examined the POCSO Act's …

SATWANT SINGHversusMALKEET SINGH

2017 INSC 653Appeal(s) allowed

Satwant Singh, an investigating officer, arrested Malkeet Singh on a charge of murder (Section 307 IPC) after the latter had been granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC. The High Court had ordered that the bail protection applied only to offences listed in its order, leading to a …

STATE OF U.P.versusRAM KUMAR & ORS.

2017 INSC 649Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Ram Kumar and others for the murder of informant Mohan Lal, his wife, and three children by firearms and arson, alleging a common intention to kill. The trial court convicted all accused and imposed the death penalty. The Allahabad High Court acquitted them, …

SONU@AMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2017 INSC 634Dismissed

The case concerned the abduction and murder of Ramesh Jain, for which six accused were convicted under sections 120B, 364A, 302, 328A and 201 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on disclosure statements, recovered items, and Call Detail Records (CDRs) of the accused’s mobile phones. The principal …

PADMINI MAHENDRABHAI GADDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2017 INSC 622Matter referred to larger bench

The appellant, Padmini Mahendrabhai Gadda, was convicted under Section 201 of the IPC for causing disappearance of evidence and giving false information to screen the offender in a murder case, while being acquitted of the murder charge itself. The trial court sentenced her to two years' rigorous …

MUKHTIAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS L.R.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2017 INSC 621Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, heir of the deceased Mukhtiar Singh, appealed against the conviction of the latter, a former Station House Officer, under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and receiving bribes of Rs.3,000 and Rs.2,000 during a police‑trap …

STATE OF HARYANAversusKRLSHAN & ANR.

[2017] 7 S.C.R. 251Case Partly allowed

In 1980 a hooch tragedy in Kalanwali, Haryana, caused 36 deaths and 44 permanent blindings after victims consumed liquor adulterated with methyl alcohol. Krishan and Som Nath, licensees of the liquor vend, were convicted by the trial court under IPC sections 302, 328 and 120B. The High Court …

VIKRAM SINGH @ VICKY WALIA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2017 INSC 594Dismissed

The petitioners Vikram Singh, Jasvir Singh and a third accused were convicted under Sections 302, 364A, 201 and 120B of the IPC and sentenced to death, with the death sentence of the female co‑accused later commuted to life imprisonment. They filed review petitions challenging the Supreme Court’s …

S. SUBBULAXMIversusKUMARASAMY & ORS.

2017 INSC 592Dismissed

The case arose from a land dispute between closely related parties in which Subramani was killed during a violent altercation on 15 September 1994. The trial court convicted Kumarasamy and two others under Sections 34, 302 and 506(11) of the Indian Penal Code, but the Madras High Court set aside the …

MUTTAICOSE @ SUBRAMANIversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2017 INSC 586Dismissed

The appellant, Muttaicose@ Subramani, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for assaulting the deceased Natrajan with a sickle after chasing him, during a dispute over land. The defence argued that the First Information Report (FIR) was lodged with an undue delay and that the key …

SATISH NIRANKARIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2017 INSC 479Appeal(s) allowed

Satish Nirankari and his lover Pooja, whose inter‑caste marriage was opposed by her family, went to a vacant house, performed a makeshift marriage, and each consumed copper sulphate. Pooja ingested a larger dose, later hanged herself; Nirankari survived, raised alarm, and sought medical help. He was …

V. SHANTHAversusSTATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 468Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, V. Shanth, was the owner of a seed distribution company accused of selling spurious chilli seeds that caused loss to farmers, leading to three FIRs under the IPC and the Seeds Act, 1966. The State invoked preventive detention under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of …

ANJAN KUMAR SARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF ASSAM

2017 INSC 467Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Anjan Kumar Sarma and others, were convicted by the High Court for murder (Sec. 302) and related offences on the basis that they were last seen with the victim, Rekha Dutta, and offered no explanation. The Supreme Court examined whether the "last seen together" circumstance, without …

CHANDRASEKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE

2017 INSC 465Dismissed

The appellants Chandrasekar and another were convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and of voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC for repeatedly assaulting the deceased on the head with a hammer, sickle and iron rod, resulting in his death. The prosecution relied heavily on the testimony …

STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH SP, CBIversusLALU PRASAD @ LALU PRASAD Y ADAY

2017 INSC 452Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Jharkhand, represented by the CBI, appealed against the Jharkhand High Court’s order quashing several criminal cases arising from the fodder scam on the ground that the accused had already been convicted in one case, invoking Article 20(2) of the Constitution and Section 300 of the CrPC …

KUMARANversusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.

2017 INSC 447Dismissed

The appellant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was ordered to pay Rs.2.75 lakh as compensation under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a default imprisonment of one month for non‑payment. He served both the principal sentence and the default …

MUKESH & ANR.versusSTATE FOR NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

2017 INSC 448Dismissed

On 16 December 2012, a 23-year-old paramedical student and her male friend boarded a bus in Delhi. Six men, including the appellants, gang-raped her, inserted an iron rod into her private parts causing severe internal injuries, and threw both victims out of the moving bus. The woman died from her …

BIBI PARWANA KHATOON @ PARWANA KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2017 INSC 442Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Tamkinat Ara, was allegedly burned to death by her husband and several in‑laws. The trial court convicted the husband, father‑in‑law, sister‑in‑law (Bibi Parwana Khatoon) and her husband (Md. Hasan) under IPC s.304B read with s.34, sentencing them to imprisonment. On appeal, the High …

VASANTA SAMPAT DUPAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2017 INSC 436Dismissed

The petitioners, Vasanta Sampat Dupare, were convicted of raping and murdering a four‑year‑old girl and sentenced to death. They sought review, arguing that the trial court violated Section 235(2) of the CrPC by not granting a separate hearing on sentencing, that the State failed to discharge its …

STATE OF U.P.versusSUNIL

2017 INSC 428Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh alleged that Sunil, along with his brother‑in‑law Suresh Pal Singh, murdered the complainant's father, mother and two sisters. A confessional statement by the deceased brother‑in‑law led to the recovery of a knife and blood‑stained clothing, but the prosecution could not …

ARUN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2017 INSC 419Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, son of the deceased, challenged the acquittal of four accused persons charged with murder, attempt to murder and rioting under Sections 302, 34, 201 and 307 IPC. The trial court had acquitted all accused despite the prosecution's evidence from 13 witnesses. The High Court dismissed …

PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF H.P.

2017 INSC 415Dismissed

The appellant, previously acquitted of kidnapping and rape offences, repeatedly threatened and teased the victim, a teenage girl, leading her to set herself ablaze and die. The victim’s dying declaration, recorded by a Head Constable in the presence of a doctor, implicated the appellant as the sole …

SEENI NAINAR MOHAMMEDversusSTATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

2017 INSC 406Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and IPC for the murder of a Hindu leader. The Supreme Court examined whether the required prior sanction under Section 20‑A of TADA had been validly obtained. It found that the sanctioning authority …

BRIJENDRA SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2017 INSC 409Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were named in FIR No. 53 of 2000 for offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act but were not arraigned as accused. After the trial commenced, the complainant applied under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to summon the appellants as additional accused. The trial court, …

BALIRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2017 INSC 395Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Baliraj Singh and co‑accused were convicted for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based on the testimony of three eyewitnesses who were relatives of the deceased and on a post‑mortem report indicating a fatal wound caused by a sharp object. The Supreme Court found serious …

HEERA LAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2017 INSC 390Appeal(s) allowed

The wife, Lalita, committed suicide within five years of her marriage, alleging daily quarrels and dowry demands by her mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law. A dying declaration recorded by a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate detailed the harassment and the in‑laws’ presence at the time of the act. The trial …

RAJ TALREJAversusKAVITA TALREJA

2017 INSC 385Appeal(s) allowed

The husband filed a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging that his wife had made false and defamatory complaints against him, his family and colleagues, which amounted to cruelty. The wife had lodged multiple complaints with various authorities and the media, all …

KANAKARAJAN @ KANAKANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2017 INSC 377Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a night-time religious procession at a temple where nine accused allegedly attacked the deceased Rajesh and the complainant Vinod (PW2), leading to Rajesh's death. One of the accused, A-2, was found dead hanging from a tree the next day, and the remaining eight were charged under …

FAZAR ALI & ORS.versusSTATE OF ASSAM

2017 INSC 375Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC for attacking the complainant's family with weapons, injuring them and preventing medical treatment, which led to the death of the complainant's brother. The FIR listed only five names but expressly mentioned …

MAHENDRA SINGH DHONIversusYERRAGUNTLA SHYAMSUNDAR AND ANR.

2017 INSC 1282Disposed off

The complainant, dissatisfied with a magazine cover that featured the petitioner with the caption "God of Big Deals," filed a complaint under Section 295A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code before a magistrate in Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner sought transfer of the proceedings to …

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.versusAMIT KUMAR @ BACHCHA RAL

2017 INSC 374Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar appealed against the Patna High Court's order granting conditional bail to Amit Kumar, the principal of Vishnu Rai College, who was alleged to be the king‑pin of the "Bihar Toppers Scam" involving tampering of answer sheets, illegal firearms, and large sums of cash and property. …

KALYAN DEY CHOWDHURYversusRITA DEY CHOWDHURY NEE NANDY

2017 INSC 370Case Partly allowed

The husband Kalyan Dey Chowdhury and his wife Rita Dey Chowdhury (née Nandy) were married in 1995 and later divorced. The wife sought permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which was initially set at Rs.16,000 per month in 2015. The husband’s net salary rose from Rs.63,842 to …

MACHINDRAversusSAJJAN GALFA RANKHAMB & ORS.

2017 INSC 368Dismissed

Machindra, the father of a deceased son, appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court's acquittal of Sajjan Ghalfa Rankhamb and his son for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The trial court had convicted them based on testimonies of alleged eye‑witnesses and medical …

BALAKRAMversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2017 INSC 365Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Balakram, was charged with murder and attempted murder and, after the prosecution's witness (the investigating officer) was examined, sought to produce copies of pages from the police diary obtained under the Right to Information Act to confront the officer. The trial court rejected …

AYAN CHATTERJEEversusFUTURE TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC. & ORS.

2017 INSC 358Disposed off

The plaintiff filed a civil suit seeking declaration of tenancy and a permanent injunction, and during the suit applied for a temporary injunction under Order 39 of the CPC. The trial court granted the injunction, directing a status‑quo and finding the plaintiff prima facie in possession. On appeal, …

VANEET MAHAJANversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2017 INSC 1279Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Vaneet Mahajan, alleged that he, his brother and an employee were brutally attacked by 10‑12 persons armed with swords, baseball bats and other deadly weapons, allegedly at the behest of a cabinet minister. The attack caused grievous and simple injuries, leading to an FIR and …

SUDHA RENUKAIAH & ORS.versusSTATE OF A. P.

2017 INSC 347Dismissed

The case involved a violent incident in which two persons were killed and an injured witness (PW.5) was assaulted; the trial court acquitted 19 accused, finding inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony and doubting medical evidence. The State appealed, and the High Court convicted the surviving …

ROOPENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF TRIPURA & ANR.

2017 INSC 336Appeal(s) allowed

The accused Roopendra Singh was acquitted of offences under Sections 342, 376(2)(b) and 506 IPC. The victim, the widow of the deceased, filed a criminal appeal under Section 372 of the CrPC, which the Gauhati High Court admitted without requiring leave under Section 378(3). The State challenged …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusRAMANAND

2017 INSC 334Disposed off

The respondent Ramanand was charged with the deaths of his wife Anita and daughter Ekta, alleged to be caused by strangulation with the bodies later set on fire. Post‑mortem reports established that death resulted from asphyxia due to strangulation and that the burns were post‑mortem, contradicting …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusNIRMALA DEVI

2017 INSC 325Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed against the Himachal High Court’s order that replaced the trial court’s imprisonment sentences for Nirmala Devi with a fine of Rs.30,000. The trial court had convicted her under IPC sections 307 (attempt to murder), 328 (causing hurt by poison) and 392 …

SURAIN SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB

2017 INSC 323Disposed off

Surain Singh was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) for killing two men during a violent clash between rival factions in a court of the Executive Magistrate. The clash erupted when Singh, objecting to the presence of a rival, drew his kirpan and struck several persons, resulting in two deaths. He …

CHARANDAS SWAMIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2017 INSC 322Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Gadadharanandji, the newly elected Chairman of the Vadtal Temple Board of Trustees, who was allegedly kidnapped, strangled and his body burnt and dumped in Rajasthan by a group of temple functionaries. The prosecution proved the accused's motive—fear of losing control …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusNISAR RAMZAN SAYYED

2017 INSC 321Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra prosecuted Nisar Ramzan Sayyed for the murder of his pregnant wife and their three‑year‑old son, alleging that he poured kerosene on his wife and set her on fire after demanding Rs.50,000 as dowry. The trial court convicted him under Sections 302 and 498‑A of the IPC and …

DR. SOU JAYSHREE UJWAL INGOLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2017 INSC 317Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, a haemophiliac road‑accident victim, was admitted to Irvin Hospital. On 5 September 1997, after developing abdominal pain, the Emergency Medical Officer called Dr. Jayshree Ingole, the surgeon on call, who examined the patient, ordered a physician to be summoned and then left the …

DEVENDRA NATH SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

2017 INSC 316Dismissed

Devendra Nath Srivastava was convicted by a trial court for murdering his wife after assaulting her with a brick, resulting in her death by asphyxia due to multiple ante‑mortem injuries. The trial court sentenced him to death under Section 302 IPC. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court set aside the …

HARI SHANKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

2017 INSC 313Case Partly allowed

A land dispute in Mamkhor village led to a scuffle on 11 July 1992 during which accused Hari Shankar Shukla retrieved a country-made pistol and fired a bullet that killed Umesh Shukla and attempted to kill Savitri Devi. The trial court acquitted all three accused, finding the eyewitness accounts …

ORISSA OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION TH. GENERAL SECRETARYversusSTATE OF ORISSA & ANR.

2017 INSC 310Directions issued

The Orissa Olympic Association (OOA) was granted a lease of 20.808 acres for a stadium but later constructed 23 shops and a Kalyan Mandap (Barabati Palace) on land the State claims lies outside the lease. The Supreme Court, after a committee measured the leasehold area, found that the shops and part …

VINEET KUMAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2017 INSC 305Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Vineet Kumar and others, had loaned money to the complainant’s family and later filed complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoured cheques. The complainant subsequently alleged that the appellants had raped her and filed an application under Section …

KATTUKULANGARA MADHAVAN (DEAD) THR. LRS.versusMAJEED & ORS.

2017 INSC 292Disposed off

The case arose from a 1993 political clash in Kerala where the deceased, Suresh Babu, was stabbed and beaten to death by members of an unlawful assembly. The trial court convicted several accused under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and sentenced them to life imprisonment, also convicting …

GANESH SHAMRAO ANDEKAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2017 INSC 250Directions issued

The appellants, Ganesh and Avinash Andekar, were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the killing of their neighbour Raghunath, based on the testimony of the victim's daughter and wife who claimed to have witnessed the assault. The trial court had acquitted all …

VIRUPAKSHAPPA GOUDA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 283Dismissed

Virupakshappa Gouda and another were charged under several IPC sections, including 302 and 149, for an alleged honour killing. They applied for bail repeatedly; the trial court and High Court rejected the first two applications and a Special Leave Petition, but a third application was granted bail …

KRISHNEGOWDA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA BY ARKALGUD POLICE

2017 INSC 276Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved an alleged unlawful assembly in which members of two rival groups clashed, resulting in the death of a farmer, Channegowda. The accused were convicted by the Karnataka High Court on charges including murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and assault (Sec. 324 IPC) despite the trial court’s …

MANJU DEVIversusONKARJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA @ OMKARJEET SINGH & OTHERS

2017 INSC 1276Appeal(s) allowed

Manju Devi, a Scheduled Caste woman, complained that the respondents assaulted her, outraged her modesty and insulted her caste, invoking Sections 323, 354, 452 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(xi) of the SC/ST Act. The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the respondents under Section 438 of the …

SOYEBBHAI YUSUFBHAI BHARANIA & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2017 INSC 1275Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for the murder of Rameshbhai Prajapati, who was attacked with a large knife while sleeping, after the accused objected to his brother's marriage. The trial court convicted four of the five accused under Sections 302, 147, 148 and 149 IPC, acquitting one; the High Court …

STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS ETC.versusANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS ETC.

2017 INSC 259Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Central Government's Rule 7 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 – which mandates that investigations under the SCST Act be conducted by a police officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police – is …

HAKEEM KHAN & ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2017 INSC 254Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a violent clash during a panchayat election in Sehore, Madhya Pradesh, where a group of accused, armed with lathis and fasris, attacked members of the complainant party, resulting in one death and several injuries. The trial court acquitted all seventeen accused, reasoning that …

K. SLTARAM & ANR.versusCFL CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICE LTD. & ANR.

2017 INSC 244Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent company borrowed Rs 900 lakhs from a consortium led by State Bank of Travancore (SBT). SBT assigned the debt to Kotak Mahindra Bank on 29‑03‑2006 but failed to inform the borrower. Unaware of this, the borrower later assigned a separate debt to Kotak and discovered the earlier …

HUSSAIN AND ANR.versusUNION OF LNDIA

2017 INSC 227Disposed off

The appellants, who were in custody for several years—one under trial for an offence under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act and another convicted under Section 302 of the IPC—challenged the denial of bail, invoking their fundamental right to a speedy trial under Article 21. The Supreme Court examined …

PAWAN @ RAJINDER SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2017 INSC 216Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Pawan @ Rajinder Singh and Ajit @ Dara Singh, were convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and, for Ajit, of an offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, based largely on the testimony of two chance witnesses who claimed to have heard an altercation and a gunshot. …

HIMANSHU MOHAN RAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

2017 INSC 208Appeal(s) allowed

The case involves the murder of Lalit Mohan Rai, who was shot by the accused Imran Afreen after an altercation at Hotel Shalimar. The trial court convicted the accused under Section 302 IPC, but the High Court acquitted him, questioning the reliability of the eyewitnesses and the timing of the FIR. …

M. G. ESHWARAPPA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2017 INSC 198Dismissed

The State of Karnataka prosecuted four relatives of the complainant for offences under Sections 506, 354 and 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the fatal assault of Basavaraj. The trial court acquitted the accused, holding that the prosecution had not proved the case beyond reasonable doubt, …

CHHANGA @ MANOJversusSTATE OF M. P.

2017 INSC 186Dismissed

The appellant, Chhanga (Manoj), was part of a four‑person group that hurled two bombs at a shop where an informant was present, causing only minor injuries because the bombs exploded at a distance. The appellant shouted "kill him" and was charged under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian …

GANDI DODDABASAPPA @ GANDHI BASAVARAJversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2017 INSC 1268Dismissed

The appellant, Gandi Doddabasappa, was convicted by the Karnataka High Court for killing his daughter Shilpa, allegedly because she married a man of a lower caste. The trial court had acquitted him, dismissing the sole eyewitness testimony of PW‑18, but the High Court relied on that testimony, …

RAJAGOPALversusMUTHUPANDI @ THAVAKKALAI & ORS.

2017 INSC 190Appeal(s) allowed

Five accused attacked Rajagopal with deadly weapons, inflicting twelve serious injuries that led to the amputation of both his legs. Rajagopal, the injured eye‑witness, gave a detailed, uncontradicted testimony identifying each accused and describing the specific weapons used and injuries inflicted. …

PARASA KOTESWARARAOversusEEDE SREE HARI & ORS.

2017 INSC 187Dismissed

The case involved the murder of a woman whose decapitated body was recovered in a gunny sack from a canal. The Sessions Court convicted the two accused brothers on the basis of alleged motive, a "last seen" theory, recovery of the body, their absconding and false information given to the victim's …

RAVADA SASIKALAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.

2017 INSC 181Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a young man, trespassed into the victim's house and poured acid on her head after his marriage proposal was rejected, causing grievous hurt. He was convicted under Sections 326 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced by the trial court to one year of rigorous imprisonment with …

SHEIKH JUMAN & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF BLHAR

2017 INSC 173Dismissed

The appellants, armed with bombs and guns, attacked the informant's nephews, hurling bombs that caused two deaths and injuries to others. The trial court convicted several accused under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, …

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusSADHU RAM SINGLA & ORS.

2017 INSC 175Dismissed

The Central Bureau of Investigation filed an appeal against the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order quashing FIR No. SIA‑2001‑E‑0006, which alleged cheating, forgery and conspiracy (IPC sections 420, 471, 120B) against Sadhu Ram Singla and others. The FIR arose from alleged fraudulent stock …

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON LONDON BRANCHversusZENITH INFOTECH LIMITED

2017 INSC 165Disposed off

Zenith Infotech Ltd filed a reference under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR). The Registrar of the Board refused to register the reference on the ground that the company was not an "industrial company" …

T. A. KATHIRU KUNJUversusJACOB MATHAI & ANR.

2017 INSC 1265Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an advocate, was charged by his client for failing to return a cheque handed over for filing a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and for not obtaining an acknowledgment of its return. The Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India found him …

ARJUN AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2017 INSC 141Case Partly allowed

On 19 November 2006, a dispute over cutting a tree led three accused (Arjun, Lalaram and Padumlal) to assault the deceased Ayodhya Prasad with a katta, gandasa and a stone, causing fatal head injuries. The prosecution proved the case through the testimony of a related witness (the deceased's …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSELVI J. JAYALALITHA & ORS.

2017 INSC 143Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court allowed appeals against the acquittal of A2 to A4 (Sasikala, Sudhakaran, Elavarasi) in a disproportionate assets case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The trial court had convicted them for conspiracy and abetment with A1 (Jayalalitha, since deceased) in amassing …