Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 15601–15800

MANOversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2007 INSC 361Dismissed

The appellant Mano was convicted, along with three others, for the murder of Pasupathy under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The prosecution case relied on the testimony of two brothers of the deceased and on weapons recovered after the incident, though the weapons were not subjected to …

NETRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2007 INSC 333Appeal(s) allowed

Netraaj Singh was acquitted by a trial court of charges under IPC s.302 r/w s.149 on the ground of inadequate evidence. The State appealed, and during the pendency of the appeal the appellant obtained permission to replace his counsel with Mr. Ashutosh Singh. However, the cause list for the final …

SHANKAR DIWAL WADUversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 324Disposed off

Shankar Diwal Wadu killed his brother Mahu Wadu after a quarrel that arose when he attempted to force the widow Kamlibai into becoming his mistress. The victim intervened, prompting the accused to strike him with a wooden plank, resulting in death. The trial court convicted the accused under …

VISHWANATH GUPTAversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL

2007 INSC 329Dismissed

The petition concerned a kidnapping for ransom where the victim was abducted in Lucknow (U.P.), ransom demands were made in Haldwani (Uttarakhand) and the bodies were recovered in Unnao (U.P.). The FIR was lodged and investigation commenced at Haldwani. The question before the Supreme Court was …

DNYANESHWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 323Dismissed

The appellant, the husband of Leelabai, was convicted of murdering his wife who was found dead in their matrimonial home. A post‑mortem revealed multiple ante‑mortem bruises and contusions, and the medical officer opined that death was caused by asphyxia (throttling). The appellant contended that …

THELAPALLI RAGHAVAIAHversusSTATION HOUSE OFFICER AND ORS.

2007 INSC 303Dismissed

The petitioner, a sub‑contractor, alleged that the respondent company mixed fly ash with gravel, made illegal deductions from its bills and fabricated expert reports, thereby cheating it and committing criminal conspiracy, breach of trust and other offences under the IPC. An FIR was lodged and the …

BISWAJIT HALDER @ BABU HALDER AND ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2007 INSC 305Appeal(s) allowed

Rupali, married to Biswajit Halder, alleged that her husband and in‑laws repeatedly demanded additional dowry items after the marriage. She committed suicide within seven years of marriage. The trial court convicted the appellants under IPC Sections 304B (dowry death), 498A and the Dowry Prohibition …

RAMKRIPAL S/O SHYAMLAL CHARMAKARversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2007 INSC 306Dismissed

The appellant, Ramkripal, was convicted of rape under Section 376 of the IPC for forcibly having sexual intercourse with a woman who was collecting grass. The trial court, based on the victim’s testimony and medical evidence of perineal laceration and a torn hymen, found penetration and sentenced …

AKHLAQversusSTATE OF U.P.

2007 INSC 313Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Asha, who was found strangled and allegedly raped in a maize field. The prosecution relied on eyewitness testimony, medical evidence of rape and strangulation, and an extra‑judicial confession made by co‑accused Babu to a witness in the presence of the appellant …

MUMMIDI HEMADRI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2007 INSC 300Appeal(s) allowed

Six persons formed an unlawful assembly and attacked Nellisetti Venu, resulting in his death by stabbing. The three appellants (A‑2, A‑3 and A‑6) were alleged to have caught hold of the deceased, while the other accused inflicted the fatal injuries. The appellants contended that they neither used …

SMT. PARMINDER KAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

2007 INSC 287Disposed off

The petitioners, Smt. Parminder Kaur and her husband, sought transfer of two criminal cases pending in the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, to courts in Delhi or Chandigarh under Section 406 of the CrPC, alleging threats to their lives, old age, and ill health. The Supreme …

NAMDEOversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 283Dismissed

Namdeo, who had a long-standing dispute with his neighbour Ninaji over livestock, attacked Ninaji with an axe on the night of 25 October 2000, inflicting a fatal head wound. Ninaji’s son Sopan, who was present in the courtyard, witnessed the assault in electric light, chased the assailant and later …

GEEJAGANDA SOMAIAHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2007 INSC 278Dismissed

Geejaganda Somaiah was convicted for the murder of his relative Chengappa, who had been seeking an equitable partition of family land. After Chengappa disappeared while meeting a revenue inspector, his body was found the next day. The appellant surrendered, made a voluntary statement to police, and …

BANDUversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 271Dismissed

The appellant Bandu was married to Shanta, who gave birth to a daughter Nita. After marital discord, Bandu alleged Nita was not his child and prevented Shanta from feeding her. On 1 January 1991, Bandu strangled Nita, as testified by Shanta, who was an eye‑witness, and the post‑mortem report showed …

YOGESH NARAIN SAXENAversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL

2007 INSC 273Dismissed

Yogesh Narain Saxena was convicted of murdering his neighbour's ten‑year‑old son, Sandeep, after the child's body was discovered in a tin box inside Saxena's quarter. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant's proximity to the victim, his presence in the …

SANJAYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 252Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a husband, was convicted under IPC Sections 498-A read with 34 and 306 read with 34 for allegedly abetting his wife's suicide by self‑immolation. The sole evidence against him comprised three dying declarations of the deceased: the first indicated an accidental fire that the husband …

SWAMI PRASADversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2007 INSC 254Dismissed

Swami Prasad was charged with murdering his step‑brother Rameshwar during a property dispute. He went to the police station with the axe used in the killing and blood‑stained clothes, confessing that the deceased had been killed with that axe. The sole eye‑witness, the victim's sister, heard the …

OMKAR PRASAD VERMAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2007 INSC 255Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a government school teacher, was convicted under Section 376B of the Indian Penal Code for having sexual intercourse with a student, on the premise that the student was in his custody as a public servant. The trial court held the student to be a consenting adult and acquitted the …

STATE OF GOAversusSANJAY THAKRAN AND ANR.

2007 INSC 241Dismissed

The State of Goa appealed the acquittal of Sanjay and Anjali Thakran for murder, robbery and criminal conspiracy of a newly‑wed couple. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence – the accused were last seen with the victims, some jewellery and clothing were recovered from them, and …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusNETRAPAL AND ORS.

2007 INSC 217Dismissed

During the night of 25-26 November 1987 a dacoity was allegedly committed in Samarpur village, during which several houses were robbed and a victim was shot dead. The victims identified the accused in electric light and the police recovered empty gun bores and ornaments, which were also identified …

LALSAI KHUNTEversusNIRMAL SINHA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 220Dismissed

Lal Saij Khunte was elected to the Chhattisgarh Legislative Assembly but his election was challenged on the ground that he had been convicted under IPC sections 420, 34 and 468 and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment, which under Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 …

T. VENGAMAversusT. DORA SWAMY NAIDU AND ORS.

2007 INSC 222Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant had executed a General Power of Attorney (GPOA) in favour of the first respondent, later cancelled it, but the first respondent still executed a sale deed in favour of the second respondent using the revoked GPOA. A private complaint was filed, leading to an FIR and registration of a …

PROBODH PURKAITversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

2007 INSC 216Dismissed

The case concerned a double murder that occurred on 15 January 1985 when an alleged unlawful assembly, allegedly led by Probodh Purkait, attacked the houses of Payed Ali Laskar and Dr. Srinibas Roy, dragging out and killing Abdur Rahaman Laskar and Abdur Molla. The trial court convicted six persons …

NALINI SHANKARAN AND ORS.versusNEELKANTH MAHADEO KAMBLE AND ORS.

2007 INSC 224Appeal(s) allowed

The Somvashi Arya Samaj Trust entered into an agreement with the accused to construct a community hall, which the accused failed to do, leading the Trust’s Chief Managing Trustee to file a criminal complaint under Sections 418, 409, 166 read with 114 IPC. The accused obtained a compromise with the …

NADIMUTHU AND ORS.versusTHE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2007 INSC 208Dismissed

The case involved four accused who tied, beat, strangled and poisoned the deceased, who was the brother of three accused and son of the fourth. The wife of the deceased (PW‑1) initially gave a false account to the Village Administrative Officer under threat, but later narrated the true events to her …

RAMESH CHANDER SINGHversusHIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AND ANR

2007 INSC 207Disposed off

The appellant, an Additional District & Sessions Judge, granted bail to an under‑trial accused in a murder case after considering factors such as the filing of the charge‑sheet, the accused's ill father, and lack of prior convictions. A complaint was filed alleging the judge had taken illegal …

SHAHJAJHAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

2007 INSC 211Dismissed

The appellants, a group of five men, were convicted for the murder of Abdul Samad and for causing injuries to two eyewitnesses under Sections 302, 324 and 34 of the IPC. The High Court altered one conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 (II) but upheld the others. On appeal, the accused argued …

ALPESH NAVINCHANDRA SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 212Case Allowed

Alpesh Na Vinchandra Shah and his brother were arrested for mis‑declaring import consignments and evading customs duty. Both were detained under section 3(1) of the COFEPOSA Act. They later applied for settlement under section 1278 of the Customs Act; the Settlement Commission accepted full duty …

MANAGER, ICICI BANK LTD .versusPRAKASH KAUR AND ORS.

2007 INSC 213Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, Prakash Kaur, had taken a hire‑purchase loan from ICICI Bank for a truck and defaulted on instalments. The bank, through its agent Kartik Associates, forcibly seized the vehicle. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking registration of a FIR against the bank and police for …

D.K. GANESH BABUversusP.T. MANOKARAN AND ORS.

2007 INSC 191Case Partly allowed

The complainant appealed against a Madras High Court order that granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. to three accused who were apprehending arrest in a dowry‑related murder case. The High Court had stipulated detailed conditions and effectively released the accused without …

MOHANLAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2007 INSC 182Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court reviewed the conviction of the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and others for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, which was based solely on the victim’s dying declaration that they set her on fire over a dowry dispute. The Court reiterated that a dying declaration can support …

SMT. MAYADEVIversusJAGDISH PRASAD

2007 INSC 184Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the decree of divorce granted to the husband on the ground of cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The husband alleged that his wife repeatedly demanded money, denied food, threatened him and the children, and physically abused the children, culminating in the death …

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.versusM/S. ISHAR DAS MADAN LAL

2007 INSC 160Dismissed

The respondent, a jeweller, insured his jewellery against theft with National Insurance Co. Ltd. The policy contained an exclusion clause that denied cover for theft by a "customer" of property "entrusted" to them. An unknown customer entered the shop and stole jewellery. The insurer denied the …

KALEGURA PADMA RAO AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF A.P. REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

2007 INSC 154Case Partly allowed

The deceased was assaulted by a group of accused after a dispute over his auto and later died from the injuries. The trial court convicted the accused under sections 148, 448 r.w. s.149, 302/149 and 324/149 IPC; the High Court affirmed these convictions for some. On appeal, the Supreme Court …

MANJUNATH CHENNABASAPA MADALLIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2007 INSC 155Appeal(s) allowed

Manjunath Chennabasapa Madalli was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife Sumithra under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, based largely on circumstantial evidence and an alleged dying declaration. The Karnataka High Court set aside the 498A conviction but upheld the …

CHANDRAPPA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2007 INSC 142Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were acquitted by the trial court of offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302, 324 and 149 IPC because the court found contradictions in eye‑witness testimony and noted that key witnesses were not examined, giving them the benefit of doubt. The State appealed under Section 378 of …

RAM SINGHversusSONIA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 143Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the murder of a family of ten, including three infants, committed by A‑1 (Sonia) and her husband A‑2 (Sanjiv) to prevent the transfer of property to the step‑brother. The trial court convicted them under Sections 302, 34 and 120‑B IPC and sentenced them to death, a …

IMTIAZ AND ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2007 INSC 145Dismissed

The dispute arose over the cleaning of a drainage channel when the complainant and his brothers were attacked by twelve accused who arrived armed with spears and lathis. The accused ordered them to stop, and when they refused, three of the accused inflicted spear blows on the brothers, resulting in …

SHYAMversusSTATE OF M.P. THROUGH P.S. BERCHA

2007 INSC 146Dismissed

The appellant Shyam was convicted for the murder of Kailash on 27 October 1995 based on the testimony of the deceased's widow, who witnessed the assault and identified Shyam as the assailant. The trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC; the …

ABBAS ALIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2007 INSC 147Case Partly allowed

Abbas Ali was convicted by the trial court and the Rajasthan High Court for murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing a sleeping victim on a railway overbridge. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the mens‑rea requirements of Sections 299 and 300 IPC, focusing on the distinction between knowledge …

JAKKI @ SELVARAJ AND ANR.versusSTATE REP. BY THE IP, COIMBATORE

2007 INSC 141Dismissed

The appellants, JAKKI @ SELVARAJ and another, were convicted under Sections 148 and 302 IPC for the murder of a deceased, based primarily on the testimony of an eye‑witness (PW‑13) and corroborating medical evidence. Two other eye‑witnesses turned hostile, and the High Court acquitted four …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.versusLALIT SOMDATTA NAGPAL AND ANR.

2007 INSC 129Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether offences under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (including those committed during the period of the Essential Commodities (Special Provisions) Act, 1981) fall within the ambit of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA). It held that the 1955 …

SHIVU AND ANR.versusR.G. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

2007 INSC 136Dismissed

The accused were convicted of raping and murdering a young woman, Shivamma, under IPC sections 376 and 302 read with section 34, based solely on circumstantial evidence. The trial court sentenced them to death, which the Karnataka High Court confirmed under Section 366 of the CrPC. On appeal, the …

N. SURIYAKALAversusA. MOHANDOSS AND ORS.

2007 INSC 125Dismissed

The wife, N. Suriyakalan, filed a criminal case under Sections 498A and 406 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against her husband A. Mohandoss and his relatives, which the Madras High Court later quashed. She also filed a maintenance petition. An SLP under Article 136 of the …

SAYARABANO@ SULTANABEGUMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 116Dismissed

The deceased, Halimabi, was married into the appellant's family and allegedly suffered chronic ill‑treatment by her mother‑in‑law and husband. On 13 August 1998, the mother‑in‑law is said to have poured kerosene from a lamp on the deceased, causing severe burns. The victim gave two dying …

UMESHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 111Dismissed

Umesh was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Dilip Ganpatrao Shirbhate on 26 November 1997. The prosecution’s case rested on two eyewitnesses who saw Umesh stab the victim, forensic evidence showing the victim’s blood group on Umesh’s shirt, and the recovery of the alleged murder …

ANURAN RASTOGI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

2007 INSC 113Disposed off

The informant filed a complaint alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323 and 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The magistrate took cognizance of those offences only and issued summons. The informant later applied that the material in the case diary also justified adding …

DHANANJAY @ DHANANJAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2007 INSC 99Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and the informant were involved in a commercial dispute over payment for supplied bags. The informant alleged that the appellant and a third person forcibly took Rs.1580 from his pocket, leading to an FIR that listed offences including extortion under Section 384 IPC. The High Court …

RAM ABHILAKHversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2007 INSC 100Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under Section 494 of the IPC for marrying a second time while his first marriage subsisted. He appealed the conviction, which was upheld, and then filed a revision petition under Section 397 of the CrPC. The High Court dismissed the revision petition ex parte because the …

HARISHCHANDRA PRASAD MANI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR.

2007 INSC 79Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant alleged that his son was murdered by the accused through a conspiracy, with the body allegedly cremated after a false death certificate. The police investigation culminated in a final report which the Chief Judicial Magistrate accepted, and later, on 12 April 2005, the magistrate …

SELLAPPANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2007 INSC 83Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court reviewed the conviction of Sellappan for beating the deceased Periasamy, who later died from head injuries. The key issue was whether the injury satisfied the test for murder under Section 300(3) of the IPC – i.e., being sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death – …

SHRI HARENDRA NATH BORAHversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2007 INSC 74Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Shri Harendra Nath Borah, a police constable, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the death of a truck driver who was assaulted by police personnel and later died in hospital. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguing that the facts did not constitute …

NAVJOT SINGH SIDHUversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2007 INSC 68Case Allowed

Navjot Singh Sidhu, a sitting Member of Parliament, was convicted by the Punjab High Court under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment. He resigned from the Lok Sabha and sought a fresh mandate, filing an application to suspend the order of conviction, arguing …

BISHNU PRASAD SINHA & ANR.versusSTATE OF ASSAM

2007 INSC 42Dismissed

The appellants, Bishnu Prasad Sinha and a co‑accused, were convicted of raping and murdering a 7‑8‑year‑old girl who was staying overnight in a travel agency’s waiting room. The prosecution’s case rested on the night watchman’s voluntary confession recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, …

JAMEELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 43Dismissed

The appellant, a mechanic, lured a five‑year‑old girl, took her away and allegedly committed sexual assault, including intercourse through the rectum. The girl identified the accused the next day and a medical report corroborated the assault. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 363, …

VIRENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

2007 INSC 46Dismissed

Virendra Kumar was tried for the death of his wife, Pushpa, and was initially convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder. The Allahabad High Court set aside that conviction and convicted him under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide, relying on a presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence …

RATHNASHALVANversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2007 INSC 29Dismissed

On 23 July 1996 the appellant, driver of a lorry, allegedly drove at high speed, struck a tree and caused the deaths of three persons and grievous injuries to three others. He was convicted under Sections 304‑A, 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code. On appeal the conviction under Section 279 was set …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusBACCHUDAS@ BALARAM AND ORS.

2007 INSC 25Dismissed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed a High Court order acquitting Bacchudas and others, who had been convicted by a trial court for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under IPC Section 304 Part II read with Section 34. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the deceased's widow (PW‑1), …

RAMKISHAN S/O. MADHAV SHELKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 15Case Partly allowed

The appellant Ramkishan and his two sons were charged with murder under s.302 read with s.34 IPC for the death of Mohan Gavane, who was alleged to have encroached on the appellant’s land. The trial court convicted all three, but the High Court acquitted the two sons, holding the evidence …

APPASAHEB AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 9Appeal(s) allowed

Appasaheb and his mother-in-law were convicted under IPC Section 304‑B (dowry death) for the suicide of their wife, Bhimabai, who allegedly took poison after being harassed for dowry. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded money for domestic expenses and for purchasing manure, which the …

RAJ KUMAR PRASAD TAMARKARversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2007 INSC 3Appeal(s) allowed

The father of a deceased woman appealed against the High Court's acquittal of her husband, who was charged with murder under Section 302 IPC. The trial court had convicted the husband based on circumstantial evidence, a threatening letter (Exhibit 7) establishing motive, the recovery of a revolver …

GULZARversusSTATE OF M.P.

2007 INSC 7Case Partly allowed

Gulzar was convicted of stealing an attache containing about Rs 55,000 from Vinod Kumar Aggarwal on a bus; the attache was later recovered from Gulzar’s possession but he could not explain the source of the money. The trial court sentenced him to three years’ rigorous imprisonment under Section 379 …

ACHARAPARAMBATH PRADEEPAN AND ANRversusSTATE OF KERALA

2006 INSC 1020Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the murder of a school teacher by a group of accused who entered the classroom and assaulted him with iron rods, resulting in 44 injuries. The prosecution relied primarily on child witnesses and two chance witnesses, while the defence challenged the reliability of their testimony, …

M.R.KUDVAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2006 INSC 1022Dismissed

M.R. Kudva, a bank manager, was convicted in two separate cases for offences under Sections 120B, 420, 468, 471 IPC and Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, receiving 18 months' rigorous imprisonment in one case and two years in the other. Both convictions and sentences were upheld by …

S.R. BATRA AND ANR.versusSMT. TAR UNA BATRA

2006 INSC 1026Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law (appellants) against a Delhi High Court order that held the second floor of a house owned by the mother‑in‑law to be the matrimonial home of their daughter‑in‑law, Taruna Batra. The wife had earlier lived in the house with …

MURARI THAKUR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2006 INSC 1015Dismissed

The appellants Murari Thakur and Sudhir Thakur, along with a third accused, were convicted for the murder of a 14‑year‑old boy, Bal Krishna Mishra, on 26 August 1998. The prosecution proved that Murari held the victim's legs, Sudhir sat on his back, and the third accused cut the victim's throat, …

SUJATA UDAY PATILversusUDAY MADHUKAR PATIL

2006 INSC 1004Disposed off

Suja Uday Patil (wife) appealed against the decree of divorce granted to her husband, Uday Madhukar Patil, on the grounds of cruelty and desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act. The trial court had initially ordered judicial separation, but the District Judge later dissolved the marriage and awarded …

ALOKE NATH DUTTA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2006 INSC 991Disposed off

The case involved the murder of Biswanath Dutta, allegedly committed by his brother Aloke Nath Dutta to facilitate the sale of family property. Aloke Nath made an extra‑judicial confession admitting to the killing, while co‑accused Mrinal Dutta gave a judicial confession that was later retracted, …

AJAY GOSWAMIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 995Dismissed

Ajay Goswami filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking court‑issued guidelines for newspapers to prevent minors from being exposed to sexually explicit material, and to set up a committee for regulating such content. The petition argued that existing statutes were inadequate to protect …

BABLU @ MUBARIK HUSSAINversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2006 INSC 998Dismissed

The appellant, Bablu (Mubarik Hussain), was convicted of murdering his wife, three minor daughters and a minor son by strangulation. The trial court relied on an extrajudicial confession, the appellant's presence at the crime scene and the recovery of the wife's earring to uphold a conviction under …

GOKUL BHAGAJI PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 973Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior police inspector, was charged under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) for allegedly facilitating a counterfeit stamp syndicate by failing to seal the printing press and arrest its kingpin, Telgi. The Special Judge and the High Court denied his bail, …

CHENNA BOYANNA KRISHNA YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 974Appeal(s) allowed

Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav, a former minister and advocate, was charged under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) for allegedly abetting Abdul Karim Telgi's counterfeit stamp syndicate. The High Court rejected his bail applications, relying on a recorded conversation between …

DHARAM AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2006 INSC 975Case Partly allowed

The appellants, Dharam, Raj Singh and Raj Kumar, along with two others, attacked the deceased Partap Singh and his family in the latter's fields using lethal weapons, resulting in the death of Partap Singh. The appellants pleaded private (self) defence, claiming they acted to protect themselves when …

VADLA CHANDRAIAHversusSTATE OF A.P

2006 INSC 970Case Partly allowed

A police constable seized four guavas from a vendor without paying and a quarrel ensued. The appellant, a carpenter, intervened with his tool (a badze) and struck the constable, causing instantaneous death. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC for murder, a decision affirmed by the …

PARKASH SINGH BADAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2006 INSC 960Dismissed

The petitioners, including former Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal, challenged prosecutions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the IPC on the ground that no prior sanction under Section 197 of the CrPC was obtained and that the complaints were filed with malafide intent. The Court …

LALU PRASAD@ LALU PRASAD YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CBI (AHD) PATNA

2006 INSC 961Dismissed

The appeals concerned the validity of a sanction to prosecute Lalu Prasad Yadav under Sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The sanction had been issued under Section 19(1)(b) of the Act and Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but was signed by the …

ROTASHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2006 INSC 962Dismissed

The appellant, Rohtash, was convicted under IPC s.302 read with s.34 for the murder of Moosaram, alleged to have been carried out by a group armed with iron pipes. The prosecution relied on statements of the first informant (PW‑1) and the victim's mother (PW‑6), both of whom named Rohtash as part of …

K.KARUNAKARANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2006 INSC 964Disposed off

The appellant, K. Karunakaran, was prosecuted for an alleged abuse of office. The High Court held that no sanction under CrPC Section 197 was required because the appellant was not holding the office at the time the court took cognizance of the offence. The appellant further contended that the …

SUBHASH HARNARAYANJI LADDHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 955Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Yadav Navkar allegedly entered into a sale agreement for his land with the appellants, but a forged General Power of Attorney was later executed by accused No.1, leading to a sale deed in favour of the appellants. After Navkar went missing, his wife filed a report, a FIR was lodged …

SALIM SAHABversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2006 INSC 956Appeal(s) allowed

Salim assaulted his father‑in‑law’s brother Saleem with a pair of scissors during a heated quarrel, causing injuries that led to Saleem’s death. The trial court convicted Salim under Section 324 IPC (grievous hurt) and sentenced him to five years’ rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court …

HORI LAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P

2006 INSC 957Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a land‑dispute‑related shooting in which members of an unlawful assembly opened fire, killing Hori Lal and Smt Ram Shree and injuring others. The appellants challenged the conviction on grounds that the FIR was ante‑timed, the prosecution failed to prove a common object, …

KULWINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 958Dismissed

The appellant, Kulwinder Singh, was convicted along with three others for the murder of Rajbir Singh, allegedly hired by Nirpal Singh, Nardev Singh and their father Pargat Singh in a land‑dispute motive. The prosecution’s case rested on the statements of eyewitness PW‑3, the extra‑judicial …

MUSTAFIKHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 945Dismissed

The appellant, a junior engineer supervising irrigation tank construction under a government employment guarantee scheme, was alleged to have fabricated muster rolls showing payments to fictitious labourers, thereby misappropriating Rs 6,764.10. Evidence showed that the same 21 labourers were …

PRAKASHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2006 INSC 939Dismissed

The appellant Prakash, along with co‑accused Badrilal and Dinesh, chased the unarmed deceased Ramprasad with lathis. Prakash struck Ramprasad's leg, causing him to fall, after which Badrilal delivered a fatal blow to the head, leading to death from multiple skull fractures. The trial court convicted …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusKEDAR YADAV

2006 INSC 929Case Partly allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed a High Court order that reduced the ten‑year rigorous imprisonment awarded to Kedar Yadav for an offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code to the period already served. The trial court had convicted Yadav for attempting to murder the complainant, Parvat …

ANTAR SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2006 INSC 936Dismissed

On 6 July 1993, the deceased Keshrabai and her 15‑year‑old daughter Annuabai were attacked in their home. The appellant, Antar Singh, along with three others entered the house armed with deadly weapons while eight other persons surrounded the house. Badri assaulted the deceased, who suffered eight …

DEVENDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2006 INSC 926Appeal(s) allowed

A married woman, Sumitra, died in a fire that also injured her two‑year‑old son and her father‑in‑law, both of whom later died. The husband, Devender Singh, and his brother‑in‑law were prosecuted under IPC sections 306 (abetment of suicide) and 498‑A (dowry harassment) based on letters in which the …

PREM NARAIN AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2006 INSC 927Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Prem Narain and others were convicted under Section 304(II) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Gopal Singh, based primarily on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses, PW‑1 (Ganeshi Bai) and PW‑3 (Kallu). The Supreme Court examined the consistency of their …

SADASHIO MUNDAJI BHALERAOversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 918Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved seventeen police officials charged under Sections 302, 34 and 201, 34 IPC for the alleged custodial death of a suspect, Dilip, during interrogation. The prosecution relied on eye‑witnesses, many of whom had criminal records, and on fingerprint/thumb‑impression evidence to identify …

NAVEEN CHANDRAversusSTATE OF UTTRANCHAL

2006 INSC 916Case Partly allowed

Naveen Chandra and his parents were convicted for the murder of three members of a rival family. The appellant claimed that the killings occurred in a sudden quarrel, were provoked, and were in self‑defence. The Supreme Court examined whether Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC (sudden fight) applied and …

M.C.MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 913Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a Public Interest Litigation concerning the Taj Heritage Corridor project, which alleged irregularities and unauthorized release of Rs. 17 crore. The Court had earlier ordered a CBI inquiry and later directed the CBI to register an FIR and investigate senior officials. The …

MOHAMMED ARSHADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 892Disposed off

The deceased Kayyum gave three dying declarations after being assaulted. The first (before a doctor) and second (before a magistrate) named Syed Shaukat and Salim but not Mohammed Arshad; the third (before an investigating officer) named Arshad as having struck the victim with a wooden stick, citing …

CHATAR SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2006 INSC 893Case Partly allowed

The appellant was convicted for kidnapping two boys and for offences under Sections 364 and 365 IPC, read with Sections 120‑B and 201 IPC. The trial court sentenced him to ten years each for the two counts of kidnapping (total 20 years) and the High Court upheld the conviction and ordered the …

VIKRAMJLT SINGH@ VICKYversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 894Appeal(s) allowed

Vikramjit Singh (Vicky) was convicted by the Sessions Court and sentenced to death for the murder of his wife, Meena Rani, based on a prosecution case that alleged he killed her due to an illicit relationship. The prosecution relied on a knife allegedly recovered after a confession, jewellery found …

GAGAN KANOJIA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 897Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for kidnapping and murdering two children based largely on circumstantial evidence, including the testimony of a child witness, a taxi driver, extra‑judicial confessions, fingerprint matches, recovered clothing, and a ransom‑demand letter. The trial and High Courts …

BASO PRASAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2006 INSC 898Disposed off

The accused were charged under Sections 302 and 34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the murder of Shivnandan Prasad. Eye‑witnesses identified Brijandan Prasad as the sole shooter, while the other four accused were alleged to have participated in brick‑batting but not in firing. The defence …

SASI THOMASversusSTATE AND ORS.

2006 INSC 899Disposed off

The appellant, the brother of the deceased Achamma, alleged that his sister’s death was not a natural heart‑failure but a murder concealed as suicide. After exhumation and a post‑mortem indicating organophosphorus poisoning, the CB‑CID investigated and charged the husband under Section 306 IPC …

ANIL@RAJU NAMDEV PATILversusADMINISTRATION OF DAMAN & DIU, DAMAN AND ANR.

2006 INSC 900Dismissed

The appellant, Anil Raju Namdev Patil, was convicted of kidnapping a five‑year‑old boy for ransom, the boy’s murder and related offences, and sentenced to death and five years’ rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, arguing that the charge of kidnapping for ransom with intent to murder (Section 364‑A …

PARME HANSDA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF BIHAR(NOW JHARKHAND)

2006 INSC 875Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Jharia Kisku, was alleged to have been caught stealing and was tied and assaulted by the accused, Parme Hansda and Churka Hansda, along with other villagers. He later died from his injuries. The trial court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 304 (culpable homicide not amounting …

GANGARAM SHANTARAM SALUNKHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 881Dismissed

The appellant, Gangaram Shantaram Salunkhe, was convicted under IPC Section 302 read with Section 34 for the murder of Bhaulal Jadhav. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses (PW4 and PW5), a dying declaration of the deceased recorded by PW6, and medical evidence. The appellant challenged the …

SURENDERversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2006 INSC 882Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Surender, convicted under Sections 306/34 (abetment of suicide) and 498A/34 (dowry harassment) of the IPC. The prosecution proved that Pushpa, his wife, was repeatedly harassed and beaten for dowry demands, was expelled from the matrimonial home, and later …

BABU SINGH AND ANOTHER.versusRESHAMPAL SINGH AND ANR.

2006 INSC 883Dismissed

The trial court convicted Reshampal Singh and another for murder under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced them to death. The Punjab and Haryana High Court affirmed the conviction but reduced the sentence to life imprisonment, imposed a fine of Rs. 50,000 and additional rigorous imprisonment for …

KALYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2006 INSC 874Appeal(s) allowed

On 31 July 1989, a group of accused, including Kalyan Singh, allegedly surrounded a well where Durga Singh Rawat was bathing and Kalyan Singh is said to have urged Budh Singh to fire, resulting in the victim's death. The trial judge, after detailed analysis of witness statements and noting …

SANGHAMITRA GHOSHversusKAJAL KUMAR GHOSH

2006 INSC 864Disposed off

Sanghamitra Ghosh filed a transfer petition seeking to move a matrimonial suit for restitution of conjugal rights to Bangalore, alleging physical and mental torture by her husband Kajal Kumar Ghosh and his parents, and claiming she was driven out of the marital home with their minor child. Both …

RAJESH RANJAN YADAV @ PAPPU YADAVversusCBI THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

2006 INSC 856Dismissed

Rajesh Ranjan Yadav, a four‑time Member of Parliament, was charged with a triple murder under IPC sections 302, 34 and 120B, and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. After being in judicial custody for more than six years, he repeatedly applied for bail, arguing that continued detention violated his …

BAPUversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 857Dismissed

The appellant, Bapu, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly setting his wife, Shobhabai, on fire. The prosecution's case rested on three dying declarations made by the deceased—two recorded in a rural hospital before an Executive Magistrate and a police constable, and a third before …

SATIN CHANDRA PEGUversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2006 INSC 849Disposed off

Satin Chandrapegu was convicted under Section 409 IPC for alleged misappropriation of Rs.91,006 and sentenced to two years' imprisonment with a fine. His appeal to the Sessions Court was dismissed, and he filed a criminal revision under Sections 397, 401 and 482 of the CrPC before the Guwahati High …

RAVIKANT S. PATILversusSARVABHOUMA S. BAGALI

2006 INSC 843Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ravikant S. Patil, was convicted in 2000 for offences under IPC sections 366 and 376 and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment. While his criminal appeal was pending, the Bombay High Court stayed both the execution of the sentence and, on 26 March 2004, the conviction itself so that …

B.K. CHANNAPPAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2006 INSC 822Disposed off

The case arose from a politically motivated attack in 1995 in which Basavarajaiah was killed and four others were injured. Twenty‑three persons were tried; the trial court convicted several under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149, while others were acquitted. The High Court affirmed the murder …

STATE OF A.P.versusV. SARMA RAO AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2006 INSC 827Dismissed

The State of Andhra Pradesh alleged a large‑scale fraud in the award of compensation under the Land Acquisition Act and sought a criminal inquiry under Section 340 of the CrPC. A District Judge conducted the inquiry, but the High Court held that the Subordinate Judge appointed under the Act was not …

AMRIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 829Case Partly allowed

Amrit Singh was convicted of raping and murdering a 7‑8‑year‑old girl, Rajpreet Kaur, whose body was found bleeding profusely in his cotton field. The trial court and High Court sentenced him to death under IPC Sections 376 and 302, relying primarily on the "last seen together" testimony and …

STATE OF KERALAversusKURISSUM MOOTTIL ANTONY

2006 INSC 812Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala appealed the Kerala High Court’s acquittal of Kurissum Moottil Antony, who had been convicted under Sections 377 and 451 IPC for committing an unnatural offence on a ten‑year‑old girl. The High Court set aside the conviction on the ground that the victim’s testimony was not …

RANJIT SINGH AND CO.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 816Disposed off

The case concerned the murder of Harbhajan Kaur, who died from burn injuries allegedly inflicted by members of her in‑law family. The prosecution’s case rested on two dying declarations made by the deceased, which contained inconsistencies regarding the roles of various accused. The Supreme Court …

SHIVANNA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2006 INSC 806Case Partly allowed

The appellants, Shiv Anna and others, were convicted for the murder of Mahadevappa and related offences arising from a land‑dispute in which they entered the disputed field and assaulted the deceased and his relatives, resulting in Mahadevappa's death. The appellants appealed, claiming that they …

M/S. TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE COMPANY LIMITEDversusN.K. SINGH

2006 INSC 809Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, N.K. Singh, an Assistant Store Keeper, was found to have occupied company quarters without permission and assaulted the Town Warden during the execution of an eviction decree, leading to an FIR under IPC sections 311, 307 and 34. A domestic inquiry under the company's standing orders …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusKASHI RAM

2006 INSC 794Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan charged Kashi Ram with the murder of his wife and two infant daughters, alleging that the victims were last seen alive with him on 3 February 1998 and that the house was found locked thereafter, with the bodies discovered on 6 February. The trial court convicted him based on …

VENKATEGOWDA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2006 INSC 788Case Partly allowed

The incident occurred on 4 November 1986 when five accused assaulted two injured witnesses and the deceased, who later died. The FIR was lodged the next day, and the key witnesses gave their testimony ten years later, leading to minor discrepancies in their accounts. The trial court acquitted all …

VITHALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 775Dismissed

The appellant Vithal was convicted of murder (IPC s.302) for allegedly pouring kerosene on the deceased Vishwanath and setting him alight, causing 98% burn injuries. Four dying declarations of the deceased were recorded by police officers and an executive magistrate; all named the appellant and were …

SUKUMARROYversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2006 INSC 770Dismissed

The deceased, Prafulla Nayak, was collecting seedlings from a disputed plot of land when Sukumar Roy, his father, wife and sister‑in‑law entered the field armed with a lathi and a bhali. An altercation ensued and Sukumar struck the deceased on the abdomen with the bhali, causing a deep penetrating …

STATE CBIversusSASHI BALASUBRAMANIAN AND ANR.

2006 INSC 771Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from allegations of irregularities in the grant of an advance licence for import of cotton fabrics, leading to a criminal complaint against a company, its directors and four public servants under the IPC, Prevention of Corruption Act and Customs Act. The company and its directors …

JASBIR SINGHversusPUNJAB & SIND BANK AND ORS.

2006 INSC 761Appeal(s) allowed

Jasbir Singh, a peon employed by Punjab & Sind Bank, was accused of embezzling Rs 25,000, forging a depositor's signature and tampering with bank records. He faced a criminal trial under IPC §§ 409 and 201 and was acquitted, and a civil recovery suit filed by the bank was also decided in his favour, …

BANSHI DHARversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.

2006 INSC 764Dismissed

Banshidhar, a Patwari, was suspended in 1976 on allegations of accepting illegal gratification and was convicted under Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act read with Section 161 of the IPC. He was dismissed in 1987 but later acquitted by the appellate court in 2001. By the time of his …

SAMGHAJI HARIBA PATILversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2006 INSC 715Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Samghaji Hariba Patil, was charged under IPC sections 302, 307, 504 r/w 34 for the murder of Murugappa during a land‑related quarrel. The trial court acquitted him, finding that the prosecution had not proved his motive, that the alleged weapon (a hammer) was not typical for …

MAJOR SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 717Disposed off

Major Singh and Baldev Singh were convicted of murdering Kashmir Singh by severing his head, allegedly motivated by suspicion that Kashmir had caused the death of their sister Sukhwinder Kaur. The prosecution relied on the eyewitness testimony of Lakhbir Singh, who identified the accused under …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusMUKESH AND ORS.

2006 INSC 718Disposed off

The State of Madhya Pradesh charged three reservation clerks with abetting Suresh Shah in the illegal procurement and sale of railway tickets under Sections 143(1) and 143(2) of the Railways Act, 1989. Shah was arrested with a large number of tickets and cash, but later absconded, and the clerks …

SUBHASH MARUTI AVASAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 721Dismissed

The appellant, accused No.3, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for the killing of Baban, based on eyewitness testimony of the deceased's mother (PW‑1) and other prosecution witnesses. The appellant claimed an alibi, asserting he was unable to walk due to a compound fracture and relied on …

SURESH PATHRELLAversusORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE

2006 INSC 726Dismissed

The appellant, a Chief Manager of Oriental Bank of Commerce, was dismissed after an enquiry found him guilty of misappropriating Rs.10 lakh by opening a fraudulent account and transferring the funds to three third parties. The appellant challenged the dismissal, arguing that no loss was suffered by …

YUVARAJ AMBAR MOHITEversusSTTE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 736Dismissed

The appellant, a Judo Karate teacher, was accused of murdering his foster sister-in-law after a dispute involving another autorickshaw driver. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, notably that the deceased was last seen with the appellant, and the testimony of three witnesses, …

COMMISSIONER EXCISE AND ANR.versusMANOJ ALI AND ANR.

2006 INSC 737Dismissed

The Commissioner of Excise cancelled the wholesale and retail licences of Manoj Ali (respondent) and forfeited his security on the ground that a large quantity of IMFL and beer was seized from a room in the premises, which the department claimed was under his possession. The respondent contended …

ISHWARCHAND AMICHAND GOVADIA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 699Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were charged under Sections 306, 498A read with Section 34 of the IPC for the death of Sharmila. The complainant sought to introduce a later death certificate dated 10‑04‑2004, which alleged a different cause of death from an earlier certificate dated 18‑05‑2000. The trial court kept …

LALLAN CHAUDHARY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2006 INSC 696Dismissed

The complainant filed a complaint before a Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 452, 323 and 395 IPC. The magistrate endorsed the complaint to the police, but the SHO registered an FIR only under Sections 452, 380 and 323/34, omitting several …

TRIMUKH MAROTI KIRKANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 691Dismissed

The appellant, Trimukh Maroti Kirkan, was married to Revata, who repeatedly complained of physical abuse and denial of food because her parents could not meet a dowry demand of Rs.25,000. Revata died under circumstances initially reported as a snake bite, but a post‑mortem revealed death by …

EPURU SUDHAKAR AND ANR.versusGOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 695Case Partly allowed

The petitioners, sons of murder victims, challenged the Governor of Andhra Pradesh’s order granting remission of the unserved portion of a ten‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed on respondent No.2 for murder. They argued that the remission was granted on irrelevant and extraneous material, …

THE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUKOTTAI, TAMILNADUversusA. PARTHIBAN

2006 INSC 685Appeal(s) allowed

A. Parthiban, a public servant, was convicted for demanding and receiving illegal gratification, an act that attracted charges under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The trial court sentenced him to six months' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of …

KAILASHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2006 INSC 686Case Partly allowed

Kailash was convicted under Sections 304B (dowry death) and 498A (dowry harassment) of the IPC for the death of his wife, whose body was found in a well, indicating death "otherwise than under normal circumstances." The trial court sentenced him to ten years for the 304B offence, with no separate …

YEDLA SRINIVASA RAOversusSTATE OF A.P.

2006 INSC 670Dismissed

The appellant, Yedla Srinivasa Rao, repeatedly promised to marry a girl aged between 15 and 16 years, forcibly had sexual intercourse with her, and continued the liaison even after she became pregnant, later refusing to marry her and absconding. The girl reported the matter to the village Panchayat …

KURUPPUSAMY AND ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2006 INSC 672Case Partly allowed

The case arose from a property dispute within a joint family that escalated into a violent quarrel at a bus stop, where the deceased was assaulted with a firewood log and died the next day. Four accused were tried; two were convicted of murder (s.302 IPC read with s.34) and one of voluntarily …

KAILASHversusST ATE OF M.P.

2006 INSC 673

The appellant Kailash and two associates entered the deceased Ramkishan’s house armed with an axe, lathi and musal over a land dispute. During a quarrel the deceased received a single blow; the prosecution alleged it was an incised wound caused by the sharp side of the axe, leading to a conviction …

TARAKESHWAR SAHUversusSTATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND)

2006 INSC 666Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Tarakeshwar Sahu, was convicted by the trial court and the Jharkhand High Court of rape under sections 376/511 IPC for forcibly taking a 12‑year‑old girl to his gumti with intent to commit sexual intercourse, although the girl was rescued before any act was completed. The Supreme …

GHANSHYAMversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 665Dismissed

Ghanshyam, a tenant, alleged that his landlord Surya Prasad (respondent No.3) illegally evicted him with armed men on 8 November 1986, causing serious injuries. An FIR under Sections 147 and 307 IPC was lodged and a charge‑sheet filed, but the Public Prosecutor later moved an application under …

BALBIR SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 656Case Partly allowed

The deceased Amarjit Kaur died from severe burns after allegedly being set alight by her husband Balbir Singh and mother‑in‑law Nachattar Kaur. Two dying declarations were recorded – one by a doctor in the hospital and another by a police sub‑inspector – both implicating the husband, while the …

KISHORE EKNATH NIKAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 650Dismissed

On 11 April 1998, accused A1 stabbed the deceased Parshant to death while witnesses PW2 and PW3 attempted to intervene. Accused A2 stood by, threatened the witnesses and inflicted a knife injury on PW3, thereby preventing them from assisting the victim. The trial court convicted A1 and A2 under …

KHAMBAM RAJA REDDY AND ANR.versusPUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2006 INSC 637Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted by the Andhra Pradesh High Court for causing the death of Khambam Venkatramana Reddy, based primarily on the eye‑witness testimony of the victim's wife that the accused threw a 25‑30 kg stone on the victim's head. The defence argued that the principal accused was …

BHIMAPPA CHANDAPPA HOSAMANI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2006 INSC 633Dismissed

The appellants were charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Lakshman, who was sleeping on the 'katta' of his house. The trial court acquitted them, finding that the mother of the deceased (PW‑1) was not a truthful eyewitness and that the younger brother (PW‑2) …

BIPIN BIHARIversusSTATE OF M.P.

2006 INSC 635Disposed off

The appellant, Bipin Bihari, was convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to murder the complainant after firing a gun that injured the complainant's calf. The trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment and a fine; the High Court reduced the imprisonment to two years …

SUGA RAM @ CHHUGA RAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

2006 INSC 624Case Partly allowed

The trial court acquitted four accused persons of offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Atrocities Act. The State of Rajasthan applied for leave to appeal under Section 378(3) CrPC, but the Rajasthan High Court dismissed the application without giving any reasons. The informant (appellant) had …

LAXMANversusSTATE OF M.P.

2006 INSC 625Appeal(s) allowed

Laxman and several co‑accused shot arrows at a group during a dispute; one arrow struck the deceased, who died instantly. The trial court convicted them under sections 148, 302/149 and 324/149 IPC, and the High Court upheld a conviction of murder under section 302 IPC against Laxman. Laxman …

GAJANAND AGARWALversusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 626Appeal(s) allowed

The father of a deceased woman (Gajanand Agarwal) appealed against the Orissa High Court’s grant of bail to two accused (Bimal Kumar Khetan and Sunil Kumar Khetan) in a dowry‑death case involving offences under Sections 498A, 304B, 302, 406 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Earlier …

SIDDARAMA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2006 INSC 622Disposed off

The appellants were convicted for offences under Sections 143, 147, 341, 307 and 149 of the IPC, with the High Court altering the conviction for the assault to Section 326 read with Section 149 and imposing eight years' rigorous imprisonment plus a Rs.500 fine. The appellants challenged the …

BEENA PHILIPOSE AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2006 INSC 577Disposed off

The appellants, Beena Philipose and her father, were convicted for forging university mark‑sheets to secure admission to a medical college, offences punishable under Sections 420, 471, 120B, 466 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. The Sessions Judge sentenced them to one year and three years of …

A.GEETHAversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

2006 INSC 578Dismissed

The appellant, A. Geetha, challenged the preventive detention of her husband under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982, alleging that the detaining authority failed to consider a representation and that the likelihood of his release on bail was remote because of an NDPS case. …

SHAM SHANKAR KANKARIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 576Case Partly allowed

The deceased Vijay was tied to a cot and brutally assaulted with an iron pipe and wooden stick by six accused, leading to his death. While on his deathbed he gave a dying declaration to his brother (PW9) and mother (PW10) identifying all six assailants. The trial court convicted the principal …

RENUKA BAI @ RINKU @ RATAN AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 570

The appellants, two sisters, were convicted of a series of kidnappings and murders of children between 1990 and 1996, based largely on the testimony of an approver who had been granted pardon under CrPC s.306. The trial court sentenced them to death under IPC s.302 read with s.120B, a sentence …

SURINDER SINGH @CHHINDA AND ANRversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 573Case Partly allowed

The case involves four accused who stopped the complainant and his son; one accused thrust a knife into the son, causing his death. The trial court convicted all four under Section 302/323 read with Section 34 of the IPC, and the High Court affirmed the conviction. Two of the accused (Surinder Singh …

SANTOSH KUMARversusSTATE OF M.P.

2006 INSC 556Dismissed

The appellant, Santosh Kumar, was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) IPC for raping the prosecutrix, Halki Bai, inside a bus. The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, corroborating statements of two constables who entered the bus after hearing shrieks, and a hostile witness who partially …

DIRECTOR GENERAL, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF DOORDARSHAN AND ORS.versusANAND PATWARDHAN

2006 INSC 558Dismissed

The documentary "Father, Son and Holy War" produced by Anand Patwardhan, dealing with oppression of women, masculinity, and communal violence, was submitted to Doordarshan for telecast in 1995. Doordarshan refused, citing an internal circular that barred the telecast of any film certified "A" by the …

JAGDISH MURAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 541Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Jagdishmura was charged under Section 307 IPC for allegedly firing a pistol at the neck of PW‑2, a driver, in an attempt to murder him. The trial court acquitted him, finding the key witnesses’ statements contradictory, the motive unestablished, and the FIR ante‑dated and improperly …

RAMJEE RAI AND ORSversusST A TE OF BIHAR

2006 INSC 543Dismissed

The appellants, a group of villagers, forcibly took the deceased Baijnath Singh and his brother onto a boat, assaulted Singh, resulting in his death; the body was recovered after five days and identified by several eye‑witnesses. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302, 34 and 201 …

SURENDRA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 548Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, two brothers, were convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and causing hurt (Sec. 324 IPC) for the death of their uncle Devaji and injuries to his children during a property‑related dispute. They claimed they acted in private defence after being attacked by the deceased and his son, who …

SETTU AND ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2006 INSC 534Case Partly allowed

The case involved three accused who attacked a man, causing his death, and also injured his friend. Appellant No.1 used a concealed knife to inflict multiple head injuries that proved fatal; Appellant No.2 cut the victim's back and knee and also wounded the friend; Appellant No.3 struck the victim's …

RAM BADAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2006 INSC 528Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the case of Ram Badan Sharma and his father-in‑law, who were accused of killing their daughter‑in‑law Sanju Kumari by poisoning her after persistent demands for a colour TV, a motorcycle and cash. The prosecution proved that the accused repeatedly demanded dowry, harassed …

PARDEEP KUMARversusUNION ADMINISTRATION, CHANDIGARH

2006 INSC 516Appeal(s) allowed

Five men were tried for a gang rape under Section 376 of the IPC. The trial court convicted all, and the High Court upheld the conviction of Pardeep Kumar, while acquitting one accused and two died during appeal. Pardeep Kumar appealed, arguing that the prosecutrix had expressly stated that he did …

PULICHERLA NAGARAJU @NAGARAJA REDDYversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2006 INSC 520Dismissed

The case involves a long-standing feud between two families in Chittoor district, culminating in the stabbing of Purushotham Reddy by appellant Nagaraja Reddy with a Barisa (dagger). The trial court acquitted the accused, extending the benefit of doubt and rejecting the testimony of two eyewitnesses …

KRISHNANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2006 INSC 510Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Krishnan was charged with murdering his elder brother after a quarrel over thorn sticks used to block a common yard drain. He claimed he acted in self‑defence after being attacked and bitten by the deceased and his son. The trial court rejected the plea and convicted him under Section …

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusRAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAVA, IAS AND ANR.

2006 INSC 505Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered an FIR under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 against an IAS officer. The respondent filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of the FIR, alleging that the State of Rajasthan had …

ARUN NIVALAJI MOREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 493Dismissed

Arun Nivalaji More, a licensed commission vendor at a railway catering unit, had his licence cancelled by the Divisional Commercial Superintendent. In retaliation he entered the superintendent's office and stabbed him with a knife, causing fatal injuries. The victim gave multiple dying declarations …

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusM/S. AMRITSAR BEVERAGES LTD. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 496Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab Sales Tax Department seized a hard disk containing the dealer's books and documents under Section 14(3) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948. The dealer failed to cooperate, and the High Court ordered the return of the seized material and imposed personal costs on the officers. On …

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.versusPASTOR P. RAJU

2006 INSC 490Appeal(s) allowed

Pastor P. Raju was arrested and remanded to judicial custody after an FIR was lodged under Section 153B IPC for allegedly urging Hindus to convert to Christianity. He filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, contending that a prior sanction under …

LACHMAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2006 INSC 476Case Partly allowed

A dispute over water flow escalated into a roof‑side gunfight in which Lachman Singh, Dev Singh and Randhir Singh fired a revolver, killing Naib Singh and injuring several others. The trial court convicted all three under Section 302 IPC, Section 307 IPC with Section 34, and under the Arms Act. On …

SYED IBRAHIMversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2006 INSC 473Appeal(s) allowed

Syed Ibrahim was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife based solely on the testimony of the deceased's father, PW I. The High Court upheld the conviction despite noting inconsistencies in PW I's evidence. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether a conviction can rest on a …

DALJIT SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY HOME AFFAIRS

2006 INSC 474Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved six accused, of whom four were convicted under IPC sections 307/34, 324/34 and 323/34 for a violent assault. The trial court sentenced them, and the High Court upheld convictions under sections 324/34 and 323/34 but acquitted on 307/34. On appeal, the accused argued that the High …

M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATIONversusM/S NEPC INDIA LTD. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 452Case Partly allowed

Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) entered into fuel supply contracts with NEPC India Ltd. and its sister company, securing the dues by hypothecating two aircraft. After NEPC defaulted, IOC obtained injunctions and later filed criminal complaints alleging theft, cheating, criminal breach of trust and …

S. SUDERSHAN REDDY & ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2006 INSC 455Dismissed

Four accused were convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Khaja Saheb. The prosecution relied mainly on the testimony of PW‑3, a close relative of the deceased, while other eye‑witnesses (PW‑1, PW‑2, PW‑4) either gave only partial support or later retracted their statements. The appellants …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusSANTOSH KUMAR

2006 INSC 432Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant State of Madhya Pradesh challenged the High Court's reduction of the rigorous imprisonment term for Santosh Kumar, who was convicted of raping a six‑year‑old girl under Section 376(2) of the IPC and also under Section 342. The trial court had sentenced him to ten years' rigorous …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusANNEGOWDA

2006 INSC 425Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal against a High Court order that allowed the accused, Annegowda, to defer the recording of his statement under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) until the trials of ten other related cases were completed. The accused faced eleven charge sheets …

BHUPINDER SINGH AND ORS.versusJARNAIL SINGH AND ANR.

2006 INSC 427Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were arrested for a dowry death under Section 304B(8) of the IPC and applied for bail, contending that the police challan had not been filed within the statutory period. The trial magistrate rejected bail, holding that the challan was filed within 90 days, while the Sessions Judge …

PRIYA PATELversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ANR.

2006 INSC 420Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Priya Patel, was charged under IPC sections 323 and 376(2)(g) for allegedly facilitating her husband’s rape of a woman. The High Court upheld the charge, holding that Explanation I to Section 376(2) makes a woman liable for ‘gang rape’ if she assists the act. On appeal, the Supreme …

SABBI MALLESU AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2006 INSC 423Disposed off

The case arose from a violent dispute over a bund in which a large number of persons were alleged to have participated. The FIR named fifteen persons, but thirty‑nine were tried. The trial court convicted six accused, including the appellants, under Sections 302/149 IPC despite the charge sheet …

PAPPUversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2006 INSC 412Case Partly allowed

The appellant Pappu was convicted for the death of Mal Singh, who died after a lathi blow to the head during a sudden quarrel at a marriage function. The appellant argued that the incident fell within Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC, which would reduce the offence to culpable homicide not amounting …

LATA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

2006 INSC 407Case Allowed

Lata Singh, a 27‑year‑old graduate, married a man of a different caste of her own free will. Her brothers filed false missing‑person and kidnapping reports, leading police to arrest her husband’s relatives. Despite a police final report and a medical opinion that Lata was mentally fit, the …

V.K. RATHEESHversusSTATE OF KERALA

2006 INSC 404Appeal(s) allowed

V.K. Ratheesh was tried for murder (IPC 302) and the trial court acquitted him, finding serious discrepancies in the prosecution's evidence. The Kerala High Court set aside the acquittal, deeming the discrepancies trivial, and convicted him under IPC 304(1) with a seven‑year sentence. On appeal, the …

BUNNILAL CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2006 INSC 397Disposed off

The case arose from a dispute over the balance payment for a she‑buffalo which led to a violent confrontation in which Bunnilal Chaudhary (A‑1) stabbed the victim Shambhu Raut on the left side of the chest, causing his death. The trial court convicted all ten accused of murder under Section 302 read …

SHRI BALASAHEB K. THACKERAY AND ANR.versusSHRL VENKAT @ BABRU AND ANR.

2006 INSC 401

The complainant filed a private defamation complaint under IPC s.500 read with s.34 against the editor, printer and publisher of a newspaper. The trial court issued process, but a petition under CrPC s.482 was dismissed by the High Court. While the appeal was pending before this Court, the …

POPULAR MUTHIAHversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2006 INSC 383Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a 1992 murder where the charge sheet omitted two alleged participants, Popular Muthiah and Murugan, although eye‑witnesses identified them. Only Nallakannu (Muthu) was tried, convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, the Madras High Court, exercising its appellate …

HEERALAL YADAVversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 385Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Gokul Singh was brutally assaulted and later died; a dying declaration identifying several assailants was recorded by Dr. A.S. Khan after the victim regained consciousness following glucose and saline administration. The trial court convicted three accused under IPC sections 302 and 34 …

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusRAVI @NEHRU

2006 INSC 386Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tamil Nadu charged Ravi @ Nehru under Section 376 IPC for raping a five‑year‑old girl. The victim recounted being taken to the accused's bedroom, stripped, and having his penis pressed against her genitalia, after which she fled crying. Medical examination of the girl revealed a …

KALU RAM AND ANR.versusSTATE OF DELHI

2006 INSC 372Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Kalu Ram and others were convicted by the trial court under Section 304(1) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. They filed an appeal against the conviction, while an informant filed a criminal revision petition seeking …

RAJINDERversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2006 INSC 368Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Rajinder was convicted for the death of his nephew Subhash, who died from a thigh wound inflicted by a firearm. The trial court and High Court upheld a conviction under Section 302 IPC (murder) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the distinction …

PANAKANTI SAMPATH RAOversusSTATE OF A.P.

2006 INSC 346Dismissed

The appellant, a medical representative, was married to Panakanti Kavitha who was found dead in their rented house within three months of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the appellant had repeatedly harassed her for dowry, leading to her death by asphyxia due to throttling, and charged him …

UMRAOversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 332Dismissed

Umrao filed a FIR alleging that when he, his son Rajinder and his brother went to a tube‑well owned by the brother, the accused were removing an electric motor from it. A quarrel ensued and the accused struck Rajinder and others with various weapons. Rajinder was hospitalized, discharged on 25 …

BABANRAO TUKARAM RANJANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 334Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Deputy Superintendent of Stamps, was charged under the IPC and Sections 3(2), 3(5) and 24 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) for allegedly aiding a large‑scale fake‑stamp racket. He had been in custody for over two years when the Special Court denied his bail …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusKARANVIR

2006 INSC 337Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed a High Court revision that set aside the conviction of Karanvir, a postmaster, under Section 409 of the IPC for misappropriating Rs. 8,000 entrusted to him for the purchase of National Savings Certificates. The complainant had deposited the amount with the …

BUDH SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2006 INSC 342Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Budh Singh and five others, were charged with murdering Ram Gopal and his wife Chatarvati and attempting to murder their son Rajveer Singh over a land dispute. The prosecution’s case relied on an FIR lodged at 00:25 on 13 April 1992, which reached the court on 18 April, and on …

OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2006 INSC 317Dismissed

The appellant Om Prakash was convicted of raping a married woman (the prosecutrix) in the veranda of a Zila Parishad near a court, after having come to the premises to help her husband obtain bail. The victim’s testimony, corroborated by an eye‑witness (her brother‑in‑law) and medical examination, …

RAM BIRAJI DEVI AND ANR.versusUMESH KUMAR SINGH AND ANR.

2006 INSC 318Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, Umesh Kumar Singh, alleged that the appellants, Ram Biraji Devi and another, accepted part payment for a plot of land but later refused to transfer it, leading him to file a criminal complaint under IPC sections 406, 419, 420 and 120B. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the …

SUNNY KAPOORversusSTATE (UT OF CHANDIGARH)

2006 INSC 293Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased businessman Satish Kumar Mehra was found dead near Udyog Bhavan, Chandigarh, and rickshaw pullers including Sunny Kapoor were charged with murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC. The trial court convicted them based largely on circumstantial evidence and alleged extra‑judicial …

ANIL KUMAR TULSIYANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

2006 INSC 297Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the State of Uttar Pradesh, challenged the Allahabad High Court's order granting bail to the respondent, an advocate charged with murder under IPC s.302 read with s.201. The High Court had allowed bail despite the offence being non‑bailable and the gravity of the crime, which involved …