Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 16401–16600

GADE LAKSHMI MANGRAJU @ RAMESHversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2001 INSC 287Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder and criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 302, 34 and 404, based largely on circumstantial evidence, including a sniffer dog tracking, fingerprint evidence, and identification of stolen ornaments. The defence challenged the reliability of the sniffer dog …

SMT. LAXMIversusOM PRAKASH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 282Dismissed

The case involved the death of Janak Kumari, who suffered extensive burn injuries and allegedly made five dying declarations implicating her husband, mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law. The trial court acquitted the accused, holding that none of the statements were reliable. On appeal, the Supreme …

RE: SUO MOTO PROCEEDINGS AGAINST MR. R. KARUPPAN, ADVOCATEversus-

2001 INSC 279Disposed off

The Supreme Court, acting suo moto, examined an affidavit filed by Advocate R. Karuppan in support of a writ of quo‑warranto challenging the age of the Chief Justice of India. The Court found that Karuppan knowingly asserted that the President had not determined the Chief Justice’s age, despite …

RIZWAN AHMED JAVED SHAIKH AND ORS.versusJAMMAL PATEL AND ORS.

2001 INSC 281Dismissed

The appellants filed a complaint alleging that police officers, who had arrested and detained them, failed to produce them before a magistrate within 24 hours and beat them while in custody. The magistrate, relying on a Maharashtra Government notification under Section 197(3) of the CrPC, discharged …

SHRI BHAGWANversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2001 INSC 274Disposed off

Shri Bhagwan, a 20‑year‑old apprentice goldsmith, was convicted of murdering five members of Shiv Pratap's family and committing robbery and dacoity. The conviction was based on circumstantial evidence: he was seen with one of the deceased, sustained injuries, possessed blood‑stained clothing and …

RAMDEO CHAUHAN@ RAJ NATHversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2001 INSC 272Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered a review petition filed by R.D. Chauhan, who claimed he was a juvenile at the time of committing murder under Section 302 IPC and therefore could not be sentenced to death. The petition argued that the trial and appellate courts failed to apply the Juvenile Justice Act, …

BIBHACHHAversusSTATE OF ORISSA

2001 INSC 262Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC after the dead body of the deceased was found near the Hati River. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence, such as the last sighting of the accused and the deceased together, recovery of blood‑stained clothing, the missing …

RAJEEV CHAUDHARYversusSTATE (N.C.T.) OF DELHI

2001 INSC 257

The appellant, Rajeev Chaudhary, was arrested for offences under IPC sections 386, 506 and 120B and was released on bail by a Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code because the charge‑sheet was not filed within 60 days. The Additional Sessions Judge set aside the …

SHOBHA SURESH JUMANIversusAPPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FORFEITED PROPERTY AND ANR.

2001 INSC 254Dismissed

The appellant, Shobha Suresh Jumani, wife of a detenu whose properties were ordered forfeited under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976, filed an appeal claiming to be a "person aggrieved" under Section 12(4) of the Act and also sought maintenance under …

PURAN ETC. ETC.versusRAMBILAS AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 251Dismissed

The appellants were charged under Sections 498‑A and 304‑B of the IPC for a dowry‑death. The Additional Sessions Judge granted them bail on 13 November 2000 without recording any reasons, prompting the father of the deceased to move the High Court, which cancelled the bail on the ground that the …

RAJUversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2001 INSC 247Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Raju, was accused of enticing an 11‑year‑old girl, Rinku, with toffees, raping her and subsequently striking her with two bricks when she threatened to disclose the crime, resulting in her death. The prosecution relied on eyewitness testimony, the appellant's extra‑judicial confession …

M.N. DAMANIversusS.K. SINHA AND ORS.

[2001] 3 S.C.R. 415Appeal(s) allowed

M.N. Daman filed a private complaint under Section 500 of the IPC alleging that S.K. Sinha and others made false and malicious imputations against him in a bail application, thereby defaming him. The magistrate, after recording Daman's sworn statement, issued summons to the respondents, finding a …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusGIAN CHAND

2001 INSC 235Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Himachal Pradesh prosecuted Gian Chand for raping a 5‑year‑old girl, a distant relative, on 29 October 1991. The trial court convicted him under Section 376 IPC, sentencing him to ten years' imprisonment and a fine. The Himachal Pradesh High Court set aside the conviction, relying on …

ARVIND SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2001 INSC 232Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the death of Minta Devi, who was allegedly burnt to death by her husband Arvind Singh and his in‑laws. The trial court convicted all four accused under Sections 304B (dowry death) and 498A (cruelty) and sentenced them to life imprisonment; the High Court set aside the conviction of …

STATE OF KERALAversusM.M. MANIKANTAN NAIR

2001 INSC 225Appeal(s) allowed

The Secretary of a Gram Panchayat was prosecuted for offences under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act. He moved the High Court under Section 482 CrPC to quash the prosecution, arguing that no sanction under Section 122 of the Kerala Panchayat Act was obtained. The High Court first …

CHETANDASSversusKAMLA DEVI

2001 INSC 214Dismissed

Chetan Dass married Kamla Devi in 1976 and, after about two years, filed for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which was dismissed when the couple's relations improved. The wife later lodged a criminal complaint alleging the husband’s illicit relationship with a nurse, prompting …

LOKEMAN SHAH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 201Dismissed

In 1984 a communal riot in Calcutta led to the murder of two police officers. Four persons were initially sentenced to death, but on retrial only Lokeman Shah and Nasim @ Naso were convicted; the High Court altered Shah's sentence to life imprisonment and upheld Naso's death sentence. Both …

UKARAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2001 INSC 197Appeal(s) allowed

Ukaram was convicted for the murder of his wife and minor daughter based solely on the wife's dying declaration. The wife, Parveena, was alleged to have suffered from mental illness, raising doubts about her capacity to make a reliable statement. The Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution …

NARSINGH PRASAD SINGHversusRAJ KUMAR @ PAPPU AND ORS.

2001 INSC 191Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Narsingh Prasad Singh, filed a criminal appeal after his daughter was brutally beaten with a burning wooden stick by the respondents, Raj Kumar and others, for alleged dowry demand. The trial court convicted the respondents under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced …

SUBHASH CHANDER ETC. ETC.versusKRISHAN LAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 186Disposed off

The case arose from a long‑standing feud between the families of Bhagwan Ram and Krishan Lal. On the night of 21‑22 August 1992 the accused entered Bhagwan Ram's house and fired indiscriminately, killing Bhagwan Ram, his son Sunder Ram and his mother Chando Devi, and injuring Subhash Chander (PW2) …

UDAY MOHANLAL ACHARYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASIITRA

2001 INSC 184Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was remanded to judicial custody for offences under the IPC and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. After the statutory 60‑day period for filing a charge‑sheet elapsed, he applied for bail, asserting the indefeasible right under the proviso to Section 167(2) of …

ASSURANCE CO., SHIMLAversusKAMLA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 178Disposed off

An accident on 1 March 1993 involving a truck driven by Liaqat Ali resulted in three deaths. The insurer, New India Assurance Co., claimed it was not liable for third‑party compensation because the driver allegedly held a forged licence, constituting a breach of the insurance policy. The Motor …

PRAHLAD SINGH BHATversusN.C. T., DELHI AND ANR.

2001 INSC 168Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, father of a woman allegedly murdered by her husband (respondent No.2), challenged the grant of regular bail by a Metropolitan Magistrate in a murder case (Section 302 IPC) after the accused had earlier obtained anticipatory bail for lesser offences. The High Court dismissed the …

SUCHA SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2001 INSC 166Dismissed

During the peak of militancy in Punjab, two teenage sons of Diwan Singh were abducted from their home by four armed men, including the appellant Sucha Singh, and were later found shot dead. The parents were present in the house at the time of the abduction. The prosecution proved the abduction and …

SMT. OM WAT! AND ANR.versusSTATE. THROUGH DELHI ADMN. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 152Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the mother of a deceased youth, appealed against the Delhi High Court’s order that quashed the murder charge (IPC s.302) framed against the accused and directed the trial court to give detailed reasons for framing charges. The Supreme Court held that under Sections 227 and 228 of the …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRITESH, S/O VASUDEO WANJARI

2001 INSC 146Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent Ritesh was charged with murder and related offences, including criminal conspiracy, for allegedly killing his beloved Shubhangi, a Scheduled Caste member. The trial court denied bail, finding him complicit in the conspiracy. The High Court, on a revision petition under Section 439 of …

DHANANJAYA REDDY ETC.versusSTATE OF KARN AT AKA

2001 INSC 144

The Supreme Court examined the murder of an army officer allegedly orchestrated by his wife (Al) and her paramour (A2) with the help of two accomplices (A3, A4). The trial court convicted Al and A2 under Section 302 IPC, while acquitting A3 and A4; the High Court upheld Al and A2's convictions and …

ASHOK YESHWANT BADAVEversusSURENDRA MADHAVRAO NIGHOJAKAR AND ANR.

2001 INSC 143Dismissed

Ashok Yeshwant Badave issued a post‑dated cheque dated 20‑Jan‑1996 as part of a sale transaction. The cheque was presented on 7‑Jul‑1996, within six months of the date on the cheque, and was dishonoured. The complainant filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, …

PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2001 INSC 142Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the conviction of Pawan Kumar and co‑accused for abetment of suicide, dowry harassment and related offences under Sections 306, 498A, 201 and 193 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence and a statutory presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence …

SURESH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF UP

2001 INSC 131Dismissed

The case concerned a gruesome family murder motivated by a land dispute, for which Suresh (A‑1) and his brother‑in‑law Ramji (A‑2) were convicted of murder and sentenced to death, while their wife Pavitri Devi (A‑3) was acquitted. The State appealed the acquittal, arguing that A‑3’s presence at the …

SOHAN AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

2001 INSC 133Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for offences under Sections 148, 149 and 302 of the IPC based solely on the testimony of PW‑7, a cousin of the deceased and an interested witness. The Supreme Court held that the burden of proof lies on the prosecution and must be discharged beyond reasonable doubt. It …

KANHAI MISHRA @ KANHAIYA MISARversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2001 INSC 119Appeal(s) allowed

KanHai Mishra was convicted by the trial court and the Patna High Court for the rape and murder of Rita Kumari, based solely on six alleged circumstantial facts. The Supreme Court examined whether those circumstances satisfied the legal test that circumstantial evidence must be wholly inconsistent …

RAMASHRAYAAND ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2001 INSC 116Dismissed

The appellants, Ramashraya and another, attacked the deceased Ajeet with a lathi, inflicting severe injuries to his skull and body, which caused his death. They argued that the incident arose from a sudden quarrel, that there was no pre‑meditation or intention to kill, and that the offence should be …

DAYA SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2001 INSC 96Dismissed

In 1988 a terrorist attack on Dr. Harnam Singh's house in Kurukshetra resulted in four deaths and several injuries. Fourteen accused, including Daya Singh, were tried under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and the IPC for murder and attempted murder. The trial court convicted …

ALPIC FINANCE LTD.versusP. SADASIVAN AND ANR.

2001 INSC 94Dismissed

Alpic Finance Ltd., a non‑banking financial company, financed Rs 92.5 million for the purchase of 100 dental chairs for a trust run by the respondents under a lease‑hire purchase agreement. The respondents defaulted on rental instalments and some chairs were found missing, prompting Alpic to file a …

MADRAS HIGH COURT ADVOCATES ASSOCIATIONversusDR. A.S. ANAND, HON. THE CJJ., AND ANR.

2001 INSC 87Dismissed

A writ petition under Article 32 was filed by R. Karuppan, claiming to act for the Madras High Court Advocates Association, seeking a declaration that Chief Justice of India Dr. A.S. Anand was born on 1‑Nov‑1934 rather than 1‑Nov‑1936 and had therefore retired on 31‑Oct‑1999. The Association’s …

DR. SURAJMANI STELLA KUJURversusDURGA CHARAN HANSDAH AND ANR.

2001 INSC 89Dismissed

The appellant, a member of the Oraon tribe, alleged that her husband, a Santhal, contracted a second marriage while their first marriage subsisted, and filed a criminal complaint for bigamy under Section 494 of the IPC. The trial magistrate dismissed the complaint for lack of evidence of any tribal …

V. L. TRESAversusSTATE OF KERALA

2001 INSC 83Dismissed

The appellant V.L. Tresa was accused of murdering her husband Vincent, but the trial court acquitted her of the murder charge (Sec. 302 IPC) due to lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt. She was, however, convicted under Sec. 201 of the Indian Penal Code for causing disappearance of evidence and …

IN THE MATTER OF: 'K', A JUDICIAL OFFICERversus-

2001 INSC 82Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Metropolitan Magistrate, complained that a Delhi High Court judgment contained disparaging observations against her, which later entered her confidential annual records and threatened her career. She sought expungement of those remarks under Article 136 of the Constitution, arguing …

SANJAY @ KAKAversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2001 INSC 77Dismissed

The appellants Sanjay, Nawabuddin and Vinod were convicted for murder and robbery after the police recovered a weapon, blood‑stained clothes and stolen jewellery based on their disclosure statements made under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. The defence argued that the statements were inadmissible …

JATINDER SINGHversusRANJIT KAUR

2001 INSC 56Dismissed

Ranjit Kaur filed a criminal complaint against Jatinder Singh under IPC 494 for bigamy and against four others under IPC 109 for abetment. The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint for default because the complainant was absent, and she subsequently filed a second complaint with the same …

SHAMNSHAEB M. MULTTANIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2001 INSC 43Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, his brother and father were tried for murder (IPC s.302) of the appellant's wife; the trial court acquitted them after witnesses turned hostile. The Karnataka High Court, however, convicted the appellant under IPC s.304B (dowry death) and s.498A without a specific charge for s.304B. …

SURESH CHAND JAINversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.

2001 INSC 19Dismissed

The appellant was named in a private complaint alleging offences under the Prizes, Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Prohibition) Act and IPC 420. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, without examining the complainant on oath, ordered the police to register an FIR and investigate under Section 156(3) of …

LAL SINGH ETC. ETCversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

2001 INSC 13Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of five appellants under Section 3(3) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for alleged conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, the recovery of large quantities of arms, ammunition and explosives, and related offences under the …

SURYANARAYANAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2001 INSC 3Dismissed

The appellant Suryanarayana was convicted under IPC Section 302 for the murder of Saroja, based primarily on the testimony of a four‑year‑old child witness, Bhavya, who identified the appellant as the assailant. The appellant appealed, arguing that a conviction cannot rest on the sole testimony of a …

IN RE: S.K. SUNDARAMversus-

2000 INSC 602Disposed off

Advocate S.K. Sundaram sent a telegram to Chief Justice of India A.S. Anand on 3 November 2000 demanding his resignation, threatening criminal complaints under IPC sections 420, 406, 468 and 471, a writ of quo‑warranto and a demand for Rs 3 crore. He later filed a criminal complaint before a …

T. SUDHAKAR PRASAD ETC.versusGOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.

2000 INSC 595Disposed off

A contempt application was filed under Section 17 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal against the Principal Secretary for wilful disobedience of the Tribunal's order. The State and the Principal Secretary challenged the Tribunal's jurisdiction …

PIPAL SINGH ETCversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2000 INSC 589Dismissed

Pipal Singh and Mukhtiar Singh were convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34, along with several others, for causing two fatal injuries to the deceased. Some co‑accused were acquitted. On appeal, the appellants argued that the acquittal of other accused barred their conviction …

GURA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2000 INSC 574Dismissed

Gura Singh was convicted of murdering his father under IPC 302. The prosecution relied on the appellant’s extra‑judicial confession to several relatives (PW 2, 5, 6, 7) and on the recovery of the murder weapon and a blood‑stained sheet disclosed by the accused. Some of the witnesses were later …

STATE, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHIversusSUN IL AND ANOTHER

2000 INSC 551Disposed off

The State of NCT of Delhi appealed against the acquittal of Sunil and Ramesh, who were convicted by a Sessions Court for kidnapping, raping and murdering a four‑year‑old girl, Anuradha. The High Court set aside the conviction, citing minor inconsistencies in the testimonies of three witnesses, the …

KUNWAR BAHADUR SINGHversusSHEO BARAN SINGH AND ORS.

2000 INSC 553Appeal(s) allowed

The accused were convicted by a Sessions Court for offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. While their appeals were pending, the High Court discovered that the trial court records were missing and directed the trial court to reconstruct the file using carbon copies of witness …

SAJUversusSTATE OF KERALA

2000 INSC 529Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Jameela, was allegedly pregnant by the appellant Saju and refused to abort the pregnancy. She was later stabbed to death by accused No.1 (Biju). The prosecution alleged that Saju conspired with Biju to murder her, securing convictions under Sections 109, 120‑B and 302 IPC. On appeal, …

MURALIversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2000 INSC 526Dismissed

Murali was convicted under Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Vinayagam after dragging the victim into a room, bolting the door and stabbing him with a knife. He appealed, claiming the right of private defence and arguing that his injuries were serious, while also …

MADHUKAR BHASKARRAO JOSHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2000 INSC 513Dismissed

The appellant, a Sub Engineer of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, was caught in a police‑set trap accepting cash from a private contractor after demanding a sum for sanctioning additional power load. He claimed the money was a gift, not gratification. The trial court convicted him under …

VISHNU NAGNATH DESHMUKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2000 INSC 511Disposed off

Vishnu Nagnath Deshmukh was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (sections 5(2) and 5(1)(d)) and IPC section 161 for accepting an illegal gratification of Rs.10. The Special Judge sentenced him to six months’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine, which the Bombay High Court upheld. He …

ABDUL KARIMversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2000 INSC 505Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined applications filed by the Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) under Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code to withdraw TADA charges against accused linked to the forest brigand Veerappan, whose kidnapping of actor Rajkumar prompted the Karnataka government to concede to …

STATE OF U.P.versusHARI MOHAN AND ORS.

2000 INSC 508Case Partly allowed

The State prosecuted Hari Mohan for the murder of his sister‑in‑law Roop Devi, whose body was found in a gunny bag with gunshot wounds. The trial court convicted Hari Mohan under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment, while other accused were convicted under Section …

SHAMSHER KHANversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2000 INSC 494Disposed off

Shamsher Khan was convicted for manufacturing and storing bombs in his Delhi house, which later exploded, killing three and injuring many. He was sentenced under IPC sections 304, 308, 120‑B, TADA sec. 5 and Explosive Substances Act sec. 4(b). On appeal he challenged the culpable homicide …

STATE OF DELHIversusGYAN DEVI AND ORS.

2000 INSC 491Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Delhi charged Gyan Devi, her mother‑in‑law and husband with culpable homicide not amounting to murder (IPC 304/34) in the death of Sudesh. The High Court, on a revision petition, directed the trial court to record only medical evidence and then quashed the charge under Section 304/34 …

ABDUL WAHAB ANSARIversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2000 INSC 483Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a public servant appointed as a duty magistrate, ordered open firing to disperse a mob at an encroachment site, resulting in one death and injuries. A private complaint was filed alleging multiple offences under the IPC and the Arms Act, and the Chief Judicial Magistrate took …

STATE BY C.B.I. NEW DELHIversusR. SURI BABU AND ANR.

2000 INSC 486Disposed off

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a criminal appeal against a Karnataka High Court order that discharged two of six accused, including former Chief Minister Bangarappa and his private secretary Suri Babu, in a case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and IPC section 120‑B. The …

BASAVARAJ R. PATIL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2000 INSC 477Disposed off

The appellants were charged under the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 498‑A IPC for dowry harassment. After the prosecution evidence was closed, the trial court dispensed with personal examination of two accused under Section 313 CrPC and acquitted them. The High Court set aside the acquittal, …

STATE OF KERALAversusP. SUGATHAN AND ANR.

2000 INSC 461Dismissed

The State of Kerala prosecuted P. Sugathan (A1) and Krishna Kumari (A2) for the murder of Soman and for criminal conspiracy under Sections 302 and 120B IPC. The prosecution alleged that A1, a police Sub‑Inspector, and A2, his concubine, conspired to kill Soman after he tried to revive a past …

HUKAM SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2000 INSC 446Dismissed

Munshi Singh, an advocate's clerk, was murdered near his home by Hukam Singh and three relatives who shot him, assaulted his wife and son, and later cremated his body. The prosecution, led by a public prosecutor, chose not to examine two independent witnesses (Inder Singh and Budh Ram Nayak) after …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusGITA RAM

2000 INSC 438Disposed off

The respondent, Gita Ram, was charged under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The case was committed by a magistrate to a Sessions Court that had been designated as a Special Court for offences under the SC/ST Act, …

NARAYAN CHETANRAM CHAUDHARY AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2000 INSC 432Dismissed

The appellants, Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary and Jitu, along with Raju, murdered seven members of a family, including two children and a pregnant woman, to conceal a robbery. Raju later became an approver after the trial court granted him pardon and recorded his confession. Both the trial court and …

P.P. UNIKRISHNAN AND ANR.versusPUTTIYOTTIL ALIKUTTY AND ANR.

2000 INSC 433Dismissed

The petitioners, a Sub‑Inspector and a Constable of the Kerala Police, were charged with offences of assault, grievous hurt, attempt to murder and criminal intimidation under the IPC for illegally confining and beating a shop‑keeper in a police lock‑up. They argued that the trial court should not …

LIFE CONVICT LAXMAN NASKARversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

2000 INSC 429Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, a life convict sentenced under Sections 302 and 34 IPC, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking premature release, claiming that he had served the equivalent of 20 years (the statutory period for life imprisonment) and earned remissions under the West Bengal Correctional …

R. BALAKRISHNA PILLAIversusSTATE OF KERALA

2000 INSC 425Dismissed

R. Balakrishna Pillai, a former Kerala minister, was convicted under Sections 5(1)(d) and 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 for abusing his office to supply electricity to a private firm in Karnataka. He filed a criminal appeal before the Kerala High Court and subsequently moved a …

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusMIR MOHAMMAD OMAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2000 INSC 422Case Partly allowed

The State of West Bengal prosecuted Mir Mohammad Omar and six co‑accused for abducting a 29‑year‑old businessman, Mahesh Kumar Aggarwal, with the intention of killing him, and for his subsequent murder. The trial court convicted them under Section 364 read with Section 34 IPC but acquitted them of …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusMANGO RAM

2000 INSC 411Disposed off

The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed the acquittal of a 17‑year‑old accused who was found not guilty of raping his 13‑14‑year‑old niece. The trial court had held that the girl was over 16 and had consented, while the High Court affirmed this view. The Supreme Court examined medical reports, dental …

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusPOLAMALA RAJU @ RAJARAO

2000 INSC 387Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Polamala Raju, was convicted by a Sessions Court for raping a five‑year‑old girl under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. The Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld the conviction but reduced the term to five years, citing the passage of time and possible …

GHULAM HUSSAIN AND ANR.versusSTATE OF DELHI

2000 INSC 375Case Partly allowed

The deceased, Islamuddin, died from burn injuries after his in‑laws allegedly poured kerosene on him and set him alight. His statements recorded by an Assistant Sub‑Inspector (ASI) in the hospital and by a magistrate were treated as dying declarations. The Supreme Court examined whether the ASI's …

RAM DEO CHAUHAN ALIAS RAJ NATH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2000 INSC 364Dismissed

Ram Deo Chauhan (alias Raj Nath Chauhan) was convicted of the pre‑planned, cold‑blooded murder of four members of a family, including a two‑year‑old child and two women, and of causing injuries to two other persons. The trial and high courts relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence and a …

MOHAMMED AYNUDDIN @ MIYAMversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2000 INSC 361Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a driver of an Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation bus, was convicted under IPC Section 304A after a passenger fell from the bus while boarding and was run over by the rear wheel, resulting in death. The trial, sessions, and high courts held him guilty of culpable …

R.K. MOHAMMED UBAIDULLAH AND ORS.versusHAJEE C. ABDUL WAHAB (DEAD) BY LRS.

2000 INSC 338Dismissed

The plaintiff entered into a sale agreement with the first defendant on 27 July 1971 for a godown, paying an advance and agreeing that the sale deed would be executed within 90 days. The first defendant reneged and sold the same property to defendants 2‑5 on 9 November 1971. The plaintiff sued for …

SUDHAKAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2000 INSC 337Appeal(s) allowed

A school teacher alleged that the headmaster and a co‑teacher of her school gang‑raped her on 9 July 1994. She reported the incident to her family and later to the police, who recorded her statement eleven days after the incident. She subsequently committed suicide in December 1994. The trial court …

K.K. PATEL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

2000 INSC 326Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent‑police officer filed a complaint before a Metropolitan Magistrate alleging that the appellants, police officers, had committed offences including sections 166, 167, 219 etc. of the IPC and an offence under section 147(G) of the Bombay Police Act. The Magistrate took cognizance and …

HARDEO SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2000 INSC 318Dismissed

Hardeo Singh, a contractor, obtained overdraft facilities totalling Rs 21.5 lakh from the Birpur branch of Central Bank of India, facilities that were beyond the authorised limit of the branch manager, S.K. Roy, who was alleged to habitually receive illegal gratification from a third party. Although …

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusJ. JAYALALITHA

2000 INSC 308Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tamil Nadu alleged that former Chief Minister J. Jayalalitha conspired with ten others to import coal at inflated prices, causing a loss of about Rs 6.5 crore. The Special Judge discharged her, finding the record insufficient to frame a charge, and the Madras High Court affirmed that …

ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE AND ANR.versusM. SAMBA SIVA RAO AND ORS.

2000 INSC 305Appeal(s) allowed

The Enforcement Directorate issued summons under Section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 to M. Samba Siva Rao and others, who refused to comply with the directions. The Delhi High Court held that such refusal did not attract Section 56 of the Act and dismissed the complaints. On …

ARNIT DASversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2000 INSC 311Dismissed

Arnit Das was arrested for a murder under IPC 302 and claimed to be a juvenile, asserting a birth date of 18‑09‑1982. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate ordered an enquiry under Section 32 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986, and, after a medical board report, concluded that Das was above 16 …

ABDUL NAZAR MADANI ETCversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

2000 INSC 290Dismissed

The petitioners, among 181 accused in the Coimbatore serial bomb blast case, filed a transfer petition under Sections 406 and 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move the trial from Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu to Kerala, alleging that communal tension in the state would prevent a fair and …

T.K. GOPAL @ GOPIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2000 INSC 291Dismissed

The appellant, T.K. Gopal, was convicted under Section 376(2) of the Indian Penal Code for raping a 1½‑year‑old girl and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The Supreme Court issued a notice to consider enhancing the sentence to life imprisonment. The appellant pleaded that …

LILY THOMAS, ETC. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2000 INSC 293Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition and several writ petitions filed by Lily Thomas and others seeking to set aside the earlier judgment in Sarla Mudgal’s case, which held that a Hindu husband who converts to Islam without dissolving his first marriage commits bigamy under Section 494 IPC. …

JAI MANGAL ORAONversusSMT. MIRA NAYAK AND ORS. ETC.

2000 INSC 295Dismissed

The appellant, a member of a Scheduled Tribe, claimed title to land that had been surrendered by his predecessor Nanda Oraon in 1942 to a landlord. He alleged that he was the adopted son of Sukhi Oraon and therefore succeeded to the land, filing a complaint that led the Special Officer under the …

DALBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2000 INSC 284Dismissed

The appellant, a bus driver for Haryana Roadways, knocked down and killed a cyclist and was convicted under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence). He appealed, seeking the benevolent provision of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, arguing that he …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusMAN JANNA

2000 INSC 283Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka prosecuted Manjan for raping a girl who was 15 years old at the time of the offence. The trial court convicted him based on the victim’s testimony, corroborative eyewitness accounts, medical findings of injuries and seminal stains on the victim’s clothing, and the victim’s …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusDAMU AND ORS.

2000 INSC 273Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra prosecuted four accused for abducting and murdering infant children as part of a superstitious ritual to uncover hidden treasure. The trial court relied on a voluntary confessional statement, corroborating circumstantial evidence, and the testimony of a child who escaped two …

MALEMPATI PATIABI NARENDRA ETCversusGHATIAMANENI MARUTHI PRASAD AND ORS. ETC.

2000 INSC 262Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Gram Sarpanch Sitaram Anjanalelu, for which six persons were convicted by the trial court under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC. On appeal, the Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld convictions of two accused (A‑1 and A‑3) only under Section 326 and acquitted …

JOSEPH S/O KOOVELI POULOversusSTATE OF KERALA

2000 INSC 260Case Partly allowed

The appellant Joseph was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and robbery (Sec. 392 IPC) for allegedly luring Gracy, a convent worker, away on a false pretext, assaulting her, stealing her ornaments and causing her death by laying her on a railway track. The trial court acquitted him on all charges, …

SAGAYAMversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2000 INSC 252Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted by a Designated Court under Sections 3 and 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 and Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly storing lethal weapons, extorting money and threatening a police officer during a …

SWARAN SINGH ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2000 INSC 253Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Shamsher Singh and Amar Singh, allegedly committed by Swaran Singh, Jagjit Singh and others using a 12‑bore double‑barrel gun. The prosecution relied on eye‑witnesses (PW‑3 and PW‑4), forensic evidence (site plan, photographs, blood‑stained earth, post‑mortem reports, …

KANS RAJversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2000 INSC 251Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the death of Sunita Kumari, who was found dead by asphyxiation three years after her marriage. The husband, Rakesh Kumar, and his relatives were initially convicted under Sections 304‑B, 306 and 498‑A IPC, but the High Court acquitted all of them. On appeal, the Court held …

MURRAY AND CO.versusASHOK KR. NEWATIA AND ANR.

2000 INSC 243Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard a contempt petition filed by Murray & Co. against Ashok K.R. Newatia and others after the respondents filed an affidavit in a transfer petition falsely claiming that the petitioner had not sold or dealt with the disputed immovable property, contrary to the facts. The Court …

KAMAL KISHORE ETCversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2000 INSC 240Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the rape of a minor girl by Kamal Kishore, whose conviction was upheld by the Himachal Pradesh High Court but the sentence was reduced to three years under the proviso of Section 376 IPC, citing the offence's age and the accused's settled life as "adequate and special …

KULDEEP SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2000 INSC 241Dismissed

Kuldeep Singh, Mahendra Singh, Uttam Chand and Surjeet Kaur were charged with the murder of Sohan Singh. The prosecution alleged that Singh's objection to an illicit relationship between Kuldeep and Surjeet, and to her attempt to sell her share of the house, provided motive for a conspiracy to kill. …

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusSELVI J. JAYALALITHA

2000 INSC 249Disposed off

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed to the Supreme Court seeking to uphold criminal revision petitions filed in the Madras High Court against the trial of Selvi J. Jayalalitha. The accused, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw those revision petitions without prejudice to her right to …

GAURISHANKARPRASADversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2000 INSC 227Appeal(s) allowed

Gauri Shankar Prasad, a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, entered a complainant's clinic to enforce a court‑ordered removal of encroachments on government land, used abusive language and dragged the complainant out. The complainant filed a criminal complaint alleging offences under Sections 323, 504 and …

RAGHBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2000 INSC 223Dismissed

Raghbir Singh was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Arjun Singh after eyewitnesses Nasib Singh and Banarsi testified that the appellant shot the victim. The appellant challenged the conviction on three grounds: the alleged delay in filing the FIR, the alleged non‑presence of the …

JAMNALAL AND ORS.versusRADHESHYAM

2000 INSC 224Appeal(s) allowed

The landlords owned a property in Ujjain and let three rooms to the tenant at Rs.60 per month. The tenant defaulted on rent for March‑July 1976 and produced forged receipts; the landlords gave notice of termination for arrears and nuisance and sued for eviction under Section 12(1)(a) of the Madhya …

R.SARALAversusT.S.VELU

2000 INSC 216Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from the suicide of a young bride, Selvi, after which the police investigated and filed a charge‑sheet against her husband and his mother under Sections 304B and 498A IPC. Dissatisfied that the sister‑in‑law and her father were not named, the deceased's father approached the Madras …

STATE OF U.P.versusBABU RAM

2000 INSC 212Appeal(s) allowed

The State prosecuted Babu Ram for the murder of his parents and brother, relying on circumstantial evidence such as his own statements, recovery of spades and a blood‑stained cloth, and his pointing to the burial site. The trial court convicted him and imposed the death penalty, but the Allahabad …

CAMILO VAZversusSTATE OF GOA

2000 INSC 206Case Partly allowed

Camilo Vaz was part of a gang of seventeen accused tried for the murder of Sub‑Inspector Simon Fernandez and the attempted murder of his brothers during a violent clash between rival village groups. The Sessions Court convicted five, including Vaz, of murder under Section 302 read with Sections …

RAJENDER SINGH AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

2000 INSC 202Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Kameshwar Singh, where appellants Rajendra Singh and Triloki Singh were convicted under Sections 302/34, 307 and 324 of the IPC. The appellants challenged the conviction on five grounds: (1) the prosecution’s failure to explain a grievous injury sustained by …

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusNARAYAN K. PATODIA

2000 INSC 197Appeal(s) allowed

The West Bengal Sales Tax Bureau, after investigating alleged fraud by Narayan K. Patodia involving forged applications and tax evasion, forwarded a complaint to the police which resulted in the registration of an FIR under several IPC offences and sections of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act. The …

NARINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2000 INSC 198Dismissed

The appellants, Narinder Singh and Ravinder Singh alias Khanna, were charged with murdering Gurdev Singh, the Granthi of a village Gurudwara, after threatening him to relinquish his post. The Sessions Court acquitted them, holding that the prosecution failed to prove motive, that key witnesses were …

ASOKANversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADRAS

2000 INSC 190Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Porkodi, who was manually strangulated in her in-laws' house, and the related dowry death allegations. The trial court had acquitted Balasubramaniam (A-2) for lack of evidence of his participation, while convicting Rajammal (A-1) and Murugesan (A-3) for …

JASWANT SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2000 INSC 184Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Kulwant Singh and Bidhi Shankar by a group of nine accused who formed an armed unlawful assembly to avenge a prior killing. The trial court convicted all accused under Sections 302 and related provisions, but the High Court acquitted several of them, holding that …

HRIDAYA RANGAN PD. VERMA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2000 INSC 178Appeal(s) allowed

The three Verma brothers sold land to a cooperative society, received part payment, and later the society's cheques bounced. The society filed a criminal complaint alleging cheating and related offences, claiming the brothers concealed a pending partition suit. The brothers filed a petition under …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusKRISHNAPPA

2000 INSC 170Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka appealed against the Karnataka High Court's reduction of the sentence imposed on Krishnappa for raping an eight‑year‑old girl. The trial court had sentenced him to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine, but the High Court reduced the imprisonment term to four years, …

SURESH RAI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2000 INSC 171Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Suresh Rai, Pradeep Rai and Jitendra Prasad Rai were convicted for the murder of Shambhu Rai under IPC sections 302, 34, 109 and the Arms Act, and sentenced to life imprisonment. They appealed, contending that the three alleged eye‑witnesses were not present at the scene, that the …

NIRMAL SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2000 INSC 175Dismissed

The appellant, an army personnel, was convicted of murdering four persons and attempting to murder twelve others under IPC sections 302 and 307 and Arms Act sections 25 and 27. Prior to his arrest, a magistrate recorded statements of 27 witnesses under Section 299 of the Criminal Procedure Code …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusN.K. - THE ACCUSED

2000 INSC 172Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan appealed the acquittal of N.K., who had been convicted of rape under Section 376 IPC. The trial court had found the prosecutrix’s testimony reliable, corroborated by her father’s statement and medical evidence showing a ruptured hymen, and had accepted the five‑day delay in …

K. KARUNAKARANversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

2000 INSC 167Dismissed

During K. Karunakaran's tenure as Chief Minister, the Kerala State Supplies Corporation entered into a contract for importing palmolein, which was later alleged to be corrupt. A petition under Article 226 seeking registration of a criminal case was dismissed by the High Court, and a subsequent FIR …

NAR SINGH PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2000 INSC 169Appeal(s) allowed

Nar Singh Pal, a casual labourer who had acquired temporary status in the Telecom Department, was terminated in May 1992 on the basis of alleged assault and pending criminal charges under the IPC. The termination was effected by paying retrenchment compensation without a regular departmental …

SURENDRA CHAUHANversusSTATE OF M.P

2000 INSC 150Case Partly allowed

Surendra Chauhan, who had an illicit relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman named Alpana, took her to the clinic of Dr. Ravindra Sharma, an unqualified electro‑homeopathic practitioner, for an abortion. Alpana died during the procedure, and Chauhan later confessed to her mother that he had arranged …

HASAN KHAN IBNE HAIDER KHANversusR.H. MENDNOCA AND ORS.

2000 INSC 139Dismissed

The appellant, Hasan Khan, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slum‑lords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 on the ground that he was a notorious goonda who extorted money, threatened and assaulted residents, thereby …

ARIVAZHAGANversusSTATE, REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2000 INSC 128Disposed off

Arivazhagan was charged under Section 13(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Section 109 of the IPC. He filed a defence list of 267 witnesses. The Special Judge examined the list and, on the ground of avoiding delay, allowed only a few witnesses from each division. The Madras …

KULWANT SINGHversusAMARJIT SINGH AND TWO ORS. ETC.

2000 INSC 125Case Partly allowed

An incident on 23 September 1989 outside a Munsif court led to cross‑fire between two rival groups, resulting in one death and several injuries. The trial court convicted Amarjit Singh under IPC 307 and the Arms Act, sentencing him to five years rigorous imprisonment and a fine, while Jagsir Singh …

G.V. RAOversusL.H.V. PRASAD AND ORS.

2000 INSC 122Dismissed

The petitioner, a forward‑community scientist, married respondent No.4 after being told she belonged to a forward caste, later discovering she was from a Scheduled Tribe. He filed a criminal complaint under IPC sections 415, 419, 420 read with 34, alleging cheating due to the caste …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusLALJIT RAJSHI SHAH AND ORS.

2000 INSC 108Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a Bombay High Court decision that held the chairman and managing committee members of a cooperative society were not "public servants" for purposes of Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA). The respondents had …

MIS. MEDCHL CHEMICALS AND PHARMA PVT. LTD.versusM/S. BIOLOGICAL E. LTD. AND ORS.

2000 INSC 103Appeal(s) allowed

Medchl Chemicals & Pharma Ltd. entered into a supply agreement with Biological E. Ltd. for raw materials. The respondents allegedly failed to supply as promised, causing a loss of about one crore rupees to the petitioner, and the petitioner filed a criminal complaint under IPC sections 120B, 415, …

MASUMSHA HASANASHA MUSALMANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2000 INSC 99Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused of stabbing the deceased, a Scheduled Caste member, with a dagger, resulting in death. The trial court convicted him of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC and under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The High …

KALLIKATT KUNHUversusSTATE OF KERALA

2000 INSC 100Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing the deceased with a dagger. The prosecution's case relied on eyewitness testimony that the appellant drew a dagger and inflicted fatal injuries, while the defence argued that the dagger was found enclosed in a sheath and bore …

STATE OF U.P.versusASHOK DIXIT AND ANR.

2000 INSC 76Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the Allahabad High Court's acquittal of Ashok Dixit and Chaman Lal, who had been convicted by a Sessions Court for murder (IPC s.302), attempt to murder (IPC s.307) and illegal possession of arms (Arms Act s.25). The prosecution relied on eyewitnesses, a child …

MAHMOOD AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

2000 INSC 79Appeal(s) allowed

A dacoity and murder occurred on 9 June 1985 in the house of informant Bhupendra Mohan Singh. Nine persons were charged under IPC Sections 396 and 412; the trial court convicted five and acquitted four, a decision upheld by the High Court. Three of the convicted—Mahmood, Mokid Alam and Post Card …

MICHAL MACHADO AND ANR.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR.

2000 INSC 66Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a Metropolitan Magistrate could, at a very advanced stage of trial, implead two bank officials as additional accused under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The trial had already examined 49 witnesses, and only the statements of three subsequent witnesses …

RANADHIR BASUversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2000 INSC 52Case Partly allowed

Randhir Basu and a co‑accused were convicted of murdering the mother, father and grandparents of a girl named Sudipa. Sudipa, after being granted pardon, was examined as an approver before a magistrate in chambers, without the accused present for cross‑examination. The appellant challenged the …

STATE OF HLMACHAL PRADESHversusSURINDER MOHAN AND ORS.

2000 INSC 53

The State prosecuted Surinder Mohan and others for murder and related offences. An accomplice, Sandeep Kumar, was granted pardon by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and his statement was recorded before the case was committed to the Sessions Court, but the accused were not cross‑examined at that stage. …

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusMOHINDER SINGH

2000 INSC 55Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana issued circulars under Section 432 of the Criminal Procedure Code granting remission of sentence to prisoners confined in jail and those on parole or furlough on a specified date, expressly excluding persons convicted of rape or dowry death. Five respondents were on bail and …

G. SAGAR SURI AND. ANRversusSTATE OF C.P. AND ORS.

2000 INSC 34Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, G. Sagar Suri and Shama Suri, were accused of obtaining a loan of Rs. 50 lakh from a finance company and issuing cheques that later bounced. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed, and concurrently a First Information Report under Sections 406 and …

GANGULA ASHOK AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2000 INSC 37Disposed off

The appellants, a lawyer and his wife who was a hostel matron, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly outraging a hostel resident's modesty and for attempting to suppress the complaint. The police filed the charge‑sheet directly …

RAMESHW ARI DEVIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2000 INSC 31Dismissed

The case concerned the entitlement to family pension and death‑cum‑retirement gratuity of a deceased government employee who had two wives. The first wife, Rameshwari Devi, claimed the benefits for herself and her son, while the second wife, Yogmaya Devi, claimed benefits for herself and her four …

AMBIKA PRASAD AND ANR.versusSTATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION, DELHI)

2000 INSC 27Dismissed

The case arose from a land dispute in which the appellants, armed with deadly weapons, allegedly attacked the complainant party, resulting in the death of Virender Singh and injuries to several witnesses. The trial court convicted the appellants under Sections 302/34, 341/34 and 307/34 of the IPC …

S.N. DUBE ETC.versusN.B. BHOIR

2000 INSC 17Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Suresh Dube and the subsequent terrorist‑related conspiracy involving gangs of Bhai Thakur and Manik Patil. The trial court had excluded confessions recorded under Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) on the ground of …

SATNAM SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1999 INSC 569Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a truck driver, was originally convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly crushing the deceased with his truck. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the reliability of three eye‑witness statements, noting material omissions and the three‑day delay in recording them under …

MOHD. ANWARversusSTATE OF DELHI

1999 INSC 571Case Partly allowed

The case concerns the murder of informer Khalil during a police chase of three boys, where appellants Mohd. Anwar and Tasleem were convicted under Sections 302, 307, 34 of the IPC and Section 5 of the TADA Act. The prosecution relied on eyewitness testimony, seizure of Anwar's .32 bore revolver and …

KISHORIversusSTATE (NCT) OF DELHI

1999 INSC 572

The appellant Kishori was convicted for the murder of three Sikh brothers during the 1984 anti‑Sikh riots, based on eye‑witness testimony that identified him as a member of the unlawful assembly who used a knife to kill the victims. The High Court upheld the conviction and imposed the death penalty, …

MANOHAR LAL @ MUNNA AND ANR.versusTHE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

1999 INSC 573Case Partly allowed

During the 1984 anti‑Sikh riots in Delhi, four Sikh brothers were dragged from their home, doused with petrol and set ablaze in front of their mother, Harbai. The accused, Jaggu and Mannu, were convicted under IPC sections 302, 396 and 149 and sentenced to death by the trial court, a decision …

KESHAB NARAYAN BANERJEE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

1999 INSC 565Dismissed

The appellants were tried before the Special Judge (Vigilance), Patna, for alleged fraud in obtaining a Rs. 2 crore compensation under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950. They contended that the offences were committed in respect of a document produced before the Compensation Officer and that, under …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusARUN KUMAR AGARWAL AND ORS.

1999 INSC 555Case Partly allowed

Arun Kumar Agarwal and others filed a writ petition in the Karnataka High Court seeking the cancellation of a 1,000 MW thermal power project at Mangalore and the registration of a FIR for alleged corruption. The High Court, without detailed analysis, directed the CBI to investigate based on thirteen …

V. VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF KERALA

1999 INSC 550Appeal(s) allowed

The State alleged that a watchman was murdered after a quarrel with accused No.1 and that five accused conspired to kill and hang him. The trial court convicted them under IPC sections 302, 34, 201 and 120‑B based solely on circumstantial evidence, including alleged presence of blood in the guard …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSURESH

1999 INSC 551Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra charged Suresh with the rape and murder of a four‑year‑old girl, Sneha, alleging that he abducted her, sexually assaulted her and concealed her body in a farm. The trial court convicted him on the basis of circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who saw the accused …

C.K. RAVEENDRANversusSTATE OF KERALA

1999 INSC 542Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, C.K. Raveendran, was married to Yashoda who later went missing and her body was discovered in a ravine. The prosecution alleged that Raveendran killed her, relying on circumstantial evidence such as sightings of the couple together in a jeep, the recovery of Yashoda’s wrist‑watch from …

RAMAN BHAI NARAN BHAL PATEL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1999 INSC 534Dismissed

The appellants (Accused Nos. 1‑4 and 6) were convicted for murder, attempted murder and related offences after a group assault on a printing press and the deceased’s residence, resulting in the death of Ramanbhai Mohanbhai. The prosecution relied on a dying declaration, medical evidence, and …

PADAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

1999 INSC 535Appeal(s) allowed

Padam Singh was convicted by a Sessions Court and upheld by a two‑judge High Court bench for murder and related offences under Sections 302, 307, 148, 452, 324 and 149 of the IPC, based largely on the testimony of four eyewitnesses who were hostile to the accused. The prosecution failed to explain …

MUJEEB AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1999 INSC 532Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Mujeeb, Johnson and Akbar were accused of hiring the taxi of driver Balan, intoxicating him with a soft drink allegedly mixed with sleeping tablets, strangling him, and disposing of his body, followed by tampering with the vehicle's registration. The prosecution relied solely on …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusTARA DUTT AND ANR.

1999 INSC 526Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Himachal Pradesh charged Tara Dutt and others under IPC sections 468, 420, 120‑B and the Prevention of Corruption Act for forging receipts in 1983. The charge‑sheet was filed in 1987 and cognizance was taken the same year. The Special Judge acquitted them of the charged offences but …

RAJESH GOVIND JAGESHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1999 INSC 508Disposed off

The accused were convicted for the murder of Joy Kutty under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. The Supreme Court examined whether the identification parade of Accused No.2 (Rajesh Govind Jagesha) was conducted properly, noting an unexplained delay and a change in his appearance that rendered the …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusLEKH RAJ AND ANR.

1999 INSC 509Case Partly allowed

The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Lekh Raj and Diwan Chand for the alleged rape of a 55‑year‑old widow. The prosecution relied on the victim's testimony, her injuries, and forensic evidence of blood and semen on her torn salwar. The High Court had set aside the conviction on …

STATE OF U.P.versusUDAI NARAYAN AND ANR.

1999 INSC 504Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Udai Narain, an Additional Collector of Customs, and Reshamwala, a private individual, for allegedly receiving Rs.2 lakh in a corrupt transaction at Lucknow airport. They were charged under Sections 8, 10, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusKESHAV RAMCHANDRA PANGARE AND ANR.

1999 INSC 505Appeal(s) allowed

Respondent K.R. Pangare, a retired Deputy Engineer of the Maharashtra Public Works Department, was charged in 1990 with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act. Although sanction for prosecution was obtained in August 1989, he challenged the criminal …

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusCHANDRIKA

1999 INSC 502Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent Chandrika and two others were charged with murder under IPC sections 302, 307 and 34. The Sessions Court convicted Chandrika under section 304 and sentenced him to eight years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, Chandrika did not contest the conviction but sought a plea bargain on the …

M.S. AHLAWATversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

1999 INSC 493Appeal(s) allowed

M.S. Ahlawat, a police officer, filed forged affidavits and made false statements before the Supreme Court, which subsequently convicted him under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code (perjury) and Article 129 of the Constitution (contempt) by way of a show‑cause notice. Ahlawat challenged the …

MOLAI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1999 INSC 486Dismissed

Molai, a jail guard, and Santosh, a prisoner, were convicted of raping, strangling and murdering Naveen, the 16‑year‑old daughter of an assistant jailor, and disposing of her body in a septic tank. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, forensic findings of human blood on a knife, and …

BALBIRversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

1999 INSC 487Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Balbir was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC based on a private complaint, while a separate police‑filed case led to the acquittal of another accused, Guria, for the same killing. Both cases were tried before the same Sessions Judge but were not consolidated, and the appellant …

RISHI NANDAN PANDIT AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1999 INSC 484Appeal(s) allowed

Twelve accused were convicted under Sections 394 and 395 of the IPC for a dacoity and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. Their appeal before the Patna High Court was heard by a single judge after the appellants' counsel failed to appear, and the appeal was dismissed on merits, confirming …

DWARIKA PRASAD SATPATHYversusBIDYUT PRAVA DIXIT AND ANR.

1999 INSC 481Dismissed

The husband, D.P. Satpathy, claimed that his marriage to B.P. Dixit was performed under duress and therefore invalid, and also denied paternity of the child born shortly after the ceremony. The wife filed an application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code for maintenance for herself and …

SHEELAM RAMESH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1999 INSC 471Dismissed

The appellants, members of the Peoples War Group, were convicted for firing at two ex‑members of the group at a hair‑cutting salon, resulting in the death of one victim. The trial court relied on the testimony of four eye‑witnesses who identified the accused under street‑light and shop‑light …

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ETC.versusV.K. SEHGAL AND ANR.

1999 INSC 468Appeal(s) allowed

The CBI and the State of Haryana prosecuted V.K. Seghal, a public servant, under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 for receiving a bribe. The Special Judge convicted him and sentenced him to two years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. Seghal appealed to the …

LEELA RAM (D) THROUGH DULI CHANDversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

1999 INSC 461Appeal(s) allowed

The accused Om Prakash was charged under Section 302 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for shooting Maman Ram during a village dispute. The trial court convicted him based on eye‑witness testimony, ballistic evidence and the post‑mortem report, sentencing him to life imprisonment. The Punjab & …

SATVINDER KAURversusSTATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) AND ANR.

1999 INSC 455Appeal(s) allowed

Satvinder Kaur filed a complaint alleging dowry harassment and torture by her husband Rajinder Singh and his parents in Patiala. An FIR under IPC sections 406 and 498A was later lodged in Delhi. The husband sought quashing of the FIR on the ground that the Delhi police officer lacked territorial …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusK. YARAPPA REDDY

1999 INSC 456Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka prosecuted K. Y. Reddy under Section 302 IPC for murdering his lover Rekha with a chopper inside the house of a family friend (PW‑11). The trial court convicted Reddy based primarily on the eye‑witness testimony of PW‑11, who saw the accused stab the victim, and on forensic …

SUKHARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1999 INSC 451Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sukhar, was convicted under Section 307 IPC for allegedly shooting his uncle Nakkal, who later died. The prosecution relied on the FIR, the victim's statements, and the testimony of PW2, who claimed the victim identified Sukhar as the shooter after PW2 arrived at the scene. The …

KOLI CHUNILAL SAVJI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1999 INSC 445Dismissed

The husband and mother‑in‑law of Dhanuben were alleged to have set fire to her and her son, resulting in their deaths. Two dying declarations were recorded – one by a police officer and another by an Executive Magistrate – but the trial court excluded them and acquitted the accused of murder while …

JAI KARANversusSTATE OF (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

1999 INSC 443Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Jai Karan, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly burning his wife, Wanti Devi, based solely on her dying declaration recorded by a doctor in a hospital. The trial and High Courts held the declaration reliable, but the Supreme Court examined the circumstances surrounding …

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusRAJENDRAN

1999 INSC 435Appeal(s) allowed

The accused Rajendran, a jobless alcoholic, was alleged to have strangled his wife and set fire to their hut, resulting in the deaths of his wife and two daughters. The trial court, relying on a series of corroborative circumstantial facts – including repeated quarrels, the accused’s presence in the …

RAMMI @ RAMESHWAR ETC.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1999 INSC 428Dismissed

The appellants, Rammi alias Rameshwar and Bhura alias Sajjan Kumar, were charged with murder of Sardar Singh Thakur inside a moving bus, allegedly as revenge for a prior killing. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the bus driver, the conductor, and a passenger, as well as weapons recovered …

STATE OF U.P.versusDHARMENDRA SINGH AND ANR. ETC.

1999 INSC 431Appeal(s) allowed

The State of U.P. prosecuted Dharmendra Singh and Narendra for the pre‑meditated murder of five members of a complainant’s family, including children and an elderly man, after a personal grievance and an attempted molestation. The trial court convicted them under Section 302 IPC and sentenced them …

TRISUNS CHEMICAL INDUSTRYversusRAJESH AGARWAL AND ORS.

1999 INSC 423Appeal(s) allowed

The Chairman of Trisuns Chemical Industry filed a complaint before a Judicial Magistrate of First Class in Gujarat alleging that the respondents, directors of a company in Madhya Pradesh, cheated them by supplying inferior toasted soybean extracts after taking advance payment. The magistrate …

GURDEEP SINGH @ DEEPversusTHE STATE (DELHI ADMN.)

1999 INSC 424Dismissed

Gurdeep Singh was convicted under Sections 302, 324 IPC, the Explosive Substances Act and the Indian Explosive Act for a bomb blast that killed three persons. The sole basis of the prosecution was his confessional statement recorded under Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities …

RAMESH S/O LAXMAN GAVLIversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.

1999 INSC 416Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Kanhaiyalal, a member of a rival Gawli faction, for which Ramesh (senior) and others were convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34. The prosecution relied on eye‑witnesses PW1, PW2 and PW4, whose testimonies were corroborated by a doctor’s post‑mortem report. The …

STATE THROUGH CBI, DELHIversusGIAN SINGH

1999 INSC 396Disposed off

After the signing of an accord between the Prime Minister and Sikh leader Sant Harchand Singh Longowal, an extremist group conspired to assassinate the Sant. Gian Singh and co‑assailants opened fire on the Sant during a public meeting on 20 August 1985, causing his death. They were overpowered, …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusJAI LAL AND ORS.

1999 INSC 393Dismissed

The State of Himachal Pradesh alleged that accused growers and officials conspired to inflate the quantity of scab‑affected apples procured for destruction, thereby cheating the government. The prosecution’s case rested entirely on the testimony of the District Horticulture Officer, who was …

PAPARAMBAKA ROSAMMA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1999 INSC 391Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 302, 302/114 and 498-A of the IPC solely on the basis of the deceased's dying declaration. The Supreme Court examined whether the dying declaration was reliable, focusing on the requirement that the declarant be conscious and in a fit state of mind, which …

RAMASHISH YADAV AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1999 INSC 387Dismissed

The case arose from a land dispute in which thirteen accused, some armed with guns, gandasa, knives and lathis, attacked members of the complainant's party, resulting in two deaths and several injuries. The trial court convicted all accused under sections 302 and 149 IPC, sentencing them to life …

STATE OF PUNJABversusGURDEEP SINGH

1999 INSC 383Dismissed

The State of Punjab charged Gurdeep Singh with the rape and murder of a ten‑year‑old girl. The prosecution’s case rested on an extra‑judicial confession made by the accused to a taxi driver (PW‑7) after a delay of about 24 days, and on the testimony of an uncle (RS) who claimed to have seen the …

RAM SARAN MAHTO AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

1999 INSC 384Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Asha Kumari was found dead in a well at her marital home and was hurriedly cremated by her husband and relatives. The appellants, including Ram Saran Mahto, were charged under Sections 302, 34, 201, 342 and 379 IPC. While the trial court acquitted them of murder, it convicted them under …

USHA AHUJAversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1999 INSC 351Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a partner in a firm, filed a criminal complaint alleging offences under Sections 405, 406 and 408 IPC against two former partners. A civil suit for dissolution of the partnership and accounts was simultaneously pending. The respondents moved the Punjab & Haryana High Court under …

KISHAN LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1999 INSC 337Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Smt. Sulochana was allegedly burnt and later died; she gave an oral dying declaration on 6 November naming the appellant and his family, and a later statement before a magistrate on 11 November that did not name any accused. The police investigation found no sustainable evidence, …

DANDU LAKSHMI REDDYversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1999 INSC 338Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Dandu Lakshmi Reddy and his mother were convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC based solely on two dying declarations of the deceased, which contained a material discrepancy regarding the circumstances of the fire. The Supreme Court examined the reliability of dying …

STATE OF ORISSAversusARJUN DAS AGRAWAL AND ANR.

1999 INSC 329Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa appealed the acquittal of Manmohan Das (Manu Bangali) and Arjun Das Agrawal for the murder of Bhagirathi Panda. The trial court had convicted several accused under Sections 302/149 IPC, but the High Court acquitted Manmohan Das and Arjun Das, holding that the prosecution evidence …

P. NALLAMMALversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

1999 INSC 314Dismissed

The case arose from prosecutions of former Tamil Nadu ministers under Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possessing assets disproportionate to their known lawful income. Their relatives were also charged as co‑accused under Section 109 of the IPC, alleging they had …

ZUNJARRAO BHIKAJI NAGARKARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1999 INSC 311Appeal(s) allowed

Zunjarrao Bhikaji Nagarkar, then Collector of Central Excise, ordered confiscation of excisable goods and confirmed duty against Mis. Hari Vishnu Packaging Ltd. but did not impose a penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules. The Central Board of Excise directed him to appeal to the …

COMMON CAUSE, A REGISTERED SOCIETYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1999 INSC 299Case Allowed

The Supreme Court reviewed a petition challenging its earlier orders that directed the Minister of State for Petroleum, Capt. Satish Sharma, to pay Rs.50 lakh as exemplary damages to the Government and to undergo CBI investigation for alleged criminal breach of trust. The Court held that the earlier …

ARUN SHANKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1999 INSC 287Appeal(s) allowed

The accused were convicted of murder and related offences by a Sessions Court, which then scheduled a hearing on sentence. The accused failed to appear, leading the trial court to issue non‑bailable warrants. Instead of filing a statutory appeal, the accused filed a petition under Section 482 of the …

RAJATHIversusC. GANESAN

1999 INSC 286Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant wife filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking maintenance, alleging that her husband, who had sufficient means, had neglected and refused to maintain her and was living with another woman. The husband contended that the wife could not prove a second …

STATE OF KERALAversusV. PADMANABHAN NAIR

1999 INSC 273Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former Executive Engineer of the Kerala Public Works Department, was charged with defrauding the government by misappropriating steel rods, involving offences under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and IPC Sections 406, 409, 201, 109 and 120‑B. After his …

KANTI BHADRA SHAH AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

1999 INSC 268Dismissed

A charge sheet under IPC sections 454, 380 and 120B was filed against the appellants before a Metropolitan Magistrate who, after hearing them, framed charges and dismissed their petition for discharge. The appellants approached the Calcutta High Court seeking quash of the charge; the High Court set …

AMANULLA KHAN KUDEATALLA KHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

1999 INSC 267Dismissed

The appellant, Amanulla Khan, a member of a notorious gang, was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person" after allegedly extorting money by threatening death and assaulting victims on three separate occasions. He challenged the detention, …

ARUN VYAS AND ANR.versusANITA VYAS

1999 INSC 260Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a magistrate could discharge accused persons after taking cognizance of offences under Sections 406 and 498‑A IPC when the complaint was filed beyond the statutory limitation period. The magistrate correctly discharged the accused on the Section 406 charge because …

SRI MAHENDRA NATH DAS @ SRI GOBIND DASversusSTATE OF ASSAM

1999 INSC 261Dismissed

The appellant, M.N. Das, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the brutal murder of Hara Kanta Das, in which he struck the victim with a sword, amputated his hand and severed his head, and then carried the head to a police outpost. The Sessions Court sentenced him to death, a decision affirmed by …

MARY ANGEL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1999 INSC 251Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by accused A3‑A6 challenging a Madras High Court order that imposed Rs 10,000 costs on each of them for filing a frivolous revision under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). The High Court had imposed the costs to deter abuse of process after the …