Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 17001–17200

V. SUJATHA ETC. ETC.versusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 397Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined three sets of appeals arising from a bus‑driver case, a food‑exporter case, and several petitions seeking expunction of adverse judicial remarks. In the bus‑driver appeal, the Court held that the High Court had erred in overturning the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s acquittal …

INDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1994 INSC 392Disposed off

The petitioner, Inder Singh, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking the release of seven of his relatives who were allegedly abducted by a senior police officer, Baldev Singh, D.S.P., and six other policemen in October 1991. The victims remain untraced; a FIR was …

VIJAY @ GYANCHAND JAINversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1994 INSC 350Dismissed

The appellant, Gyanchand Jain, was convicted under Sections 302 and 309 of the IPC for murdering his wife and attempting suicide. The prosecution relied on a handwritten letter found at the scene, which detailed his intention to kill his wife and then end his own life, and on a hand‑writing expert’s …

AMRUTLAL SOMESHWAR JOSHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1994 INSC 346Dismissed

Amrutlal Someshwar Joshi was convicted of murdering three persons, including a three‑year‑old child, during a robbery and was sentenced to death under IPC 302. He appealed, arguing that he was only 17 years old at the time of the offence and that age should be a mitigating factor, citing Hamam and …

KUM NARAYANAMMAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS .

1994 INSC 341Appeal(s) allowed

The victim, a 14‑year‑old illiterate agricultural labourer, was gang‑raped by three accused. The trial court convicted them under IPC sections 376 and 114, but the Karnataka High Court acquitted them, holding that the victim's testimony was unreliable as it lacked medical corroboration. On appeal, …

RAGHBIR SINGHversusSURJIT SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 336Dismissed

Raghbir Singh, convicted under IPC sections 326 and 149 and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment, was released in November 1988 and subsequently contested the Punjab Vidhan Sabha election in February 1992. The respondent filed an election petition alleging that Singh was disqualified …

TARSEEM KUMARversusTHE DELHI ADMINISTRATION

1994 INSC 332

The appellant, Tarseem Kumar, was charged under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Gulshan Rai. The prosecution's case relied entirely on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant's alleged exclusive possession of rooms where the body was found, blood‑stained clothes recovered after his …

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusBABUL NATH

1994 INSC 315

The State of Uttar Pradesh charged Babul Nath with rape of a five‑year‑old girl. The trial court convicted him based on an eye‑witness who saw the victim bleeding and the accused fleeing, and on a medical report showing a torn hymen, lacerations and other injuries indicating sexual intercourse. The …

AMRUTLAL SOMESHWAR JOSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1994 INSC 310

Amrutlal Someshwar Joshi, a domestic servant, was convicted of murdering three members of his employer's family and an infant in their Bombay flat and stealing valuables. The prosecution relied on a series of circumstantial facts, including eyewitness testimony that Joshi was present in the flat …

SMT. PRAMILA NESARGIversusC.K. JAFFER SHARIEF AND ORS.

1994 INSC 305Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Lok Sabha election of C.K. Jaffer Sharief from Bangalore North, alleging that the candidate engaged in corrupt practices by arranging large‑scale free mass feedings of electors, exceeding election‑expenditure limits, and using spurious ballot papers. The …

SMT. LAXMI DEVIversusSATYA NARAYAN AND ORS.

1994 INSC 307

The appellant, Laxmi Devi, alleged that her husband, Satya Narayan, had contracted a second marriage, constituting an offence under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court held that the prosecution failed to prove the essential Hindu marriage rite of Saptapadi, which is required to …

ANLL KUMAR MAHSIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 271Dismissed

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Mahsi, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 as being discriminatory against husbands and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. He sought dissolution of his marriage on the ground of his wife's desertion and …

MOHMED SALEEMLIAS CHUHO MOHMED SHAKOORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 270Disposed off

The appellant, Mohammed Saleem, was tried for assault with a knife that caused injuries to the complainant, and was charged under IPC Section 324, TADA Section 3(1), and the Bombay Police Act Section 135(1). The trial court acquitted him of the Bombay Police Act charge, but convicted him under IPC …

ARJUN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1994 INSC 257

The case involved four appellants (Arjun, Rampal, Bhagwan Singh and Mukhoram) convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for the killing of Jyoti Ram. The prosecution relied on five eye‑witnesses, who were relatives or associates of the deceased, to identify the appellants as the assailants. The four …

SURESH CHANDRA BAHRI ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1994 INSC 246Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Urshia Bahri and her two children, for which Suresh Chandra Bahri, Gurbachan Singh and Raj Pal Sharma were convicted under Sections 302, 120B and 201 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on the testimony of an approver, Ram Sagar Vishwakarma, whose statement …

SH. MANI RAM AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF UITAR PRADESH

1994 INSC 211Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted of murder and related offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code based solely on the testimony of the deceased's brother, an interested witness. The brother claimed the accused fired at the victim from behind while he was running, but the …

KRISHAN YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 207Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana Subordinate Selection Board conducted a written test and interview for 96 Taxation Inspector posts in 1988‑89, but the process was riddled with fabricated interview sheets, fake roll numbers, forgery, ministerial interference and the destruction of original records. Unsuccessful …

SUKHVINDER SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1994 INSC 208Case Partly allowed

The case arose from the abduction and murder of a child, Varun Kumar, for which five persons were convicted under Sections 302, 149, 120B of the IPC, Section 3 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and related provisions. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the …

MINAKSHI BALA SUDHIR KUMAR AND ORS.versusSUDHIR KUMAR AND ORS.

1994 INSC 201

The appellant filed an FIR alleging offences under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC against her husband, his parents and other relatives. The police investigated, filed a charge sheet and the magistrate took cognizance, framed charges under Sections 239 and 240 of the CrPC and fixed a date for recording …

P. RATHINAM/NABHUSAN PATNAIKversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 171

The Supreme Court considered two writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalises attempted suicide. The petitioners argued that the provision violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. After reviewing earlier High Court …

ANSHAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1994 INSC 168

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of five accused (Al, A2, A3, A4, A5) for the murders of Savitri Devi and her grandson Sunil and related robbery. The Sessions Court had sentenced them to life imprisonment, but the Karnataka High Court enhanced the sentences of Al, A2 and A3 to death. The …

L/NK. MEHARAJ SINGH/KALUversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1994 INSC 163

The case concerned the murder of Laxman Singh on 3 November 1977, for which Kalu, Meharaj Singh and others were charged under Section 302 IPC. The trial court acquitted all accused, finding the First Information Report (FIR) to be ante‑timed and the eyewitness testimony unreliable, especially in …

JASHUBA BHARATSINH GOHIL AND ORS .versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 153Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the murder‑conspiracy case of 20 September 1984 in which twelve persons were tried for offences including murder, unlawful assembly and illegal possession of arms. The trial court convicted all accused and sentenced them to life imprisonment; the Gujarat High Court upheld …

MEESALA RAMAKRISHANversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1994 INSC 155Dismissed

Meesala Ramakrishnan was convicted of murdering his wife by setting her on fire. The principal evidence was the victim's dying declaration, which she could not speak and therefore communicated through nods and gestures recorded by a magistrate. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether such a …

SHANKAR @ GAURL SHANKAR AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1994 INSC 140Dismissed

The appellants, a gang led by A‑1 (Shankar @ Gauri Shankar) and his associates A‑2 to A‑6, were convicted of six murders committed in a brutal, organised manner involving a brothel and illicit arrack business. The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of an approver (P.W.1) and the retracted …

BALWANT SINGH AND ANR. ETC. ETCversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1994 INSC 124Disposed off

Balwant Singh, his brother Mahabir Singh, Lal Singh and Abhey Singh were convicted for murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC. The High Court acquitted Mahabir and Lal Singh, but upheld the convictions of Balwant and Abhey. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the credibility of eye‑witnesses Raj …

MARWADI KISHOR PARMANANDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 115Dismissed

The appellants, Marwadi Kishor Parmanand and Marwadi Mangal Dhulji, were charged with murder of Punaram and Sohanlal under IPC sections 302 and 34. The trial court acquitted them, finding the sole eye‑witness, Ranchhodbhai (PW‑1), unreliable. The Gujarat High Court reversed the acquittal, holding …

STATE OF U.P.versusMATA BHIKH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 110Appeal(s) allowed

The State of U.P. appealed against a High Court order that set aside the conviction of respondents for violating a Section 145 order because the complaint was filed by a successor magistrate rather than the magistrate who originally issued the order. The Supreme Court examined the meaning of "public …

ARJUN MARIK AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1994 INSC 100Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Arjun Marik, Mulo Marik and Bansi Marik were convicted of murdering Sitaram, his wife and granddaughter and of robbery, and sentenced to death under IPC sections 302, 394 and 411. The Supreme Court re‑examined the circumstantial evidence, finding no reliable motive, inconsistencies in …

RAMPAL PITHWAS RAHIDASS AND ORS.versus'STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.

1994 INSC 95Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a dacoity‑cummurder on a highway in July 1984 for which eight persons were convicted, largely on the testimony of an approver, Ramcharan, who had been arrested under suspicious circumstances and later granted pardon. The Supreme Court examined the legality of his arrest, the …

STATE OF PUNJAB .versusBALBIR SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 96Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a series of cases where the State of Punjab alleged that arrests, searches and seizures under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) were illegal because police officers failed to comply with certain statutory provisions. The Court held that …

RAMSINH BAVAJI JADEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 97Dismissed

The appellant was acquitted by the trial court of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) but was convicted on appeal by the Gujarat High Court. The conviction rested on the statement of the deceased's brother (PW6) recorded by the investigating officer after a telephonic message about the incident was received. The …

S.P. VAITHIANATHANversusK. SHANMUGANATHAN

1994 INSC 99Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an arrack shop in‑charge, complained to senior police officials that the Additional Superintendent of Police, K. Shanmuganan, was colluding with illicit distillers. The respondent summoned the appellant, beat him and later tortured him. The appellant filed a criminal complaint under …

RAJA RAM AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1994 INSC 86

Ten persons, including eight appellants, were tried for murder (Sec. 302 read with Sec. 149 IPC) and other offences arising from an assault on the deceased Halke. The High Court convicted them of murder and sentenced them to life imprisonment, along with convictions under Sec. 323 and Sec. 325 IPC …

LAXMAN NAIKversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1994 INSC 88Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Laxman Naik, who was convicted of raping and murdering his 7‑year‑old niece. The prosecution case was built entirely on circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who saw the accused and victim together, the accused’s false statements about the victim’s …

BALWANT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

1994 INSC 81Appeal(s) allowed

Balwant Singh, a police constable, fired his service rifle during a clash with villagers who were assaulting police officers. He fired two shots in the air to scare the assailants, but two by‑standers (Karnail Singh and Pahalwan Ram) were struck and died. The trial court acquitted him, the High …

BHERU SINGH S/0 KALYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1994 INSC 44Dismissed

Bheru Singh was convicted of murdering his wife and five children. He lodged a first information report (FIR) admitting motive and describing the killings, and later gave a judicial confession under Section 164 Cr.P.C., which he later retracted. The Supreme Court examined whether the FIR could be …

SANTOSH DE AND ANOTHERversusARCHNA GUHA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 43Dismissed

The complainant, Archna Guha, filed a private complaint in 1977 alleging torture by five police officers in 1974. Two of the accused, Santosh De and Ranjit Guha Niyogi, sought discharge under Section 245(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing that the prosecution had failed to produce all …

ESHWARAIAH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1994 INSC 32Dismissed

The deceased Ramesh was found dead in his house on the night of 14-15 December 1982 with injuries indicating asphyxia. Two accused, Eshwaraiah (a constable) and Mayamma (the deceased's mistress), entered the house after a cinema show and were later discovered hiding under a cot when the door was …

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSH. B.R. BAJAJ AND ORS.

1994 INSC 12

The Union of India and the Delhi Special Police Establishment appealed against a Punjab & Haryana High Court order that quashed an FIR registered under sections 120‑B, 418, 468 IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act against Shri B.R. Bajaj, the Finance Secretary of Chandigarh, and several …

DHANANJOY CHATIERJEE @ DHANAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

1994 INSC 6

The appellant, a security guard, was transferred after complaints of teasing a young girl living in an apartment. Ignoring the transfer, he went to the girl’s flat under the pretext of making a telephone call, raped and murdered her, and stole her wrist‑watch. The prosecution relied on a chain of …

AMRIK SINGH, SATNAM SINGH AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

1993 INSC 397Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by Amrik Singh, Satnam Singh and Mohar Singh against convictions for murder and attempted murder arising from a 1976 shooting that killed Satveer and Lal Chand and injured others. The sole surviving eye‑witness, Trilok Kumar, who was critically injured, identified …

BRIJ MOHAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1993 INSC 393Dismissed

The case involved an armed robbery and dacoity at night in a village where four persons were killed. Six accused were arrested after an encounter and, within 24 hours, a test identification was conducted before a Judicial Magistrate, resulting in eleven eyewitnesses positively identifying the …

BHALINDER SINGH @ RAJUversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1993 INSC 394Appeal(s) allowed

Bhalinder Singh was convicted of murder, kidnapping and abetment of suicide based solely on circumstantial evidence, including a claim that he was last seen with the deceased, the recovery of the victim's shoes, an extra‑judicial confession to the village sarpanch, and a false explanation to the …

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.versusMANOJ KUMAR AND ANR.

1993 INSC 356

The State of Haryana prosecuted Manoj Kumar for the death of Chetan, alleging that Kumar repeatedly pursued the brothers on a motorcycle and deliberately ran Chetan over with his car, causing fatal injuries. The sole eye‑witness, Rohan, the victim’s brother, testified to the entire sequence of …

NATHU RAMversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1993 INSC 343Dismissed

The appellant, Nathu Ram, was accused along with a private doctor of attempting to rape the daughter‑in‑law of the complainant while she lay unconscious in the doctor's clinic. The complainant (PW8) testified that the doctor was naked and the appellant was scantily dressed when he entered with hot …

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusSRI ORILAL JAISWAL AND ANR.

1993 INSC 307Case Partly allowed

The State of West Bengal appealed the Calcutta High Court's acquittal of Orilal Jaiswal and his mother, Gujarati Debi, on charges of abetment of suicide (Sec. 306 IPC) and cruelty (Sec. 498A IPC). The Supreme Court examined whether the victim’s mother, brother and other close relatives provided …

MANIYARI MADHVANversusSUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS.

1993 INSC 306

Maniyeri Madhavan, a journalist, alleged that Kerala police assaulted him and his newspaper office and sought an impartial investigation. The Kerala High Court directed a Deputy Inspector General to investigate, but the investigation stalled and the Supreme Court, exercising its Article 142 …

GOKARAJU VENKATANARASA RAJUversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1993 INSC 273Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder, theft of jewellery and concealment of evidence under IPC sections 302, 404 and 201. The prosecution relied on a series of circumstantial facts – the appellant’s presence with the victim, possession and disposal of the victim’s gold chain, ring and watch, the …

SUBRAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1993 INSC 255Modified

The Supreme Court reviewed its earlier judgment in Subran and others v. State of Kerala after noting that paragraph 11 could be misinterpreted as a general statement of law. The case involved four appellants, including Subran, who were convicted of murder under Section 302 of the IPC. On review, the …

RAMESH KUMARversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1993 INSC 253Case Partly allowed

In 1970 Harbansh Narain Lal Das was attacked, tied with a rope and dragged by three accused who also seized his pistol. The trial court convicted them of murder under Section 302/34 IPC and sentenced each to life imprisonment. The Patna High Court altered the conviction to culpable homicide not …

KAKA JOGINDER SINGH ALIAS DHARTI PAKADversusK.R. NARAYANAN VICE PRESIDENT OF INDIA

1993 INSC 238Dismissed

Kaka Joginder Singh alias Dharti Pakad challenged the election of K.R. Narayanan as Vice‑President of India, alleging (i) that the Returning Officer wrongly accepted Narayanan's nomination despite substantial defects, and (ii) that a whip issued by the Congress party amounted to undue influence …

PRABHUDA YAL AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1993 INSC 209Dismissed

Sangita, a young married woman, was found burnt to death in the house of her in‑laws on the night of 14‑15 September 1984. She had previously complained of dowry‑related harassment and physical abuse by her husband, father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law. The trial court acquitted all four …

SURENDER KUMAR GARGversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1993 INSC 211Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Surrender K.L. Garg, was convicted for cheating the Uttar Pradesh Small Industries Corporation by creating a fictitious firm, Seemak Industrial Corporation, and obtaining a loan of Rs 39,352.50. He was found guilty under IPC sections 120‑B, 419, 420, 468 and 471 and sentenced to …

KIKAR SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1993 INSC 194Dismissed

Kikar Singh was convicted of murder for repeatedly striking his unarmed neighbour with a spade, causing three injuries, the third of which severed the victim's neck and was deemed sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. The appellant argued that the killing occurred in the heat …

AJAY AGARWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

1993 INSC 181Dismissed

The appellant, an NRI businessman, was charged with criminal conspiracy, cheating and forgery for a scheme hatched in Chandigarh that involved the issuance of foreign letters of credit and forged shipping documents in Dubai, resulting in a loss to Punjab National Bank. The trial court discharged the …

RAM ASREYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1993 INSC 183Case Partly allowed

The appellant Ram Asrey, along with Munni Lal and the now‑deceased Radhey Shyam, were charged with the murder of Gokaran Prasad on 24 November 1975. The trial court acquitted them for lack of proof, but the Allahabad High Court convicted Asrey and Munni Lal under Section 302 read with Section 34 …

USHA K. PILLAIversusRAJ. K. SRINIVAS AND ORS.

1993 INSC 174Disposed off

The appellant, Usha Pillai, was appointed guardian of her granddaughter Nivedita after the child's mother committed suicide. The child's father, R.K. Srinivas, abducted the child and took her to the United States, leading the appellant to file a kidnapping complaint. During the criminal trial, the …

SMT. VANKA RADHAMANOHARIversusVANKE VENKATA REDDY AND ORS.

1993 INSC 158Amount Awarded

The appellant, a wife, complained that her husband subjected her to cruelty and later contracted a second marriage, invoking Sections 498A and 494 of the Indian Penal Code. The Andhra Pradesh High Court, applying Section 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), quashed the criminal proceedings on …

HARI SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1993 INSC 150Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved six accused, including Hari Singh, Satbir and Gulbir, who were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC for the death of Mange Ram. The trial court and High Court upheld the convictions, but the Supreme Court was asked to consider whether the earlier …

KAPILDEO SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1993 INSC 143Case Partly allowed

The case concerned six accused, including Kapildeo Singh, charged with the murder of Shyamdeo Singh and grievous injuries to Rajmani Devi. The trial court acquitted them, the High Court reversed the acquittal, and the Supreme Court examined the appeal. The Court evaluated the admissibility of a …

MANI RAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1993 INSC 131Dismissed

Mani Ram and his brother Hari Ram had a dispute with Hazur Singh. On the day of the incident Singh went to his field, ate a meal brought by his wife Surjeet Kaur and son Jaskaran, and was subsequently shot by Mani Ram with a licensed pistol; Hari Ram allegedly encouraged the act. The trial court …

KUNDULA BALA SUBRAHMANYAM AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1993 INSC 119Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder trial of Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam, who died from extensive burns after allegedly being set alight by her husband and mother‑in‑law over a dowry‑related dispute. The prosecution relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence: a clear motive (dowry and land …

A.M. KUNHIKOYA@ KOYAversusSTTE OF KERALA

1993 INSC 120Case Partly allowed

On 16 September 1980, a dispute arose after an alleged stone‑pelting incident, culminating in a confrontation where the appellant, A.M. Kunhiko ya, and four others attacked the deceased, Moideen Kutty. The appellant first struck the victim's hand and, during a struggle, thrust a dagger into the …

RADHEY SHYAM KHEMKA AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ETC.

1993 INSC 121Dismissed

The appellants, promoters and directors of a public limited company, issued a prospectus inviting public subscription for shares, claimed that the application to list the shares on a stock exchange was rejected, yet retained the money collected from investors and transferred it to another company …

MOHD. ASLAM ALIAS KUYIANversusSTATE OF U.P.

1993 INSC 101Dismissed

The case arose from a long‑standing family enmity over a religious dispute. On 25 December 1975 the appellant, Mohd Aslam, armed with a double‑barrel gun, shot the complainant’s son‑in‑law Shamim Raza, who died on the spot, and Mohd Umar, who later died of his injuries. The Sessions Court acquitted …

ANIL PHUKANversusSTATE OF ASSAM

1993 INSC 96Appeal(s) allowed

Anil Phukan and his brothers were convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for the murder of Trinayan Chandra Baruah, based primarily on the testimony of a single eye‑witness, the deceased's nephew. The Supreme Court examined whether a conviction can rest on such testimony without independent …

SURINDER PAL JAINversusDELHI ADMINISTRATION

1993 INSC 82Appeal(s) allowed

Surinder Pal Jain was charged with murdering his wife, Usha Jain, with the prosecution relying solely on circumstantial evidence such as a neighbor's call, dogs of a dog squad pointing to the accused, alleged injuries on the accused, and a purported disclosure statement leading to the recovery of …

HARENDRA NATH MANDALversusSTATE OF BIHAR

1993 INSC 73Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Harendra Nath Manda, was involved in a dispute over harvesting paddy crops with the complainant and his brother. During the confrontation the appellant allegedly struck the brother with a stick, but the victim survived. The Sessions Court convicted the appellant under section 307 read …

SUBRAN @ SUBRAMANIAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1993 INSC 67Case Partly allowed

Six persons were tried for a violent assault on 24 December 1986 that resulted in the death of Suku. The trial court convicted all under various IPC sections, including murder (302) read with Section 149, and the High Court later acquitted two accused while confirming the others. On special leave, …

SARDAR SINGHversusSTATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION, DELHI)

1993 INSC 65Case Partly allowed

Sardar Singh, his wife Saraswati and his brother's wife Savitri were charged with murder and with concealing evidence under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of the IPC. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence: the deceased's illicit relationship with Saraswati and Savitri, the discovery …

DWARKA PRASADversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1993 INSC 66Case Partly allowed

Dwarka Prasad was convicted of murder under sections 302 and 307 IPC. The prosecution alleged that he and a co‑accused attacked the deceased and a witness with knives, motivated by a prior altercation, and that the FIR was lodged several hours after the incident. The accused claimed he was guarding …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusRAGHUBIR SINGH

1993 INSC 60Appeal(s) allowed

The State prosecuted Raghubir Singh, then aged about 16, for raping an 8‑year‑old girl. The victim, her father and sister testified, and a medical doctor confirmed injuries consistent with sexual intercourse. The trial court convicted the accused under S.376 IPC and sentenced him to five years' …

JARNAIL SINGH AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

1993 INSC 21Dismissed

The accused Jarnail Singh and his four sons were convicted of murder and rioting for killing Gurbux Singh and his brother Wasava Singh. The prosecution alleged a motive stemming from the suicide of the accused's son, who had been in love with the victims' daughter. The defence argued that there was …

SAMPAT SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 356Dismissed

Petitioners, comprising 16 MLAs and 3 MPs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a CBI investigation into alleged corruption by Minister Bhajan Lal and the setting aside of a magistrate's order of discharge. The High Court dismissed the petition without addressing the petitioners' locus …

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusCH. BHAJAN LAL AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 357Dismissed

The DIG of Police, S.A. Khan, filed a contempt petition seeking suo moto proceedings against Chief Minister Ch. Bhajan Lal, alleging that a press statement made by the latter interfered with pending corruption proceedings before the Supreme Court. The petition also contained interlocutory …

S.A. KHANversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 358Dismissed

Deputy Inspector General of Police S.A. Khan was suspended by the Haryana Government on 5 July 1991, a suspension later confirmed by the Central Government under the All India Services (Discipline and Appeals) Rules, 1969. Khan alleged that the suspension was mala fide, intended to protect Chief …

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusW.N. CHADHA

1992 INSC 347Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the Union of India's and CBI's challenge to a Delhi High Court order that quashed the FIR registered against W.N. Chadha in the Bofors scandal and set aside the letters rogatory issued to Swiss authorities. The Court held that the FIR disclosed a prima facie offence and …

P.D. PUSHPARAJANversusSTATE OF KERALA

1992 INSC 326Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Divakaran, for which four accused, including Pushparajan (A‑3) and Murali (A‑4), were convicted under IPC sections 302 and 324 read with section 34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. The appellants argued that A‑3 should only be liable for the assault …

JEET SINGH ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1992 INSC 323Dismissed

The appellants, Jeet Singh (who had two wives) and his first wife Mayawati, challenged the inclusion of two plots transferred to Mayawati in Jeet Singh's land holding under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, arguing that Mayawati was a "judicially separated" wife and …

SHANTILAL KASHIBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1992 INSC 298Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a complaint that food inspectors demanded a bribe of Rs 5,000 for a food‑safety inspection. The complainant, after paying part of the amount, approached the Anti‑Corruption Bureau, which recorded the transaction in the presence of two Panch witnesses and used anthracene powder to …

SAROJINI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

1992 INSC 284Dismissed

Vinod Bhalla and his mother-in-law Sarojini were charged with the homicide of Rajini, the wife of Vinod, under sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, alleged to be a dowry death. The trial court convicted them, but the High Court acquitted both of the murder charge, convicting only Sarojini under section …

MULLAGIRI VAIRAM AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1992 INSC 283Disposed off

The case concerned the murder of the village Sarpanch, Nethala Veeraswamy, for which twelve persons were charged. The trial court convicted all under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC, but the Andhra Pradesh High Court set aside the convictions of seven accused and upheld the convictions …

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusJ.S. BRAR

1992 INSC 270Appeal(s) allowed

Major J.S. Brar was charged under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 read with Section 379 IPC for theft of army property. After an initial General Court Martial (GCM) found him guilty of one charge and acquitted him of another, the Confirming Authority ordered a revision under Section 160 and Rule 68 …

PASHORA SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1992 INSC 271Case Partly allowed

Pashora Singh and his brother Lahora Singh were tried for offences under Sections 307, 447, 326, 324 and 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for inflicting injuries on Amar Singh and Pal Singh in 1981. The trial court convicted them of the latter four offences and, as they were not …

AHER MAYA VISA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1992 INSC 247Dismissed

The accused were charged with murder of two brothers under Sections 302 and 34 IPC. The trial court acquitted them, relying on a purported custom of the Aher community that a widow should not leave her house for 45 days after her husband's death, and finding the eye‑witnesses' testimony doubtful. …

ASLAM BABALAL DESAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1992 INSC 245

The appellant was arrested for offences under Sections 147, 148, 302 and 323 read with 149 IPC and, after the investigating agency failed to file a charge‑sheet within the 90‑day period prescribed by the proviso to Section 167(2) of the CrPC, the Sessions Judge released him on bail. After the …

JANTA DAL ETC. ETC.versusH.S. CHOWDHARY AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 226Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a petition filed by H.S. Chowdhary, claiming to be a public‑interest litigant, seeking to quash a FIR and stop a letter rogatory to Switzerland in the Bofors scandal. The Court held that Chowdhary had no locus standi and that the petition did not fall within the definition …

SAT PAL @ SADHUversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

1992 INSC 210Dismissed

Sat Pal alias Sadhu, convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1978, filed a writ petition claiming his continued detention was illegal because he had served more than 14 years (including remission) and thus his sentence should be deemed commuted under Section 55 of the …

OM PARKASH ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1992 INSC 212Dismissed

The victim Rita was allegedly burnt alive by her husband Om Parkash, his parents Sheela Wanti and Rup Lal, and other relatives after they demanded dowry. Rita gave a detailed statement to the investigating officer after doctors confirmed she was conscious, which was later treated as a dying …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusLAKSHMANAIAH

1992 INSC 178Appeal(s) allowed

Lakshmanaiah was charged with murdering his wife Nagarathnamma and with theft of his mother‑in‑law's property. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence showing a motive of money, prior maltreatment of the wife, and that the accused sent the mother‑in‑law, her daughter and a relative out of …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC. ETC.versusSUKHDEO SINGH AND ANR. ETC .. ETC.

1992 INSC 173Disposed off

The State of Maharashtra prosecuted Sukhdev Singh (Accused No.1) and Harjinder Singh Jinda (Accused No.5) for the murder of retired General Vaidya under the IPC and TADA. The trial court convicted both of murder (IPC ss.302, 307, 34) and sentenced them to death, relying on eyewitness identification, …

BHAGWAN SINGH AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB ETC.

1992 INSC 155Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered a case where four police officers abducted a suspect and three witnesses from a hotel, beat them in a police staff room, and the suspect later died with his body never recovered. The trial court had convicted the officers only for kidnapping, but the High Court upheld …

MADAN GOPAL KAKKADversusNAVAL DUBEY AND ANR.

1992 INSC 140Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Madan Gopal Kakkad, sought to overturn a High Court judgment that convicted Naval Dubey, a medical graduate, only of outraging a woman's modesty under IPC s.354 and imposed a fine. The victim, an eight‑year‑old girl, testified that the accused stripped her, forced oral sex and …

M.R. PRATAPversusV.M. MUTHUKRISHNAN, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL - III, MADRAS

1992 INSC 141Dismissed

M.R. Pratap, the Managing Director of Rayala Corporation Private Ltd., signed and verified the company's income‑tax return for AY 1965‑66, which was later found to be false. He was prosecuted under section 277 of the Income‑Tax Act for wilfully making a false verification. The appellant contended …

SURJIT SINGH ALIAS GURMIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1992 INSC 127Dismissed

Surjit Singh, a serving soldier, was charged along with his brothers and two others for criminal trespass, murder of the village Sarpanch, and grievous hurt. He claimed an alibi, asserting he left the village at 4 p.m. on the day of the crime and was traveling by train to his unit, and also argued …

NADODI JAYARAMAN ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1992 INSC 128Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a trade‑union rivalry that culminated in the murder of Prathab Chandran, a union vice‑president, on 15 June 1972. Six accused, including A‑2 (Nadodi Jayaraman) and A‑3 (Dilli Bai), assaulted the victim with iron rods and pipes, causing multiple injuries; the head injury was fatal. …

STATE OF U.P.versusDR. RAVINDRA PRAKASH MITTAL

1992 INSC 129Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Dr. Ravindra Prakash Mittal, who was charged with murdering his second wife and attempting to conceal the crime by burning her body. The trial court had convicted him under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC based on a chain of circumstantial …

SMT. CHAND DHAWANversusJAWAHAR LAL AND ORS.

1992 INSC 130Appeal(s) allowed

Smt. Chand Dhawan filed a criminal complaint alleging bigamy under Sections 494 and 109 IPC, claiming her husband Jawahar Lal had married another woman while their marriage subsisted. The Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance and issued summons against the husband, the second wife, and their …

K.T.M.S. MOHD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA

1992 INSC 134Appeal(s) allowed

The Enforcement Directorate seized Rs.4,28,713 in 1966 and recorded statements from appellants K.T.S. Mohammed and M. Jamal Mohammed under Section 39 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA). Both appellants later retracted those statements, claiming they were obtained under duress, and the …

SURINDER KUMAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

1992 INSC 135Dismissed

Surinder Kumar's second wife, Sheema, died from severe burn injuries. Kumar and his son were convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and of cruelty under Section 498‑A, based primarily on a dying declaration recorded before a Judicial Magistrate, with a doctor's certificate that she …

RAJINDER SINGH @ KADAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1992 INSC 111Appeal(s) allowed

Rajinder Singh was charged with murder under Section 302 IPC and illegal use of a pistol under Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting Chamkaur Singh, who later died of injuries. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses (Harbans Singh and Hakam Singh) and two dying declarations of the …

DARBARA SINGH AND ANOTHER ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 112Disposed off

The incident occurred on 10 November 1979 when Wazir Singh, armed with a kulhari, and his accomplices Darbara Singh and Dalip Singh attacked Sadha Singh, inflicting a fatal incised wound and multiple blunt injuries. The trial court convicted all three under Section 302/34 IPC and sentenced them to …

MUNNI SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1992 INSC 114Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a dacoity that occurred on the night of 5-6 April 1970 at the house of Dhaniram Singh (PW‑11) in Awadhiya village. The prosecution alleged that five of the accused, including Munni Singh, participated in the robbery and murder of the victim's uncle. Four sets of eyewitnesses were …

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS.versusSURENDRA PRASAD SINHA

1992 INSC 109Dismissed

The Supreme Court decided two matters. In Punjab National Bank & Ors. v. Surendra Prasad Sinha, the Court held that Section 3 of the Limitation Act bars only the remedy, not the underlying right to a debt, and that the bank's adjustment of a fixed‑deposit security to satisfy the principal debtor's …

MULAKH RAJ ETC.versusSATISH KUMAR AND OTHERS

1992 INSC 106Case Partly allowed

The case concerned the death of Shashi Bala, wife of Satish Kumar, who was alleged to have been strangled and her body burnt to destroy evidence. The trial court convicted Kumar under Sections 302 and 201 IPC based on the post‑mortem report, medical testimony and circumstantial evidence, while …

GANESHLALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1992 INSC 107Dismissed

The appellant Ganeshlal was charged, along with his parents, sister, maternal uncle and the uncle's daughter, for the murder of his wife Kanchana, whose body was found severely burnt on the third floor of their house. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) …

STATE OF ORISSAversusDAMBURU NAIKO AND ANR.

1992 INSC 97Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa prosecuted Dambru Naiko and another accused for kidnapping and gang rape of a village girl, Manguri Bhotruni, under IPC sections 366, 376 and 34. The victim identified the two respondents in an identification parade and medical examination showed injuries to her private parts, …

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusKARUPPUSAMY AND ORS.

1992 INSC 99Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tamil Nadu prosecuted accused Karuppusamy and Natarajan for the murder of Muthusamy and the attempted outraging of Anjali's modesty, alleging that the accused used aruvals to cut off the victim's head and assault the woman. Four eye‑witnesses, including a rustic woman (PW‑1) and a child …

MOOL CHAND ETC. ETC.versusJAGDISH SINGH BEDI AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 100Dismissed

The case arose from a violent incident during a wedding procession on 17 November 1972 in which Ramesh Chand was shot dead and several others injured. The accused—Kashmiri Lal, Madan Lal, Babu Ram, Jagdish Singh Bedi and Prem Pal—were convicted by a Sessions Court for conspiracy to murder, murder, …

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusY. BASAVADEVUDU AND ANR.

1992 INSC 91Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh prosecuted Y. Basavadevudu and S. Subha Rao for embezzling Rs.1,22,500 by falsifying entries related to fake RBI demand drafts in a Sub‑Treasury. The trial court found the accused and an approver guilty under IPC sections 409, 467, 471 and 477‑A, but the High Court …

B. HANUMANTHA RAOversusSTATE OF A.P.

1992 INSC 92Dismissed

B. Hanumantha Rao, an Excise Sub‑Inspector, was charged with accepting Rs 50,000 as illegal gratification from an arrack contractor. He claimed the money was rent arrears that the contractor could not deposit because the bank was closed, and he refused to keep the cash. The prosecution conducted a …

ANITA LAXMI NARAYAN SINGHversusLAXMI NARAIN SINGH

1992 INSC 86Appeal(s) allowed

Anita Laxmi Narayan Singh married Laxmi Narain Singh in 1987. The husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act in Bombay. The wife, residing in Ghaziabad, had to travel long distances to defend herself and applied for interim maintenance and travel expenses. The …

SMT. PANIBENversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1992 INSC 78Dismissed

The appellant, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly burning her daughter‑in‑law. The prosecution's case rested on four dying declarations made by the victim, three of which identified the appellant as the assailant. The trial court dismissed …

SAKHARAMversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1992 INSC 43Appeal(s) allowed

Sakharam, a 16‑year‑old boy, was living alone with his grandfather when his aunt, Awadhrani, stayed with him for about eight to ten days. On 29 October 1968 a gun‑shot was heard; neighbours found Awadhrani dead with a 12‑bore gun nearby and Sakharam standing nearby, crying. The trial court, relying …

BHAGWAN SWAROOPversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1992 INSC 33Appeal(s) allowed

Bhagwan Swaroop was charged with murder, attempt to murder, trespass and a violation of the Arms Act after he fired his father's licensed gun during a dispute over land. The father, Ramswaroop, was being beaten with a lathi by the complainant Shahjor Singh when Bhagwan, fearing for his father's …

CHANDRA MOHAN TIWARI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1992 INSC 24Dismissed

Chandra Mohan Tiwari and Ram Pal Singh Sengar were convicted of murder after the Madhya Pradesh High Court set aside a trial court acquittal. They appealed to the Supreme Court under Section 379 of the CrPC and Section 2(a) of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, …

BHAGEL SINGHversusSWARAN SINGH AND ORS.

1992 INSC 25Disposed off

The dispute arose over a proposed drain through the fields of the complainant, Baghel Singh, leading to a violent clash between his party and that of Swaran Singh and his brothers. During the altercation, Swaran Singh, armed with a rifle, fired two shots that killed Kandhara Singh and Darbara Singh, …

MRS. HARPREET KAUR HARVINDER SINGH BEDIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

1992 INSC 17Dismissed

Harpreet Kaur, the wife of Harvinder Singh, challenged the detention of her husband under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers and Drug Offenders Act, 1981. The husband had been involved in bootlegging, threatened police, attempted to run them over, injured a …

N. M. PARTHASARATHYversusSTATE BY S. P. E.

1992 INSC 18Disposed off

N.M. Parthasarathy, a former Inspector of Industries, and another Inspector were charged with criminal conspiracy to obtain a Small Scale Industries Registration Certificate, Essentiality Certificate and import licences by making false representations. The trial court acquitted them, but the Madras …

PRADUMANSINH KALUBHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1992 INSC 20Dismissed

Pradumansinh Kalubha was accused of stabbing Harijan painter Keshav Uka after a collision at Piplawala Chowk, leading to Uka's death. The trial court acquitted Kalubha, finding the prosecution story implausible, but the Gujarat High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting him under IPC Section 304 …

STATE OF U.P.versusASHOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

1992 INSC 6Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Ashok Kumar Srivastava, his father Rajendra Lal and sister Sudha for the murder of Meera Srivastava, alleging they set her ablaze over a dowry dispute. The trial court convicted them under Sections 302 and 34 IPC based on the testimony of neighbours (PW1, PW4, …

BISHAN DAYAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF DELHI (ADMN.)

1991 INSC 347Disposed off

A highway robbery on 20 April 1975 resulted in the death of Naresh Chand after he was stabbed. Five persons were initially charged; the Delhi High Court acquitted one, leaving four accused. The High Court convicted the four under Sections 302/34 IPC (murder with common intention) and 394 IPC …

MOHINDER SINGHversusGULWANT SINGH AND ORS. ETC.

1991 INSC 342Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate alleging that his brother‑in‑law, Darshan Singh, had contracted a second marriage while his first marriage to Jagjit Kaur was still subsisting, thereby committing bigamy under IPC s.494 and abetment under s.109. The magistrate, …

K.M. MATHEWversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

1991 INSC 302Appeal(s) allowed

The Chief Editor of a daily newspaper was charged in a complaint alleging defamation under Sections 500 and 34 of the IPC, but the complaint contained no specific allegation that he edited or approved the offending news item. The magistrate issued summons, the editor pleaded not guilty and requested …

HOSHIAR SINGH AND ORSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1991 INSC 277Dismissed

A civil dispute over a plot of land led to a violent incident on 16 December 1975 in which nine accused, armed with firearms and bladed weapons, attacked the complainants, resulting in several deaths and injuries. The trial court acquitted four of the accused and convicted the remaining five under …

SMT. SHASHI NAYARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 274Dismissed

Smt. Shashi Nayar, the wife of a condemned prisoner, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of the death penalty imposed on her husband for murder under IPC Section 302. She argued that capital punishment violates Article 21, lacks deterrent effect, is …

MATHURA PRASHAD AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1991 INSC 255Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Mathura Prashad and Binda Prashad were convicted under IPC s.302 read with s.34 for the murder of Keshav Singh. The prosecution’s case rested on a dying declaration in which the deceased wrote only the name "Guiab Chand" and on witness testimony that did not specifically identify the …

BALBIR SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1991 INSC 249Dismissed

Balbir Singh and Inderjit Singh, brothers, were charged with murder of their relative Onkar Singh under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC. The Sessions Judge acquitted them, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court, on appeal by the State, convicted them and sentenced them to life imprisonment. The …

PARUSURAMAN @ VELLADURAI AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1991 INSC 228Disposed off

Parusuraman and six others were charged with the murder of Jawahar, facing three sets of charges including murder, rioting and unlawful assembly. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the Tamil Nadu High Court convicted three of them (A1‑A3) under Section 304 Part I read with Section 34, …

NETHALA POTHURAJU AND ORS.·versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1991 INSC 226Disposed off

Seven accused were tried for rioting, murder and related offences arising from the killing of Madda Lakshamandas. The trial court convicted six under Sections 148 and 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC; the high court later acquitted four of them, retaining convictions of three (A‑1 to A‑3) on the …

SONI DEVRAJBHAI BABUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

1991 INSC 214Dismissed

The petitioner’s daughter died in August 1986 and the petitioner filed a criminal complaint under Section 498-A IPC. After the Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986 inserted Section 304‑B IPC (dowry death) with effect from 19 November 1986, the petitioner sought to have the case transferred to a …

BHAGWAN SWARUP AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1991 INSC 215Disposed off

The father (A1) and son (A2) were charged with murder, conspiracy and abetment of the death of A2's wife, who was found dead in their house. The trial court acquitted them for lack of evidence of a conspiracy and of a homicidal death. The High Court convicted them under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B …

THE JANATA DAL & ORS. ETC.versusH.S. CHOWDHARY & ORS. ETC.

1991 INSC 210Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a public interest litigation filed by H.S. Chowdhary under Article 51A challenging the Central Bureau of Investigation's request to issue a Letter Rogatory to Switzerland in the Bofors scandal. The Court held that the petitioner and intervening parties (Janata Dal, CPI(M), …

RANJIT SINGHversusUNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH & ANR.

1991 INSC 206Disposed off

Ranjit Singh was convicted of murder in 1979 and sentenced to life imprisonment. While on parole he committed a second murder in 1980, for which the Supreme Court in 1983 sentenced him to another term of life imprisonment, directing that the second sentence would not run concurrently with the first …

STATE OF U.P.versusKAPIL DEO AND ANOTHER

1991 INSC 203Dismissed

The case arose from the murder of a 12‑year‑old domestic help, Vinod Kumar, in 1968. Four persons – Kapil Deo, his wife Sheo Kumari, their son Vidya Sagar and brother Ramapati – were charged under IPC s.302, s.302 read with s.34 and s.201 read with s.34. The trial court convicted Vidya Sagar of …

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusDR. M.V. RAMANA REDDY AND ORS.

1991 INSC 195Case Partly allowed

The State appealed the High Court's acquittal of three accused in the murder of trade‑unionist lawyer Ram Subba Reddy. The Supreme Court examined whether the daughter’s (PW 1) testimony was reliable despite allegations of self‑inflicted injuries, the delay in the identification parade, and the …

K. VEERASWAMIversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1991 INSC 163Dismissed

The appellant, a former Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. He sought to quash the criminal proceedings, arguing that judges are not "public servants" under the Act and that no …

HARENDRA NARAIN SINGH ETCversusSTATE OF BIHAR

1991 INSC 157Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Harendra Narain Singh and Ram Nath Singh were convicted for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based solely on circumstantial evidence that a dead body was taken from the doctor's dispensary on an ekka to a village courtyard. The Supreme Court examined the principles governing …

GURMEJ SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1991 INSC 154Dismissed

Gurmej Singh, Gian Singh and Bur Singh were convicted of murdering Harnam Singh, a neighbour, based on the testimony of two close relatives who identified the accused under the light of a tubewell lamp. The defence argued that a third eye‑witness, Narain Singh, who was sleeping near the victim, was …

KHUJJI@SURENDRA TIWARIversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1991 INSC 153Dismissed

Khujji @ Surendra Tiwari was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution relied on three eye‑witnesses, discovery of a blood‑stained weapon and the appellant's blood‑stained pant. Two witnesses (PW‑3 and PW‑4) were declared hostile because they could …

ASHOK KUMAR ALIAS GOLUversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 145Dismissed

Ashok Kumar was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He sought premature release under the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 1958, arguing that Section 433A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – which imposes a 14‑year minimum before any release for life …

GAGAN BIHARI SAMAL AND ANRversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1991 INSC 144Dismissed

The appellants forcibly took a teenage girl to a remote house, intoxicated her, undressed her and sexually assaulted her, after which she escaped from a truck and sought help. The trial court convicted them of rape under IPC s.376(2)(g) relying on the victim's uncontroverted testimony and the …

STATE OF PUNJABversusIQBAL SINGH AND ORS.

1991 INSC 139Appeal(s) allowed

The wife of Iqbal Singh set herself and her three children on fire on 7 June 1983 after prolonged dowry harassment by her husband, his mother and sister. She had previously complained to police and written letters detailing the abuse and her fear for her life. The husband, his mother and sister were …

SEYAKA PERUMAL, ETCversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1991 INSC 133Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions and death sentences of Sevaka Perumal and Isakkimuthu for the pre‑meditated murder of four young boys, committed for cash and jewellery. The Court held that the dead bodies were positively identified by the victims' mother and forensic evidence, so corpus …

BOLLAVARAM PEDDA NARSI REDDY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1991 INSC 134Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were charged with murder under IPC sections 302 and 149. The trial court acquitted them, rejecting the testimony of five eyewitnesses and finding the identification parades perfunctory. The High Court reversed the acquittal, relying on the two eye‑witnesses and the identification …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusANAND CHINTAMAN DIGHE

1991 INSC 124Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra charged Anand Chintaman Dighe under the Indian Penal Code and the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for the murder of a municipal corporator, alleging that Dighe had incited violence against political opponents through statements to the press. The …

JAHARLAL DASversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1991 INSC 101Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted of raping and murdering a five‑year‑old girl based solely on circumstantial evidence, including the alleged last sighting of the girl with the accused, his purported false explanation, the claim that he pointed out the body’s location, and alleged blood‑stains and genital …

MALKIAT SINGH AND ORSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1991 INSC 98Case Partly allowed

The case concerned the murder of four liquor‑shop workers and the attempted murder of a fifth person. The prosecution relied mainly on the ocular testimony of two injured witnesses (PW‑3 and PW‑4), ballistic evidence linking a rifle owned by the accused A‑1, and circumstantial evidence. The …

MAGUNI CHARAN PRADHANversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1991 INSC 91Dismissed

The appellant, a lawful owner of a field, discovered the deceased Bhikari Pradhan and his companions illegally ploughing the land. He demanded they unyoke their bullocks; when they refused, he struck the unarmed, seated deceased on the head with a stick, causing fatal injuries. The trial court …

MAHESH CHANDER AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF DELHI

1991 INSC 88Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the murder of Hanumant Singh, allegedly over a dispute concerning gold ornaments, with Mahesh Chander and Mohinder Singh convicted on the basis of eye‑witness testimony. The appellants challenged the conviction, arguing that the FIR was delayed, the names of the accused were …

NARENDRA PRATAP NARAIN SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P

1991 INSC 89Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Narendra Pratap Narain Singh and Puran Singh, were in charge of government agricultural seed stores and were charged under IPC sections 409, 467 and 471 for allegedly preparing forged bills and receiving payments for credit sales to village level workers, contrary to government …

STATE OF BIHAR ETC. ETC.versusP.P. SHARMA, IAS AND ANR.

1991 INSC 84Appeal(s) allowed

The Bihar State Co‑operative Marketing Union (BISCOMAUN) was placed under administration by the State Government, after which its administrator, R.K. Singh, reported alleged financial irregularities involving former Managing Director P.P. Sharma, advisor G.D. Mishra and Chairman Tapeshwar Singh in …

BHUPENDRA SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1991 INSC 74Appeal(s) allowed

On 25 April 1972, a political dispute in Padaria Tula, Uttar Pradesh, led Bhupendra Singh (appellant No.1) and his supporters to fire at Gajendra Singh, who later died. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the Allahabad High Court convicted Bhupendra Singh under section 302 IPC for murder and …

K. NAGAMALLESWARA RAO AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1991 INSC 76Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned fifteen accused persons charged with the murder of Appikatla Tataiah. Four of them (A‑1, A‑2, A‑5 and A‑11) were convicted under section 302 read with section 149 of the IPC, while the remaining eleven were acquitted. The central issue was whether section 149 IPC could be invoked …

NAIN SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1991 INSC 65Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for the murder of Bali and for causing injuries to his wife, based on the testimony of several eye‑witnesses and medical reports. The trial court sentenced them to life imprisonment under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and six months under s.323/34; the High Court reduced the …

DARYAO SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1991 INSC 45Dismissed

Daryao Singh was convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for the murder of Nagji, stemming from a long‑standing family feud. The trial court acquitted him, deeming the testimony of the deceased’s relatives uncorroborated, but the Madhya Pradesh High Court reversed that decision, finding the …

GOKAK PATEL VOLKART LTD.versusDUNDAYYA GURUSHIDDAIAH HIREMATH AND ORS.

1991 INSC 41Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Gokak Patel Volkart Ltd., filed criminal complaints under Section 630(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 406 IPC against former employees who, after retirement, failed to vacate company quarters. The trial magistrate dismissed the complaints as time‑barred under the …

JAI PRAKASHversusSTATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION)

1991 INSC 22Dismissed

Jai Prakash was convicted of murder for stabbing Champat Rai with a kirpan after an altercation at the house of Agya Devi, the deceased's wife, with whom the appellant allegedly had an illicit relationship. The sole eyewitness, the deceased's brother, testified that the appellant, after a verbal …

PADMABEN SHAMALBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1991 INSC 9Dismissed

The victim, Gangaben, suffered 90% burns after kerosene was poured on her and, while being treated, made dying declarations to two doctors naming Padma Patel, her husband's sister, as her tormentor. The Sessions Court acquitted Patel, doubting the victim's mental fitness and the possibility of …

BABU LALversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 8Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Babu Lal, was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis as Sub‑Inspector, Food & Supplies in Haryana in 1975. He was suspended on 15 April 1980 because criminal proceedings under IPC s.420 were pending, and his services were terminated on 17 November 1980 while the suspension was still in force. …

S.D. SONIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1990 INSC 398Dismissed

The appellant S.D. Soni was married to Varsha, who was found dead in their matrimonial home. The defence claimed suicide, citing a note (Exh. 80) and alleged poisoning, while the prosecution alleged homicide, pointing to internal injuries to the pancreas and spleen and a fabricated suicide note. The …

PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1990 INSC 384Appeal(s) allowed

Partap Singh and his co-accused were charged under IPC sections 302 and 326 read with section 34. The charge‑sheet framed the appellant only vicariously under section 34, as the prosecution had no material linking him directly to the knife injuries. At trial, the prosecution led eye‑witness …

JASWANT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1990 INSC 368Appeal(s) allowed

Jaswant Singh, a police constable, was dismissed by the Assistant Inspector‑General of Police under Punjab Police Rules on the ground that he threatened to obstruct any departmental enquiry and to harm witnesses. The authority invoked clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the …

RAVIKANT BHAGOJI DHUMAL AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1990 INSC 355Dismissed

A 29‑year‑old woman, Chandrakala, vanished near Bharana Naka while alighting from a bus and was later found dead, having been raped and throttled. The initial police investigation wrongly focused on the bus crew, but CID Inspector Kulkarni later implicated three accused – a hotel waiter (appellant …

SMT. SHANTI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

1990 INSC 349Disposed off

The deceased, Smt. Kailash, was married to Sat Pal and allegedly subjected to harassment by her mother‑in‑law (Smt. Shanti) and another relative for not providing a scooter and television as dowry. She was found dead under unnatural circumstances within seven years of marriage, and the accused were …

BRATHI ALIAS SUKHDEV SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1990 INSC 332Dismissed

Sukhdev Singh and his uncle Teja Singh were tried for the murder of Socha Singh under IPC sections 302 and 34. The trial court acquitted Teja Singh but convicted Sukhdev Singh, sentencing him to life imprisonment. On appeal, the Punjab & Haryana High Court re‑examined the evidence, held that the …

BUDHWA ALIAS RAMCHARAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1990 INSC 302Disposed off

The appellants were charged with murder, rioting and unlawful assembly under IPC ss. 147, 149 and 302 for the killing of Hanuwa, a villager, during a group rivalry. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the testimony of the victim’s mother (PW‑1) and sister (PW‑5), who were close relatives and …

DILAVER HUSSAIN SON OF MOHAMMADBHAL LALIWALA ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

1990 INSC 301Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from the June 9, 1985 communal riot in Dabgarwad, Gujarat, where a mob set fire to the house of Maniben, killing her, her daughters, grandchildren and a neighbour’s son. The appellants were charged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 and several …

SHAM SUNDERversusPURAN AND ANR.

1990 INSC 298Disposed off

The dispute arose when the respondents, armed, attacked Partap Singh after a protest over burnt sugarcane damaging his wheat crop, leading to his death. The trial court convicted the respondents under section 302 IPC (murder) and sentenced them to life imprisonment. The High Court, however, …

BALDEV RAJversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1990 INSC 284Dismissed

Baldev Raj was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murdering his wife. The prosecution’s case hinged on an extra‑judicial confession he allegedly made before a village panchayat, witnessed by three persons, and on circumstantial evidence such as the recovery of the weapon, ornaments, and …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1990 INSC 274Dismissed

Ashok Kumar was charged with murdering his sister‑in‑law, Asha Rani, by burning her to death in a dowry‑related dispute. The trial court acquitted him, finding no motive, contradictions in medical testimony, and a defective investigation. The Rajasthan High Court, invoking Sections 378 and 386 of …

KISHORE CHANDversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

1990 INSC 260Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC for the murder and concealment of Joginder Singh, based primarily on three pieces of circumstantial evidence: identification by two liquor‑shop owners, an extra‑judicial confession to a village pradhan, and the recovery of a saw …

AYUB @PAPPU KHAN NAWAB KHAN PATHANversusS.N. SINHA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 239Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, Ayub, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 on grounds that he was a "bootlegger" and a "dangerous person" involved in several offences. The petition challenged the detention, arguing that the detaining authority had not applied …

CHHETRIYA PARDUSHAN MUKTI SANGHARSH SAMITIversusSTATE OF U.P AND ORS.

1990 INSC 230Dismissed

The Chhetriya Pardushan Mukti Sangharsh Samiti filed a letter alleging that an oil mill and a refinery in the Sarnath area were causing severe air and water pollution, leading to health hazards and ecological damage, and treated the letter as a writ petition under Article 32. The respondents, …

KHANJAN PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

1990 INSC 219Appeal(s) allowed

Khanjan Pal was accused of stabbing his co‑worker Deep Singh to death in a factory. The trial court acquitted him, discarding eye‑witness testimony and finding reasonable doubt. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court accepted the witnesses, found Pal responsible for the death, and convicted him under …

GURJA BEDIA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1990 INSC 215Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, three brothers, were convicted under IPC sections 302, 394 and 34 for the murder of Bigna Bedia and robbery of his house. The sole eye‑witness, the victim's wife (PW‑14), claimed to have identified the accused but later said she was unconscious until the police arrived, casting doubt …

VISHAL JEETversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 171Disposed off

Vishal Jeet filed a public‑interest writ petition under Article 32 seeking a CBI inquiry into police negligence, the forced prostitution, Devadasi and Jogini systems, and rehabilitation of victims. The Court observed that prostitution is a socio‑economic problem requiring preventive, not merely …

SUNIL GUPTA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.

1990 INSC 172Disposed off

The petitioners, social workers who staged a peaceful dharna for school teachers, were arrested, convicted under Section 186 IPC and sentenced to one month’s imprisonment. After serving the sentence they were detained further and alleged that police handcuffed and paraded them in public without any …

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusMOTI RAM AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1990 INSC 174Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court's order acquitting 24 of the 41 accused in a mass‑murder case that left 13 victims dead. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy by the accused to murder the victims during a sugar‑cane cutting, relying heavily on the …

M.J. ZAKHARIA SAITversusT.M. MOHAMMED AND ORS.

1990 INSC 161Appeal(s) allowed

In the 1987 Kerala Legislative Assembly election, M.J. Zakharia (appellant) was declared elected over T.M. Mohammed (first respondent). The respondent filed an election petition alleging two corrupt practices: a pamphlet re‑printing a 1983 newspaper item and a wall‑poster accusing the respondent of …

VIJAYEE SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1990 INSC 145

Four accused (Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 6) were originally convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC for the killing of Mahendra Singh and Virendra Singh. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the scope of Section 105 of the Indian Evidence Act, holding that the prosecution must prove …

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANRversusRAM DIYA

1990 INSC 133Dismissed

The State of Haryana appealed against High Court orders directing it to consider premature release of two convicts whose death sentences had been commuted to life imprisonment. The convicts were sentenced before the 1978 amendment introducing Section 433A of the CrPC, which mandates a minimum of 14 …

M. SUNDERAMOORTHYversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE

1990 INSC 123Dismissed

S. Sundaramoorthy, an accountant‑cum‑head clerk in the Tamil Nadu Forest Training School, was accused of demanding and receiving a Rs 100 bribe from canteen contractor PW‑1 after promising to help restore the contractor's licence. A trap was arranged, the money was handed to the appellant, and a …

GOVIND RAMJI JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1990 INSC 80Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and two others were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and of concealing evidence under Section 201 read with Section 34 IPC. The High Court set aside the murder convictions, confirmed the conviction under Section 201 for the appellant, and enhanced his …

MOSTT. SIMRIKHIAversusSMT. DOLLEY MUKHERJEE @ SMT. CHHABI MUKHERJEE & ANR.

1990 INSC 73Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a private complaint for offences under IPC sections 323 and 452 before a Judicial Magistrate First Class, who transferred the case to a Second Class Magistrate for enquiry under CrPC sections 192(2) and 202. The Second Class Magistrate issued process against the respondents, who …

SAHAB SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1990 INSC 51Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted by an Additional Sessions Judge on three counts, including a life sentence with a fine of Rs.200 under Section 302/149 IPC. The High Court, while dismissing their appeal, altered the fine to Rs.5,000 per count per appellant, increasing it to Rs.30,000 each, without any …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusCHANDRAPRAKASH KEWAL CHAND JAIN

1990 INSC 14Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Sub‑Inspector of police, was convicted of raping a 19‑year‑old woman, Shamimbanu, by the trial court. The High Court acquitted him, holding that the victim’s testimony required corroboration in material particulars and that medical evidence was inconsistent. The State appealed. The …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusANAND CHINTAMAN DIGHE

1990 INSC 11Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, A.C. Dighe, a district chief of the Shiv Sena party, was arrested for the murder of a corporator and charged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The designated court in Pune granted him bail while …

GAURI SHANKER SHARMA ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. ETC.

1990 INSC 7Dismissed

The case concerned the death of Ram Dhiraj Tiwari while in police custody. The prosecution alleged that Sub‑Inspector Rafiuddin Khan (Accused No.1) beat the deceased with lathis and dandas after his arrest on 19 Oct 1971, causing 28 injuries that led to death, and also demanded a bribe. The defence …