Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Indian Post Office Act, 1898

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD.), AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 80124 August 2017Reference answered

The case arose from a reference to a nine-judge bench to determine whether the right to privacy is a constitutionally protected fundamental right under the Indian Constitution, particularly in light of the Aadhaar scheme's collection of biometric data. The petitioners argued that privacy is an intrinsic part of the rig

NAGARAJA RAOversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2015 INSC 95416 January 2015Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a postal sorting assistant, was convicted of theft of a registered insured parcel containing a gold chain under Section 381 IPC and of a breach of duty under Section 52 of the Indian Post Office Act. Both offences arose from the same incident and were tried together, resulting in separate six‑month simpl

CESC LTD.versusCHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS.

2012 INSC 23211 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed

CESC Ltd., an electricity supplier, used franking machines to post monthly consumption bills as 'book post' at Rs 1 per bill based on a 29 May 1997 letter from the Director of Postal Services. The Postal Authority later cancelled that instruction on 29 October 1998 and demanded a deficit of Rs 1,83,89,410, alleging the

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search