SITA RAM BHAMAversusRAMVATAR BHAMA
2018 INSC 26023 March 2018Case Partly allowed
The father of the parties, a self‑acquired owner of a house and a shop, decided to divide his property on 25‑Oct‑1992 but died on 10‑Sep‑1993. The surviving brothers recorded a memorandum of settlement on 9‑Sep‑1994, signed by their mother and sisters, allocating the entire property between them. The plaintiff sued for…
DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. AND ANR.versusDIRECTOR, T & C. PLANNING HARYANA AND ORS.
2010 INSC 79319 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, DLF Universal Ltd. and another, were licensed under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 to develop residential colonies and entered into private agreements with plot and flat buyers that included clauses for extension fees and maintenance charges. The Director, Town and Count…
UNITECH LIMITED & ORS.versusTELANGANA STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION (TSIIC) & ORS.
2021 INSC 9617 February 2021Disposed off
APIIC invited bids to develop a 350‑acre aerospace park and awarded the contract to Unitech, which paid Rs 165 crore in installments. The contract was conditioned on the outcome of a pending litigation concerning the title to the land, which the Andhra Pradesh High Court and later this Court held that the government di…
BAR COUNCIL OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusB. NARAYAN SWAMY & ANR.
2014 INSC 100415 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh disciplined advocate B. Narayan Swamy for attesting blank stamp papers in his capacity as a Notary, finding him in violation of the Notaries Act and Section 35 of the Advocates Act. The State Bar Council imposed a lifetime debarment, which the Bar Council of India stayed and set aside,…
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE ANDversusAKHALAQ HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER
2020 INSC 2563 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents Akhlaq Hussain and Saqir Hussain exchanged a small parcel of land for a larger agricultural parcel owned by Mangal Singh, a member of a Scheduled Tribe, through a registered deed. The Assistant Collector declared the exchange void under Sections 157‑B and 161 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Ref…
STATE BANK OF HYDERABADversusRABO BANK
2015 INSC 7241 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff, RABO Bank, sued State Bank of Hyderabad (SBH) in a summary suit under Order 37 of the CPC, claiming payment on several Bills of Exchange that SBH had allegedly accepted via telex/fax messages. SBH denied liability, asserting that the co‑acceptances were unauthorized, that the Bills lacked proper signatur…