Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Succession Act, 1925

187 judgments · newest first · showing 1–187

ASHIM CHATTERJEE AND ANR.versusSHANTA ASHOK TOLAT

DISMISSED

The appeal challenges a single judge’s order granting probate of the 1989 will of the late Tarapada Chatterjee in favour of his daughter Shanta Ashok Tolat. The appellants, the son’s heirs, contended that the will was forged, the testator suffered from Parkinson’s disease, the signature was shaky, …

ASHIM CHATTERJEE AND ANR.versusSHANTA ASHOK TOLAT

DISMISSED

The appeal challenges a single judge’s order granting probate of the 1989 will of the late Tarapada Chatterjee in favour of his daughter Shanta Ashok Tolat. The appellants, the son’s heirs, contended that the will was forged, the testator suffered from Parkinson’s disease, the signature was shaky, …

SIMON HAROLD ATTWOODversusSybil Beatrice Hughes

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court had earlier granted a Succession Certificate to Simon Harold Attwood in Testamentary Petition No. 3042 of 2024. Britannia Industries Ltd filed a Miscellaneous Petition seeking revocation of that certificate. The Court, after considering submissions, held that under Sections 212(1) and …

SURESH SHIVAJIRAO KALE AND ANRversusMAHESH SHIVAJIRAO KALE AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioners challenged a civil judge’s order that allowed Abhiraj Kale, a legatee under a 2018 registered will, to be impleaded as the legal representative of the deceased plaintiff Shashikala Kale in a suit concerning alleged illegal gift deeds. The petitioners argued that the deceased’s sons, …

COLETTE M. LOUIS and ANR.versusMrs. Esssther Doric Desouza and Anr

DISPOSED OFF

The plaintiffs sought probate of a Will dated 20 April 1983 executed by the deceased Hilary Joseph DeSouza, naming the plaintiff‑niece and her husband as executors and beneficiaries. The defendants, the deceased's brother and sister, opposed the grant on grounds of alleged lack of testamentary …

JAIVEER SINGHversusSMT. RINKI AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Jaiveer Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Aligarh to dispose Suit No. 295 of 2025, filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, within a stipulated period. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in …

Rajkumar Assudomal Gurbani.versusVijay Gulab Gurbani.

DISPOSED OFF

The plaintiff, a nephew of the deceased Gulab Hukumatrai Gurbani, sought probate of a Will dated 30 November 2004 that named him sole executor and principal beneficiary, including a share in a Jaipur property. The deceased's two sons opposed, filing caveats and alleging forgery, lack of testamentary …

AMIT D.NANDURKAR and ANRversusGULABAI SITRAMA BAIRAGI.

DISMISSED

The plaintiff, Sumit Devidas Nandurkar, sought Letters of Administration with a Will annexed for the estate of the deceased Kachardas Balkrishna Bairagi, relying on a Will dated 28 April 1984 that named his mother and himself as beneficiaries. The will was contested by several heirs who filed …

BHANU DATTA PATHAKversusHARDUTTA PATHAK AND OTHERS

The plaintiff‑appellant Bhanu Datta Pathak sought to cancel a registered will dated 06‑12‑1971 executed by his grandfather Shankar Dutt Pathak in favour of the defendant‑respondent Hari Dutt Pathak and to obtain a partition of ancestral property. The trial court held the will invalid on grounds of …

Dr. Govindaraja Venkatesh IyengarversusA. R. Sampathkumar (Since Deceased)

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court heard a probate suit filed by Dr. Govindaraja Venkatesh Iyengar, executor of the 1998 will of Rajalakshmi Gopal Ayengar, seeking probate of a bungalow in Chembur. The will bequeathed the property to the plaintiff and directed that proceeds could be used for the A.R. …

USHA HARI PANSE AND ORSversusRAMCHANDRA BHIKAJI PANSE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellants, Usha Hari Panse and others, claimed that a property was joint family property and that they were entitled to inherit it through the husband, challenging a will executed by the deceased father‑in‑law, Bhikaji. The trial and appellate courts held that the property was Bhikaji's …

SMT. ADLENE MASSEY AND 2 OTHERSversusMANISH DAS AND ANOTHER

The petition under Article 227 challenged the lower court’s order rejecting an application for a hand‑writing expert report on a 2001 unregistered will that formed the basis of an earlier suit. The petitioners argued that the appellate court could still order such expert evidence under Section 45 of …

Shreemati Dharamshila DeviversusNone

CONVERTED

Shreemati Dharamshila Devi filed a first appeal under Section 96 of the CPC, read with Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, challenging an ex‑parte dismissal of her probate case dated 29‑10‑2024. The High Court examined the appeal and noted that the matter was not contentious. Referring to an …

SMT. ISHU AND ANOTHERversusSHRI RAM KARAN AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Ishu and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Moradabad to decide a pending succession suit (Suit No. 158 of 2025) filed under section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The petition sought an …

Anil KumarversusEstate of Most. Kaushalya Devi

CONVERTED

The appellant, Anil Kumar, filed a First Appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 challenging a probate judgment dated 29 January 2025 that had rejected his claim. The High Court examined the appeal and noted that the matter was non‑contentious. Referring to a prior order dated 19 …

KUMUD LALLversusSURESH CHANDRA ROY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS

2026 INSC 443Disposed off

The husband of a patient filed a consumer complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging medical negligence by Dr. P.B. Lall, which was partly upheld by the District Forum awarding compensation. The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission set aside the award, and the matter …

KIRAN RAIKWAR (SINCE DIED)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The mother of the deceased Kiran Raikwar filed a petition seeking release of Rs 16 lakh deposited by the State under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act as part of a mutual‑consent divorce settlement. The wife had died before receiving the amount, and the mother claimed entitlement as the legal …

Shatrudhan RaiversusSitabia Devi

CONVERTED

The appellants, Shatrudhan Rai and Rambharos Rai, filed a first appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 of the CPC, invoking Sections 299 and 384 of the Indian Succession Act, against a judgment of the Additional District Judge that dismissed their probate case uncontested. The lower court had dismissed the …

SHRI UMESHBHAI DESAIJEE MEMORIAL TRUSTversusUMED VAJENDRAPRASAD DESAIJEE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a trust, filed a Miscellaneous Petition under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking revocation of letters of administration granted to the respondent for the estate of the deceased step‑mother. The property in question, a bungalow, had been transferred by a …

LEKHRAJversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

Lekhraj filed a criminal revision challenging orders that dismissed his claims in a domestic violence petition and a related criminal matter. He argued that no domestic violence was committed by him or his family and that the petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic …

DAKSHA NANAVATIversusINVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND AUTHORITY

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Daksha Nanavati, sought transfer of physical shares of Navin Fluorine International Ltd. originally held by her deceased mother, invoking a succession certificate and the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF) Rules. The respondents, IEPF Authority and the company, refused the …

Most. Madhuri Kunwar and OrsversusRajendra Singh

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Madhuri Kunwar and her brothers Arun Kumar Pandey and Rajnish Kumar Pandey, applied to be impleaded in Title Suit No. 137 of 2006 filed by the late Mst. Dulari Kunwar against the respondents. They relied on a registered deed of gift in favour of the two brothers and an unregistered …

Ramesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of heirs, challenged an order dated 15 September 2025 that rejected their claim to a long‑standing jamabandi in favour of other respondents. They sought quashing of that order, declaration that a revenue report dated 4 July 2024 was null, and a direction that their …

Smt. Pushpa DeviversusEastate Of Rupan Mahto and Anr

DISPOSED

Pushpa Devi, the daughter‑in‑law of the deceased Rupan Mahto, sought probate of a Will dated 02‑12‑2006 that purportedly appointed her as executor of his property. The Fast Track Probate Court dismissed the petition, finding the Will surrounded by suspicious circumstances and lacking proper …

SAMIR NIDHIR DUTTAversusSUBIR NIDHIR DUTTA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Samir Nidhir Dutta, sought revocation of a probate granted on 8 March 2024 in respect of a will dated 10 January 2002 executed by the deceased Nidhir Kalimohan Dutta. The respondent, Subir Nidhir Dutta, had earlier obtained probate of an earlier will dated 17 November 2001, which had …

BHARAT KANTIALAL DALALversusSURENDRA KANTILAL DALAL AND 32 ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

The plaintiff, an executor of a 1994 will, filed a suit seeking administration of the deceased’s estate and, alternatively, administration on intestacy. The defendant‑original (Def. 5) moved to dismiss the suit under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, arguing that the probate court alone decides the …

C.P. FRANCISversusC.P. JOSEPH AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 1071Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned the succession to the suit‑schedule property of the deceased parents, C.R. Pius and Philomina Pius, who had executed a joint will bequeathing the property to the appellant C.P. Francis. The respondents, other children of the deceased, challenged the will on the grounds of lack …

RAMESH CHAND (D) THR. LRS.versusSURESH CHAND AND ANR.

2025 INSC 1059Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff claimed title to a Delhi property on the basis of an agreement to sell, a general power of attorney, a receipt of consideration, an affidavit and a registered will executed by his father, Kundan Lal. The trial court and High Court had upheld his claim, but the Supreme Court examined …

GURDIAL SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRversusJAGIR KAUR (DEAD) AND ANR. ETC.

2025 INSC 866Dismissed

Maya Singh died leaving a registered Will dated 16 May 1991 that bequeathed his 67-kanal land to his nephew, Gurdial Singh, while omitting any reference to his wife, Jagir Kaur, and providing no reason for her disinheritance. The nephew sued to enforce the Will, and the wife filed a separate suit …

N.P. SASEENDRANversusN.P. PONNAMMA & ORS.

2025 INSC 388Dismissed

The appellant (son) challenged a decree of the Kerala High Court that declared a 1985 deed executed by his father in favour of his sister (plaintiff) to be a settlement and a valid gift, thereby invalidating a later cancellation deed and sale deed dated 19.10.1993. The core issue was whether the …

GOPAL KRISHAN & ORS.versusDAULAT RAM & ORS.

2025 INSC 18Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Gopal Krishan claimed title to a one‑quarter share of land in Gurdaspur based on a Will executed by the deceased Sanjhi Ram on 7 November 2005, which was subsequently transferred and sold. The respondents challenged the Will, alleging it was forged and that the attesting witness had …

SHAKTI YEZDANI & ANR.versusJAYANAND JAYANT SALGAONKAR & ORS.

2023 INSC 1076Dismissed

The testator, Jayant Shivram Salgaonkar, died leaving fixed deposits and mutual fund securities for which he had nominated certain family members under Section 109A of the Companies Act, 1956 and Bye‑law 9.11.1 of the Depositories Act, 1996. The nominees claimed that the nomination gave them …

DEREK A C LOBO & ORS.versusULRIC M A LOBO (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.

2023 INSC 1093Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants sought probate of a Will dated 10‑Nov‑1992 executed by their mother, Cecelia Gertrude Lobo, which was contested by one brother (defendant No.5) on grounds of alleged suspicious circumstances. The trial court found that the Will was duly executed, satisfying Section 63 of the Indian …

MOTURU NALINI KANTHversusGAINEDI KALIPRASAD (DEAD, THROUGH LRS.)

2023 INSC 1004Dismissed

The appellant, Moturu Nalini Kanth, filed a suit as a minor claiming absolute title to the properties of the deceased Venkubayamma based on a registered will dated 03.05.1982 and a registered adoption deed dated 20.04.1982. The trial court upheld the suit, but the Andhra Pradesh High Court reversed …

ASHUTOSH SAMANTA (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusSM. RANJAN BALA DASI & ORS.

2023 INSC 225Dismissed

Gosaidas Samanta executed a will in 1929 bequeathing his extensive property to his sons and grandson. The attesting witnesses to the will were dead, and the propounder relied on depositions of the testator's sons, a witness who saw the signing, and related documents such as a 1945 partition deed and …

SWARNALATHA & ORS.versusKALAVATHY & ORS.

2022 INSC 372Appeal(s) allowed

The married couple Mannar Reddiar and Adhilakshmiammal executed separate wills bequeathing their properties to their two sons, excluding their daughter Kalavathy who had earlier received gifts. After the death of the testators, the daughter and the second son filed a suit for partition and contested …

SWAMINATHAN & ORS.versusALANKAMONY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

2022 INSC 283Dismissed

The case concerned the revocation of letters of administration granted to a brother of the deceased under a registered will dated 23‑08‑1991. Another brother filed an application for revocation, alleging that all legal heirs had not been impleaded in the proceedings. The Madurai Bench of the High …

MURTHY & ORS.versusC. SARADAMBAL & ORS.

2021 INSC 862Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased E. Srinivasa Pillai executed a will bequeathing his house to his only son S. Damodaran, excluding his daughters. The will was produced fifteen years after the testator's death by the son’s widow, C. Saradambal, who sought Letters of Administration, while the daughters contested its …

STATE OF HARYANAversusHARNAM SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS.

2021 INSC 786Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana challenged a High Court order that had set aside the findings of the trial court and first appellate court which held that a will purportedly executed by Kishan Singh in favour of Harnam Singh was not genuine. The dispute centered on whether the will satisfied the requirements …

RAVINDER NATH AGARWALversusYOGENDER NATH AGARWAL & ORS.

2021 INSC 86Disposed off

The petitioners, Major Ravinder Nath Agarwal and his sister Lily Nath, sought transfer of a partition suit and a testamentary case involving a Will dated 06‑04‑2011 of their father. The first petition asked to move the partition suit from the Additional District Judge, Saket, Delhi to the District …

TRUSTEES OF H.C. DHANDA TRUSTversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 551Case Partly allowed

The H.C. Dhanda Trust executed a Deed of Assent to vest two immovable properties in its beneficiaries, paying only Rs.200 stamp duty. The Collector of Stamps treated the deed as a gift deed, levied a deficit duty of Rs.1.28 crore and imposed a ten‑times penalty of Rs.12.80 crore, which was upheld by …

V. KALYANASWAMY (D) BY LRS. & ANR.versusL. BAKTHAVATSALAM (D) BY LRS. & ORS.

2020 INSC 455Dismissed

The case involves a property dispute between the branch of Lakshmiah Naidu (respondents) and legatees under a Will (appellants) of Rangaswami Naidu, who died on 01.06.1955 before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The appellants claimed that Rangaswami Naidu had severed the joint family status through …

VINODCHANDRA SAKARLAL KAPADIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

2020 INSC 427Dismissed

The case concerned agricultural land in Surat district that was held by Samubhai Budhiabhai, a tenant who became a deemed purchaser under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Samubhai executed a will bequeathing the land to Vinodchandra Kapadia, who was not an agriculturist. The …

KAVITA KANWARversusMRS. PAMELA MEHTA & ORS.

2020 INSC 397Dismissed

The appellant, the younger daughter of Smt. Amarjeet Mamik, sought probate of a 2003 Will that left the entire immovable property to her, while excluding her brother and elder sister. The Trial Court and the Delhi High Court rejected the probate petition, finding numerous unexplained suspicious …

SHIVAKUMAR & ORS.versusSHARANABASAPPA & ORS.

2020 INSC 349Dismissed

The plaintiffs filed a suit claiming ownership of several properties on the basis of a Will dated 20‑05‑1991 executed by the deceased Sri Sangappa and sought to declare a trust created by the defendants void. The defendants challenged the genuineness of the Will, pointing to numerous irregularities …

DHANPATversusSHEO RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2020 INSC 316Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Dhanpat sought a declaration that he, his mother and sisters were entitled to equal shares in a suit land, challenging a Will dated 30‑April‑1980 that favored his brother’s sons. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed the suit, holding that the Will was duly executed and …

RAJ KUMARI AND OTHERSversusSURINDER PAL SHARMA

2019 INSC 1388Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Raj Kumari filed a partition suit claiming a one‑fourth share in a tenement allotted to her mother Suhagwanti. The respondent Surinder Pal Sharma defended the suit by producing a registered Will dated 02‑01‑1992, allegedly executed by Suhagwanti in his favour and attested by Ramesh …

MANJU PURIversusRAJIV SINGH HANSPAL & ORS.

2019 INSC 1244Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Surjan Singh Randhawa executed an unregistered Will in 1961 bequeathing property to his eldest daughter, Gian Hanspal. Twenty years later, a probate petition was filed and the Calcutta High Court granted probate on 4 June 1982 without issuing citations to all legal heirs, notably the …

SHIV KUMAR & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1142Dismissed

The petitioners purchased land in Delhi after a Section 4 notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had been issued, and later sought a declaration under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 that the …

RAMESH NIVRUTTI BHAGWATversusDR. SURENDRA MANOHAR PARAKHE

2019 INSC 1122Dismissed

Antoinette Bhagwat's will was probated in California and, in ancillary proceedings, letters of administration were granted by the Bombay High Court in 1994 to Dr. Surendra Parakhe. Ramesh Nivrutti Bhagwat, a relative of the deceased's husband, claimed he had no notice of this grant and filed a …

MD. ABRARversusMEGHALAYA BOARD OF WAKF & ANR.

2019 INSC 1087Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Md. Abrar, a descendant through the female line of the waqif Haji Elahi Baksh, sought appointment as a joint mutawalli of a waqf created by a deed dated 9‑Nov‑1936. The deed named two original joint mutawallis, Md. Shafi and Kammu Mia, and provided that upon the death of either, the …

GOVINDBHAI CHHOTABHAI PATEL & ORS.versusPATEL RAMANBHAI MATHURBHAI

2019 INSC 1070Dismissed

The appellants, sons of the deceased donor, claimed that a property gifted by their father to the respondent was ancestral and that the donor lacked authority to execute the gift deed, alleging the deed was forged. The trial court held the property ancestral, a view affirmed by the first appellate …

JOSE PAULO COUTINHOversusMARIA LUIZAVALENTINA PEREIRA & ANR.

2019 INSC 1029Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the succession of property belonging to a Goan domicile, Joaquim Mariano Pereira, who had bequeathed a Bombay immovable to one daughter while the other two daughters contested the applicability of the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867, to that property. The dispute centered on whether …

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusLORD NORTHBOOK AND ORS.

2019 INSC 969Matter referred to larger bench

The testator, Raja Sardar Singh, died in 1987 without apparent legal heirs and had executed a will bequeathing his assets to the Khetri Trust. The Trust sought probate, which was dismissed by the Delhi High Court, while agnates also objected. The Rajasthan Collector, after an inquiry, initiated …

KANTA YADAVversusOM PRAKASH YADAV & ORS.

2019 INSC 808Dismissed

Zorawar Singh owned immovable property in Delhi and executed a will (1985) and codicil (1995) bequeathing it to the parties. After his death, the respondents filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction concerning the will, while the appellant filed a suit for natural succession. The Delhi …

JOSEPH EASWARAN WAPSHARE & ORS.versusSHIRLEY KATHELEEN WHEELER

2019 INSC 277Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Joseph Easwaran Wapshare, obtained a Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as the son and lineal descendant of the intestate Gorden Wapshare. The respondent, Shirley Katheleen Wheeler, who is the daughter of Beatrice (the wife of Edward Wapshare, …

MURUGAN & ORS.versusKESAVA GOUNDER (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ORS.

2019 INSC 259Dismissed

The suit concerned property of Petha Gounder that had been sold by his son Balaraman both in his own name and on behalf of his minor son Palanivel without court permission, violating Section 8 of the Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act, 1956. The plaintiffs, sons of Kannan, filed a suit in 1992 for …

B.C. SINGH (D) BY LRS.versusJ.M. UTARID (D) BY LRS.

2018 INSC 458Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. B.C. Singh and his wife, Dr. S.L. Singh, jointly purchased a property, each holding an equal half. After Dr. S.L. Singh died intestate without issue, her husband claimed his statutory share under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, while the defendant J.M. Utarid, a distant kindred, claimed a …

OM PRAKASH & ANR.versusMISHRI LAL (DEAD) REPRESENTED BY HIS LR. SAVITRI DEVI

2017 INSC 245Appeal(s) allowed

Om Prakash and another, joint owners of a property, filed an eviction suit under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 against Mishri Lal (deceased) represented by his legal heirs. The tenants admitted tenancy under the appellants' grandmother but denied the …

RAMESH VERMA (D) TR. LRS.versusLAJESH SAXENA (D) BY LRS & ANR.

2016 INSC 1053Dismissed

The case arose from a partition suit filed by the deceased Lajesh Saxena seeking a share in the joint Hindu family property. The trial court allotted shares, which the High Court altered by increasing the daughter’s share to one‑eighth and rejecting the validity of three wills under Section 68 of …

JAI MAHAL HOTELS PVT. LTD.versusRAJ KUMAR DEVRAJ & ORS.

2015 INSC 696Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute over the transfer of shares of Jai Mahal Hotels Pvt. Ltd. after the death of Late Maharaja Jagat Singh, who had bequeathed his shares to his mother Gayatri Devi (GD). GD and the grandchildren (the DR Group) obtained a succession certificate and GD executed a …

ABCversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2015 INSC 482Appeal(s) allowed

An unwed Christian mother filed a petition under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, seeking to be appointed guardian of her five‑year‑old son. The Guardian Court dismissed the petition because the mother refused to disclose the name and address of the child’s putative father, holding …

SMT. SHAKUNTALA BAI & ORS.versusMR. MAHAVEER PRASAD

2015 INSC 469Dismissed

The deceased Kanhaiya Lal executed three wills, the last dated 15 November 1978, bequeathing his property to his adopted son Mahaveer Prasad. The non‑adopted family members challenged the 1978 will as a forgery and claimed the earlier registered will of 23 December 1974 was the last valid testament. …

JAGDISH CHAND SHARMAversusNARAIN SINGH SAINI (DEAD) THROUGH HIS LRS. & ORS.

2015 INSC 376Dismissed

The appellant sought a Letter of Administration on the basis of a Will dated 22‑10‑1973, allegedly executed by the deceased Nathu Singh in favour of the appellant. The trial court held the Will validly executed and granted the administration, but the High Court set aside that order, finding the Will …

VIJAYA UKARDA ATHOR (ATHAWALE)versusSTATE OF.MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2015 INSC 39Appeal(s) allowed

Vijaya Ukarda Athor, daughter of a deceased municipal employee, applied for a compassionate appointment in 1997 as a minor and again in 1998 after attaining majority. She married in 2009, and the corporation appointed the deceased's illegitimate son in 2012, rejecting her claim on the ground that …

LEELA RAJAGOPAL & ORS.versusKAMALA MENON COCHARAN & ORS.

2014 INSC 612Dismissed

The mother, K.P. Janaki Amma, executed two wills in 1981 and 1982 bequeathing a house to her daughter Kamala Menon and granddaughter Geetha, expressly excluding her sons. The sons challenged the validity of the later will, alleging undue influence, suspicious circumstances such as the daughter’s …

GAIV DINSHAW IRANI & ORS.versusTEHMTAN IRANI & ORS.

2014 INSC 341Dismissed

The original tenant, Bomanji Irani, bequeathed his government‑owned tenancy to his wife Daulatbai, who was a residuary legatee, and the tenancy was held jointly by her and their five sons. After Daulatbai's death, the Bombay Municipal Corporation (BMC) transferred the tenancy to one son, Dinshaw …

M.B. RAMESH (D) BY LRS.versusK.M. VEERAJE URS (D) BY LRS. & ORS.

2013 INSC 308Dismissed

The respondents filed a suit claiming title to ancestral land based on a will dated 24‑10‑1943 executed by the testatrix, Smt. Nagammanni, and registered the next day. The trial court and the first appellate court dismissed the suit, holding that the will was not proved because it did not satisfy …

MATHAI SAMUEL AND ORS.versusEAPEN EAPEN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2012 INSC 526Appeal(s) allowed

The appeal concerned whether the recitals in Exhibit A1, particularly item 1 of Schedule 8, created a testamentary disposition (a Will) or a settlement/gift that vested rights in the plaintiffs during the executants' lifetimes. The Supreme Court examined the nature of the composite document, …

SURAJ LAMP & INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

2011 INSC 739Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the legality of transactions that rely on Sale Agreements, General Power of Attorney or Wills (collectively termed SA/GPA/Will transfers) as a mode of transferring immovable property. It observed that such arrangements are used to evade stamp duty, registration fees and to …

SIDDAMURTHY JAYARAMI REDDY (D) BY LRS.versusGODI JAYA RAMI REDDY & ANR.

2011 INSC 254Dismissed

Bijivemula Subba Reddy executed a 1920 muffussil will bequeathing all his movable and immovable property to his minor granddaughter Lakshumamma, appointing his son‑in‑law Rami Reddy as executor and guardian. The will contained a defeasance clause: if the daughter Pitchamma and Rami Reddy failed to …

GOPAL SWAROOPversusKRISHNA MURARI MANGAL & ORS.

2010 INSC 817Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a partition suit against his father, the Karta of a joint family, who died during the proceedings. The plaintiff's brother, Gopal Swaroop, claimed that the deceased had executed a will leaving his share to him. The trial court and a single High Court judge held that the will was …

SADARAM SURYANARAYANA & ANR.versusKALLA SURYA KANTHAM & ANR.

2010 INSC 726Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a Will dated 4 September 1976 in which the testatrix bequeathed certain properties in absolute terms to her two daughters, with a later clause stating that after the daughters' deaths the remaining property should devolve to their female children. After one daughter died …

ITTIANAM AND ORS.versusCHERICHI @ PADMINI

2010 INSC 436Disposed off

The dispute concerned the grant of letters of administration for seven properties bequeathed in a Will dated 8 May 1967. The testator had acquired full title to items 4‑7 through a sale deed executed on 2 May 1967 and registered on 8 May 1967, before his death on 20 July 1971. The High Court limited …

SAMIR CHANDRA DASversusBIBHAS CHANDRA DAS & ORS.

2010 INSC 295Appeal(s) allowed

Jogesh Chandra Das executed a Will in 1983 appointing his wife Parul Bala Das and son Samir Chandra Das as executors. During probate proceedings the executors sold land covered by the Will; Samir signed as a witness to the sale deed. The Calcutta High Court held that by signing as a witness Samir …

BALATHANDAYUTHAM & ANR.versusEZHILARASAN

2010 INSC 217Dismissed

The father executed a registered Will in 1972 bequeathing property to two sons and two daughters, omitting his eldest son (appellant). After the father's death in 1980, the appellant claimed that the earlier Will had been revoked by two subsequent unregistered Wills dated 25 April 1980 and 2 May …

BHAG SINGHversusJASKIRAT SINGH & ORS.

2009 INSC 1313Case Partly allowed

Natha Singh executed two wills, one in 1979 bequeathing his Punjab house to his son Shag Singh and another in 1986 bequeathing his Haryana house to his second son Jaskirat Singh. After Natha Singh's death, Jaskirat filed a suit for possession of the Haryana house, while Shag Singh's brothers filed a …

FGP LTD.versusSALEH HOOSEINI DOCTOR AND ANR.

2009 INSC 1138Dismissed

FGP Ltd., a public limited company, occupied a flat in Mumbai under a tenancy agreement dated 16‑07‑1981. The legal representatives of the original owner filed a suit for possession under the Bombay Rent Act, 1947, claiming reasonable and bona‑fide requirement; the Small Causes Court, the appellate …

CHALLAMMAversusTILAGA & ORS.

2009 INSC 990Dismissed

The deceased K.T. Subramanya had taken four life insurance policies naming his mother, Challamma, as nominee. After his death, his alleged wife Tilaga and their two children applied for a succession certificate under Section 372 of the Succession Act, 1925, claiming the deceased was married to …

OMPRAKASH & ORS.versusRADHACHARAN & ORS.

2009 INSC 671Dismissed

The case concerned the intestate succession of self‑acquired property of Narayani Devi, a widow who was expelled from her matrimonial home and lived with her parents. After her death, her mother and her brothers applied for a succession certificate, while the heirs of her husband also claimed the …

KRISHNA KUMAR SHARMAversusRAJESH KUMAR SHARMA

2009 INSC 420Case Partly allowed

The dispute arose between step‑brothers over the validity of a registered will and the right to obtain probate or letters of administration under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The respondent claimed the will was valid, while the appellant sought probate. The central legal question was whether …

YUMNAM ONGBI TAMPHA IBEMMA DEVIversusYUMNAM JOYKUMAR SINGH & ORS.

2009 INSC 330Dismissed

The appellant, Yumnam Ongbi Tampha Ibema Devi, claimed that her father‑in‑law Yumnam Gouramani Singh executed a valid will on 13‑8‑1986 bequeathing land to her. The respondents contested the will, alleging it was not duly executed. The Supreme Court examined whether the will complied with Section 63 …

SYED ASKARI HADI ALI AUGUSTINE IMAM & ANR.versusSTATE (DELHI ADMN.) & ANR.

2009 INSC 290Dismissed

The appellants sought registration and mutation of a will dated 3 May 1998, which was contested by the testatrix's heir in both civil and criminal proceedings alleging forgery. While the criminal case (IPC 420, 468, 444, 34) was instituted before the probate suit under the Indian Succession Act, the …

BHAGWAN KR I SHAN GUPTAversusPRABHA GUPTA & ORS.

2009 INSC 262Dismissed

The dispute arose between the heirs of Murari Lal Gupta (the testator) and the family of his brother Girdhari Lal Gupta over a property jointly owned by the brothers. The testator's will declared that the ground floor would vest in his four sons and the first floor in Girdhari's family, with both …

RUR SINGH (D) TH. LRS. & ORS.versusBACHAN KAUR

2009 INSC 156Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a Will executed by a villager, Kehar Singh, bequeathing his agricultural lands to his sons, which was challenged by his daughter Bachan Kaur on the ground that the Will was not duly executed and was surrounded by suspicious circumstances. The trial court and the first appellate …

LALITABEN JAYANTILAL POPATversusPRAGNABEN JAMNADAS KATARIA & ORS.

2008 INSC 1504Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard an appeal against a Gujarat High Court order that granted probate of a Will dated 18 June 1995 executed by the deceased Jayantilal Kataria. The appellant contended that the Will was not validly attested because Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 requires two or …

BHARPUR SINGH & ORS.versusSHAMSHER SINGH

2008 INSC 1429Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Devi, a 75‑year‑old widow, executed a will on 30‑March‑1962 in favour of Shamsher Singh, an agnate five degrees removed, disinheriting her two surviving daughters. After her death in 1990, Shamsher Singh sued the daughters (appellants) to set aside a mutation order in their favour, claiming he …

NARENDRA GOPAL VIDYARTHIversusRAJAT VIDYARTHI

2008 INSC 1385Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a Will executed by Bishan Sahai Vidyarthi in 1965, which set aside Rs.30,000 for the benefit of his widowed daughter‑in‑law Chandramukhi and her son Narendra Gopal Vidyarthi. Within a month the testator purchased an immovable property with that amount. After the testator's …

CHANDRABHAI K. BHOIR & ORS.versusKRISHNA ARJUN BHOIR & ORS.

2008 INSC 1265Appeal(s) allowed

The testator Kanha Barik Mhatre executed a Will in 1963; after his death, the legatees (respondents) obtained probate while the appellants filed a caveat and later withdrew it. The parties entered into a compromise agreement claiming to alter the Will’s terms and a separate family‑arrangement …

SHYAMAL KANTI GUHA (D) THROUGH LRS & ORS.versusMEENA BOSE

2008 INSC 665Case Partly allowed

The case concerned the construction of a 1985 Will of Hillol Kanti Guha, who bequeathed his dwelling house in equal shares to his brother Shyamalkanti Guha and sister Meena Bose, with a clause that the brother could occupy the premises absolutely after the sister's death. The sister filed a suit for …

BABU SINGH & ORS.versusRAM SAHAI @ RAM SINGH

2008 INSC 559Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a will dated 25‑9‑1981 could be proved under Sections 68 and 69 of the Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 63(1)(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The will was attested by two witnesses, one of whom had died and the other, Harnek Singh, was alive but was not …

ANIL KAKversusKUMARI SHARADA RAJE & ORS.

2008 INSC 516Dismissed

Maharani Sharmishthabai Holkar executed a detailed Will on 4 November 1992 that referred to three appendices containing the specific distribution of her assets. The appendices were not signed by the attesting witnesses and were not in existence at the time of execution. Applications for probate were …

KUNVARJEET SINGH KHANDPURversusKIRANDEEP KAUR & ORS.

2008 INSC 449Dismissed

The testator executed a will on 9 September 1991 and died on 5 October 1995. A probate petition filed by a respondent was withdrawn on 9 August 1999, after which respondents 1‑3 filed a petition for letters of administration on 7 August 2002. The appellant argued that the petition was barred by the …

KRISHNA KUMAR BIRLAversusRAJENDRA SINGH LODHA AND OTHERS

2008 INSC 424Disposed off

The case concerned the grant of probate of a 1999 will of Smt. Priyamvada Devi Birla (PDB) and earlier 1982 mutual wills executed by her and her husband. Several members of the Birla family filed caveats claiming a "caveatable interest" in the estate, while Rajendra Singh Lodha (RSL) sought probate …

VIDYADHARI AND ORSversusSUKHRANA BAI AND ORS.

2008 INSC 79Case Allowed

The case concerned two applications for a succession certificate under s.372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, filed by Vidyadhari (the second wife and nominee) and Sukhrana Bai (the first wife) for the movable assets of the deceased Sheetaldeen, a coal‑field employee. The trial court granted the …

GAUDIYA MISSIONversusSHOBHA BOSE & ANR.

2008 INSC 51Case Allowed

The Gaudiya Mission claimed that a will and codicil executed by its disciple, Kum. Uma Bose, in 1994 and 1996 respectively, vested her property in the Mission. After Uma's death, her sister Kum. Shobha Bose obtained a Letter of Administration and later filed a testamentary suit, which a Single Judge …

KANWARJIT SINGH DHILLONversusHARDYAL SINGH DHILLON AND ORS.

2007 INSC 1072Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kanwarjit Singh Dhillon, filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that certain immovable and movable properties left by his father, the late S. Kirpal Singh, were joint Hindu family assets and an injunction restraining the respondent from alienating them. The respondent had obtained …

SAVITHRI AND ORS.versusKARTHYAYANI AMMA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 1075Dismissed

Sankaran Nair executed a registered Will on 7 August 1971 bequeathing his property to his sister Nanikutty Amma's children and their descendants, while leaving a modest sum to his son Madhavan Nair. The son challenged the Will, alleging suspicious circumstances such as the testator's ill health, the …

BASANTI DEVIversusRAVIPRAKASH RAMPRASAD JAISWAL

2007 INSC 1080Appeal(s) allowed

A Hindu widow executed a will in favour of the respondent. After her death, the respondent obtained a grant of probate from the High Court, but failed to disclose that the testator owned property in Uttar Pradesh and did not publish citations there as required by Section 283(3) of the Indian …

SUNIL GUPTAversusKIRAN GIRHOTRA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 1021Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Sunil Gupta, successor of a purchaser of property belonging to the deceased Har Bhagwan, who sought to be impleaded in probate proceedings concerning a will dated 09‑09‑1997. The petitioners (the daughters of the deceased) had applied for probate, while the …

BAJRANG FACTORY LTD. AND ANRversusUNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA AND ORS

2007 INSC 639Dismissed

The testator, Nerode Chandra Vasu Mullick, executed a will bequeathing his immovable property to his son Hamir Chandra Vasu Mullick for life, with further appointments to his sons, grandsons, or, failing male issue, to daughters or their sons. The will contained clauses allowing conversion of the …

APOLINE D' SOUZAversusJOHN D SOUZA

2007 INSC 604Disposed off

Florine D' Souza, a 96‑year‑old bedridden woman, executed a will bequeathing land to Apoline D' Souza (appellant) and John D' Souza (respondent). The appellant, unrelated to the testatrix, claimed the bequest was due to his service to her and applied for letters of administration under Sec. 276 of …

BENGA BEHERA AND ANR.versusBRAJA KISHORE NANDA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 590Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute over a Will executed by 70‑year‑old Sarajumani Dasi in favour of a stranger, Brajakishore Nanda. The Will and a sale deed were executed on the same day, but the original Will was never produced; only a certified copy and a Xerox copy were offered. The Court found …

ASH OK KUMAR KAPUR AND ORSversusASHOK KHANNA AND ORS

2007 INSC 284Matter referred to larger bench

The case concerned a pension fund set up as a trust by Mis Dunlop India Ltd. After the beneficiaries had been paid, the trustees applied to the Calcutta High Court under Section 34 of the Indian Trusts Act seeking a direction on the surplus fund. The High Court refused to entertain the application, …

NIRANJAN UMESHCHANDRA JOSHIversusMRIDULA JYOTI RAO AND ORS.

2006 INSC 1027Dismissed

The deceased Umeshchandra Madhav Joshi executed a Will in a hospital ICU bequeathing his entire residuary estate to his son Dr. Niranjan Umeshchandra Joshi, who also acted as executor. The Will was attested by an advocate and a doctor, both known to the appellant, and was drafted under circumstances …

SHANTI DEVIversusDAROPTI DEVI AND ORS.

2006 INSC 1007Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Shanti Devi, claimed a Will executed by her mother in her favour and sought mutation of the property. Her sister, Daropti Devi, challenged the Will's validity, filing suits for perpetual injunction and declaration, both dismissed by the trial court. The Delhi High Court remitted the …

OFFICIAL TRUSTEE OF WEST BENGALversusSTEPHEN COURT LTD.

2006 INSC 1017Dismissed

The Official Trustee of West Bengal, as executor and trustee of a 1919 lease, was asked by Stephen Court Ltd. to apply to the Calcutta High Court for an extension of the lease under Section 302 of the Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 26 of the Official Trustees Act, 1913. The High Court …

M/S BAY BERRY APARTMENTS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusSHOBHA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 740

The testator executed a 1932 Will granting his sons only a life interest in certain properties, with absolute succession to their heirs after death. In 1975 the son, then a minor at the time of the Will, and his own son sold the property to the appellants, although they possessed only a life …

B. VENKATAMUNIversusC.J.YODHYA RAM SINGH AND ORS.

2006 INSC 743Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the validity of an unregistered will executed by an unmarried woman, Akkayamma, bequeathing her property to one of the children of her paramour, Jai Singh. The trial court and a single High Court judge rejected the will, citing nine (later twelve) suspicious circumstances …

SADHU SINGHversusGURDWARA SAHIB NARIKE AND ORS.

2006 INSC 586Appeal(s) allowed

Ralla Singh, a Hindu male, executed a will bequeathing his self‑acquired property to his wife Isher Kaur for life, with a restriction that she could not alienate the property and that after her death the two nephews would inherit. After Ralla's death, Isher Kaur gifted the property to a Gurdwara, …

BINAPANI KAR CHOWDHURYversusSRI SATYABRATA BASU AND ANR.

2006 INSC 345Disposed off

Binapani Kar Chowdhury filed a title suit in 1995 challenging the validity of a sale deed executed by the deceased Avarani Bose in favour of S.S. Basu. The plaintiff died in 1997 and the first respondent, claiming to be the executor and legatee under a 1996 will, was substituted as the legal …

GURSWAROOP JOSHIversusBEENA SHARMA & ORS.

2006 INSC 254Appeal(s) allowed

Harbans Lal Joshi executed a will on 3 January 1980, which later became the subject of a probate application filed by Gurswaroop Joshi under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The trial court granted probate, but the widow and other heirs appealed, contending that certain clauses in the …

NIRMALJIT KAURversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2005 INSC 593Disposed off

The widow Nirmaljit Kaur filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking production of her minor daughter, alleging that the husband's siblings forcibly took the child after his death and concealed her whereabouts. The respondents claimed the child had lived with them since birth and produced a …

SHRI BANARSI DASSversusMRS. TEEKU DUTTA AND ANR.

2005 INSC 233Dismissed

The appellant, Banarsi Dass, objected to the grant of a succession certificate to Mrs. Teeku Dutta, alleging she was not the deceased's daughter. He moved an application under Order 151 CPC for a DNA test to establish paternity, which the trial court allowed. The Delhi High Court set aside that …

KOKILAMBAL AND ORS.versusN. RAMAN

2005 INSC 226Appeal(s) allowed

Kokilambal, a Hindu widow with no issue, executed two settlement deeds in 1963‑64 granting her nephew Varadan a life usufruct and an absolute interest after her death. Varadan died in 1979 before Kokilambal, who then revoked the deeds and executed a fresh settlement in favour of Babu and Shanthi. …

SUBHADRA RANI PAL CHOUDHARYversusSHEIRLY WEIGAL NAIN AND ORS.

2005 INSC 187Disposed off

The mother bequeathed two properties to her daughters, Subhadra Rani Pal Choudhary and Jyotsnamayee Pal Choudhary, who obtained probate. The brothers appealed; during pendency the sisters were appointed administrators‑cum‑joint receivers and were permitted by the Calcutta High Court to lease the …

SRIDEVI AND ORS.versusJAYRAJA SHETTY AND ORS.

2005 INSC 54Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the daughters and a granddaughter of Padmayya Kambali challenging a will dated 28‑03‑1976 that bequeathed certain properties to the testator's two sons. The appellants argued that the will was not duly executed, citing the testator's advanced age, his death …

MEENAKSHIAMMAL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.versusCHANDRASEKARAN AND ANR.

2004 INSC 635Dismissed

The deceased Siva executed a will bequeathing his property to his step‑brother's children, excluding the plaintiffs who were children of his real sister. The plaintiffs sued for a declaration and possession, claiming they were the rightful heirs. The trial court held the will proved and dismissed …

P.S. SATHAPPAN (DEAD) BY LRSversusANDHRA BANK LTD. AND ORS.

2004 INSC 583Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners challenged a Madras High Court judgment that a Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 15 was not maintainable against an order of a single High Court judge hearing an appeal. The Supreme Court examined the interplay between Section 104(1) and (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the …

JAYAMMAversusMARIA BAI DEAD BY PROPOSED LRS. AND ANR.

2004 INSC 407Dismissed

Jayamma, the holder of a Will dated 20 February 1984 executed by the deceased tenant‑occupier Anthony Rebello, applied under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for letters of administration. The wife and children of the deceased contested the Will, alleging it was invalid. The trial court held …

COMMISSIONER, JALANDHAR DIVISION AND ORS.versusMOHAN KRISHAN ABROL AND ANR.

2004 INSC 225

The Supreme Court examined a dispute over a bungalow bequeathed by Smt. Chanan Kaur to the Randhir Jagjit Hospital. The State Government, as successor to the Hospital, sought eviction of Mohan Krishan Abrol, who claimed he was a tenant under a ten‑year lease and that the Hospital was only a …

UMA DEVI NAMBIAR AND ORS.versusT.C. SIDHAN (DEAD)

2003 INSC 705Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, daughters of the deceased, filed an application under Sections 192‑195 of the Indian Succession Act seeking possession of their ancestral house, alleging illegal occupation by the respondent who claimed title under a purported joint will. The District Judge, in a summary proceeding, …

BHAGAT RAM AND ANR.versusSURESH AND ORS.

2003 INSC 672Dismissed

The appellants, sons of the deceased Mast Ram, challenged the sale of their father's property by his widow Muni Devi, arguing that a statement recorded by the Registrar of Deeds on 21 May 1973 constituted a codicil that, if valid, limited the widow to a life estate. The Court examined whether a …

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusMRS. VIJAYA C. GURSHANEY AND ANR.

2003 INSC 422Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Ohan, an allottee of a plot under the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), died without constructing on the land and left a will in favour of a non‑blood relative, Mrs. Vijaya C. Gurshane. She obtained a Letter of Administration from the District Judge based on the will and applied to the DDA for …

M. RANGASAMYversusRENGAMMAL AND ORS.

2003 INSC 416Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned two settlement deeds executed by Nanjammal in favour of her grandson, the appellant, which the daughters claimed were obtained by undue influence. The trial court declared the deeds void, but the first appellate court upheld their validity as gift deeds. The High Court reversed, …

JOHN VALLAMATTOM AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA

2003 INSC 322Case Allowed

The petitioners, two Christians, challenged Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 which barred Christians from bequeathing property for religious or charitable purposes unless a will was executed at least twelve months before death and deposited as prescribed. They argued that the provision …

ARUNKUMAR AND ANR.versusSHRINIWAS AND ORS.

2003 INSC 221Appeal(s) allowed

Sitabai executed a will bequeathing her self‑acquired property to her husband, Ramachandra, for his lifetime and thereafter to three minor nephews. After the testator and her husband died, the husband's brother and his children took possession, and a compromise decree was obtained in an injunction …

M.V. SHANKAR BHAI AND ANR.versusCLAUDE PINTO (SINCE DECEASED) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2003 INSC 91Dismissed

The testator Claude Pinto executed a will appointing his son as executor to sell a property and distribute the proceeds, while also allowing the legatees to seek partition. The executor entered into a sale agreement with the tenant, M.V. Shankar Bhoi, which contained a clause that the sale was …

SUBAL PAULversusMALINA PAUL AND ANR.

2003 INSC 79Dismissed

The appellant, son of the testator, applied for probate of his father's will. The Additional District Judge rejected the application, but the Gauhati High Court, on appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, granted letters of administration. The respondents filed a letters‑patent …

JANKI NARAYAN BHOIRversusNARAYAN NAMDEO KADAM

2002 INSC 551Dismissed

The respondent filed a suit for possession of property on the basis of a Will that was signed by two attesting witnesses. At trial only one attesting witness and the scribe were examined, while the second witness, though alive, was not called. The trial court accepted the Will, but the District …

TALUK LAND BOARD AND ORS.versusCYRIAC THOMAS AND ORS.

2002 INSC 373Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the Taluk Land Board against a Kerala High Court order that accepted sale deeds executed by the sisters of Cyriac Thomas, the declarant. The central question was whether the sisters, as daughters of the deceased Elanjikkal Cyriac, possessed a legal share in …

MADHUKAR D. SHENDEversusTARABAI ABA SHEDAGE

2002 INSC 14Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Madhukar D. Shende, claimed title to a suit property based on a registered will executed by the deceased Bhagubai in favour of her niece Chingubai, which was later transferred to the plaintiff. The defendant, Tarabai Abashedage, contested the will, alleging oral gift and adverse …

N. KAMALAM (DEAD) AND ANR.versusAYYASAMY AND ANR.

2001 INSC 341Dismissed

The appellants filed a partition suit claiming title to a half of a property based on a will executed by Masane Gowder in favour of two sisters. The respondents contested the will, arguing that the property was joint family property and that the will was not properly attested. The trial court held …

MUNINANJAPPA AND ORS.versusR. MANUAL AND ANR.

2001 INSC 204

The appellant Muninanjappa claimed that a Will dated 1 June 1942 gave him and Guruswamy only a limited, non‑alienable life interest in a house, with absolute ownership only if a son was born. Guruswamy died without male issue and his widow Sevamma sold the property to respondents R. Manual and …

CLARENCE PAIS AND ORSversusUNION OF INDIA

2001 INSC 110Dismissed

The petitioners, Indian Christians, challenged the constitutionality of Section 213(2) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as amended by the Kerala Amendment Act, 1986, arguing that the compulsory probate requirement applied only to Christians and was discriminatory. Two writ petitions (C No. 137 of …

SHRI VISHIN N. KHANCHANDANI AND ANR.versusVIDYA LACHMANDAS KHANCHANDANI AND ANR.

2000 INSC 400Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased holder of several National Savings Certificates (NSC) died, and his widow and daughter sought a succession certificate under s.370 of the Indian Succession Act for the debts and securities, including the NSCs where the deceased had nominated his brother and step‑brother as nominees. The …

MADHVI AMMA BHAWANI AMMA AND ORS.versusKUNJIKUTTY PILLAI MEENAKSHI PILLAI AND ORS.

2000 INSC 264Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration as legal heir and partition of property and simultaneously applied for a Succession Certificate under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to claim insurance proceeds. The trial court declared the plaintiff the sole heir and granted the certificate; the …

BALWANT KAUR AND ANR .versusCHANAN SINGH AND ORS.

2000 INSC 225Appeal(s) allowed

Sham Singh, the sole owner of a 47-kanal land, executed a will bequeathing two‑thirds of the property to his brothers and one‑third to his widowed daughter, Balwant Kaur, as a life interest that would revert to the brothers on her death. The daughter, a destitute dependent of her father, claimed …

K.R. PATEL (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1999 INSC 360Dismissed

The deceased K.R. Patel and B.G. Amin were appointed executors and trustees under a 1962 will that directed payment of debts, conveyance of specific legacies, conversion of remaining assets into cash and donation to charitable purposes. The will created a public trust, which was registered in …

K LEELAVATHY BAI AND ORS.versusP.V. GANGADHARAN AND ORS.

1999 INSC 113Dismissed

The testator S.P. Sadanandan bequeathed specific property to his two sons and appointed his wife, elder son and a chartered accountant as executors. After the chartered accountant relinquished, the widow and elder son remained as joint executors and obtained probate. The elder son executed a …

NAGULAPATI LAKSHMAMMAversusMUPPARAJU SUBBAIAH

1998 INSC 177Dismissed

The father of the appellant executed a will that was purportedly attested by five persons; only two actually signed, while three "Nishanis" neither signed nor affixed a thumb impression. One of these, identified as DW‑2, claimed to have attested the will but his name was written by a scribe on his …

GURDIAL KAUR AND ORS.versusKARTAR KAUR AND ORS.

1998 INSC 158Dismissed

The case concerned a registered will allegedly executed by Hamam Singh in favour of the appellants, Gurial Kaur and others. Although the will bore the Sub‑Registrar’s endorsement and the executant was said to have been identified by a village Lambardar, the trial court set aside the will on grounds …

HA MALBARI (DEAD) BY LRS.versusNASIRUDDIN PIRMOHMAD AND ORS.

1997 INSC 682Dismissed

The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased licensee, challenged the continuation of summary ejectment proceedings under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, after the licensee's death. They argued that the cause of action was personal and should abate with the licensee's …

P.D. GUPTAversusRAM MURTI AND ANR.

1997 INSC 535Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by advocate P.D. Gupta under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961, challenging his one‑year suspension imposed by the Bar Council of India for professional misconduct. Gupta, who had acted as counsel for a client in litigation over the estate of the deceased …

KARTAR KAUR AND ANR.versusMILKHO AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1244Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, the widow and daughter of the deceased Atma Singh, challenged a registered will that left all of his property to his sister (the first respondent) and subsequent sale deeds that transferred land to the sister's son. The trial court found numerous suspicious circumstances—such as …

MRS. NALINI NAVIN BHAGWATI AND ORS.versusMR. CHANDRAVADAN M. MEHTA

1996 INSC 1200Appeal(s) allowed

Manvantrai Mehta died leaving property and a will of his wife Kamlaben. The sons, including Chandravadan Mehta, obtained probate of Kamlaben’s will in 1987. The other children, led by Nalini Navin Bhagwati, filed an application under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act to revoke that probate. …

SMT. YALLAWWversusSMT. SHANTAVVA

1996 INSC 1163Disposed off

Basappa filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(i‑b) of the Hindu Marriage Act and obtained an ex‑parte decree on 15‑12‑1989. Basappa died on 26‑05‑1990; the wife, Shantavva, claimed she only learned of the decree on 31‑03‑1990 and was not properly served, filing an application under Order IX …

SMT. SAWARNIversusSMT. INDER KAUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 932Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Smt. Sawarni, and her sister Roori claimed to be the daughters of the deceased landowner Gurbax Singh and sought a declaration of title and possession of the disputed land. A will executed by the widow Gurdip Kaur in favour of the two daughters and a succession certificate issued …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GUJARATversusSHRI UDAYAN CHINUBHAI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 907Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, former members of a Joint Hindu Family, received specific assets and certain family debts after a partition ordered by an arbitrator's award. They claimed that interest paid on these debts, especially to unsecured creditors, should be deductible as a diversion of income by an …

USHA SUBBARAOversusB.E. VISHVESWARIAH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 697Appeal(s) allowed

Usha Subbarao, the widow of B.N. Subbarao (one of five sons of Dr. N.S. Nanjundiah), claimed a one‑fifth share in the properties left by her father‑in‑law under a 1935 will. The will divided the estate into Schedules A, B, C and D, gave management rights to the testator’s wife, and stipulated that …

MRS. JOYCE PRIMROSE PRESTORversusMISS VERA MARIE VAS AND ORS.

1996 INSC 513Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Joyce Primrose Prestor, sought letters of administration for her mother’s estate, relying on a holograph will dated 19 June 1964 that bequeathed equal shares to her three daughters. The husband and two other daughters contested the will, alleging undue influence by the plaintiff. The …

MADHU KISHWAR AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 489Disposed off

The petitioners, tribal women from Bihar, challenged Sections 7, 8 and 76 of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 as discriminatory against women and violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution. The Court examined whether the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the Indian Succession Act, 1925 …

ASHOK KUMAR SINGHAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 281Appeal(s) allowed

Gyaso Bai executed a will in 1964 bequeathing land to Ram Swaroop, and a probate was granted in 1965. The government later acquired the land and, under the Land Acquisition Act, a reference court directed compensation to be paid in the ratio of two‑thirds to the appellants and one‑third to the …

DR. MAHESH CHAND SHARMAversusSMT. RAJ KUMARI SHARMA AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 823Case Partly allowed

Ram Nath Dewan executed a 1942 will granting his wife Satyawati a life estate in the Doctor's Lane house and directing that after her death the property go to his legal heirs. After Ram Nath's death, the son (first defendant) contested the will, claiming a later 1950 will, and the parties litigated …

KASHIBAI W/O LACHIRAM AND ANR.versusPARWATIBAI W/O LACHIRAM AND ANR.

1995 INSC 597Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, the first wife Kashi Bai and her daughter Sunita, sued for a half share in the property of their deceased husband Lachiram, alleging he was the sole owner at his death. The defendants, the second wife Parwati Bai, her daughter Meena and grandson Purshottam, contended that Lachiram …

V.M. MATHEWversusV.S. SHARMA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 510Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, V.M. Mathew, contested the validity of a will executed by his sister V.S. Annama, while the respondents sought letters of administration. In the earlier proceeding, a witness named Kurian was examined, but he died before the case concluded. The appellant later sought to introduce …

KAILVELIKKAL AMBUNHI (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusH. GANESH BHANDARY

1995 INSC 489Dismissed

The petition challenged the Kerala High Court's interpretation of a will that contained an earlier clause granting an absolute estate to Kannan and a later clause (Schedule A) stating the same properties were to be possessed as "Tavazhi". The Supreme Court examined whether the later clause, which …

SMT. GUMPHA AND ORS.versusJAIBAL

1994 INSC 66

The male testator executed a 1941 will granting each of his two wives a life interest in half of his property, with his daughter as ultimate beneficiary. After the testator's death in 1958, one widow executed a 1966 will transferring her interest to a stranger. The daughter (respondent) sued, …

PAVITRI DEVI AND ANR.versusDARBARI SINGH AND ORS.

1993 INSC 286Appeal(s) allowed

Brahmadeo Singh, a coparcener in a Mitakshara joint family, filed a suit for partition of his share. The suit was dismissed and while the appeal was pending he died. His alleged daughter, Pavitri Devi, filed an application for substitution, claiming she was his heir and that a registered gift deed …

CHIRANJILAL SHRILAL GOENKA(DECEASED) THROUGH LRversusJAGJIT SINGH AND ORS.

1993 INSC 102Disposed off

The deceased Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka left a will appointing his younger daughter as executrix, which was contested by Radhey Shyam, who claimed to be an adopted son. The parties, along with another claimant, were brought before a Supreme Court order that appointed a retired Chief Justice as …

COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, ERNAKULAMversusABDUL KARIM MOHD. (DEAD) BY LRS.

1991 INSC 146Dismissed

The Commissioner of Gift Tax appealed against a Kerala High Court order that allowed an exemption from gift tax on a transfer of movable assets made by a Muslim businessman who was seriously ill and died six weeks after executing a settlement deed. The issue was whether the transfer qualified as a …

VEERATIALINGAM AND OTHERSversusRAMESH AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 286

The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from a 1942 will of Smt. Rathinammal, which directed that her great‑grandsons should take possession of the property in "equal shares" after attaining majority. The plaintiffs, three great‑grandsons of the younger son, claimed a half share, while the …

ELIZABETH ANTONYversusMICHEL CHARLES JOHN CHOWN LENGERA

1990 INSC 138Dismissed

The petitioner, Elizabeth Antony, lodged a caveat to oppose the grant of probate of a will claimed to have been executed by the deceased Mary Aline Browne, alleging that the will was fictitious and that she had a caveatable interest arising from a trust, a gift deed and a later will of Zoe Enid …

RAM PIARIversusBHAGWANT & ORS.

1990 INSC 76Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a disinherited daughter, challenged a will executed by her ailing father one day before his death, which left all property to the sons of her sister. She alleged that the beneficiary's father had taken an active role in drafting the will and that suspicious circumstances surrounded …

WORLD WIDE AGENCIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR .versusMRS. MARGARAT T. DESOR AND ORS.

1989 INSC 392Dismissed

World Wide Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and its director Mrs. Amrit Kaur Singh appealed against a Delhi High Court order that allowed the widow and children of the deceased shareholder S.K. Desor to file a petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (and alternatively for winding up). The …

M.VEERAPPAversusEVELYN SEQUEIRA & ORS.

1988 INSC 8Dismissed

The plaintiff, a tenant, engaged an advocate to file a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court against an eviction order. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and the plaintiff sued the advocate for negligence and misconduct, claiming damages. The plaintiff died during the suit, and his …

MRS. MARY ROY ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

1986 INSC 22Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Travancore Christian Succession Act, 1092 continued to govern intestate succession for Indian Christians in the former State of Travancore after the Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951 extended the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to that territory. The petitioners …

MELEPURATH SANKUNNI EZHUTHASSANversusTHEKITTIL GOPALANKUTTY NAIR

1985 INSC 245Dismissed

M.S. Ezhlitassan filed a suit for defamation which was dismissed, appealed and obtained a decree for damages. The respondent appealed, the High Court reversed the decree and dismissed the suit. While the appeal before the Supreme Court was pending, the appellant died. His grandchildren filed …

INDU BALA BOSE & ORS.versusMANINDRA CHANDRA BOSE & ANR.

1981 INSC 192Dismissed

The case concerned an application for probate of a will executed by the deceased Ranendra Chandra Bose in 1952. The executors sought probate, but the trial court refused on the ground of doubts about the testator's mental capacity and the authenticity of his signature. The High Court set aside that …