Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951

4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4

BHARATI TAMANGversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 698Directions issued

The widow of Madan Tamang, a political leader murdered in public, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking quashing of charge‑sheets and a fresh investigation by an independent Special Investigation Team, alleging that the State police, CID and CBI investigations were faulty. The Supreme Court …

GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOMversusM. KRISHNAN & ANR.

2009 INSC 1100Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a telecom authority, disconnected a telephone line for non-payment of the bill. The respondent filed a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, which ordered reconnection and payment of Rs.5,000 compensation with interest. The appellant challenged the forum's …

SURJIT SINGHversusMAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD.

2008 INSC 499Dismissed

Surjit Singh had three telephone lines – two in his name (residential and business) and one in his wife’s name. The wife, a housewife, was financially dependent on him and the line in her name had unpaid dues. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. disconnected the two lines in Singh’s name under Rule 443 …

TATA PRESS LTD.versusMAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 435Appeal(s) allowed

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (the Nigam) and the Union of India claimed exclusive rights to publish the list of telephone subscribers under Rule 458 of the Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951, and sought to restrain Tata Press Ltd. from publishing its "Tata Press Yellow Pages" – a buyers' guide …