Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
Petitioners Saiz Chand and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04-12-2025 that alleged offences under sections 351(3), 318(4), 352 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and section 66(D) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000. The High …
The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000 and the POCSO Act, alleged to have attempted rape. He applied for regular bail, claiming false implication, a clean antecedent, and …
Manoj Prasad, a 61‑year‑old resident of East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR that primarily accused four other persons of raping a minor and related offences. The FIR also alleged that the petitioner, belonging to a Scheduled Caste, abused the informant, but …
The petitioners, who are relatives of the accused Shamsad Ansari, sought bail after being implicated in a case under sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and section 67 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000. The prosecution alleged that Shamsad Ansari, …
