Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
16 judgments · newest first · showing 1–16
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Devi Dayal Singh Yadav in Crime No. 414 of 2026, where the FIR named co‑accused Alok Patel for using unfair means in a UP Subordinate Services Selection Commission examination. The prosecution’s case against the applicant rested …
Petitioner Puttu Lal Gupta filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 17‑12‑2025 that arose from a monetary dispute. The Court referred the matter to its Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where the parties reached a settlement agreement on 07‑08‑2026, which they both affirmed as fully …
Dr. Man Singh Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking multiple mandamus orders directing cyber authorities and global platforms to investigate and curb alleged AI‑generated deepfakes and cyber offences under the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and related provisions. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite the disposal of a pending Sessions case (No. 467 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 420, 328, 376, 384 IPC and Sections 66D, 66E of the IT Act. The respondent, the …
Petitioner Ravindra Kumar filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 02‑03‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 318(4), 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66C of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The relief was later limited to protection …
The petitioner, Mohd Ansar Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 26-11-2025 under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2008, and also requested that the police not arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, if arrest were …
The applicant, Modi Jaimin Dineshkumar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The prosecution opposed bail, citing …
The applicant, Shubham Rajeshbai Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) to pre‑empt arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210062250053) alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 66‑D of the IT …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 420 and 120(B) of the IPC, Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act, 1981 and Section 67 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that a similar …
Ram Pravesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber fraud case (Cyber P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025) under Sections 303(2), 319(2), 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. He applied for regular bail for the second time, claiming that …
Surjeet Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 23‑01‑2025 and stay the cyber‑fraud trial (Case No. 25 of 2025) in which he was named as an accused. He contended that he was never mentioned in the FIR and was implicated only because his …
The applicant, Mohd Jameer, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑10, Kanpur. He asserted that the dispute with the State had been settled by a compromise dated …
Jasveer Kumar filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his arrest and subsequent remand under sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sahnita, the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and the Aadhaar Act, 2016. The petitioner contended that the arrest memo lacked a proper ground and was based on an …
The petitioner, a B.Sc. student, was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case alleging impersonation of Blue Dart employees to obtain unauthorized bank withdrawals, charged under Sections 319(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The …
The case arose from an FIR filed in 2020 alleging that the accused, S. Harish, had downloaded and stored child pornographic videos on his mobile phone. The investigation recovered two such videos and a chargesheet was filed under Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act …
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the petitioner conducted three crowdfunding campaigns on the Ketto platform. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) opened investigations under FEMA and later filed a complaint under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act (PMLA), attaching the petitioner’s bank account in …
