Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The Bombay High Court considered two Official Assignee’s reports (Nos. 46 of 2025 and 47 of 2025) filed in insolvency petitions concerning Bansi Jairamdas Jaising and Avinash Bansi Jaising. The Court examined whether the Official Assignee could adjudicate claims based on 295 Bills of Exchange and …
The Bombay High Court considered two Official Assignee’s reports (Nos. 46 of 2025 and 47 of 2025) filed in insolvency petitions concerning Bansi Jairamdas Jaising and Avinash Bansi Jaising. The Court examined whether the Official Assignee could adjudicate claims based on 295 Bills of Exchange and …
The Bombay High Court considered two Official Assignee’s reports (Nos. 46 of 2025 and 47 of 2025) filed in insolvency petitions concerning Bansi Jairamdas Jaising and Avinash Bansi Jaising. The Court examined whether the Official Assignee could adjudicate claims based on 295 Bills of Exchange and …
The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) sought to evict Ganga Devi and others from a stall at Baba Kharag Singh Marg, alleging sub‑letting and unauthorised construction. The occupants claimed ownership under a 1998 licence deed, a 2001 public notice granting ownership rights in certain markets, and a …
Vinay Bubna sued the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) alleging that the Exchange's Rules 16 and 43, which dictate how the proceeds from the sale of a defaulting member's membership are allocated, were arbitrary, violated constitutional guarantees and were inconsistent with insolvency law. The appellant …
