Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Institutes of Technology Act, 1961

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KANPURversusRAJA RAM VERMA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 81224 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether IIT Kanpur could limit the extension of retirement age to 62 years only to teachers and staff treated on par with teachers, as per communications from the Ministry of Human Resource Development. The first respondent, an Assistant Registrar, claimed entitlement to the extended age but

AVINASH SINGH BAGRI AND ORS.versusREGISTRAR IIT DELHI AND ANR.

2009 INSC 104312 August 2009Disposed off

The petitioners, who are SC/ST/OBC students admitted to IIT Delhi for B.Tech, were expelled after failing to meet the minimum credit requirements in their first two years. They argued that the institute provided no special coaching, summer courses, or a slow‑track programme, thereby violating the constitutional mandate

I. I. T.KANPURversusUMESH CHANDRA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 2782 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, appointed the respondent as Senior Pilot Instructor (Glider) with a superannuation age of 60 years. The respondent claimed that his post was an academic one and therefore his retirement age should be 62 years, obtaining a writ order from the Allahabad High Court in

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search