Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The landlord, Janak Raj, filed a suit for eviction against his tenant, Paradeep Kumar, under the Jammu & Kashmir Houses and Shops Rent Control Act, 1966. The tenant had failed to pay rent for the period January 1984 to January 1985, making a partial payment of Rs.6,000 against a due of Rs.6,500, and …
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 3(c) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (as amended in 1988), which excludes premises with a monthly rent exceeding Rs 3,500 from the Act’s protection. The appellants argued that the classification was arbitrary, violated Article 14, …
The landlord served a notice of rent arrears and termination of tenancy by registered post, which was returned undelivered, and subsequently affixed a copy of the notice on the premises. The tenant argued that the statutory requirement under Section 11 of the Jammu & Kashmir Houses and Shops Rent …
