RAHUL KUMAR YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
2024 INSC 35925 April 2024
Rahul Kumar Yadav was convicted under Sections 302 and 394 of the IPC and Section 27(2) of the Arms Act, receiving a death sentence which was later commuted to life imprisonment. He claimed that he was a juvenile at the time of the alleged offence (27 July 2011) and filed applications under Section 7‑A of the Juvenile …
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusANURUDH & ANR
2026 INSC 479 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that granted bail to the accused Anurudh and directed that a medical board determine the victim's age in all POCSO cases. The accused was charged under IPC sections 363 and 366 and POCSO sections 7 and 8 for allegedly abducting a 12‑year‑old girl. The High …
SATYA DEO @ BHOOREYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2020 INSC 5777 October 2020Directions issued
The appellant Satya Deo was convicted of murder under IPC s.302 r/w s.34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. He claimed he was a juvenile at the time of the offence (aged 16 years 7 months) and sought relief under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The Supreme Court examined the applicabi…
KARAN @ FATIYAversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2023 INSC 1973 March 2023Case Partly allowed
The appellant Karan was convicted under IPC and the POCSO Act for heinous offences and sentenced to death, which the High Court affirmed. While the appeals were pending, the appellant claimed he was a juvenile at the time of the offence, prompting a trial‑court inquiry that established his date of birth as 25‑07‑2002, …