Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 74518 August 2023Directions issued

The petition arose from the hardships faced by a child victim of sexual offence who, despite the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and its 2020 Rules, was not provided with an effective support person. The Court examined the statutory definition, duties and entitlements of

RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONSversusI.A. NO. 68248 OF 2017

2017 INSC 95515 September 2017Directions issued

The Supreme Court, hearing a public‑interest writ petition (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 406 of 2013) on the inhuman conditions in 1,382 Indian prisons, examined the high incidence of unnatural deaths, especially suicides, in custodial settings. Relying on the International Committee of the Red Cross guidelines, the Court

NIDHI KAIMversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & OTHERS ETC.

2017 INSC 13112 May 2016Directions issued

The appellants, who had secured admission to medical colleges in Madhya Pradesh through the Pre‑Medical Entrance Test (PMT), challenged the cancellation of their results and admissions on the grounds that the Vyapam Board was not validly constituted under the Madhya Pradesh Professional Examination Board Act, 2007 and

MAHENDER CHAWLA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 11535 December 2018Disposed off

The petitioners, who were witnesses or relatives of witnesses in the Asaram rape cases, alleged that they faced threats, attacks and even murders, and that the State failed to provide any protection, violating their right to a fair trial under Art. 21. They sought a court‑monitored witness‑protection programme and the

DR. SR. TESSY JOSE AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KERALA

2018 INSC 6671 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The victim, a minor at the time of rape, became pregnant and delivered a child at a hospital where three staff members – a gynecologist, a pediatrician and a hospital administrator – were later charged under Sections 19(1) and 21(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, and Sections 201 and 34

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search