Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Karnataka Forest Act, 1963

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S. KARNATAKA STATE FOREST INDUSTRIES CORPORATIONversusM/S. INDIAN ROCKS

2008 INSC 122724 October 2008Dismissed

The Karnataka State Forest Industries Corporation (KSFIC) was appointed as the State's agent to sell confiscated granite blocks. After a legislative committee uncovered a scam, the State terminated KSFIC's agency and directed it to refund the amounts paid by the purchasers, Indian Rocks and other companies. KSFIC claim

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusK. KRISHNAN

2000 INSC 40317 August 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The Range Forest Officer seized a jeep and a lorry along with forest produce for being transported without a permit under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The authorized officer ordered the jeep’s release on the condition that the respondent furnish an irrevocable bank guarantee, but the respondent sought unconditional

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusK.A. KUNCHINDAMMED

2002 INSC 20516 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 authorized officers seized a lorry carrying sandalwood oil and later ordered its confiscation and that of the vehicle, publishing the order in the official gazette. The vehicle's owner applied to a Judicial Magistrate for interim custody, which was dismissed on the ground that only the au

KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ETC. ETC.versusCANTREADS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 15815 April 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka Forest Development Corporation supplied natural rubber sheets (RMA grades I‑V) to Cantreads Pvt Ltd. The State, under s.101A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, levied a forest development tax on the raw smoked rubber. The High Court held that the processed rubber sheets were not forest produce and set asi

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusSMT. GOWRAMMA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 131814 December 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The owners of a land in Karnataka applied for permission under the Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 to fell certain trees, including reserved varieties, and were conditionally permitted to transport a portion of the timber to a government depot. After the timber was taken to the government godown, the owners s

T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMALPADversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2012 INSC 8913 February 2012Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined petitions seeking to declare sandalwood (Santalum album) and red sandalwood (Pterocarpus santalinus) as "specified plants" under Section 2(27) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and to include them in Schedule VI. The Court noted that while Indian sandalwood is listed as "vulnerable" in t

M/S. MURUDESHWARA CERAMICS LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 50512 October 2001Disposed off

Respondent nos. 13‑22 filed a writ petition seeking to restrain Murudeswara Ceramics Ltd. and its associate from constructing a clay processing unit on land in Survey No. 23, Varakodu Village, Shimoga, alleging contravention of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The land had been purchased by the second appellant on

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search