Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1974

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

BASAYYA I. MATHADversusRUDRAYYA S. MATHAD AND ORS.

2008 INSC 9424 January 2008Case Allowed

The appellant, a tenant under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, obtained occupancy rights to certain lands, while his brothers claimed a share and filed a suit for partition. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed the suit. The High Court, in a second appeal (RSA No. 105 of 1997), directed production of the

CHANNABASAPPA (DEAD) BY LR & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2013 INSC 62617 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, owners of lands purchased in 1956, claimed self‑cultivation of the property. The second respondent, Gangappa, filed a Form No.7 in 1975 asserting he was an occupant/tenant and sought occupancy rights. The Special Tehsildar reported no record of such an application, leading the respondent to file a writ

JAGADEESH & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2008 INSC 17512 February 2008Dismissed

The appellants, Jagadeesh and others, claimed tenancy and occupancy rights over a scheduled agricultural land and filed Form‑7 before the Karnataka Land Tribunal. The Tribunal and the Appellate Authority granted occupancy rights, but the High Court, exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section 121A of the Karnataka

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search