Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957

48 judgments · newest first · showing 1–48

GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1314Dismissed

The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owner of a tug, entered into a six‑month time charter agreement with New Mangalore Port Trust. The Karnataka tax authorities directed the company to register under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, claiming the agreement attracted tax under section 5C, which …

M/S ACHAL INDUSTRIESversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2019 INSC 410Dismissed

M/s Achal Industries, a manufacturer registered under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, challenged turnover tax assessments for the years 1990‑91 to 1999‑2000, arguing that the tax should be levied on "taxable turnover" rather than "total turnover" as defined in Section 6‑B(1). The appellant …

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT), MUMBAIversusM/S. DILIP KUMAR AND COMPANY & ORS.

2018 INSC 646Reference answered

The case concerned the interpretation of Customs Notification No. 20/1999, under which the respondents claimed a concessional customs duty rate for imported vitamin E50 feed powder. The Customs department denied the benefit, classifying the goods under a higher duty heading, leading to a series of …

HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2016 INSC 846Dismissed

Hindustan Lever Ltd., a tea manufacturer, claimed exemption from entry tax on packing materials used for tea under a 1993 notification and a reduced rate under a 1998 notification. The issue was whether packing material could be classified as "raw materials, component parts or inputs" within Entry …

SMT. B. NARASAMMAversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES KARNATAKA & ANR.

2016 INSC 591Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether iron and steel reinforcement used in building works contracts retains its identity as "declared goods" under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and consequently whether it is taxable at the restricted 4% rate prescribed in Section 15. The Court held that the 46th …

M/S RAVI PRAKASH REFINERIES (P) LTD.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2016 INSC 363Case Partly allowed

M/s Ravi Prakash Refineries (P) Ltd. sold Sunflower De‑oiled Cake (SF DOC) in inter‑State trade and claimed a reduced central sales tax rate of 2% by producing Form C under Notification No. FD 119 CSL 2002(2). The assessing officer initially accepted the claim, but a later officer reopened the …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusM/S PRO LAB & ORS. ETC.

2015 INSC 76Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Entry 25 of Schedule VI of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, which levies tax on the processing and supply of photographs, photo prints and photo negatives. The issue centered on whether the State could tax the goods component of a works …

M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

2013 INSC 653Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether agreements between a developer and flat purchasers constitute "works contracts" under Art.366(29‑A)(b) and whether the State can levy sales tax on the goods used in such contracts. It held that a construction agreement, even when coupled with a transfer of …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusAZAD COACH BUILDERS PVT.LTD. & ANR.

2010 INSC 607Dismissed

Azad Coach Builders was contracted by an exporter to fabricate bus bodies according to a foreign buyer’s specifications, after which the bodies were mounted on chassis and exported as complete buses. The assessee claimed exemption from State sales tax under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, …

M/S. A & G PROJECTS & TECHNOLOGIES LTD.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2008 INSC 1417Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. A & G Projects & Technologies Ltd., a dealer registered under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, entered into three contracts for supplying capacitor banks to Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (KPTCL). The goods were procured from a manufacturer in Tamil Nadu via an EPC contractor …

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusM/S SRI CHAMUNDESWARI SUGAR LTD.

2008 INSC 464Case Allowed

M/s Sri Chamundeswari Sugar Ltd., a sugar manufacturer, purchased sugarcane from growers and paid the Statutory Minimum Price fixed by the Central Government together with the State Advised Price (SAP) fixed by Karnataka. The assessing authority levied purchase tax on the total amount, including …

M/S. IMAGIC CREATIVE PVT. LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ORS.

2008 INSC 33Case Allowed

M/s Imagic Creative Pvt Ltd, an advertising agency, filed returns for service tax under the Finance Act, 1994 and for VAT under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The VAT authority classified the entire transaction, including the concept‑creation service for which service tax had already been …

M/S KUMAR MOTORS, BAREILLYversusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, U.P. LUCKNOW

2007 INSC 96Dismissed

M/S Kumar Motors, Bareilly purchased auto‑rickshaw chassis and bodies separately and assembled them before sale. The issue was whether this assembly amounted to "manufacture" under Section 2(e‑1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 and consequently attracted purchase tax under Section 3‑AAAA despite the …

M/S. BALKRISHNA HATCHERIESversusCLARIFICATION & ADVANCE RULING AUTHORITY

2006 INSC 592Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mis. Balkrishna Hatcheries, sold dressed chicken in polythene bags that were closed by stapling, crimping, or a rubber band. The Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 exempts meat sold in non‑sealed containers, but imposes tax on meat sold in sealed containers. The issue was whether such bags …

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.versusSHREYAS PAPERS PVT. LTD. AND ORS

2006 INSC 15Dismissed

The State of Karnataka appealed against Shreyas Papers Pvt. Ltd., which had purchased the land, building, plant and machinery of a defaulting company after the Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation took over those assets under the State Financial Corporation Act. The …

XEROX MODICORP LIMITED.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2005 INSC 376Dismissed

Xerox Modicorp Ltd entered into Full Service Maintenance Agreements (FSMA) and Spares and Service Maintenance Agreements (SSMA) with customers after selling Xerox machines. The dispute concerned whether the supply of spare parts, toners and developers under these agreements amounted to a sale liable …

M/S. K. RAHEJA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2005 INSC 262Dismissed

The appellant, Mis. K. Raheja Development Corporation, entered into development agreements with land owners and sale agreements with prospective purchasers to construct residential and commercial units for consideration. The State of Karnataka assessed turnover tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, …

SREE BALAJI RICE MILL, BELLARYversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2005 INSC 169Dismissed

The appellant, Sree Balaji Rice Mill, challenged a penalty imposed by the Additional Commissioner under Section 18A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, which was levied suo motu in revision proceedings under Section 22A after the Assessing Authority had failed to impose any penalty. The High Court had …

M/S. WIDIA (INDIA) LTD. AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 410Dismissed

The case concerned the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 and its amendment in 1993 which inserted the words "retrospectively or prospectively" in Section 3(1). The petitioners challenged the validity of the amendment for lack of the President's assent under Article 304(b) of the …

M/S. KANTHI ENTERPRISES & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2002 INSC 372Dismissed

The appellants, dealers under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, challenged the retrospective operation of an Explanation inserted in 1996 to the first proviso of Section 5(1‑A), arguing that it imposed a new tax burden they could not pass on to consumers and was therefore unreasonable and arbitrary. The …

M/S. MYCON CONSTRUCTION LTD.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

2002 INSC 267Dismissed

The appellant, Mis. My Con Construction Ltd., challenged the constitutional validity of sub‑section 6 of Section 17 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 as amended by Act 5 of 1996 and its further amendment by Act 7 of 1997 which made the provision retrospective. It argued that the State lacked …

20TH CENTURY FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2000 INSC 304

The appellants, leasing companies, entered into master lease agreements for equipment and were taxed by several states on the transfer of the right to use the goods. The states relied on explanations in their sales tax statutes that deemed the taxable event to occur where the goods were used, …

DENA BANKversusBHIKHABHAI PRABHUDAS PAREKH AND CO. AND ORS.

2000 INSC 245Dismissed

Dena Bank had taken a mortgage over the property of the partnership firm Mis Bhikhabhai Prabhudas Parekh & Co. and its partners. While the suit was pending, the State of Karnataka attached and auctioned the mortgaged property to recover arrears of sales tax. The trial court granted a decree to the …

KARNATAKA PAWN BROKERS ASSON. AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

1998 INSC 406Dismissed

The appellants, Karnataka Pawnbrokers Association, challenged the liability to pay sales tax on the sale of unredeemed pledged goods disposed of through public auction. The issue was whether a pawnbroker, by virtue of statutory authority to sell defaulted pledges, qualifies as a "dealer" and carries …

K. GOPINATHAN NAIR ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1997 INSC 307

The appellants, processors of cashew nuts in Kerala and Karnataka, purchased raw cashew nuts imported by the Cashew Corporation of India (CCI), a canalising agency, and argued that these purchases were "in the course of import" and thus exempt from state sales tax under Section 5(2) of the Central …

M/S. LIPTON INDIA LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1165Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Lipton India Ltd., challenged a Karnataka High Court judgment that was based on an affidavit filed by the State Government asserting that a sales‑tax Government Order had not been published in the Official Gazette nor laid before the Legislature. The affidavit, verified by Deputy …

VASAVADATTA CEMENTS ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER

1996 INSC 95Appeal(s) allowed

Vasavadatta Cements, a cement manufacturer, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 5(3‑D) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, which made packing material (gunny/plastic bags) taxable. The Karnataka High Court dismissed the challenge, relying on Ranganatha Associates and the Supreme …

CONSOLIDATED COFFEE LIMITED AND ANR.versusCOFFEE BOARD AND ANR.

1994 INSC 531Disposed off

The appellants, coffee growers, filed writ petitions seeking to restrain the Coffee Board from using the Pool Fund, created under Section 30 of the Coffee Act, 1942, to pay the purchase tax imposed by the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The High Court held that the growers were not liable to pay the …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSUNAGAR BROS.

1993 INSC 152Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka appealed against Sunagar Bros., who had challenged a best judgment assessment for the year 1972-73. The first and second appellate authorities dismissed the appeal on the ground that the assessee had not paid the tax "not disputed in appeal". The Karnataka High Court reversed …

BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION.OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

1992 INSC 315Dismissed

The Builders' Association of India, an association of contractors, challenged the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, specifically Explanation 3(c) to Section 2(t) and Section 5‑B with the Sixth Schedule, alleging that they converted inter‑state sales into intra‑state sales and imposed tax on the value …

T. RAMAKRISHNIAHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1990 INSC 191Dismissed

The appellant, a chartered accountant, was appointed as a non‑official member of the Karnataka Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 4(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, with his tenure periodically extended. Upon retirement he claimed a superannuation pension under the Mysore Civil …

ANDHRA STEEL CORPORATIONversusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES IN KARNATAKA

1990 INSC 115Appeal(s) allowed

Andhra Steel Corporation, a dealer under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, purchased iron scrap both within and outside Karnataka to manufacture steel products. The Act's Section 5(4) together with Schedule IV, Item 2 and Explanation II (applicable before 1‑April‑1978) exempted sales of steel semis made …

COFFEE BOARD, KARNATAKA, BANGALOREversusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

1988 INSC 163Disposed off

The Coffee Board challenged the levy of purchase tax on coffee it received from growers under the compulsory delivery provision of the Coffee Act, 1942, arguing that the transaction was a compulsory acquisition and not a sale. The Karnataka High Court held that an element of consensuality existed, …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusB. RAGHURAMA SHETTY ETC.

1981 INSC 74Appeal(s) allowed

The assessees, owners of rice mills, bought paddy from agriculturists (who were exempt from sales tax) and milled it into rice for sale. The Karnataka Sales Tax Authority levied purchase tax on the paddy under section 6(i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The assessees contended that paddy and …

STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.versusM/S. HANSA CORPORATION

1980 INSC 191Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka Legislature enacted the Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1979 to replace octroi by levying a tax of up to 2% ad valorem on specified goods (textiles, tobacco, sugar) entering 27 selected local areas. The State notified the areas and rates, and several petitions challenged …