Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

XEROX MODICORP LIMITED.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2005 INSC 37624 August 2005Dismissed

Xerox Modicorp Ltd entered into Full Service Maintenance Agreements (FSMA) and Spares and Service Maintenance Agreements (SSMA) with customers after selling Xerox machines. The dispute concerned whether the supply of spare parts, toners and developers under these agreements amounted to a sale liable to Karnataka sales

M/S INDIAN DAIRY MACHINERY CO. LTD.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

2008 INSC 8622 January 2008Dismissed

M/s Indian Dairy Machinery Co. Ltd., a dealer with a branch in Karnataka, entered into a works contract and received goods from its head office in Gujarat via stock transfer. The company claimed the benefit of composition tax under Section 17(6) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, but the assessing authority denied i

BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION.OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

1992 INSC 31517 November 1992Dismissed

The Builders' Association of India, an association of contractors, challenged the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, specifically Explanation 3(c) to Section 2(t) and Section 5‑B with the Sixth Schedule, alleging that they converted inter‑state sales into intra‑state sales and imposed tax on the value of works contracts in

SMT. B. NARASAMMAversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES KARNATAKA & ANR.

2016 INSC 59111 August 2016Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether iron and steel reinforcement used in building works contracts retains its identity as "declared goods" under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and consequently whether it is taxable at the restricted 4% rate prescribed in Section 15. The Court held that the 46th Constitution Amendment

LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITEDversusADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ANR.

2016 INSC 8525 September 2016Disposed off

Larsen & Toubro Ltd., a contractor, executed works contracts and assigned portions of the work to registered sub‑contractors who paid sales tax on their own turnover. The issue was whether the payments made to these sub‑contractors should be included in L&T's total turnover for computing turnover tax under Section 6‑B

UNITED BREWERIES LTD.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1997 INSC 2254 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

United Breweries Ltd. (the appellant) challenged the assessment of sales tax on the value of bottles and crates supplied with its beer, arguing that these were not sold but were returned against a refundable deposit. The Commercial Tax Officer, the Tribunal and the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the bottles and cr

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search