Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003

9 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKAversusM/S. M. K. AGRO TECH. PVT. LTD.

2017 INSC 98322 September 2017Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. M.K. Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd. (the assessee) purchased sunflower oil cake, paid input VAT, extracted oil (taxable) and sold the de‑oiled cake (exempt under Section 5). The State of Karnataka argued that only a partial rebate of input tax was permissible under Section 17 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act read with Ru

M/S. SOUTHERN MOTORSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 5518 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed

M/S Southern Motors, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, issued tax invoices for vehicle sales and later granted post‑sale discounts through credit notes, retaining only the net amount. The Assessing Authority disallowed deduction of these discounts from total turnover, insisting that a d

M/S TATA MOTORS LTD.versusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (SPL) & ANR.

2023 INSC 53315 May 2023Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether a credit note issued by an automobile manufacturer to a dealer, for replacing a defective part under a warranty, constitutes a sale liable to sales tax. It held that when the dealer uses a part from his own stock or purchases it from the market and is reimbursed by a credit note, the

THE STATE OF KARNATAKAversusM/S ECOM GILL COFFEE TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED

2023 INSC 21213 March 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka appealed against the High Court’s order allowing Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed by several purchasing dealers, including M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited. The Assessing Officer had denied ITC on the ground that the transactions were not genuine and the sellers were either deregistered

SMT. B. NARASAMMAversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES KARNATAKA & ANR.

2016 INSC 59111 August 2016Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether iron and steel reinforcement used in building works contracts retains its identity as "declared goods" under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and consequently whether it is taxable at the restricted 4% rate prescribed in Section 15. The Court held that the 46th Constitution Amendment

M/S MODI NATURALS LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX UP

2023 INSC 9746 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Modi Naturals Ltd., a registered dealer of rice bran oil in Uttar Pradesh, claimed full input tax credit (ITC) on tax paid for raw rice bran used to manufacture taxable oil and a by‑product (de‑oiled rice bran, an exempt good). The Revenue argued that under Section 13(1)(f) of the UP VAT Act the ITC should be limited t

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.versusM/S DURGA PROJECTS INC

2018 INSC 2056 March 2018Dismissed

M/s Durga Projects Inc, a civil works contractor registered under the Karnataka Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, sought clarification from the Authority for Advance Clarification and Ruling on the tax rate applicable to works contracts before 1 April 2006. The AAR held that the rate shoul

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search