Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The appellant, K. Rudrappa, sought to be recognized as the legal representative of his deceased father, who had an appeal pending for a land grant under the Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961. Unaware of the appeal, the appellant learned of it only after receiving a letter from his …
The appellant, a holder of a village office (Walikarki) under the Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961, claimed exclusive ownership of land regranted to him after the abolition of the office. Upon partition, he received only one‑fifth of the property while the respondents, other members of …
The appellant purchased 5 acres of land that had been regranted to a watan land‑holder in 1968, who had obtained a sanction to alienate the land under Section 5(3) of the Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961. In 1978 the Act was amended (Act 13 of 1978) to prohibit the transfer of any …
