Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The Plantation Corporation of Kerala claimed deductions for rent paid to its landlord and interest on loans used for cultivating both mature and immature oil palm plants under the Kerala Agricultural Income‑Tax Act, 1950. The Revenue disallowed these deductions, relying on Explanation 2 to Section …
Poothundu Plantations Pvt Ltd was assessed under the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act. A later Agricultural Income Tax Officer, invoking section 36, rectified the assessment on the ground that the predecessor had misinterpreted section 12, relying on the Supreme Court’s interpretation of section …
The respondent, a member of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), claimed that a partition agreement dated 3 July 1958 and a subsequent civil court decree had dissolved the HUF, so that the family could not be taxed as a HUF for assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70. The Income Tax Officer …
The assessees, Kerala Estate Mooriad Chalapuram, claimed a deduction of Rs.33,747.09 as interest on a loan under section 5 of the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1950, which was allowed. In the subsequent year, the creditor waived the interest, and the amount was credited to the assessees' …
