Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The landlord sought eviction of a long‑term tenant under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965, claiming a bonafide need for his son to start a grocery business in the premises. After the initial dismissal, the landlord obtained vacant possession of an adjacent building and the …
The tenant, Chinnamma, occupied a residential premises under a lease from Gopalan and fell into rent arrears from June 1975. After a statutory notice, the landlord sought eviction under sections 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965. The Rent Controller ordered …
The tenant Mukrigopalan appealed an eviction order of the Rent Control Court under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965. The appeal was filed after the statutory 30‑day period, and the District Judge acting as appellate authority dismissed it as time‑barred, holding that he was a …
The landlord, K.A. Anthappai, sought eviction of his tenant, C. Ahmed, under sections 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, claiming the building was needed bona‑fide for his residence after retirement. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition, finding no …
The Supreme Court examined whether a further revision by a High Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is permissible against a District Court's revisional order made under Section 20 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965. Earlier decisions – Aundal Ammal v. …
The landlord filed an eviction suit under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965 claiming bona‑fide personal need. The Rent Control Court dismissed the petition, the Subordinate Judge (appellate authority) confirmed the dismissal, and a revision before the District Judge was also …
