Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SHAMMA BHATT & ORS.versusT. RAMAKRISHNA BHATT

1987 INSC 8527 March 1987Dismissed

The appellants' father bought property from the minor's mother (guardian) in 1939. After the minor attained majority, he sued to set aside the sale and recover possession. The trial and appellate courts dismissed his suit, but the Kerala High Court set aside those judgments, ordering the respondent to pay the sale pric

KUNJAN NAIR SIVARAMAN NAIRversusNARAYANAN NAIR AND ORS.

2004 INSC 906 February 2004Case Partly allowed

The legal heirs (respondents) sued the appellant for declaration of title and possession of certain land; an earlier suit had only sought title and injunction. The appellant later filed a suit for recovery of possession and mesne profits, claiming he was a cultivating tenant and seeking compensation for improvements un

PARAMESWARAN GOVINDANversusKRISHNAN BHASKARAN AND ORS.

1992 INSC 396 February 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a mortgagor, obtained a decree for redemption of his mortgage which required payment of the mortgage amount and a sum for improvements. After depositing the decree amount, the respondent mortgagee filed applications under the Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958 and later under Section

ASGAR & ORS.versusMOHAN VARMA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1445 February 2019Dismissed

The appellants, Asgar and others, were lessees occupying a large tract of land in Kerala and sought a declaration that they could remain in possession and claim compensation for improvements under the Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958. They first raised this claim in an execution application under

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search