Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963

14 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

ACC LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2016 INSC 56128 July 2016Dismissed

ACC Ltd entered into an agreement with Cochin Cement Ltd (CCL) whereby CCL would manufacture cement using raw material supplied by ACC and the cement would be marketed under ACC's brand. ACC claimed that, under Section 5(2) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, the sale made by CCL was the first sale and ACC's sub

M/S IFB INDUSTRIES LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2012 INSC 11227 February 2012Appeal(s) allowed

IFB Industries Ltd., a manufacturer of home appliances, offered trade discounts to its dealers, some of which were granted through credit notes after sales targets were met. The dispute centered on whether such discounts, not shown on the original sales invoice, could be deducted from taxable turnover under Rule 9(a) o

M/S. COCHIN PORT TRUSTversusSTATE OF KERALA

2015 INSC 34322 April 2015Dismissed

The Cochin Port Trust, a statutory authority under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, was assessed sales tax for its dealings in scrap items such as water, firewood and waste paper. The Trust contended that it was not a "dealer" within the meaning of Section 2(viii) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, arguing that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAMversusHINDUSTAN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. AND ORS.

2015 INSC 2613 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether an Official Liquidator, appointed to wind up Premier Cable Company Ltd., qualifies as a "dealer" under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and consequently bears sales tax liability on the auction sale of the company's assets. The Court held that the liquidator, by stepping into th

MIS. SARAF TRADING CORPORATION ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2011 INSC 4213 January 2011Dismissed

The appellants, exporters of tea, bought tea at open auction from planters and exported it, claiming exemption from sales tax under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The assessing authority accepted the exemption claim as genuine but denied a refund of tax paid to the seller, holding that only the dealer

MALAYALA MANORAMA CO. LTD.versusASSTT. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES & ANR.

2010 INSC 3948 July 2010Disposed off

Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd. purchased printing ink for newspaper production in 2001‑02 and claimed a concessional 3% tax rate by filing Form 18 under Section 5(3) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Assistant Commissioner issued a penalty notice alleging that newspaper printing does not constitute "manufactur

C.T. KOCHOUSEPHversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER ETC.

2025 INSC 6618 May 2025Dismissed

The appellants purchased goods from dealers who were exempt from sales tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and challenged the levy of purchase tax under s.5A of the Kerala Act and s.7A of the Tamil Nadu Act. The questions were whether such purchases constitut

ALUVA SUGAR AGENCYversusSTATE OF KERALA

2011 INSC 6577 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Aluva Sugar Agency sold bakery margarine and argued that it should attract the concessional 4% tax rate under Entry 17A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, on the ground that margarine is an edible oil. The Sales Tax Officer and the Kerala High Court held that margarine fell under Entry 90 of the First Schedule

IDEA MOBILE COMMUNICATION LTD.versusC.C.E. & C., COCHIN

2011 INSC 5434 August 2011

Idea Mobile Communication Ltd sold SIM cards to its subscribers and charged both sales tax and service tax on activation. The dispute centered on whether the value of the SIM cards should be taxed as a service under Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994, or as a sale of goods under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act,

HEINZ INDIA LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF KERALA

2023 INSC 4884 May 2023Dismissed

Heinz India Ltd. challenged the classification of its product, Nycil Prickly Heat Powder, under state sales tax statutes. The Kerala High Court and the Madras High Court had held the product to be a "medicated talcum powder" and thus a cosmetic, subject to a lower tax rate, rejecting the revenue's view that it was a me

CARDAMOM MARKETING CORPORATION AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2016 INSC 8441 September 2016Dismissed

Cardamom Marketing Corporation and another, registered dealers under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act and Kerala Value Added Tax Act, challenged a 2002 government notification that levied an additional court fee on appeals and revisions before tribunals, directing the proceeds to the Kerala Legal Benefit Fund. They arg

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search