Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963

60 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S. PUNJAB AROMATICSversusSTATE OF KERALA

2008 INSC 55830 April 2008Case Allowed

The appellant, Punjab Aromatics, purchased "red oil" from unregistered dealers and purified it by removing water and impurities to obtain "sandalwood oil". The Department argued that this purification constituted consumption of red oil in the manufacture of sandalwood oil, attracting purchase tax under Section 5A of th

HAWKINS COOKERS LIMITEDversusSTATE OF KERALA

2008 INSC 55529 April 2008Dismissed

Hawkins Cookers Ltd manufactured aluminium cookware coated with satilon (and later tuflon), which makes the products non‑stick. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether such cookware should be taxed under Entry 5 of the First Schedule of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 as “aluminium household utensils” or

K.V. ABDUL KADER, PROPRIETOR KEVEE SUPARI TRADERSversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1998 INSC 4729 January 1998Dismissed

The appellant, a dealer in arecanuts, maintained stock with agents outside Kerala and paid sales tax on purchases based on sales effected by those agents. For the 1987‑88 assessment, the Sales Tax Officer disallowed the appellant’s claim that the closing stock held abroad should be excluded from tax, issuing a demand.

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR.versusBUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF IND!A AND ORS.

1996 INSC 140328 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 introduced optional alternate taxation provisions (Section 7(7), 7A, 7B, 11, 12) allowing contractors to pay a fixed percentage of the contract value instead of tax under Section 5(1)(iv). Several contractors who had not opted for this scheme challenged the validity of those sub‑s

ACC LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2016 INSC 56128 July 2016Dismissed

ACC Ltd entered into an agreement with Cochin Cement Ltd (CCL) whereby CCL would manufacture cement using raw material supplied by ACC and the cement would be marketed under ACC's brand. ACC claimed that, under Section 5(2) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, the sale made by CCL was the first sale and ACC's sub

M/S. KALIDAS SHEET METAL INDUSTRIES P. LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2008 INSC 27128 February 2008Dismissed

Kalidas Sheet Metal Industries Ltd., a dealer in copper and brass sheets, was assessed tax at 8% on its turnover for 1984-85 and 1985-86 under entries 116A (copper) and 1160 (brass) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The company contended that sheets are "unclassified" items taxable at 5% and that the entries a

STATE OF KERALAversusATTESEE (AGRO INDUSTRIAL TRADING CORPORATION)

1988 INSC 32927 October 1988Dismissed

The State of Kerala appealed against the Agro Industrial Trading Corporation, which claimed exemption from sales tax on PVC cloth under item 7 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The issue was whether the definition of "cotton fabrics" referred to in the Act, taken from the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, sh

MARUTI WIRE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.versusS.T.O.1ST CIRCLE, MATTANCHERRY AND ORS.

2001 INSC 17727 March 2001Case Allowed

Maruti Wire Industries Pvt Ltd supplied imported tallow to Tata Oil Mills but failed to file a return of turnover under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Sales Tax Officer assessed the tax, which was paid, and later demanded penal interest under Section 23(3) for the period from the due date of the return to

M/S IFB INDUSTRIES LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2012 INSC 11227 February 2012Appeal(s) allowed

IFB Industries Ltd., a manufacturer of home appliances, offered trade discounts to its dealers, some of which were granted through credit notes after sales targets were met. The dispute centered on whether such discounts, not shown on the original sales invoice, could be deducted from taxable turnover under Rule 9(a) o

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2009 INSC 28627 February 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the statutory first‑charge provisions in the Bombay Sales Tax Act (s.38C) and the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (s.26B) conflicted with the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (ORT Act) and the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and En

CARMEL BOOK STALLversusDY. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX

1994 INSC 28726 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Carmel Book Stall, a charitable trust, sold books whose profits were claimed to be exempt from Kerala sales tax under Section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, provided the profits were solely used for charitable purposes. The Sales Tax Officer taxed the profits for the assessment years 1981-82 and 1982-83,

HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPN. LTD. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS

1993 INSC 11826 March 1993

Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd. entered into an agreement with the Kerala Government in 1974 that exempted its newsprint turnover from Kerala's sales tax for two years from the start of production. The company sold most of the newsprint in inter‑state trade and claimed a corresponding exemption from Central Sales Tax

M/S. PIOMA INDUSTRIES ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2008 INSC 86925 July 2008Case Partly allowed

Mis. Pioma Industries and Mis. Rasna Pvt. Ltd appealed against the State of Kerala challenging the tax classification of "Rasna" under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The assessing officer, the first appellate authority, the Tribunal and the Kerala High Court had held that Rasna, a powdered fruit drink, was a "

M/S. COCHIN PORT TRUSTversusSTATE OF KERALA

2015 INSC 34322 April 2015Dismissed

The Cochin Port Trust, a statutory authority under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, was assessed sales tax for its dealings in scrap items such as water, firewood and waste paper. The Trust contended that it was not a "dealer" within the meaning of Section 2(viii) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, arguing that

MRF LTD., KOTTAYAMversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENTS) SALES TAX AND ORS.

2006 INSC 63621 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

MRF Ltd. invested heavily in expanding its tyre and rubber manufacturing unit in Kerala under a Memorandum of Understanding that promised a seven‑year sales‑tax exemption. The company obtained an eligibility certificate and a Board of Revenue exemption order covering 30 Dec 1996 to 29 Dec 2003. The Kerala Government la

FEDERAL BANK LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 32821 March 2007Dismissed

Federal Bank Ltd. and other banks challenged notices issued by the Kerala tax department demanding sales tax on the auction sale of gold and other valuables pledged as security for loans. The banks argued that such sales were not "sales" within the meaning of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and that they did not

K. GOPINATHAN NAIR ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1997 INSC 30721 March 1997

The appellants, processors of cashew nuts in Kerala and Karnataka, purchased raw cashew nuts imported by the Cashew Corporation of India (CCI), a canalising agency, and argued that these purchases were "in the course of import" and thus exempt from state sales tax under Section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

KERALA HOTEL & RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 5221 February 1990Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of provisions in the Kerala and Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Acts that taxed cooked food sold in luxury or star‑rated hotels while exempting the same in modest eating houses. Hoteliers challenged the classification as hostile discrimination violating Article 14. Th

M/S. PEEKA Y RE-ROLLING MILLS (P) LTD.versusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND ANR.

2007 INSC 31720 March 2007Appeal(s) allowed

Peeka Y Re‑rolling Mills (P) Ltd., a registered dealer under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, purchased steel ingots that were exempt from tax under a notification issued under Section 10 of the State Act. The State assessed purchase tax under Section 5A on the same ingots, arguing that no tax had been collected

STATE OF KERALAversusMADRAS RUBBER FACTORY

1997 INSC 83019 December 1997

The State of Kerala appealed against the Kerala High Court’s decision that the rubber cess imposed under the Rubber Act, 1947 could not be included in the purchase turnover of dealers for sales‑tax purposes. The dealers argued that the cess was payable only by the manufacturer and therefore not part of the purchase pri

POURNAMI OIL MILLS, ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.

1986 INSC 27419 December 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The Kerala Government issued two notifications under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 offering tax concessions to new small‑scale industries. The first, dated 11 April 1979, promised exemption from both sales tax and purchase tax for five years from the start of production. The second, dated 29 September 1980 (ga

CORPORATION BANKversusM/S SARASWATI ABHARANSALA AND ANOTHER

2008 INSC 132119 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed

Corporation Bank collected sales tax at 1% on gold bullion sold to a dealer between April and December 1999. A later notification (SRO No. 1075/99) reduced the tax rate to 0.5% with retrospective effect from 1 April 1999. The dealer claimed a refund of the excess tax, but the Assistant Commissioner rejected it based on

HALEEMA ZUBAIR, TROPICAL TRADERSversusSTATE OF KERALA

2008 INSC 132219 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed

Haleema Zubair, proprietor of two businesses – Tropical Traders (a dealer in ceramic tiles) and Poseidon Food Company (which rendered inspection and certification services to exporters) – was assessed under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Assessing Authority added a commission of Rs 45,80,168 received by Po

PREMIER BREWERIES ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1997 INSC 82718 December 1997Dismissed

Premier Breweries, a dealer in Indian Made Foreign Liquor, sold liquor in bottles packed in cardboard cartons and was assessed sales tax at 8% on the cartons under Entry 97 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Deputy Commissioner, invoking sections 5(5) and 5(6) of the Act, revised the assessment to tax the c

STATE OF KERALAversusALEX GEORGE AND ANR. ETC.

2004 INSC 65618 November 2004Dismissed

The State of Kerala appealed against the Kerala High Court’s order that the revised plantation‑tax rates introduced by the Kerala Finance Act, 1987 could not be applied during the 1987‑88 financial year. The appellants argued that the amendment to Schedule‑I of the Kerala Plantations Tax Act, 1960, which altered both r

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX ETC. ETC.versusAYSHA HOSIERY FACTORY (P) LTD. ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 1016 January 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The Kerala Additional Sales Tax Act, 1978 imposed an extra levy of 10% of the existing tax rate on all taxable sales and purchases in the State. Several dealers, including AysHA Hosiery Factory, challenged the inclusion of this additional tax in the calculation of Central Sales Tax (CST) on their inter‑state sales, arg

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (LAW) BOARD OF REVENUEversusG. S. PAI & CO.

1979 INSC 20815 October 1979Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether ornaments and other gold articles purchased by G.S. Pai & Co. for melting qualified as "bullion and specie" under Entry 56 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, and whether the GI pipes sold by the company fell within "water supply and sanitary fittings" under Entry 26A. The Cour

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX ETC.ETC.versusA. B. ISMAIL ETC. ETC.

1986 INSC 7415 April 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents purchased live goats and sheep, slaughtered them, and sold the resulting meat. The assessing officer levied purchase tax on the purchase of the animals under s.5‑A(1)(a) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, treating the conversion into meat as manufacture of "other goods". The Sales‑Tax Appellate

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, KERALAversusM/S P. KESAVAN AND CO .

1995 INSC 72714 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, sellers of Caristrap Rayon Cord Strapping, claimed exemption from sales tax under Entry 7 of Schedule III of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, contending that the strapping was a rayon fabric. The Assessing Authority rejected the claim and the respondents filed writ petitions in the High Court. T

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAMversusHINDUSTAN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. AND ORS.

2015 INSC 2613 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether an Official Liquidator, appointed to wind up Premier Cable Company Ltd., qualifies as a "dealer" under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and consequently bears sales tax liability on the auction sale of the company's assets. The Court held that the liquidator, by stepping into th

MIS. SARAF TRADING CORPORATION ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2011 INSC 4213 January 2011Dismissed

The appellants, exporters of tea, bought tea at open auction from planters and exported it, claiming exemption from sales tax under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The assessing authority accepted the exemption claim as genuine but denied a refund of tax paid to the seller, holding that only the dealer

BAKUL CASHEW CO. & ORS.versusSALES TAX OFFICER QUILON & ANR.

1986 INSC 3412 March 1986Dismissed

The appellants, cashew processors in Kerala, claimed that a 12 Oct 1973 government notification granting a retrospective sales‑tax exemption for purchases of imported raw cashew nuts (Sept 1970‑Sept 1973) could not be withdrawn and that the State was estopped from levying tax because ministers had assured them in 1971

PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS P. LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2009 INSC 78411 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Pepsico India Holdings Ltd. sought to set up a medium‑scale soft‑drink plant in Kerala relying on a 1993 state policy that exempted new industrial units from sales tax for seven years. The company obtained assurances from KSIDC and the State Industries Department that it would receive the exemption, entered a lease, pa

M/S MASTER CABLES PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2007 INSC 5409 May 2007Dismissed

Master Cables Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer registered under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, sought relief under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, after a tax inspection uncovered unaccounted sales. The company claimed that Section 90(3) of the Scheme barred the State from reopening its sales‑tax assessment, inv

MALAYALA MANORAMA CO. LTD.versusASSTT. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES & ANR.

2010 INSC 3948 July 2010Disposed off

Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd. purchased printing ink for newspaper production in 2001‑02 and claimed a concessional 3% tax rate by filing Form 18 under Section 5(3) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Assistant Commissioner issued a penalty notice alleging that newspaper printing does not constitute "manufactur

C.T. KOCHOUSEPHversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER ETC.

2025 INSC 6618 May 2025Dismissed

The appellants purchased goods from dealers who were exempt from sales tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and challenged the levy of purchase tax under s.5A of the Kerala Act and s.7A of the Tamil Nadu Act. The questions were whether such purchases constitut

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (LAW)versusN. KANNAN NAIR & ORS.

1988 INSC 1018 April 1988Dismissed

The petitioners, a group of PWD contractors, purchased sand, bricks and other materials for repairing public roads under contracts with the Public Works Department. The Revenue assessed purchase tax on the turnover of these materials under Section 5A(1)(a) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, arguing that the goo

STATE OF KERALA & ORS.versusM/S KURIAN ABRAHAM PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2008 INSC 1588 February 2008Dismissed

M/s Kurian Abraham Pvt. Ltd. purchased raw field latex in Kerala, processed it into centrifuged latex in Tamil Nadu and sold the product. For assessment years 1997‑98 and 1998‑99 the assessee relied on Circular No. 16/98 issued by the Kerala Board of Revenue under s.3(1A)(c) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, w

M/S. PADINJAREKARA AGENCIES LIMITEDversusSTATE OF KERALA

2008 INSC 1598 February 2008Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Padinjarekara Agencies Ltd., a dealer under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act, manufactures centrifuged latex from field latex (raw rubber) and claimed exemption under Government Notification SRO No. 1003/91 (later replaced by SRO No. 1727/93), which exempts "goods" made from rubber. Th

ALUVA SUGAR AGENCYversusSTATE OF KERALA

2011 INSC 6577 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Aluva Sugar Agency sold bakery margarine and argued that it should attract the concessional 4% tax rate under Entry 17A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, on the ground that margarine is an edible oil. The Sales Tax Officer and the Kerala High Court held that margarine fell under Entry 90 of the First Schedule

PERIYAR & PAREEKANNI RUBBERS LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2008 INSC 3237 March 2008Dismissed

Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd., a distillery registered under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, leased its factory to Eagle Distillery Ltd. The lessee continued to use the lessor's sales‑tax registration number and statutory Forms C and D, but failed to remit the tax collected. The assessing authority issued notices

M/S. YASHA OVERSEASversusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX & ORS.

2008 INSC 5866 May 2008Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a batch of six appeals concerning the taxability of Replenishment Licences (REP licences) and the Duty Entitlement Passbook (DEPB) scheme under various State sales tax statutes. The appellants argued that the three‑judge decision in Vikas Sales Corporation v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.versusMAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES LTD. AND ORS

2005 INSC 2646 May 2005Disposed off

The State of Kerala created a monopoly in the wholesale trade of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) by establishing the Kerala State Beverages Corporation (KSBC) as the sole purchaser of liquor from manufacturers. The dispute centered on whether the duty levied under Section 17 of the Kerala Abkari Act was a true excise

GUJARAT STEEL TUBES LTD. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

1989 INSC 1825 May 1989Appeal(s) allowed

Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd., a manufacturer of black and galvanised steel tubes, challenged the Kerala tax authorities' assessment that its galvanised pipes were taxable under Entry 46 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. The company argued that the galvanised pipes were "declared goods" and should not attract additional

IDEA MOBILE COMMUNICATION LTD.versusC.C.E. & C., COCHIN

2011 INSC 5434 August 2011

Idea Mobile Communication Ltd sold SIM cards to its subscribers and charged both sales tax and service tax on activation. The dispute centered on whether the value of the SIM cards should be taxed as a service under Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994, or as a sale of goods under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act,

HEINZ INDIA LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF KERALA

2023 INSC 4884 May 2023Dismissed

Heinz India Ltd. challenged the classification of its product, Nycil Prickly Heat Powder, under state sales tax statutes. The Kerala High Court and the Madras High Court had held the product to be a "medicated talcum powder" and thus a cosmetic, subject to a lower tax rate, rejecting the revenue's view that it was a me

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND ORS.versusM/S PEEKA Y RE-ROLLING MILLS (P) LTD.

2007 INSC 3653 April 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Kerala State Government could, under Article 162 of the Constitution, issue a comprehensive Government Order (G.O.) dated 26‑27 November 1993 withdrawing tax exemption granted under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, due to an acute power shortage. The Court held that the Sta

STATE OF KERALA & ORS.versusMINI SHAMSUDIN & ORS.

2009 INSC 922 February 2009Dismissed

The appeal concerned whether a lottery ticket is a "good" for purposes of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The petitioner argued that the ticket, being a piece of paper, should attract sales tax, while the State contended that the purchaser's right to a conditional prize is an actionable claim excluded from the

CARDAMOM MARKETING CORPORATION AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2016 INSC 8441 September 2016Dismissed

Cardamom Marketing Corporation and another, registered dealers under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act and Kerala Value Added Tax Act, challenged a 2002 government notification that levied an additional court fee on appeals and revisions before tribunals, directing the proceeds to the Kerala Legal Benefit Fund. They arg

BABY VARGHESEversusSTATE OF KERALA

2008 INSC 8951 August 2008Disposed off

The appellant, a dealer in aluminium household utensils, purchased old aluminium vessels and scrap which were processed into new utensils. The issue was whether the purchase turnover of such scrap and old utensils fell under Entry 5 (aluminium household utensils) or Entry 83 (metal scraps) of the First Schedule of the

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search