Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

MARUTI WIRE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.versusS.T.O.1ST CIRCLE, MATTANCHERRY AND ORS.

2001 INSC 17727 March 2001Case Allowed

Maruti Wire Industries Pvt Ltd supplied imported tallow to Tata Oil Mills but failed to file a return of turnover under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Sales Tax Officer assessed the tax, which was paid, and later demanded penal interest under Section 23(3) for the period from the due date of the return to

M/S IFB INDUSTRIES LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2012 INSC 11227 February 2012Appeal(s) allowed

IFB Industries Ltd., a manufacturer of home appliances, offered trade discounts to its dealers, some of which were granted through credit notes after sales targets were met. The dispute centered on whether such discounts, not shown on the original sales invoice, could be deducted from taxable turnover under Rule 9(a) o

STATE OF KERALAversusJAY ENGINEERING WORKS LTD., ERNAKULAM

1983 INSC 1218 February 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala appealed against the High Court's decision in a dispute with Jay Engineering Works Ltd. concerning the timing of a claim for deduction under Rule 9(b)(i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 for goods returned by purchasers. The Supreme Court examined whether such a deduction should be claime

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAMversusHINDUSTAN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. AND ORS.

2015 INSC 2613 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether an Official Liquidator, appointed to wind up Premier Cable Company Ltd., qualifies as a "dealer" under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and consequently bears sales tax liability on the auction sale of the company's assets. The Court held that the liquidator, by stepping into th

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search