Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
2137 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The appellant, the estate of the deceased Govind Pandharinath Rathode, appealed against a 2011 award concerning land acquired from Sangvi (Jewari) village for the rehabilitation of earthquake‑affected persons. The appellant argued that the same controversy had already been decided by this Court in …
The appellant’s agricultural land of 4 ha 65 are in Nilanga was acquired in 1987 for a 132 kV sub‑station and the Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 1,77,863, which the Land Reference Court later enhanced to Rs 3,91,819. The appellant sought a further increase, relying on two sale …
The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M.S.E.B.) filed four separate appeals before the Bombay High Court challenging the compensation awards granted by the Jalgaon Land Reference Court in respect of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants contended that the compensation …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation for lands acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank, contending that the lands were irrigated and that fruit‑bearing trees were not compensated. The State argued that the lands were correctly classified as dry and that the market value determined by …
The State of Maharashtra acquired agricultural land in Jalkot village for a percolation tank under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.295‑Rs.330 per R. The claimants challenged this award, and the reference court, after …
The State acquired 1 ha 20 R of agricultural land in Beed for a 33 kV sub‑station. The claimants sought enhanced compensation, arguing the land had non‑agricultural (N.A.) potentiality, while the acquiring authority argued the award of Rs 5,000 per Are was excessive and sought reduction. The High …
The appellants, agriculturists whose land in Jalkot village was acquired for a percolation tank under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.295‑330 per R) and the subsequent enhancement by the reference court (Rs.1200‑2400 per …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a reference court's order that enhanced compensation for land acquired at Shingoli from Rs.190 per rupee to Rs.975 per rupee, along with statutory benefits. The land was acquired for a medium project, with the acquisition notification issued under Section 4 …
The appellants, agriculturists whose lands in Jalkot village were acquired for a percolation tank under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.295‑330 per R) and the subsequent enhancement by the reference court (Rs.1200‑2400 …
The appellants, agriculturist claimants, filed first appeals against a 2008 award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 concerning land acquired for a percolation tank. They sought enhancement of compensation, arguing the reference court erred in valuing the land based on sale instances. The court …
The appellants’ land was acquired in 1994 for a reservoir, with the acquisition notification issued in 1974 and an award in 1976 granting compensation that the claimants accepted under protest. They sought a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act to determine proper market value, …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the award of compensation in a land acquisition proceeding for the Raibhar Medium Project in Osmanabad, where the original award of Rs.6,649.60 per acre was enhanced by the reference court to Rs.1,71,500 per acre. The claimants had sought Rs.40,000 per acre, while …
The State of Maharashtra appealed judgments awarding compensation for lands acquired for the Ruibhar Medium Project. The appellants contended that the reference court improperly relied on a sale deed dated 02‑07‑1982, which concerned land within Osmanabad municipal limits, as a comparable sale for …
The appellants' land was acquired in 1985 for a canal project, with the Section 4 notification issued in 1988 and the award fixed at Rs 10,000 per hectare in 1991. Dissatisfied, they sought a higher market value, relying on a 1983 sale of 21 R of Bagayat land in the adjacent village of Malegaon for …
The appellants, a group of landowners from Padali village, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Nimna Dudhna Project. The original award fixed a rate of Rs 2,500 per R for dry land, which the appellants argued was …
The Executive Engineer, Kukadi Left Bank Canal, appealed to the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay against a judgment and award dated 11 February 2011 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos. 516‑519 of 2003, contending that the compensation awarded, which was up to four times the …
The Executive Engineer, Kukadi Left Bank Canal, appealed to the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay against a judgment and award dated 11 February 2011 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos.516‑519 of 2003, contending that the compensation awarded was excessive. The State of …
The appellants, a group of landowners from Padali village, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Nimna Dudhna Project. The Reference Court had fixed a rate of Rs 2,500 per R for dry land, which the appellants argued …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired in 1986 for a minor irrigation tank, arguing that the reference court failed to apply a 10% annual escalation for the period between earlier sale instances (April 1984 and September 1985) and the notification under Section 4 of the …
The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Beed district for a percolation tank, awarding Rs.110‑100 per Are, but the Land Reference Court increased compensation to Rs.556 per Are. The claimants cross‑objected, arguing that the reference court improperly ignored the sale exemplar from an adjacent …
The acquiring body filed an appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against a 2012 judgment that awarded Rs.1,500 per R to the claimant for Bagayat land. The claimant filed a cross‑objection seeking enhancement of compensation. The court noted earlier judgments in the same …
The acquiring body appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against a 2012 judgment that awarded Rs.1,500 per R to the claimant for Bagayat land. The claimant filed a cross‑objection seeking enhancement of compensation. The court noted a prior decision (First Appeal No.770 of …
The appellant, original owner of 0.84 hectare of land in Marajwadi, Nanded, challenged the compensation awarded for acquisition of his land for the Lendi major project, arguing that the amount of Rs 60,769 per hectare was insufficient. After a reference court enhanced the compensation to Rs 72,586 …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation for land acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank, arguing that the reference court had improperly determined market value by relying on a sale instance and that further enhancement beyond Rs 50,000 per hectare was warranted. The land, notified …
The appellants sought further enhancement of compensation for land acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank, arguing that the reference court had erred by relying on a sale instance to determine market value. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs.160 per R, which was enhanced by …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the awards of compensation granted by the Land Reference Court in Amalner for three landowners whose properties were acquired for the Kurwel Distributary of the Hatnur Irrigation Project. The claimants were awarded Rs.1,311 per are for non‑irrigated land and …
The appellants challenged the award of Rs.500 per R (Rs.32,000 per acre) given by the Reference Court for land acquired in 1993 for a percolation tank, arguing that the land was dry and the market value should be higher. The Reference Court had based its valuation on a sale of irrigated land from …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for 1.62 hectares of land acquired in 1993 for a percolation tank at Jawali village, arguing that the market rate should be higher than the Rs500 per R fixed by the Reference Court. The Land Acquisition Officer had initially fixed Rs210 per R, which …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation for 1.62 hectares of land acquired in 1993 for a percolation tank in Jawali village, arguing that the market rate should be Rs 2,500 per acre (Rs 2,500 per R) rather than the Rs 500 per R fixed by the Reference Court. The Court examined the sale …
The appellants owned 1.62 hectares of land acquired in 1993 for a percolation tank in Jawali village, Latur. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs.210 per R, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs.500 per R based on a sale of irrigated land, despite the acquired land being dry. The …
The appellants' house property in Shendra village was acquired by the State in 1980 for an Agricultural University, and a compensation of Rs.8,650 was awarded in 1986. Claimants filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, alleging the compensation was inadequate, but the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the awards of compensation granted by the Land Reference Court in three land acquisition cases concerning land taken for the Kurwel Distributary of the Hatnur Irrigation Project. The State argued that the reference court had not considered the entire …
The appellant sought enhanced compensation for 1 hectare of land acquired for the Terna Medium Project, arguing that the rate should be Rs 1,250 per R (half of Rs 2,500 per R awarded for irrigated land in a similar acquisition) on the ground of parity. The court examined whether the appellant's dry …
The appellants challenged the Civil Judge's award of Rs.53,000 per hectare for land acquired for a minor irrigation project, arguing that the valuation was based on an inappropriate ready‑reckoner rate and lacked comparable sale evidence from the village of Amlibari. The Reference Court had rejected …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation for land acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank, arguing that the reference court erred in valuing the land at Rs 50,000 per hectare. The original award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer was Rs 160 per R, which was enhanced by the reference …
The appellants challenged the Civil Judge's award of Rs 53,000 per hectare for land acquired for a minor irrigation project, arguing that the valuation was not based on a comparable sale. The Reference Court had rejected their Section 18 references, deeming the adjacent‑village sale instances either …
The appellants‑claimants challenged the Civil Judge’s award of Rs.53,000 per hectare for land acquired for a minor irrigation project, arguing that the valuation was based on an inappropriate ready‑reckoner rate and that a comparable sale from the nearby village of Rajmohi should be considered. The …
The appellants claimed compensation for lands acquired for the Amlibari Minor Irrigation Project, challenging the Special Land Acquisition Officer's valuation of Rs 53,000 per hectare. They relied on a sale of agricultural land in the nearby village of Rajmohi (Exhibit 22) as a comparable …
The appellants claimed land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Amlibari village and were compensated at Rs 53,000 per hectare by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. Dissatisfied, they filed references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on a sale of agricultural …
The appellants claimed land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Amlibari village and were compensated at Rs 53,000 per hectare by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. Dissatisfied, they filed references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on a sale of agricultural …
The case concerned lands acquired in 2000 for the Renapur‑Sudha Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs 71,500 per hectare, which the claimants challenged under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act; the reference court raised the rate to Rs 136,500 per hectare. The acquiring body …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation acquired land for the Renapur‑Sudha Project under a Section 4 notification in 2000. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs 71,500 per hectare, which the claimants challenged under Section 18; the reference court enhanced it to Rs …
The lands of claimants were acquired for the Wadi Shevadi Medium Project under a notification issued on 2 September 1999 pursuant to Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and an award was passed on 30 October 1999. The claimants later obtained enhanced compensation through a judgment dated 19 …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a Land Reference Court award that increased compensation for 3.96 hectares of land acquired for the Wadi‑Shewadi Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed Rs 34,787 per hectare under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but the Reference Court …
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) appealed against awards of compensation granted by a reference court to several landowners under the Land Acquisition Act, contending that the court had excessively enhanced the compensation beyond the rate fixed by the State Level Award Officer (SLAO). The …
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) filed several First Appeals challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by a Reference Court to various landowners under the Land Acquisition Act. The Reference Court had enhanced the compensation from the State Level Award Officer's rate of Rs.1,71,000 …
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) filed several First Appeals challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by a Reference Court to various landowners under the Land Acquisition Act. The respondents claimed compensation at Rs.1,71,000 per hectare, which the Reference Court enhanced to …
The appellant, owner of 6.2 hectares of agricultural land acquired for an irrigation tank, was initially compensated at Rs 7,500‑8,500 per hectare. He sought a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Reference Court enhanced the market value to Rs 12,000 per hectare. …
The appellant's 137‑R parcel of land in Jaibhachiwadi was acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank, and the State initially paid Rs 250 per R. Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act the appellant obtained a reference court award of Rs 1,000 per R, but appealed for further enhancement, arguing …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a compensation award in a land acquisition for the Benitura Medium Project, where the Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially paid Rs13,000‑15,000 per hectare. The claimants obtained a higher award of Rs33,000 per acre and additional compensation for …
The appellants, a group of Scheduled Tribe agriculturists and fishermen from villages in Nandurbar, challenged the compensation awarded for their lands acquired in 1980 for the Sardar Sarowar project. The original award of Rs.5,160 per hectare was enhanced by the Land Reference Court to Rs.6,450 per …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the award of compensation granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for land acquired in 1993 for the Sarvadi Medium Project. The original award fixed compensation at Rs 6,800 per acre, which the reference court enhanced to Rs 40,000 per acre, also …
The appellants, agriculturists from Jalkot village, challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired for Percolation Tank No. 4 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed Rs.295‑330 per R, which the reference court later enhanced to Rs.1200‑2400 per R …
The High Court examined acquisition proceedings initiated in 2000 for lands needed for the Renapur‑Sudha Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs 71,500 per hectare, which the reference court enhanced to Rs 136,500 per hectare. The claimants argued that, in a similar reference (LAR …
The case concerned land acquired in 2000 for the Renapur‑Sudha Project under a Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs 71,500 per hectare, which was enhanced to Rs 1,36,500 per hectare by the reference court under Section 18. The claimants …
The appellant’s 2 ha 38 R land at Yamgarwadi was acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs 10,000 per hectare, which the claimant accepted under protest and then sought a higher market value under Section 18. The …
The appellants challenged a 2005 Land Reference Court award concerning compensation for land acquired under a project. They argued that, based on earlier Supreme Court decisions, the principle of parity required uniform compensation rates for irrigated, non‑irrigated, and potkharab lands. The State …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation and other acquiring bodies appealed against a 2017 award that granted enhanced compensation to Indrajit Wagh for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act for the Lower Dudhna project. The claimant also filed an appeal challenging the …
The appellant, Laxman Deorao Sakalkar, appealed the award of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge concerning compensation for land acquired for the Dhudhana Minor Irrigation Project. He argued that the land was irrigated, citing the Special Land Acquisition Officer's separate compensation for a well and …
The claimants' lands in Udatpur village, Osmanabad district, were acquired under a Section 4 notification dated 07‑04‑1994 for the rehabilitation of earthquake‑affected persons. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially fixed compensation at Rs 17,300 per hectare, which the Reference Court …
The petitioners, owners of land in Tisgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their property, alleging that the statutory requirements under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act – notably publication in two widely‑circulated newspapers and posting of a public notice – were not complied …
The appellant's agricultural land was acquired in 2000 for a state highway under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The initial compensation of Rs.34,400 per acre was accepted under protest, and the claimant sought a higher market value, leading the Reference Court to enhance compensation to …
The appellant owned agricultural land in Vadgaon, Latur, which was acquired for a percolation tank. The initial compensation of Rs.70,300 per hectare awarded in 2002 was enhanced to Rs.2,00,000 per hectare by a reference court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, based on a sale …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for submergence purposes. The claimant's one‑hectare parcel was originally awarded Rs 8,345, but the Reference Court, on a …
The appellant, a deceased landowner represented by his heirs, owned 4 ha 31 R of land from which 1 ha 70 R was acquired for a percolation tank. The Civil Judge awarded compensation of Rs 88,536 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which the appellant accepted under protest and then sought …
The appellants, heirs of the deceased landowner, challenged the award of compensation of Rs.6,600 per acre granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for land acquired for a percolation tank. They sought a higher market value, relying on a sale deed from a nearby village (Bhosa) where 81 R of …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The petitioners, original owners of 17 acres of land in Dhule, claimed that compensation for acquisition was delayed and sought interest under Section 80 of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013. A notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued in 2013, corrected later, and the award was passed on …
The appeal concerned lands acquired for the MIDC Dhule project, where the claimants argued that the compensation awarded was inadequate. The court noted that the controversy was identical to that decided in FA No. 1210/12 and therefore adopted the earlier judgment. It dismissed the acquiring body's …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and award dated 28 April 1995 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for a Benetura Medium Project. The acquisition was notified under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act on 21 April …
The State of Maharashtra appealed three separate land acquisition awards where the Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation at Rs.13,000‑14,000 per hectare and the reference court enhanced it to Rs.33,000 per acre, also adding compensation for fruit‑bearing trees and a well. The …
The case concerned land acquired for a railway expansion in Arvi village, Latur, where the Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs.127 per square metre. The claimants appealed to the reference court, which enhanced the rate to Rs.70 per square foot, prompting the acquiring …
The appellant's land of 53 and 62 roods was acquired in 1994 for a village tank, with a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation in 1998, which the appellant found inadequate and appealed under Section 18, leading the …
The acquisition proceedings for lands intended for the Hangarga Minor Irrigation Tank began in 1998 and resulted in judgments and awards in 2007. The appellants challenged those awards, seeking higher compensation, arguing that their lands are seasonally (semi) irrigated like those in the earlier …
The petitioners, Sandipan Gyandeo Late and Udhav Nivruttirao Kavhale, filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the Deputy Collector to consider their applications filed on 5 October 2017 under section 28‑A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for re‑determination of compensation. The State …
The petitioners Sandipan Gyandeo Late and Udhav Nivruttirao Kavhale filed writ petitions in the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to the Collector to consider their applications filed on 5 October 2017 under section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for re‑determination of compensation. …
The appellant challenged a land acquisition award dated 12‑12‑2006 concerning land in Gaundgaon for the Uppar Manar Project. The appellant argued that the dispute was identical to that decided in First Appeal No.276 of 2013, an order dated 13‑08‑2026, and should be resolved accordingly. The …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nilanga in three land acquisition references concerning lands acquired for the Dongargaon Barrage. The award differentiated between irrigated and dry lands, granting a lower rate for portions the court held to be …
The case concerned the acquisition of land in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank, Lohara, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands respectively. The …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division (appellant) challenged a reference court’s enhanced compensation award for lands acquired for the Renapur Medium Project. The original award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 valued dry land at Rs 36,800 per acre, which claimants accepted …
The appellants' land of 2 hectares 70 roods in Wadgaon (Siddheshwar) was acquired in 1987 for a percolation tank. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs 40,000 per hectare, which the claimants contested, arguing that post‑notification sale transactions and the land’s …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division (appellant) challenged the award of enhanced compensation granted by an Adhoc District Judge in several land acquisition reference cases concerning lands acquired for the Renapur Medium Project. The original award under the Land Acquisition Act, …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2007 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired from Baliram Girdhar Nemade, alleging the enhancement lacked material support and that statutory benefits such as solatium, additional component and interest were improperly granted. The respondent did not …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division sought to overturn a judgment of the Adhoc District Judge that enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Renapur Medium Project. The original award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 paid Rs.36,800 per acre for dry lands, which claimants …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division sought to acquire lands for the Renapur Medium Project and issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in 1996. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.36,800 per acre for dry lands, …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division appealed the judgment and award of the Adhoc District Judge, who had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Renapur Medium Project. The original award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was Rs.36,800 per acre for dry lands, with …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division (appellant) challenged the judgment and award of the Adhoc District Judge, who, on reference, enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Renapur Medium Project to Rs 1,50,000 per acre for semi‑irrigated lands and Rs 1,00,000 per acre for …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division (the acquiring body) appealed a judgment and award dated 28 March 2011 that enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Renapur Medium Project. The original award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer valued dry land at Rs 36,800 per acre, …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation for their land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Lower Terna Project. The original award of Rs 4,400 per acre was later enhanced to Rs 8,000 per acre, but the appellants argued that, based on a prior decision (First Appeal No. …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division appealed a common judgment and award that enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Renapur Medium Project. The original award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 paid Rs.36,800 per acre for dry lands, which claimants …
The appellants (Balaji, Gyanoba, Osmankhan and Ganpat) challenged the compensation awarded for their agricultural lands acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They contended that the Land Reference Court had not properly considered sale exemplars, particularly Exhibit‑33, and …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division appealed the judgment and award of the Adhoc District Judge, who had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Renapur Medium Project to Rs 1,50,000 per acre for semi‑irrigated lands and Rs 1,00,000 per acre for dry lands. The original …
The Executive Engineer, Latur Medium Project Division appealed the judgment and award of the Adhoc District Judge, who had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Renapur Medium Project. The original award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was Rs 36,800 per acre for dry …
The appellant's agricultural land, along with a well, was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a bridge project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded a modest compensation, which the appellant challenged, citing sale exemplars showing higher market …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2011 award of compensation in a land acquisition case involving Popat Nanabhau Ughade and others, challenging the enhancement of compensation and certain statutory benefits. The State argued that the Reference Court had erred in raising the market value and in …
The appellants' land of 6 hectares 45 roods in Survey No. 135, village Kanhobachiwadi, was acquired in 1984 for a percolation tank and they were awarded Rs.62 per rood. They filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act alleging the award was inadequate and sought enhancement, …
The appellants, heirs of several deceased landowners, challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired for the extension of a Gavthan in Anjale village, Jalgaon. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation at Rs 80,000 per hectare, which the reference court enhanced to Rs …
The appellants, a group of landowners whose lands were acquired for the extension of a Gavthan in Anjale village, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, which was set at Rs.80,000 per hectare. They relied on two prior sale transactions in the same village, one …
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) acquired land for a bus stand and residential quarters at Erandol under two notifications of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer determined differing market values for the same project in three reference cases, …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 1996 order of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired for an air‑strip at Latur. The acquisition was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act on 28 April 1988 and possession was taken earlier. …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered two appeals arising from the same land acquisition judgment concerning 78 R of land in Village Loni, Latur, acquired for a 33 kV sub‑station. The claimants argued that the Reference Court erred by relying on a low‑value sale exemplar and by …
The appellant challenged the compensation awarded in land acquisition proceedings (LAR No. 432/2012) seeking parity with a prior appeal that received enhanced rates. The Reference Court had granted Rs 1,60,000 per hectare for Jirayat land and Rs 80,000 per hectare for potkharab land. The High Court …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a compensation award in a land acquisition for the Benitura Medium Project, where claimants were initially paid Rs.14,000 per hectare. The claimants obtained a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which increased the market value to …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired in 1990 for the Andrud Percolation Tank, arguing that the reference court failed to consider sale transactions from the adjacent village of Nipani and that the land was irrigated, warranting a higher rate of Rs.19,000 per acre. The …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired in 1990 for the Andrud Percolation Tank, arguing that the reference court failed to consider sale transactions from the nearby village of Nipani and that the land was irrigated, warranting a higher rate. The Special Land …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation for land acquired for the Andrud Percolation Tank, arguing that the reference court failed to consider sale comparables from the adjacent village of Nipani and that the lands were irrigated, warranting a higher rate than the Rs 17,760 per acre …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired in 1990 for the Andrud Percolation Tank, arguing that the reference court failed to consider sale transactions from the nearby village of Nipani and that the land was irrigated, warranting a higher rate of Rs 19,000 per acre. The …
The appellant owned 9.71 hectares of land in Vadgaon, of which 5 hectares were acquired for a percolation tank. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs.70,000 per acre, and the appellant sought enhancement under Section 18, relying on a sale deed from a neighboring village as …
The appellant owned agricultural land in Vadgaon, Latur, part of which was acquired for a percolation tank. A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued in 2000 and an award under Section 11 fixed compensation at Rs.70,300 per hectare. The appellant, dissatisfied, …
The High Court considered three contempt petitions (Nos. 117, 118 and 120 of 2014) arising from an order that directed the respondents, an acquiring body, to decide an application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondents produced a letter dated 29‑03‑2014 indicating that …
The petitioners filed three contempt petitions alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order that directed the respondents, the acquiring authority, to decide an application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondents produced a letter dated 29‑03‑2014 indicating that …
The petitioners filed three contempt petitions (Nos. 117, 118 and 120 of 2014) against Shivaji Maruti Upase and others, alleging non‑compliance with a contempt order that directed the respondents to decide an application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondents, …
The State and the claimants challenged the common judgment and award dated 18.02.2006 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Jalgaon in LAR No.1190/2005 (Old No.53/2003), concerning acquisition of 79 R from Gat No.8, Village Hol, Taluka Raver, District Jalgaon, for construction of the …
The Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) appealed a judgment and award that increased compensation for 16 gunthas of land acquired for the Lower Terna Project. The original award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 fixed a market value of Rs.18,000 per hectare, which the claimant …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the judgment of the Reference Court which had enhanced compensation for six ropani of land acquired for a water tank, adding a Rs.3,550 per ropani amount and a 10% escalation. The State argued that the original award of Rs.9,267 by the Land Acquisition Officer was …
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) appealed the awards of three land acquisition references concerning the construction of a bus stand and residential quarters at Erandol, alleging that the Reference Court should have applied a 65% deduction in market value. The claimants, …
The case involved several land acquisition references for the construction of a state transport stand and residential quarters at Erandol, where the Reference Court had fixed different market values for the same project. Claimants, dissatisfied with the awards, sought enhancement under Section 18 of …
The land of Govind Laxman Pawar was acquired in 1993 for the Sarvadi Medium Project and the Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation that the claimant alleged was inadequate, especially for trees and structures. The claimant relied on a 1991 sale of 18 Are and valuation reports to seek enhanced …
The appellants, a group of agricultural landowners in Beed district, appealed against a Land Reference Court judgment that awarded them compensation for lands acquired for the Gunwati Brihat Laghu Sinchan Project. They contended that the compensation was far below market value, especially because …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2004 award by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aurangabad, which enhanced compensation for several land‑acquisition claimants and granted statutory benefits. The State argued that the enhancement was unsupported by material, that the comparable sale …
The appellants, a group of landowners from Padali village, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Nimna Dudhna Project. The original award fixed a rate of Rs 2,500 per R for dry land, whereas the appellants sought a …
Multiple appellants challenged the compensation awarded for dry land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Nimna Dudhna Project in Padali village. The original award fixed a rate of Rs 2,500 per R, but the appellants sought parity with other similar acquisitions and claimed a rate of …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed the dismissal of its Section 34 applications challenging arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired under National Highway No. 211. The core dispute concerned whether Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against awards of enhanced compensation and statutory benefits granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, in a series of land acquisition cases. The State argued that the Reference Court had erred in fixing a higher market value and in granting …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2004 award that enhanced compensation for several land‑acquisition claimants, arguing that the enhancement and statutory benefits were unsupported by evidence and imposed an undue burden on the exchequer. The claimants had produced oral and documentary …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the Civil Judge's award that enhanced compensation and granted statutory benefits to several land‑acquisition claimants. The State argued that the enhancement was unsupported by material and that the solatium, additional component and interest were improperly …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against awards of enhanced compensation and statutory benefits granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, in multiple land acquisition cases. The State argued that the reference court erred in fixing a higher market value based on comparable sales and …
The appellants' agricultural land in Ardhapur was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a bypass road under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed compensation at Rs 13,80,000 per hectare, which the reference court increased by a 20% escalation to Rs 16,56,000 per …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against awards of enhanced compensation and statutory benefits granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, in a series of land acquisition cases. The State argued that the Reference Court erred in inflating compensation without adequate material and …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Civil Judge's award that enhanced compensation and granted statutory benefits to several land acquisition claimants. The State argued that the enhancement was unsupported by material and that the statutory solatium, additional component, and interest …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against awards of enhanced compensation and statutory benefits granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, in multiple land acquisition cases. The State argued that the Reference Court erred in fixing a higher market value and in awarding solatium, …
The National Highways Authority of India filed a batch of appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Principal District Judge, Aurangabad's common judgment dated 16/10/2025 dismissing its Section 34 applications and upholding arbitral awards. Lands in …
The appellants, Bahubali Digambar Durugkar and Chandrakant Subrao Patil, appealed against the State of Maharashtra challenging the compensation awarded for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that a prior judgment (FA No. 95/2004) had already fixed the compensation rate …
The appellant, Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, appealed the judgment and award of the Latur Reference Court which enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Rena Medium Project. The original award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was Rs 24,000 per acre …
The appellants challenged a 2014 award for land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana project, seeking a higher compensation based on the parity principle. The land, classified as dry, was originally awarded at Rs.565 per are, with a notification under Section 4 dated 07.10.1999. Relying on the Supreme …
The Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (appellant) challenged the enhanced compensation awarded by a reference court for land acquired for the Rena Medium Project in Latur. The original award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 valued dry land at Rs 24,000 per acre, which the …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired in 1986 for a minor irrigation tank at Pimpla village, arguing that the Reference Court failed to apply a 10% annual escalation for the period between earlier sale instances (1984‑85) and the notification under Section 4 of the …
The State of Maharashtra acquired land for the Benetura Project Murum under the Land Acquisition Act, taking possession in 1987 and awarding compensation in 1992. Claimants appealed the award and the reference court enhanced compensation in several land acquisition references. The State appealed, …
The appellant, Ginyandeo Chapla Rathod, challenged the award dated 15‑02‑2012 fixing the market value of his acquired dry land at Rs 1400 per R, arguing that higher sale exemplars should have been considered. He relied on three sale instances, the highest being Rs 3618 per R for a small parcel, and …
The State of Maharashtra acquired land for the Benetura Project Murum under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, taking possession in 1987 and awarding compensation in 1992. Claimants appealed the award and the reference court enhanced compensation in several land acquisition references. The State …
The appellants challenged the award of Rs 70,000 per hectare for land acquired for a storage tank, arguing that a prior sale of a nearby hectare for Rs 2,50,000 should raise the market value. The Reference Court had fixed the market value at Rs 1,20,000 per hectare after a reference under Section 18 …
The Chief Engineer (Construction) of Central Railway sought condonation of a 168‑day delay in filing several first appeals challenging an award that enhanced compensation for land acquired at Harangul village for railway gauge conversion. The acquisition, notified under Section 4 of the Land …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Hangarga Minor Irrigation Tank, contending that the lands should be classified as seasonally irrigated and thus attract a higher rate. The reference court had applied rates for seasonally irrigated and dry lands, but the …
The appellants, whose lands in Belora village were acquired for a percolation tank, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs 1,700 per R) and the subsequent enhancement by the Reference Court (Rs 2,200 for dry land and Rs 3,300 for semi‑irrigated land). They …
The appellants' 6.85‑hectare agricultural land in Beed district was acquired for a village tank, with an initial compensation of Rs.870 per R fixed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. The appellants challenged this amount before the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired for a bypass road in Nanded, arguing that a prior sale of similar agricultural land in the same village should be used to determine market value. The trial court had applied a 20% escalation to the Land Acquisition Officer's …
The petitioners, owners of land in Tisgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their property by the State of Maharashtra and CIDCO, alleging procedural violations under the Land Acquisition Act, including non‑compliance with the dual‑newspaper publication requirement of Section 6(2) and the …
The case involved several first appeals and cross‑objections arising from land acquisition awards for the construction of a State Transport (S.T.) stand and residential quarters at Erandol. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed market values at different rates (Rs.55 per sq m, Rs.1,310 per …
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) appealed the awards of the Reference Court concerning land acquired for a bus stand and residential quarters at Erandol, alleging that the market values were set too high. Claimants, the legal representatives of the deceased owners, had …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired in 1990 for the Andrud Percolation Tank, arguing that the reference court failed to consider sale transactions from the nearby village of Nipani and that the land was irrigated, warranting a higher rate of Rs.19,000 per acre. The …
The appellants, heirs of the deceased Subhash Anandrao Patil, challenged the compensation awarded for their agricultural land (2.85 hectares) acquired for the Waghur Project. They relied on a prior decision (First Appeal No.706 of 2007) where similar lands were awarded higher compensation, invoking …
The claimants' lands in Alhanwadi were acquired for a percolation tank and compensated at Rs.120 per R by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. Dissatisfied, they sought a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, presenting two sale instances: Exhibit 53 (20 R in the same …
The appellant, Urmila Ananda Patil, owned two parcels of land in Chinchkheda, Jalgaon, which were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. The trial court classified the land in Gat No.152/2 as jirayat land and awarded Rs.1,95,000 per hectare, while the land in Gat No.185/2 was treated as bagayat …
The appellant's 54‑hectare land in Budhoda village was acquired in 1982 for the Tawarja Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs.14,000 per hectare, which was enhanced to Rs.16,000 per hectare by a reference court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The appellant argued …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of appeals challenging the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants argued that the lands were irrigated, not dry, and that they were entitled to additional compensation for trees, wells, structures and pipelines, which the …
The Bombay High Court heard a batch of first appeals filed by numerous landowners against the Sub‑Divisional Officer cum Land Acquisition Officer, Vaijapur, seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants argued that the lands were irrigated, …
The Union of India, as the acquiring authority, sought to acquire land in Arvi village for a railway expansion project under a 1995 notification. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs.127 per square metre, which the claimants challenged before the reference court, leading …
The Union of India, as the acquiring authority, sought to acquire land in Arvi village for the expansion of a broad‑gauge railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs.127 per square metre, which the claimants contested, leading the reference court to enhance the rate …
The High Court considered applications for condonation of a 14‑year delay in filing cross‑objections by the original claimants in land‑acquisition proceedings. It examined whether the delay could be condoned, the appropriate market value of the acquired land, and the effect of a prior …
The High Court considered applications for condonation of a fourteen‑year delay in filing cross‑objections by original claimants in land‑acquisition proceedings initiated in 1996. The claimants argued that they were entitled to the market rate of Rs.123 per sq ft awarded in a similar coordinate …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur that were acquired for a minor irrigation project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation based on rates of Rs.1.5-2.4 lakh per hectare, which the claimants challenged as inadequate, arguing the …
The claimants appealed the 2009 judgment and award of compensation for lands acquired for the Kolsur Medium Project, seeking a higher rate of Rs.3,212 per R on the principle of parity. The court examined whether the lands in the present appeals were acquired for the same purpose, under the same …
The High Court of Bombay heard a massive group of appeals arising from a land‑acquisition proceeding for the Katpur minor‑irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court and the acquiring body (the State) contested the same award. The claimants …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer undervalued their land, which they contended was …
The High Court examined two related appeals concerning land acquired in 1993 for the Bruhat Minor Irrigation Tank project in Jalna district. The acquiring body challenged a 2010 award, while the original claimant contested a 2006 award and later filed a cross‑objection seeking enhanced compensation. …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. The claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The claimants appealed for enhancement of compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Kolsur Medium Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that, since their lands were acquired for the same purpose, under the same notification and by the same reference court as in First Appeal …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for a minor irrigation project, arguing that the land was irrigated and the rate of Rs.4,00,000 per acre was inadequate. The State …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging that the lands …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and enhanced by the Reference Court, arguing …
The High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for the Katpur minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were taken from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court, arguing that the land was irrigated and …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a group of appeals arising from the acquisition of 104 hectares of land for the Katpur minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, arguing that the …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for a minor irrigation project, alleging the lands were irrigated and the award was too low. The State (acquiring body) …
The case involved a large group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was far too low and …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (the owners of 104 ha of agricultural land) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation exceeded four times the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a mass of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the award of Rs 4,00,000 per acre for dry land (and higher rates for irrigated land) was inadequate and that they …
The appellants challenged the judgments and awards of the Joint Civil Judge in two land acquisition references concerning land taken for the Waghur Project. They sought enhanced compensation rates for Bagayat, Jirayat and Potkharab lands and a higher valuation for fruit‑bearing trees, as well as …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 which enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation, though slightly above four times the Land Acquisition Officer's award, fell …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 which had enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation did not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition …
The Executive Engineer, as the acquiring body, appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 which enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation, though slightly above four times the Land Acquisition Officer's award, was …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation exceeded four times the amount …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation exceeded four times the …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against a 2013 judgment and award that enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation, though slightly above four times the Land Acquisition Officer's award, should not be challenged per a …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against awards of compensation in multiple land acquisition cases where the reference court had enhanced compensation up to four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, a level the State Government had decided not to challenge. The …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 which had enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases and awarded interest from the date of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellant argued that the …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against a 2013 judgment and award that enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases, arguing that the increase did not exceed four times the Land Acquisition Officer's award and that the interest awarded was improper. The State …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against a 2013 judgment and award that enhanced compensation in several land acquisition cases. The State Government’s policy, as per a 2016 resolution, refrains from challenging awards that do not exceed four times the Land Acquisition Officer’s …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against a 2013 judgment and award that enhanced compensation for several land acquisition cases, arguing that the increase did not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, a threshold set by a State Government policy. The …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against multiple claimants challenging the judgment and award dated 24‑09‑2013 which enhanced compensation for land acquisition. The reference court had increased compensation to just under four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed the judgment and award dated 24 September 2013 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had enhanced compensation in several land acquisition cases. The appellant argued that the enhanced compensation did not exceed four times …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a judgment and award of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the rehabilitation of earthquake‑affected persons in Village Makani. The land …
The appellant, Babasaheb Sahebrao Kendhale, challenged the compensation awarded for his 1½‑20R land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arguing that the enhancement to Rs 1,200 per R for dry land and Rs 600 per R for pot‑kharab land was inadequate. The High Court noted that a prior First …
The Union of India, as the acquiring authority, sought to acquire land in Arvi village for the expansion of a broad‑gauge railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs.127 per square metre, which was enhanced by the reference court to Rs.70 per square foot. The …
