Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Land Acquisition Act, 2013

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 99522 September 2022Disposed off

The petitioners, project‑affected families under the Sardar Sarovar Project, sought clarification or modification of the Supreme Court's 8 February 2017 order that fixed a full‑and‑final compensation of Rs 60 lakhs per family as a comprehensive settlement. The petitioners argued that, since they were entitled to 4.293 

NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLANversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 1188 February 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court was asked to resolve compensation issues for project‑affected families (PAFs) of the Sardar Sarovar Project in Madhya Pradesh. Of the 4,998 PAFs, 681 families had not received any compensation under the Special Rehabilitation Package, while 1,358 families who had received both installments were later

JASVEER SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2017 INSC 4211 May 2017Dismissed

The appellants' land was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a railway line, with compensation paid and a reference for higher compensation awarded in 1988. They later filed a writ petition challenging the validity of the acquisition award, alleging it was not a proper award and seeking fresh compensation

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search