Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8
The Bihar Adiwasi Adhikar Forum filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Additional Chief Secretary of the Department of Land Reforms and Revenue to (i) dispose of a representation dated 15‑10‑2025 concerning a high‑level enquiry into land declared as Government …
The Bihar Adiwasi Adhikar Forum filed a public interest litigation seeking writs of mandamus directing the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Land Reform and Revenue, to (i) dispose of a representation filed on 5 November 2025 concerning a high‑level enquiry into land declared as government …
Anil Kumar Rai filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to set aside Gazette Notification No. 2776 dated 24‑07‑1990 issued under Section 15(1) of the Land Ceiling Act, contending that the land he purchased earlier should be excluded under Section 9(2) of the same Act. The petition relied on a sale …
The appellants, Md Idrish and Md Bechan, purchased land that had been declared surplus under the Bihar Land Reform (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 and sought a writ directing the Collector to delete the land from the 1 June 1990 Gazette notification issued under …
The petitioners, a group of Yadav family members, filed an application seeking restoration of Letters Patent Appeal No. 483 of 1996, which had been dismissed in 1999 for want of prosecution. They argued that the death of the family Karta, illiteracy, health accidents, and a communication gap …
Ganga Pandit filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to exclude 11 katha of land in Rampur village from being declared surplus of the late Mahanth Bharat Das, alleging that the declaration was made without notice or enquiry under Section 5(i)(iii) of the Land Ceiling …
The appellants challenged the validity of a land acquisition proceeding where the government, invoking urgency, issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 27 July 1995 and later dispensed with the inquiry required under Section 5‑A by exercising power under Section …
In a review petition arising from a civil appeal, the Bombay High Court had earlier declared the respondent a surplus holder under the Land Ceiling Act and allowed him to file a review if he was later found to be within the ceiling limit. The review petition was filed, but it raised new grounds that …
