Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Land Revenue Act, 1901

3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3

INDU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Indu Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Gyanpur to mutate a revenue order dated 24-10-2024 and restore her name in the khatauni for a specific plot of land. The petition relied on Section 219 of the Land Revenue Act, 1901, alleging that the …

RISHIKESH PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the Tehsildar’s order rejecting their mutation application based on a 2014 registered gift deed, claiming the deed contained a testamentary clause that should vest the remaining property in them. The respondents, daughters of the deceased tenure holder, argued that the …

URMILA DEVI & OTHERSversusBALRAM & ANOTHER

2025 INSC 915Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, daughters‑in‑law of a deceased landowner, obtained a mutation order based on an unregistered will and later secured an ex‑parte injunction against the complainant who had purchased a share of the land from the testator's third son. The complainant subsequently filed a criminal …