Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

205 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusLIMBAJI TUKARAM WANVE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The dispute between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and the claimants was referred to the Lok Adalat for settlement. The appellant filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 919 of 2002) but subsequently submitted a withdrawal pursis along with the authority letter. The Lok Adalat, observing the withdrawal, …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANE CO LTDversusLIMBAJI TUKARAM WANVE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The dispute between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and the claimants Limbaji Tukaram Wanve & Ors. was referred to the Lok Adalat under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The appellant filed an appeal but subsequently submitted a withdrawal petition along with the requisite …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusLIMBAJI TUKARAM WANVE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The dispute between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and the claimants was referred to a Lok Adalat under the Legal Services Authorities Act. The appellant filed an appeal but subsequently submitted a withdrawal petition along with the requisite authority letter. The Lok Adalat disposed of the …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COversusLIMBAJI TUKARAM WANVE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The dispute between The New India Assurance Co. and the claimants was referred to the Lok Adalat. The appellant filed a first appeal (No. 920 of 2002) but subsequently submitted withdrawal pursis and an authority letter. The Lok Adalat, noting the withdrawal, disposed of the appeal and any related …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusPRAKASH NOORA PAWAR

Withdrawn

The New India Assurance Co. filed a first appeal (No. 1415 of 2007) against a motor accident claim decided by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nanded. The appellant, through its counsel, submitted withdrawal purses and an authority letter, indicating its intention to withdraw the appeal. The Lok …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusMANOHAR MADANLAL RATHI AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company Ltd filed a civil application and first appeal seeking to withdraw its appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambajogai, in favour of the claimants Manohar Madanlal Rathi and others. The insurance company had already accepted the Tribunal’s …

NARAYAN POSHATTYversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a series of first appeals filed by numerous claimants against the State of Maharashtra concerning compensation for fruit‑bearing trees affected by land acquisition. The claimants, represented by advocates Rakesh Jain, …

PANDURANG LALU WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a large group of first‑appeal petitions filed by various claimants against the State of Maharashtra concerning compensation for land acquisition, including claims for fruit‑bearing trees. The parties, represented by …

SATWA LALU WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of first‑appeal petitions filed by various claimants against the State of Maharashtra were heard before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The claimants sought enhanced compensation for fruit‑bearing trees affected by land acquisition. The parties, …

MAROTI LALU WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a large group of first appeals filed by various claimants against the State of Maharashtra concerning compensation for land acquisition. The parties, represented by counsel, presented settlement agreements signed by the …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD BR PARBHANIversusPRABHAKAR CHAPAJI HAKE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., appellant, filed a first appeal (No. 246 of 2014) which was referred to the National Lok Adalat under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The appellant, through its counsel Mr M. R. Deshmukh, submitted withdrawal purses and an authority …

BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusFARJANA ADAM PATHAN AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., filed a first appeal before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Farzana Adam Pathan and others. The insurance company subsequently tendered a withdrawal petition, seeking to withdraw the …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusBHAVARLAL PUNAMJI JAIN and ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The dispute between New India Insurance Co. Ltd. (appellant) and Bhavarlal Punamji Jain and others (respondents) was referred to the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The appellant filed a withdrawal petition, accompanied by an authority letter, indicating its intention …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusKISHOR BABURAO BABULAL JAISWAL and ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The insurance company, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalgaon, in a motor accident claim. The appellant submitted withdrawal pursis and an authority letter, indicating that the full compensation amount, along with accrued …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusRADHIKABAI SATISH GODSE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.90 of 2008. The company subsequently accepted the Tribunal's award, deposited the compensation amount with the court registry, and …

BALAJI LALU WAGHMAREversusSTATE OF MAH THRU DIST. COLLECTOR NANDED AND ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of first‑appeal petitions filed by land‑acquisition claimants against the State of Maharashtra were listed before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The claimants sought enhanced compensation for fruit‑bearing trees affected by the acquisition. The Lok …

RAMA MALHARI DANGREversusSTATE OF MAH THRU DIST. COLLECTOR NANDED AND ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

Multiple appellants filed first appeals before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, seeking enhancement of compensation for fruit‑bearing trees following land acquisition by the State of Maharashtra. The parties, represented by counsel, presented settlement …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSHAMABI AHMED QURESHI AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

United India Insurance Company Ltd. filed three first appeals against various claimants seeking to contest insurance claim payments. The appeals were referred to a Lok Adalat for settlement. The appellant’s counsel, Mr Swapnil S. Rathi, together with the insurance officer, submitted a written …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusNANDKUMAR SHAMRAO KALE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd filed a first appeal (No. 960 of 2026) against claimants Nandkumar Shamrao Kale and others, seeking to withdraw the appeal after accepting the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shrirampur (Petition No. 171 of 2020). The appellant submitted a withdrawal …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.versusSABERABEE ABDUL WAHED PATHAN and ANR.

DISPOSED OFF

The dispute between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and the claimants Saberabee Abdul Wahed Pathan & Anr. was referred to the Lok Adalat for determination. The appellant filed a first appeal (No. 484 of 2005) but subsequently submitted a withdrawal pursis along with an authority letter. The Lok …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.versusBHAGWAN @ APPASAHEB HARIBHAU WAYAL AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal (No. 2063 of 2008) against a judgment in a motor accident claim but subsequently accepted the award rendered by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna, in Petition No. 41 of 2007. The insurance company deposited the compensation …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusUJWALABAI RAMDAS RAUT AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The dispute between New India Assurance Co Ltd (appellant) and Ujwalabai Ramdas Raut and others (respondents) was referred to the Lok Adalat. The appellant filed a first appeal but subsequently submitted withdrawal pursis and an authority letter. The Lok Adalat accepted the withdrawal, disposing of …

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusRENUKA MANOJ CHAVAN AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed a first appeal (No.31 of 2012) against Renuka Wd/o Manoj Chavan and others. The appellant’s counsel, Smt. R.D. Reddy, along with the corporation’s law officer, submitted a withdrawal petition. The High Court, noting the withdrawal, disposed of …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusBABULAL BUDHIRAM VISHWKARMA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed a first appeal (No. 966 of 2012) against an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad, concerning the apportionment of a claim amount. The appellant, through Advocate A.S. Usmanpurkar, submitted a withdrawal petition with the requisite authority …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusBABULAL BUDHIRAM VISHWKARMA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed First Appeal No. 964 of 2012 before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court at Aurangabad challenging an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad, regarding the apportionment of a claim amount. The appellant, represented by Advocate A.S. …

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE LTD.versusRAMRAO DHONDIBA MADHEKAR AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal (No. 1961/2013) before the National Lok Adalat at the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, against Ramrao Dhondiba Madhekar and others. The insurer, through its counsel Mr. Abhijit G. Choudhari, submitted written instructions to withdraw the …

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE LTD.versusANITA GANESH MALI AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Shriram General Insurance Co. filed a first appeal (No. 1962/2013) before the National Lok Adalat, High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench. The insurer, through its counsel, submitted written instructions (Exhibit X) to withdraw the appeal. The panel, noting the withdrawal purses, disposed of the …

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE LTD.versusPRABHAKAR NAMDEO KADAM AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Shriram General Insurance Co. filed First Appeal No. 1960/2013 before the National Lok Adalat, High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench. The insurer, through its counsel Mr. Abhijit G. Choudhari, submitted a written instruction (Exhibit X) to withdraw the appeal. The Lok Adalat accepted the …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. BEEDversusVIMAL TUKARAM BAGATE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Oriental Insurance Company filed a first appeal (No. 2864 of 2009) against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad, in favour of Vimal Tukaram Bagate and others. The insurer later submitted an email and a letter authorising the withdrawal of the appeal, having already …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusKARBHARI BABURAO GAADAWE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. concerning motor accident claim petitions. The insurer had accepted the awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals and filed withdrawal pursis along with …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusKARBHARI BABURAO GAADAWE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against various claimants in motor accident claim matters. The insurer sought condonation of delay in filing the appeals and submitted withdrawal letters authorising …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.versusNOORJAHABEE NISSARKHA PATHAN AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The dispute between New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (appellant) and Noorjahabee Nissarkha Pathan & Ors. (respondents) was referred to the National Lok Adalat. The appellant filed a withdrawal petition, accompanied by an authority letter, to withdraw its appeal. The Lok Adalat accepted the withdrawal, …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.versusSHIVANAND ANANDRAO HONSHETTE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed a First Appeal before the Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nanded, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 360 of 2001. The appellant subsequently submitted a withdrawal …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.versusSHIVANAND ANANDRAO HONSHETTE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed a First Appeal before the Special Lok Adalat of the High Court at Aurangabad, seeking to withdraw the appeal after accepting the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nanded, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 360 of 2001. The appellant submitted a …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusRANJANA VILAS WAGHMARE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Limited relating to motor accident claim petitions. The appellant submitted withdrawal letters and authority letters dated 25‑03‑2026, which the court accepted and …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusSANTOSH @ SUNIL KRISHNAPRASAD AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Ltd. against various claimants arising from motor accident claim petitions decided by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad. The insurance company submitted …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusMATEEN YUNUS PATIL AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Ltd. against various claimants under motor accident claim petitions. The insurer had already accepted the awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and deposited …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusDHRUPADABAI BABASAHEB SHELKE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed multiple first appeals before the Special Lok Adalat of the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court challenging awards granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in various motor accident claim petitions. The insurer later submitted withdrawal pursis and an …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusSANTOSH @ SUNIL KRISHNAPRASAD AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the High Court at Aurangabad heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Ltd. against various claimants under motor accident claim petitions. The insurer had earlier accepted the awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the compensation …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusMAINABAI DATTU KATKAR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Ltd. against various claimants in motor accident claim petitions. The insurer had earlier accepted the awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the compensation …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusBHANUDAS PUNDLIKRAO NAGRE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the High Court at Aurangabad considered a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Ltd. against various claimants in motor accident claim petitions. The insurance company had already accepted the awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and deposited …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusARUNABAI SUDHAKAR WAGH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company (appellant) filed multiple first appeals before the Special Lok Adalat, High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging Motor Accident Claim Tribunal awards in various motor accident claim petitions. The insurer had already accepted the Tribunal awards, deposited …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusNANDLAL DEVIDAS DHANGARE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Ltd. against various claimants arising from motor accident claim petitions. The insurer had accepted the awards rendered by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, …

KHANDU GENDAJIversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellants, a group of land owners, filed first appeals against the State of Maharashtra seeking enhancement of compensation for fruit‑bearing trees following land acquisition. The National Lok Adalat, constituted under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, facilitated a …

NARAYAN GENDAJIversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of first appeals filed by various claimants against the State of Maharashtra concerned claims for enhanced compensation for fruit‑bearing trees in land acquisition matters. The parties appeared before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, and presented …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., AURANGABADversusPRIYA RAHUL GAIKWAD

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against various claimants arising from Motor Accident Claim Tribunals. The insurer submitted withdrawal letters and authority letters authorising its signatories …

Swaleha Nasir Khan and OrsversusArun Haribhau Mhaske

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed first appeals against awards granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shrirampur, in several motor accident claim petitions. The insurer later submitted a withdrawal pursis and an authority letter, indicating its intention to withdraw the appeals. The …

Nihal Nasir Khan and OrsversusArun Haribhau Mhaske

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed first appeals and several civil applications in the Special Lok Adalat challenging awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Ahmednagar. The insurer later submitted a withdrawal pursis and an authority letter, indicating its acceptance of the Tribunal …

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE LTD.versusANITA GANESH MALI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat, organized under section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, considered several pending civil applications involving Shriram General Insurance Ltd. and various respondents. The parties had earlier filed first appeals, but those appeals were subsequently withdrawn. …

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.versusVAISHALI VIJAYKUMAR PATIL AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, considered a batch of first appeals filed by Reliance General Insurance Co. against various claimants in motor accident claim matters. The court condoned the delay in filing and recorded the insurer's email instruction to withdraw …

BABU KOETYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a large group of first appeals filed by various private claimants against the State of Maharashtra concerning compensation for fruit‑bearing trees acquired under a land acquisition project. The claimants sought enhancement …

RANI SANTOSH PALEWAD AND ORSversusSHRIKANT GOVINDRAO SHRIMANGALE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

In a First Appeal before the National Lok Adalat (High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench), the appellants Rani Santosh Palewad and others sought settlement of a motor accident claim against Shri Shikant Govindrao Shrimangale and others, including an insurance company. The parties, represented by …

SOYEB S/O IMAMSAB QURESHIversusFEROZ KHAN S/O MANSOOR KHAN AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Soyeb Qureshi, appealed against respondents Feroz Khan and an insurance company regarding a compensation dispute. Both parties appeared before the National Lok Adalat at the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, and submitted a joint compromise agreement. The Lok Adalat, under Section …

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusAANNA VITTHAL KOLI AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal (No. 386/2025) before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision in a dispute with Anna Vithal Koli and others. The insurer, through its counsel Adv. Abhijit G. Choudhari, submitted a written …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTDversusAATISH SUBHASH JAWALE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed First Appeal (ST) No. 32443 of 2012 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, along with Civil Applications No. 10018/2013 and 10019/2013. Civil Application No. 10018/2013 sought condonation of 102 days delay in filing the appeal. The matter was referred …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusRUKMINI SUMANTRAO SASE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., having accepted the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar (Petition No. 56 of 2005), filed a first appeal before the Special Lok Adalat, High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The appeal was delayed, but the court condoned the delay and …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusRUKMINI SUMANTRAO SASE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed a first appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar, in a 2005 motor accident claim. The company subsequently accepted the Tribunal’s award and submitted a withdrawal pursis dated 25 March 2026, seeking to withdraw the appeal. The …

SURESH PANDHARINATH PAWARversusALI AHAMAD HYADALI CHAUDHARI AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by Reliance General Insurance Company challenging awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The insurer submitted an email instruction, on behalf of its advocate Mr. R.H. Dahat, to withdraw …

GANGARAM RAJBA KAMBLEversusVASANT MARIBA KAMBLE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased landowner, challenged a compromise decree dated 13‑02‑2016 passed in Lok Adalat in R.C.S. No.47 of 2016, alleging that the decree was obtained by fraud. The High Court found that summons were never served, the illiterate and 82 % disabled petitioner was …

AAKASH UMESH TIWARI AND ANRversusJAGDISH OMPRAKASH PATHAK AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Aakash and Umesh Tiwari, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenging a compromise and the awards passed by the National Lok Adalat in September 2023 in Special Civil Suit Nos. 211/2022 and 245/2022. They alleged that the settlement was procured by fraud, …

DESERVE EMERALD REALTY PRIVATE LIMITEDversusADARSH KAPOL NAGAR

Disposed Off

Deserve Emerals Realty Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging a District Judge's order that set aside an execution order restraining the respondent cooperative society from creating third‑party interests in a suit property. The dispute centered on whether a compromise memo filed before …

SMT. MAYYA @ PREM KUMARI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS challenging a Lok Adalat order that rejected a police final report (NCR No. 141/2015) and treated the matter as a criminal complaint, leading to a summoning order dated 28.03.2024. The High Court examined whether a Lok Adalat …

DEEPAK KUMARversusMEENAKSHI GUPTA @ RINKU

DISMISSED

The petitioners Deepak Kumar and Meenakshi Gupta were married in 1993 but later separated, leading to criminal, maintenance and divorce proceedings. The parties entered into a settlement before the Special Lok Adalat on 31 May 2003, wherein the petitioner agreed to pay one‑third of his salary and …

M/S DHANBAD FUELS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR

2025 INSC 696Dismissed

The Union of India filed a money suit of over Rs 8.73 crore in a Commercial Court in August 2019 without first complying with the pre‑institution mediation requirement of Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The defendant, Dhanbad Fuels Pvt. Ltd., raised a preliminary objection and sought …

SAKINA SULTANALI SUNESARA (MOMIN)versusSHIA IMAMI ISMAILI MOMIN JAMAT SAMAJ & ORS

2025 INSC 570Dismissed

The appellant, Sakina Sultanali Sunesara, challenged two consent decrees arising from compromises in suits concerning disputed land, alleging she had no notice of the compromises and that they were procured by fraud. She filed applications under Order XLIII Rule 1‑A to set aside the decrees, while …

SOVARAN SINGH PRAJAPATIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2025 INSC 225Appeal(s) allowed

Sovaran Singh Prajapati was convicted of murdering his wife and daughter under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and sentenced to death by the Trial Court, a judgment affirmed by the Allahabad High Court. The appellant challenged the conviction on the ground that the trial was not a fair trial, citing …

SANJEEVKUMAR HARAKCHAND KANKARIYAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 866Dismissed

The appellant filed a civil suit for specific performance which was referred to mediation under Section 89 of the CPC and settled amicably; he sought a full refund of the court fees paid, but the trial court allowed only a 50% refund. He challenged this in a writ petition, arguing that Section 16 of …

SUHAS CHAKMAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 813Directions issued

The petitioner, a prison inmate, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a permanent mechanism to ensure free and timely legal aid for prisoners and to address overcrowded, unhygienic prison conditions. The Court examined the constitutional mandate under Articles 21 and 39‑A, the Legal …

SOCIETY FOR ENLIGHTENMENT AND VOLUNTARY ACTION & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 790Disposed off

The Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action, an NGO, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking comprehensive guidelines for the effective implementation of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 (PCMA), including the appointment of exclusive Child Marriage Prohibition Officers …

SHAKEEL AHMEDversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 1162Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition under Article 32 seeking implementation of the Srikrishna Commission's recommendations on the 1992-93 Mumbai riots, including compensation for victims, tracing of missing persons, and police reforms. The Court observed that while the Commission's report …

RAMANAND @ NANDLAL BHARTIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2022 INSC 1075Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Ramanand (alias Nandlal Bharti) was convicted and sentenced to death for allegedly murdering his wife and four children, based largely on circumstantial evidence comprising a discovery statement of the murder weapon, extra‑judicial confessions to two witnesses, alleged motive stemming …

CANARA BANKversusG S JAYARAMA

2022 INSC 597Disposed off

The appeal concerned an award of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) that had granted Canara Bank repayment of a loan from G S Jayarama without any recorded conciliation. The High Court had set aside the award, holding that the PLA lacked adjudicatory power and had bypassed mandatory conciliation steps. …

K. SRINIVASAPPA & ORS.versusM. MALLAMMA & ORS.

2022 INSC 587Appeal(s) allowed

The parties to a partition suit entered into a compromise that was recorded by a Lok Adalat on 7 July 2012, which under Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 is deemed a decree of a civil court. Plaintiffs 4‑6 later alleged that their signatures were obtained by fraud and filed writ …

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOIDA)versusYUNUS & ORS.

2022 INSC 142Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a land acquisition notification where the original compensation award was Rs.24,033 per bigha. The respondents did not file an application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, but later a reference was made and a Lok Adalat, under Section 20 of the Legal Services …

ESTATE OFFICERversusCOLONEL H.V. MANKOTIA (RETIRED)

2021 INSC 635Appeal(s) allowed

The Estate Officer filed Writ Petition No. 8074 of 2011 before the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which was later referred to a Lok Adalat on 30 November 2013. The Lok Adalat members examined the merits of the petition and dismissed it, prompting the appellant to argue that the Lok Adalat exceeded its …

BRIJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

2021 INSC 197Directions issued

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed by Brijesh Kumar challenging his conviction, finding no merit to interfere with the trial and high court judgments. While disposing the petition, the Court noted that the counsel appointed as amicus curiae for the petitioner was only given …

ANOKHILALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2019 INSC 1399Disposed off

The appellant, Anokhilal, was convicted of kidnapping, rape and murder of a nine‑year‑old girl and sentenced to death along with several other terms of imprisonment. He was represented by an Amicus Curiae appointed by the Legal Services Authority on the same day that charges were framed, leaving the …

SALEEM AHMEDversusSTATE & ANR.

2019 INSC 919Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a house owner, was charged with electricity theft after BSES issued a bill of Rs.97,786 and filed a criminal case. The parties settled the dispute in a Permanent Lok Adalat, agreeing that the appellant would pay Rs.83,120 as full and final settlement, which he duly paid. Despite the …

CHERIYATH JYOTHIversusSAINUDEEN AND ANR.

2019 INSC 566Dismissed

Cheriyath Jyothi complained to the Gram Panchayat that a neighbour had erected an unauthorised building used as a rubber‑sheet plant, violating the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2011 and posing health hazards. The Lok Adalat ordered the respondent to demolish the existing structure within three …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusABHIJIT SINGH PAWAR

2018 INSC 1101Leave Granted & Allowed

The respondent, Abhijit Singh Pawar, applied for police posts in Madhya Pradesh and disclosed in an affidavit that a criminal case (Sections 323, 325, 506, 34) was pending against him. Within four days the parties compromised and the offences were compounded under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C., …

KODUNGALLUR FILM SOCIETY & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 917Disposed off

The Kodungallur Film Society filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to prevent mob violence against cultural establishments, especially following protests over films like Padmaavat. The Court examined whether the State must implement the guidelines from In Re: Destruction of …

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ORS.versusPRADEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 10Appeal(s) allowed

The Union Territory of Chandigarh Administration sought to appoint candidates as constables, but two respondents were denied employment after a Screening Committee found them unsuitable despite their acquittal in criminal cases under IPC sections 323 and 506. The respondents challenged the …

BHARGAVI CONSTRUCTIONS & ANR.versusKOTHAKAPU MUTHYAM REDDY & ORS .

2017 INSC 867Appeal(s) allowed

Bhargavi Constructions filed a civil suit for specific performance of a land sale, which was later settled by a written compromise and an award was passed by a Lok Adalat on 22‑08‑2007. The plaintiffs later alleged fraud and misrepresentation in obtaining that award and instituted a suit seeking its …

JUSTICE SUNANDA BHANDARE FOUNDATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 1284Hearing Adjourned

The petitioners sought directions for the Union, State Governments and Union Territories to comply with the Supreme Court's earlier orders on the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, noting that the Act had been repealed and replaced by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Court …

IMTIYAZ AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2017 INSC 6Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the chronic delay in disposal of serious criminal cases in district courts, noting that many stays were issued by High Courts under Art. 226 of the Constitution and Sections 397/482 of the CrPC. It evaluated the Law Commission's "rate of disposal" method and the criticisms …

NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ON DALIT HUMAN RIGHTS & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2016 INSC 1140Disposed off

The National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights and other NGOs filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking enforcement of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and its 1995 Rules, alleging widespread non‑implementation by State and Central authorities. They …

RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONSversusRE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS

2017 INSC 955

The Supreme Court entertained Writ Petition (Civil) No. 406 of 2013 concerning inhuman conditions in 1,382 Indian prisons. Relying on earlier decisions, the Court affirmed that prisoners are persons entitled to fundamental rights, including dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. It examined …

STATE OF M.P. & ORS.versusPARVEZ KHAN

2014 INSC 823Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant State of Madhya Pradesh challenged a Division Bench order that had set aside the Superintendent of Police’s refusal to grant a compassionate appointment to the respondent, Parvez Khan, who sought recruitment to the police service after his father’s death in service. The respondent had …

MANOHARANversusSIVARAJAN & ORS.

2013 INSC 781Appeal(s) allowed

Manoharan filed a suit seeking a mandatory injunction and reconveyance of land after a loan transaction, but paid only one‑tenth of the court fee of Rs.28,797. The Sub‑Judge rejected his application for an extension of time to pay the balance fee, leading to dismissal of the suit. Manoharan …

RAJOO @ RAMAKANTversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2012 INSC 327Remitted to Lower Court

Rajoo was convicted of gang‑rape and appealed to the High Court, which upheld his conviction but did not provide him with legal representation at the appellate stage. The Supreme Court examined whether, under Article 39‑A of the Constitution and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, an accused …

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIAversusUNION OF INDIA

2012 INSC 314Dismissed

The Bar Council of India challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 22‑A to 22‑E of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (as inserted by the 2002 Amendment), arguing that they were arbitrary, violated Articles 14 and 21, denied a right of appeal and encroached on the jurisdiction of …

K.N. GOVINDAN KUTTY MENONversusC.D. SHAJI

2011 INSC 824Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which the magistrate referred to a Lok Adalat for settlement. The parties reached a compromise and the Lok Adalat passed an award, but the respondent failed to honour the payment schedule, leading the …

M/S INTERGLOBE AVIATION LTD.versusN. SATCHIDANAND

2011 INSC 425Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a claim by a passenger against Indigo Airlines for compensation due to a prolonged flight delay, alleged deficiency in service, and alleged illegal detention at Hyderabad airport. The Court held that the Permanent Lok Adalat in Hyderabad had jurisdiction to entertain the …

ASHOK KUMAR MITTALversusRAM KUMAR GUPTA & ANR.

2009 INSC 12Dismissed

Ashok Kumar Mittal filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged sale agreement. The trial court dismissed the suit and the Delhi High Court affirmed the dismissal, holding that both parties had lied on oath and deserved prosecution for perjury. Instead of ordering prosecution, the High Court …

B.P. MOIDEEN SEVAMANDIR & ANRversusA.M. KUTTY HASSAN

2008 INSC 1432Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, B.P. Moideen Sevamandir & Anr, challenged the dismissal of their second appeal by the Kerala High Court after a Lok Adalat failed to secure a settlement. The High Court had refused an adjournment request and dismissed the appeal, citing the appellants' alleged cantankerous behaviour …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusAJAY SINHA AND ANOTHER

2008 INSC 654Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, owners of insured goods, claimed insurance reimbursement after a burglary, which the insurer denied. The dispute was taken to the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, despite a pending criminal case for the alleged non‑compoundable offence of …

STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.versusJALOUR SINGH & ORS.

2008 INSC 66Case Allowed

The heirs of a deceased woman filed a claim for motor accident compensation, which was awarded Rs.1,44,000 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Dissatisfied, they appealed to the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which referred the matter to a Lok Adalat. The Lok Adalat, without the parties' consent or …