Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
21 judgments · newest first · showing 1–21
The petition was filed by HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. challenging an award of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) in a dispute with Abdul Razzak and five others. The petitioner contended that the PLA had not complied with the mandatory conciliation process prescribed under Section 22‑C of the Legal …
The petitioners, Regional Manager of The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and another, challenged the award of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) in a dispute with Harbhajan Singh Sachdeva and four others. The petition argued that the PLA had not complied with the mandatory conciliation process prescribed …
The High Court examined a writ petition filed by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. challenging an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) dated 29‑05‑2026. The petitioner argued that the PLA had not complied with the mandatory conciliation procedure prescribed under Section 22 of the …
The petitioner, I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) dated 18.05.2026, alleging that the PLA failed to conduct the mandatory conciliation process under Section 22-C of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The High Court examined the …
The New India Assurance Company challenged an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) in Muzaffarnagar, alleging that the PLA failed to carry out the statutory conciliation process required under Section 22‑C/22(g) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner argued that the PLA merely …
The New India Assurance Company challenged the award of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) on the ground that the PLA had not complied with the conciliation requirements under Section 22‑g of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The PLA’s order merely listed dates for attempted settlement without …
The petition filed by I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. challenged an order of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) that had decided a dispute with Dheeraj Jain without complying with the conciliation requirements of Section 22‑C of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner argued …
The petition challenged an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) in Ghaziabad that resolved an insurance dispute without conducting the statutory conciliation process under Section 22(g) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner argued that the PLA merely made a generic reference …
The Oriental Insurance Company challenged the order of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) that had adjudicated a dispute with the State of Uttar Pradesh and others without conducting a proper conciliation process as mandated by Section 22‑C/22(g) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner …
The Oriental Insurance Company filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) in Etah that resolved a dispute without conducting the mandatory conciliation process under the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioners argued that the PLA merely noted a date for …
The petitioner, Ram Singh, approached the Permanent Lok Adalat for dispute resolution, but the matter was already pending before a competent civil court and a civil suit had been filed. Under Sections 22-C(1) and 22-C(2) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987, the Lok Adalat proceedings were …
The Oriental Insurance Company filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) that resolved its dispute on merits without a proper conciliation process. The petitioner argued that the PLA failed to comply with the mandatory conciliation requirements under Section …
The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India, challenged an order of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) dated 17‑04‑2026 which resolved a dispute without conducting the mandatory conciliation process under Section 22‑C of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner argued that the PLA …
The Divisional Manager of National Insurance Co. challenged a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) order that resolved a dispute with Dinesh Kumar Saraswat and others. The petitioner argued that the PLA failed to conduct the mandatory conciliation process prescribed under Section 22‑C/22(g) of the Legal …
The appellant, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., filed a first appeal (C/FA/2356/2014) against a decree involving Chandulal alias Shaileshkumar Vagjibhai Solanki and others. During the hearing on 26 September 2020, the appellant's counsel, Mr. Vibhuti Nanavati, submitted a withdrawal …
The marriage between Madduri Venkateswara Rao and Madduri Sunanda was dissolved by a California divorce decree in 2007. After returning to India, Sunanda filed a matrimonial suit, a domestic violence case, and an FIR under sections 494 and 498A IPC against her husband and his relatives. The parties …
The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which base the pecuniary jurisdiction of district, state and national consumer commissions on the value of consideration paid rather than the compensation claimed. …
The Central Bank of India had mortgaged a residential property to recover a loan taken by the borrowers and obtained a settlement award from a Lok Adalat, which was signed by the borrowers and one of the guarantor's sons but not by the guarantor herself, C.L. Vimla. Vimla filed multiple writ …
The dispute arose under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act between Prateek Jain (complainant) and Rakesh Kumar Jain (accused). While a criminal appeal was pending, the parties settled and filed a joint application under Section 147 seeking compounding and requested that the matter be …
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity and practical effect of numerous amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) made by the 1999 and 2002 Amendment Acts. It held that the requirement of filing an affidavit under Section 26(2) and Order VI Rule 15(4) imposes additional …
The Salem Advocate Bar Association filed writ petitions under Article 32 challenging the 1999 and 2002 amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. While the Constitutionality of the amendments was not contested, the petitioner sought clarification on their practical implementation. The Court …
