Created by Fuzzy Cloud

M.P.I.D. Act

3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3

SHANKAR UKHA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Shankar Ukha Patil filed a criminal writ petition challenging the appointment of the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Dhule as the competent authority under Section 4 of the M.P.I.D. Act. The respondent State filed a communication stating that the appointment had been made and would require approval by the …

SUSHANT SHARADCHANDRA PHADNISversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Sushant Sharadchandra Phadnis and Shilpa Sushant Phadnis, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a fraud case (Crime No. 0329/2026) alleging investment scams involving K to Z Company and Nextech Vision Pvt. Ltd. The informant claimed the applicants induced him to invest Rs.1.24 …

SHILPA SUSHANT PHADNISversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Sushant Sharadchandra Phadnis and Shilpa Phadnis, feared arrest in connection with a fraud case (Crime No. 0329/2026) involving alleged investment scams through K to Z Company and Nextech Vision Pvt. Ltd. The informant claimed the applicants induced him to invest Rs.1.24 crore and …