Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

MADHO SINGH AND ORS.versusMONI SINGH (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2004 INSC 48630 August 2004Leave Granted & Allowed

The villagers of Kanardipura filed a suit in representative capacity under Order I Rule 8 of the CPC seeking declaration of title, permanent injunction and possession of land they claimed was grazing (Charnoi) land, not a grove. The Board of Revenue had earlier settled the land as a grove in favour of Kalu Singh’s heir

MEHARBANSINGHversusBHAGWANTSINGH AND OTHERS

1980 INSC 617 January 1980Appeal(s) allowed

Meharban Singh and others had mortgaged their khud‑kasht land to Munshi Singh under a usufructuary mortgage. After the Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951 came into force, the proprietors' rights vested in the State, but section 4(2) allowed a proprietor to retain possession of land recorded as khud‑kasht befor

SHRI KASTURCHAND AND ANR.versusSHRI HARBILASH AND ORS.

2000 INSC 44714 September 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, proprietors of khud‑kasht land, filed a suit to recover possession of land recorded in the annual village papers (Khasra) as theirs for Samvat years 2006 and 2007, before the vesting date of 2 Oct 1951. The respondents later had the appellants' names struck off and their own entered in 2008 without foll

MISHRI LAL (DEAD) BY LRS.versusDHIRENDRA NATH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

1999 INSC 1606 April 1999Dismissed

The respondent Zamindar had executed two mortgage deeds in 1947‑48 covering houses and khudkasht lands. After the Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951 came into force, the mortgagee (appellant) contended that the Zamindar could not redeem the mortgage because the Act vested all zamindari rights in the State. The

CHATTAR SINGH & ORSversusMADHO SINGH & ORS.

2019 INSC 1506 February 2019Dismissed

The plaintiffs, villagers, sued to declare that a 72‑bigha parcel recorded as ‘Charnoi’ (common grazing land) vested in the State under the Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951, and could not be claimed by the ex‑Zamindar’s heirs. The ex‑Zamindar’s father had earlier obtained a Bhumiswami title under Section 5(f

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search