STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusAMIT SHRIVAS
2020 INSC 56529 September 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Amit Shrivas claimed a compassionate appointment after his father, a work‑charged driver, died in service; the father had become a permanent employee after 15 years but was still paid from the contingency fund. The 2008 Madhya Pradesh policy excluded work‑charged/contingency employees from compassionate a…
RAM NARESH RAWATversusSRI ASHWINI RAY & ORS.
2016 INSC 121515 December 2016Dismissed
The petitioners, originally engaged as daily‑wage workers in Madhya Pradesh, were classified as "permanent employees" under the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1963, and obtained court orders directing that their pay be fixed in the regular pay‑scale of the posts. The State Government, how…
STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.versusONKAR PRASAD PATEL
2005 INSC 5987 December 2005Disposed off
Onkar Prasad Patel, a helper in the Public Health Engineering Department of Madhya Pradesh, worked continuously from 17 November 1991 and sought regularisation as a permanent employee under the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, claiming six months of satisfactory service in a clear vacancy. The Labour Court allo…