Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, NARSINGHPURversusM/S. SHIV SHAKTI KHANSARI UDYOG AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 36430 August 2012Dismissed

The respondents, operators of sugar factories in Madhya Pradesh, challenged notices issued by market committees that required them to obtain licences under the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Act, 1972 and to pay market fees on purchases of sugarcane. The High Court quashed the notices, holding that the transactions w

NAGAR PALIKA NIGAMversusKRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI AND ORS.

2008 INSC 114514 October 2008Disposed off

The Municipal Corporation of Ratlam appealed against a High Court order that it could not levy property tax on a building and superstructure erected by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti within a market yard located in the corporation's area. The dispute turned on the proviso to Section 9(3) of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusM/S HARDEO SHRINATH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 23011 July 1994

The State of Madhya Pradesh issued directions prohibiting agriculturists from selling their produce through commission agents. The commission agents challenged the directions, arguing that under the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972, agriculturists are classified as "traders" and therefore may sell throu

ORIENT PAPER AND INDUSTRIES LTD.versusTHE STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 8159 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Orient Paper & Industries Ltd., a paper manufacturer, brought bamboo— a notified agricultural produce—into the Madhya Pradesh market area as raw material for paper production. The Market Committee levied a market fee under Section 19(1)(ii) of the M.P. Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972, claiming the bamboo was brought

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search