KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, NARSINGHPURversusM/S. SHIV SHAKTI KHANSARI UDYOG AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 36430 August 2012Dismissed
The respondents, operators of sugar factories in Madhya Pradesh, challenged notices issued by market committees that required them to obtain licences under the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Act, 1972 and to pay market fees on purchases of sugarcane. The High Court quashed the notices, holding that the transactions w…
NAGAR PALIKA NIGAMversusKRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI AND ORS.
2008 INSC 114514 October 2008Disposed off
The Municipal Corporation of Ratlam appealed against a High Court order that it could not levy property tax on a building and superstructure erected by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti within a market yard located in the corporation's area. The dispute turned on the proviso to Section 9(3) of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusM/S HARDEO SHRINATH AND ORS.
1994 INSC 23011 July 1994
The State of Madhya Pradesh issued directions prohibiting agriculturists from selling their produce through commission agents. The commission agents challenged the directions, arguing that under the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972, agriculturists are classified as "traders" and therefore may sell throu…
ORIENT PAPER AND INDUSTRIES LTD.versusTHE STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.
2006 INSC 8159 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed
Orient Paper & Industries Ltd., a paper manufacturer, brought bamboo— a notified agricultural produce—into the Madhya Pradesh market area as raw material for paper production. The Market Committee levied a market fee under Section 19(1)(ii) of the M.P. Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972, claiming the bamboo was brought …