Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Madras City Tenants' Protection (Amendment) Act, 1955

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITEDversusR. CHANDRAMOULEESWARAN AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 9228 January 2020Dismissed

The three oil companies (Bharat Petroleum, Indian Oil and Hindustan Petroleum) held long‑term leases on land, constructed petrol pumps and then sub‑let the premises to dealers. The landlords filed ejectment suits and the companies sought orders under Section 9 of the Madras City Tenants’ Protection Act, 1921 for the sa

S. VENKITACHALAM IYERversusS. RAMA IYER

1991 INSC 22912 September 1991Dismissed

The appellant, a trust, owned two parcels of land in Nagercoil and leased them to the respondent, who later purchased a superstructure built by a predecessor. When the respondent defaulted on rent, the trust obtained a decree of ejectment, conditioned on paying compensation for the building. While the decree remained u

N.A. MUNAVAR HUSSAIN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ANR.versusE.R. NARAYANAN (DEAD) AND ORS.

1995 INSC 38811 July 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a lease of land in Madurai on which a theatre was built. After a compromise decree in 1955, the defendants failed to remove the superstructure and the appellants sought execution. The defendants filed applications under the Madras City Tenants' Protection Act, 1921 for compensation, which were dismi

THE NEW THEATERS (CARNATIC TALKIES) LTD., COIMBATOREversusN. VAJRAPANI NAIDU

1983 INSC 1477 October 1983Dismissed

The appellant, New Theatres (Carnatic Talkies) Ltd., held a lease for land on which it built a theatre and later claimed a right to purchase the site under Section 9 of the Madras City Tenants' Protection Act, 1921. The respondent, N.V. Naidu, sought the appellant's eviction and the matter proceeded through multiple su

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search