Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
12 judgments · newest first · showing 1–12
Balaji Anandrao Chinmalwar filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Divisional Commissioner of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Division to register an appeal under Section 6(B) of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026 against a Scrutiny Committee order dated 10.08.2026. The respondents, …
Petitioner Jyoti Anandrao Chinmalwar filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Divisional Commissioner of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Division to register an appeal under Section 6(B) of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026 against a Scrutiny Committee order dated 10‑08‑2026. The …
A group of petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the cancellation of their caste certificates and seeking a stay of the order, arguing that the newly appointed Divisional Commissioner as appellate authority had not commenced work and that the order failed to mention the protection period …
A group of petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the cancellation of their caste certificates and seeking a stay of the order pending appeal to the Divisional Commissioner appointed as Appellate Authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026. They argued that the order …
A group of petitioners filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, appointed as Appellate Authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026, and a stay of an order passed by a Scrutiny Committee that cancelled their caste certificates. They contended …
A group of petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the cancellation of their caste certificates and seeking a stay of the order pending appeal to the Divisional Commissioner appointed as Appellate Authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026. They argued that the order …
A group of writ petitions were filed by individuals whose caste certificates had been cancelled by a Scrutiny Committee, seeking a stay of the order and direction to the Divisional Commissioner, appointed as Appellate Authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026, to commence …
A group of petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the cancellation of their caste certificates and seeking interim relief, alleging that the newly appointed Divisional Commissioner as appellate authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026 had not commenced functioning …
The petitioners challenged the cancellation of their caste certificates and sought a stay of the order, arguing that the Committee’s order failed to specify the remedy of appeal under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026 and did not mention the protection afforded by the newly …
A group of petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the cancellation of their caste certificates and seeking interim relief, alleging that the newly appointed Divisional Commissioner as Appellate Authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026 had not yet commenced regular …
The petitioner, a government employee, challenged a court order that declared his caste claim invalid, fearing termination because he was appointed to a post reserved for Scheduled Tribes. The order was issued after the appointment of an Appellate Authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act …
The petitioner, Vijay Shrirang Ingle, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Appellate Authority (Respondent No. 3) to register an appeal he had filed against a judgment dated 31 July 2026 issued by the Scrutiny Committee (Respondent No. 2). The petition relied on Section 6B of the …
