Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9
The cooperative housing societies filed a suit seeking joint ownership and conveyance of recreation grounds and an internal access road, claiming rights under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. The defendants, including Wallace Flour Mills Ltd. and two charitable trusts, moved to dismiss the …
The cooperative housing societies filed a suit seeking joint ownership and conveyance of recreation grounds and an internal access road, claiming rights under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. The defendants, including Wallace Flour Mills Ltd. and two charitable trusts, moved to dismiss the …
The three cooperative housing societies filed a suit seeking joint ownership of a recreation ground, internal road and FSI advantage, invoking the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and the 1964 MOF Rules. The defendants, including Wallace Flour Mills Ltd. and two charitable trusts, moved to …
The cooperative housing societies filed a suit seeking joint ownership and conveyance of common amenities (recreation ground and internal road) and FSI benefits, relying on the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970. The defendants, including Wallace …
The petitioners, owners of flat C‑12A in Sai Vihar Residency Condominium, carried out interior and façade alterations—including demolition of brick walls and installation of a French window—without the written permission required under the condominium’s bye‑law No.31(b) and the exterior‑change …
The Cosmos Co. Operative Bank Ltd. (appellant) challenged a High Court order that held Central Bank of India (respondent No.1) had the first charge over a flat mortgaged by the original borrowers. Both banks had received security documents: the appellant bank held the share certificate of ownership, …
The appellant, a landowner, entered into a Development Agreement with the respondent developer to construct an apartment complex, also granting a General Power of Attorney. The developer failed to complete the work within the stipulated 15‑month period, prompting the appellant to serve a legal …
The Supreme Court examined whether Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 bars the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) from taking possession of land that was licensed to a corporate debtor under a Tripartite Joint Development Agreement during the …
The promoter, Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd., developed a building and sold flats to members of Panchali Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd., asserting a right to sell 25 stilt parking spaces as separate units. The society contended that the promoter could not sell those spaces because they were not …
