Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
28 judgments · newest first · showing 1–28
The petitioner, Suryabhan Natha Botule, served as a part‑time librarian from 28 March 1992 to 1 June 2006 and thereafter as a full‑time librarian until his retirement on 31 May 2026. He sought a direction that his part‑time service be counted at 50% for pension purposes and that he be governed by …
The petitioners, a group of former assistant teachers and junior college teachers appointed before 1 November 2005 in partially‑aided or 100 %‑aided schools, sought a declaration that they remain governed by the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, the Maharashtra Civil Services …
The petitioner, a former employee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash communications denying her pension and to obtain release of pension, arrears, and interest. The principal issue was the applicability of Rule 110(3) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, …
The petitioner, a retired headmistress, challenged an order of the Education Inspector that rejected her pension proposal under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. She had been continuously employed in fully aided schools from 1990 and later in a school that became grant‑in‑aid …
The petition, filed on behalf of librarians who were initially appointed on part‑time aided posts and later converted to permanent full‑time posts, sought the grant of benefits under the Old Pension Scheme. The petitioners contended that the order dated 7 February 2023 and the Government Resolution …
Dr. Parveen Parvez Sayyed, a senior law officer at Savitribai Phule Pune University, challenged two State Government letters that withdrew pay‑scale protection for her earlier service as a Law Officer (1997‑2010). She argued that her appointment, though funded by university development funds, was …
Anil Sahebrao Gharate, a librarian who served part‑time from 1995 to 2006 and full‑time thereafter, was denied the Old Pension Scheme on the ground that his full‑time appointment began after the 1 November 2005 cut‑off. The petitioner argued that, under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, …
Geetanjali Kulkarni, a retired assistant teacher, filed a writ petition seeking her pension to be calculated on the basis of a revised B.A., B.Ed. pay scale, claiming entitlement after ten years of continuous service post‑qualification. She alleged that despite a 2000 court order directing …
The petitioner, a part‑time librarian appointed in 1995 and later upgraded to a full‑time post in 2006, sought a declaration that he was governed by the Old Pension Scheme and entitled to pension under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The State argued that his full‑time …
The petitioner, a retired full‑time librarian, sought direction under Article 226 to have her pension calculated under the Old Pension Scheme, contending that her earlier part‑time service from July 1994 should be counted at half‑rate towards qualifying service. She retired on 30 November 2013, …
Bharati Hanumant Thombare, a former teacher, was appointed part‑time in 1994 and later full‑time in 2009, retiring in 2025. The Deputy Director of Education rejected her pension proposal on the ground that her earlier part‑time service did not qualify for the Old Pension Scheme. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Aruna Suryawanshi, claimed entitlement to a pension under the Old Pension Scheme, asserting that she had served as an honorary teacher before being regularized on 13 February 2006. She argued that her honorary service should be treated as a recognized appointment prior to the cut‑off …
Three employees of Vijay Army School and Junior College, appointed after 1 November 2005 but whose recruitment process began before that date, sought to be placed under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The State Department of School Education …
The petitioner, a retired teacher, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to have his breaks in service condoned and his past employment counted to qualify for pension and retirement benefits. He alleged continuous employment despite multiple stints with various schools, some under private …
The petitioner, appointed as a part‑time Shikshan Sevak in July 2002 in a 100 % grant‑in‑aid college, was later upgraded to a full‑time post. He contended that, because his service began before the 1 November 2005 cut‑off, he should remain under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 …
Durgesh Pandit Hole, a retired part‑time assistant teacher, challenged the denial of pension under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS), arguing that 12 years of continuous, 100% aided part‑time service should be counted at 50% towards qualifying service. He contended that, under Note 1 to Rule 57 of the …
The petitioner, a former State Government professor and principal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking fixation of his pension in accordance with AICTE pay scales and the Central Government Office Memorandum dated 30 July 2015, alleging discrimination because his pension was lower than …
The petitioner, a former State Government professor and principal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking fixation of his pension in accordance with AICTE pay scales and the Central Government Office Memorandum dated 30 July 2015, alleging discrimination because his pension was lower than …
The petitioners, two former employees of the State Institute of Educational Technology (SIET), challenged the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal’s decision upholding the Government Resolution that closed SIET under Section 25FFA of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and denied them pension benefits …
The appellant, a former Storage Superintendent of the Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation, retired on 31 August 2008 and was later served with a series of show‑cause notices alleging large railway transportation and storage losses during his tenure. After an unsatisfactory reply, the …
The petitioner, son of a teacher who died while in service at an aided school, claimed death‑cum‑retirement gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The claim was rejected by the school authorities, the appellate authority and the High Court, which held that the teacher was not an employee …
Madhukar, a former government employee who resigned on 18 July 1960 and immediately joined Hislop College as a lecturer, retired from the college on 24 May 1983. He sought to have his earlier government service (21 June 1950 to 17 July 1960) counted for pension under the Government Resolution dated …
The appellant, a former employee of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, was charged with offences under IPC sections 420, 465, 466, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly falsifying allotment of premises and issuing spurious rent receipts. He sought discharge under Section 228 of the …
Brij Mohan Gupta, a judge appointed directly from the Bar, was ordered to retire at age 58 by the Bombay High Court after an adverse committee report, despite his claim under Rule 10(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 that he could serve until completing ten years of …
Respondent K.R. Pangare, a retired Deputy Engineer of the Maharashtra Public Works Department, was charged in 1990 with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act. Although sanction for prosecution was obtained in August 1989, he challenged the criminal …
The appellant, an Executive Engineer who turned 50 in May 1985, was not reviewed under the 1983 circular that required performance review before age 50. Instead, his case was reviewed in June 1987 under a later 1986 circular that raised the performance standard to "not below good" and ordered his …
The appellant, a civil servant, challenged a compulsory retirement notice dated 23 January 1989 issued under Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, arguing that the review procedure prescribed in the Government circular of 1 September 1983 was not completed before …
Sukhdeo, a Class III government employee with 30 years of service but under 55 years of age, was compulsorily retired on 23 March 1990 under Rule 65(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, based on adverse remarks in his confidential reports for 1987‑88 and 1988‑89. The …
