Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
27 judgments · newest first · showing 1–27
The petitioners, retired District Court employees, filed a writ petition seeking a notional annual increment to be added to their pension calculations, arguing that they had served at least six months in the year preceding their superannuation. They relied on several earlier High Court judgments and …
The petitioners filed a writ seeking mandamus directing the State to grant them the last annual increments and to recalculate their retirement benefits, claiming they had rendered more than six months of service in the final year before superannuation. The Court held that the issue was not res …
A batch of writ petitions filed by retired government employees sought the inclusion of a notional annual increment in their retirement benefits, arguing that they had served at least six months in the relevant year. The petitioners relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) …
The petitioners, retired employees of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation, sought a notional annual increment and recalculation of their pension benefits under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, claiming they had served at least six months in the year preceding …
The petitioners, retired civil servants of Maharashtra, sought directions to grant them the notional annual increment due on 1 July and to recalculate their pension benefits by including this increment, claiming entitlement under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. …
A large group of retired Maharashtra civil servants filed writ petitions seeking the inclusion of a notional annual increment in their retirement benefits, arguing that they were entitled under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. The petitioners contended that having …
The petitioners, retired civil servants, sought direction that they be granted the notional annual increment due on 1 July and that their pensionary benefits be recalculated to include this increment, invoking Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. The Court noted that …
A large group of retired civil servants filed writ petitions seeking the inclusion of the notional annual increment in their retirement benefits, arguing that they had served at least six months in the year preceding their superannuation. They relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services …
The petitioners, retired government employees, sought directions for the Zilla Parishad to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July after their retirement, arguing that they had rendered at least six months of service in the preceding year. They relied on Rule 10 of the …
The petitioners, a large group of retired government employees, sought directions for the State of Maharashtra to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, and to recalculate their pension benefits by including such increment. They relied on Rule 10 …
A batch of writ petitions filed by retired Maharashtra civil servants sought the grant of a notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, and the recalculation of their pension benefits to include such increment. The petitioners relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra …
The petitioners, a large group of retired Maharashtra civil servants, sought directions for the State to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, and to recalculate their pension benefits accordingly. They relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil …
The petitioners, a large group of retired Maharashtra civil servants, sought directions that the State grant them the notional annual increment due on 1 July, even though they retired on or after 30 June, and that their pension benefits be recalculated to include such increment. They relied on Rule …
A large group of retired government employees filed writ petitions seeking the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, arguing that they had served with good conduct for more than six months in the relevant year. The petitioners relied on Rule 10 of the …
A large group of retired civil servants filed writ petitions seeking the inclusion of the annual increment, as provided under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, in their retirement benefits. They argued that having served at least six months in the year preceding …
A large group of civil servants who retired after serving at least six months in the last financial year sought directions that the State of Maharashtra grant them the notional annual increment due on 1 July and recalculate their pension benefits accordingly. The petitioners relied on Rule 10 of the …
The petitioners, a large group of retired government employees, sought directions that the State of Maharashtra grant them the notional annual increment due on 1 July, even though they retired after that date, and recalculate their pensionary benefits accordingly. They relied on Rule 10 of the …
The petitioners, retired civil servants of Maharashtra, filed writ petitions seeking notional/annual increments that became due on 1 July after their retirement, arguing that they had served at least six months in the relevant year. They relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised …
A large group of retired government employees filed writ petitions seeking the inclusion of the annual increment, as provided under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, in their retirement benefits. The petitioners argued that having served at least six months in the …
The petitioners, retired government employees, sought directions for the grant of a notional annual increment that became due on 1 July after their retirement, invoking Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. They contended that having served with good conduct for at …
The petitioners, a large group of retired government employees, sought directions for the State of Maharashtra to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, and to recalculate their pension benefits accordingly. They relied on Rule 10 of the …
The petitioners, retired civil servants of Maharashtra, sought direction that they be granted the notional annual increment due on 1 July and that their pensionary benefits be recalculated to include this increment. They relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, …
The petitioners, retired civil servants of Maharashtra, filed writ petitions seeking notional annual increments and recalculation of their pension benefits, contending that they were entitled to such increments under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. The Court …
The petitioners, a large group of retired Maharashtra civil servants, sought directions for the State to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July after their retirement, arguing that they had served with good conduct for more than six months in the relevant year. They …
The petitioners, retired civil servants of Maharashtra, sought directions that they be granted the notional annual increment due on 1 July and that their pensionary benefits be recalculated to include this increment, invoking Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. The …
A large group of retired government employees filed writ petitions seeking the inclusion of the notional annual increment, under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, in their retirement benefits. The petitioners argued that having served at least six months in the …
The petitioners, who retired on 30 June of various years, sought a notional addition of the annual increment that became payable on 1 July, arguing that it should be counted for pension, gratuity and other benefits. The Court relied on its earlier order in Prakash Tulshiram Chaudhari v. State of …
