Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960

225 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

SUHAS UTTAMRAO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a member of a cooperative society, challenged an interim order dated 22 February 2019 issued by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(i)(c)(ii) and (iv) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, which directed the winding up of the society and appointment of a …

RAHUL GANPAT JAWAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Rahul Ganpat Jaware filed a writ petition challenging an order and sought to contest it by filing a revision under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner’s counsel, Satyajit S. Bora, argued that the order was amenable to revision. The Court observed that the …

SARANGDHAR WAMAN DIKEversusSTATE CO OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sarangdhar Wawman Dike, challenged an order of the District Co‑operative Election Officer that rejected his objection to the nomination of respondent 5 as the delegate of respondent 3 (a co‑operative society) for the election of the Aurangabad District Central Co‑operative Bank. The …

ABDUL SATTAR ABDUL NABIversusDILIP B. BANKAR PATIL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged an order by the District Co‑operative Election Officer that excluded their names from the provisional voters list for the Aurangabad District Central Co‑operative Bank election. They argued that a resolution passed on 29‑02‑2024 admitted them as members, and that the …

VIJAY DIGAMBAR WALSEversusSEVA SAHAKARI SANSTHA M., DHANORA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Vijay, a member of Seva Sahakari Society, challenged the inclusion of his society’s delegate in the voters list for the Nanded District Central Co‑operative Bank election, alleging that the society was in default of dues on the eligibility cut‑off date of 03‑04‑2026. The respondent District …

GAJANAN LAXMANRAO GOPEWADversusSEVA SAHAKARI SANSTHA NANDED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Gajanan, a member of Seva Sahakari Sanstha (Society 1), filed a writ petition challenging the inclusion of his Society’s delegate in the voters list for the Nanded District Central Co‑operative Bank election. The petitioner argued that the Society was a defaulter on the eligibility cut‑off date of 3 …

RAKESH PRAKASH KOTIYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Allowed

Six members of the managing committee of Shri Gopalkrishna Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha, Dapoli, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Crime No. 162 of 2026) was lodged alleging loan‑sanction irregularities and offences under several IPC sections and the Maharashtra Co‑operative …

PRASAD SURYAKANT MEHTA AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Allowed

Six members of the managing committee of Shri Gopalkrishna Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha, Dapoli, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Crime No. 162 of 2026) was lodged alleging loan‑sanction irregularities and offences under several IPC sections and the Maharashtra Co‑operative …

SUDHIR SADANAND TALATHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Six members of the managing committee of Shri Gopalkrishna Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha, Dapoli, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Crime No. 162 of 2026) was lodged alleging loan‑sanction irregularities and offences under several IPC sections and the Maharashtra Co‑operative …

SHAILA ALIAS SHAILAJA PRABHAKAR MEHTAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

Six members of the managing committee of Shri Gopalkrishna Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha, Dapoli, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Crime No. 162 of 2026) was lodged alleging loan‑sanction irregularities and offences under several IPC sections and the Maharashtra Co‑operative …

MADHAVI MADHAV SHETYEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Six members of the managing committee of Shri Gopalkrishna Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha, Dapoli, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Crime No. 162 of 2026) was lodged alleging loan‑sanction irregularities and offences under several IPC sections and the Maharashtra Co‑operative …

SUPRIYA BALKRISHNA TALATHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTARA AND ORS

Allowed

Six members of the managing committee of Shri Gopalkrishna Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha, Dapoli, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR (Crime No. 162 of 2026) was lodged alleging loan‑sanction irregularities and offences under several IPC sections and the Maharashtra Co‑operative …

KISAN SHRIPATI GALAVEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kisan Shripati Galave, a director of a cooperative society, after an FIR was lodged based on an audit alleging misappropriation of Rs.4.97 crore through unauthorised loan disbursements. The applicant contended that he was merely a …

DHOPESHWAR CO-OP. SOCIETY (FISHAERY)versusSMT. ANKITA ARVIND PATIL AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, Dhopeshwar Co‑op Society (Fishery), challenged a common order dated 19‑Oct‑2018 by the Commissioner of Fisheries which confirmed the cancellation of its registration and initiated action under Section 21A of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960. The court examined whether …

SMT. GAYATRIDEVI GANPATRAO PATWARDHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a series of writ petitions filed by directors, expert directors, relatives and others of Rupee Co‑operative Bank Ltd seeking relief from an order dated 2 February 2016 made by the Authorized Officer under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, …

SHASHIKUMAR KESHAV BHIDEversusTHE AUTHORISED OFFICER RUPEE CO-OP BANK LTD AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a series of writ petitions filed by directors, expert directors, relatives and others of Rupee Co‑operative Bank Ltd seeking relief from an order dated 2 February 2016 made by the Authorized Officer under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, …

SAMA DINESH KULKARNIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THRU THE SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a series of writ petitions filed by directors, expert directors, relatives and others of Rupee Co‑operative Bank Ltd seeking relief from an order dated 2 February 2016 made by the Authorized Officer under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, …

ISHWARDAS PREMRAJ CHORDIA DECD THRU LHR SHRI. PRATEEK AJAY CHORDIAversusTHE AUTHORISED OFFICER, RUPEE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. AND DIRECTOR OF SUGAR , MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a series of writ petitions filed by directors, expert directors, relatives and others of Rupee Co‑operative Bank Ltd seeking relief from an order dated 2 February 2016 made by the Authorized Officer under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, …

The Zoroastrian Radih SocietyversusBehramshah Shroff Building No 6 Dadgar CHS

DISPOSED OFF

The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …

The Zoroastrian Radih SocietyversusBehramshah Shroff Building No 3 Damavand CHS

DISPOSED OFF

The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …

The Zoroastrian Radih SocietyversusBehramshah Shroff Building No 4 Hormuzd CHS

DISPOSED OFF

The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …

The Zoroastrian Radih SocietyversusBehramshah Shroff Building No 8 Chaechast CHS

DISPOSED OFF

The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …

The Zoroastrian Radih SocietyversusBehramshah Shroff Building No 2 Meherabad CHS

DISPOSED OFF

The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …

VEENA KHURANA AND ANRversusDY. REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOC. K / EAST, WADALA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, owners of flats A-1801 and A-1802 in a cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging the society's claim for maintenance charges and interest. The society (Respondent No.5) sought to recover amounts deposited by the petitioners, while the petitioners contested the quantum. …

ROHIDAS BAPUSO MURKUTEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU MINISTER AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions seeking interim protection, alleging that the appeals they lodged against enquiry reports issued under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 were not being heard. The court observed that the appeals were filed after a substantial …

DILIP GENUBHAU KALATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU MINISTER AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions seeking interim protection, alleging that the appeals they lodged against enquiry reports issued under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 were not being heard. The court observed that the appeals were filed after a substantial …

ROHSTOFFE INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.versusTHE COLLECTOR, MUMBAI AND 3 OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Official Liquidator of Sonal Garments India Pvt. Ltd. sought to register the transfer of Office Unit No. 134‑A, sold at a Company Court‑monitored auction to Rohstoffe International Pvt. Ltd. for Rs. 2.65 crore. The State of Maharashtra demanded a transfer premium calculated on the Ready Reckoner …

PEDRU ALEX RODRIGUES AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies to implement the recommendations of an inquiry report made under Sections 78 and 78A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, which arose from an inquiry under Section 83. The State, represented by …

CAPT. RAJEEV KUMAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged the Registrar's order dated 19 December 2019 and the Minister's confirmation dated 17 March 2021 that de‑registered the Vashi Fantasia Business Park Premises Co‑operative Society under Section 21A of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, alleging misrepresentation at …

DILIP ABARAO KASHIKARversusCAPT. RAJEEV KUMAR

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged the Registrar's order dated 19 December 2019 and the Minister's confirmation order of 17 March 2021 which de-registered the Vashi Fantasia Business Park Premises Co‑Operative Society Ltd. on the ground of alleged misrepresentation at registration. The petitioners argued …

AMOL CHANDRABHAN GOJEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Amol Goje purchased Flat No.10 of the Satyawadi Sahakari Co‑op. Housing Society and, together with the former member Hirabai Shinde, applied to the Pune Collector for transfer of society membership. The Collector approved the transfer on 25‑02‑2014 subject to payment of a fee and a condition that …

SIDDIQ ABU MOHAMMADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU REGISTRAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Siddiq Abu Mohammad, challenged an order of the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies dated 01.08.2025, which under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 declared a debt of Rs. 4,89,214 payable to Indra Co-operative Credit Society. He alleged cheating …

SIDDIQ ABU MOHAMMADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU REGISTRAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Siddiq Abu Mohammad, challenged an order of the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies dated 01.08.2025, which under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 declared a debt of Rs. 4,89,214 payable to Indra Co-operative Credit Society. He alleged cheating …

MALIKA V. CHAINANANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged the Deputy Registrar's failure to act under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, after the managing committee's strength fell below the quorum required for valid meetings. The Court found no dispute that a provisional committee was necessary to …

FLYING EARTH LLPversusDATE BUNGALOW COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED

DISPOSED OFF

Flying Earth LLP, a limited liability partnership, was appointed developer by Date Bungalow Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (the Society) for redevelopment of its building after a majority vote and approval by the Deputy Registrar. A Development Agreement dated 22 March 2025 containing an …

SHILAN THAKERversusTHE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAT AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Shilan Thaker and others, challenged a revision order dated 17 July 2026 issued by the Divisional Joint Registrar, which had set aside a disqualification order of the Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer of a cooperative society made by the Deputy Registrar under Sections 75(5) and 77A …

WADALA HEIGHTS CO OP. HSG. SOC. LTDversusGAYA BAKSH YADAV AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Wadala Heights Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. challenged the Assistant Registrar's order appointing an enquiry officer under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act and the subsequent order under Section 88, alleging that the enquiry was perfunctory. The Society had conducted …

GEETA R PANDIT AND ORSversusTHE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO OP SOC. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Pushpak Car Rentals Pvt. Ltd. and Geeta R. Pandit, challenged the execution of a recovery certificate by a credit society while revision applications were pending before the District Deputy Registrar. They alleged that the recovery order was passed ex‑parte and that they had no …

DILIP PANDURANG THOPTEversusJOINT REGISTRAR CO OP SOC. AND ORS

Disposed Off

Petitioner Dilip Pandurang Thopte challenged an order dated 8 September 2026 issued by the Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies (Dairy), Mumbai under Section 152 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The High Court examined whether the writ petition was maintainable given that a …

PRABHAKAR TUKARAM KHADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU DEPT. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the State of Maharashtra, as Respondent No.1, decide an application filed under Section 78A of the Maharashtra Co‑Operative Societies Act, 1960 for the appointment of an administrator to address alleged maladministration in a cooperative …

LT. COLONEL VIKRAM RAMSWAROOP BAKSHIversusSHIVAJI POPAT TAPKIR AND ORS

Disposed Off

Lt. Colonel Vikram Ramswaroop Bakshi filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 9 April 2026 issued by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Pune Division, which partially allowed Appeal No. 51 of 2026 and set aside the report of an Inquiry Officer made under Section 88 of the Maharashtra …

NEW SUJATA CO-OP HSG SOCIETY LTDversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, New Sujata Co‑operative Housing Society, challenged the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai’s (MCGM) approval of a proposal by Respondent No.4 to change the use of a building from residential to commercial and to alter three ground‑floor flats, invoking Section 342 of the …

ANTHONY IRINEUS CARNEIROversusFRANCIS COLACO AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, members of Everard Co-operative Housing Society, challenged the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Court to hear disputes arising from special general body meetings (SGBMs) convened to discuss the society's redevelopment. The lower courts had returned the disputes to a civil court, …

ANTONY IRINEUS CARNEIROversusFRANCIS COLACO AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, members of Everard Co-operative Housing Society, challenged the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Court to hear disputes arising from special general body meetings (SGBMs) convened to discuss the society's redevelopment. The lower courts had returned the disputes to a civil court, …

EVERARADE COOPERTIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ANRversusFRANCIS COLACO AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, members of Everard Co‑operative Housing Society, challenged the jurisdiction of the Co‑operative Court to hear disputes arising from special general body meetings (SGBMs) convened to discuss redevelopment of the society’s property. The lower courts had returned the disputes to a …

EVERARADE COOPERTIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ANRversusFRANCIS COLACO AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, members of Everard Co‑operative Housing Society, challenged the jurisdiction of the Co‑operative Court to hear disputes arising from special general body meetings (SGBMs) convened to discuss redevelopment of the society’s property. The lower courts had returned the disputes to a …

SABRUDDIN HUSSAIN ALI SHAIKH @ SHABBUversusVIJAY VITTHAL SONAWANE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petition challenges a judgment of the Co‑operative Court that ordered the petitioner and the co‑operative society to hand over peaceful possession of tenement D‑5 to respondent‑1, a member of the society. The petitioner claims ownership of the tenement through a chain of unregistered sales …

RAJESH GAMBHIRDAS SHAH AND ANRversusJAYESH PANNALAL SHAH AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought to set aside the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar dismissing their revision application concerning a cooperative housing society membership and alleged non‑payment of consideration for a flat. The registrar had condoned an eight‑year delay in filing the revision and …

RATANJI S DESAI AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. THE GOVT PLEADER AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioners, who were office bearers of a cooperative society, challenged the disqualification order passed by the Deputy Registrar under Section 76(2) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960. The society was undertaking redevelopment and several special general body meetings (SGBMs) …

SHAILENDRA ANAVKAR AND ORSversusDEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OP SOC AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged their disqualification as managing committee members of a cooperative society, ordered by the Deputy Registrar under Sections 75(5) and 78A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Deputy Registrar had issued a show‑cause notice limited to the audit …

RAJ GARDEN CO OP. HSG. SOC. LTDversusMAHENDRA ARJUN SHINDE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Raj Garden Co‑Operative Housing Society (petitioner) claimed ownership of CTS Nos. 128A/40, 128A/40/1 and 128A/40/2 in Kandivali and sought to be impleaded in a suit filed by Mahendra Arjun Shinde (respondent No.1) against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (respondent No.2) challenging …

MAHESH CHAUMAL AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Mahesh Chaumal and another, challenged an order dated 31 August 2026 by the Deputy Registrar appointing an Authorised Officer over their cooperative society under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. They feared the appointment would lead to the society’s …

LAXMI ESTATE CO-OP. HSG. SOC. LIMITEDversusWALLACE FLOUR MILLS COMPANY LIMITED

Disposed Off

The cooperative housing societies filed a suit seeking joint ownership and conveyance of recreation grounds and an internal access road, claiming rights under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. The defendants, including Wallace Flour Mills Ltd. and two charitable trusts, moved to dismiss the …

LAXMI ESTATES CO-OP. HSG. SOC. LTD.versusLAXMI CHARITABLE TRUST AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The cooperative housing societies filed a suit seeking joint ownership and conveyance of recreation grounds and an internal access road, claiming rights under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. The defendants, including Wallace Flour Mills Ltd. and two charitable trusts, moved to dismiss the …

MAHESH L. CHANDIRAMANIversusASUDA KUTIR CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Mahesh L. Chandiramani, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Co-operative Appellate Court which dismissed his appeal against a Co-operative Court order dated 10 June 2024. The earlier order had rejected his application for an interim stay to prevent Opponent Nos.4, 5, 7 …

Vikram MisraversusThe Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Society, Thane

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Vikram Misra, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking (a) a direction to the Deputy Registrar to determine maintenance dues for the period 1 April 2010 to 30 April 2023, (b) admission to a cooperative society as a member from the date of his …

Julie MudrasversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Nine members of a co‑operative society sought a mandamus directing the Deputy District Registrar to hear their objections to the society's redevelopment process. The petitioners alleged non‑disclosure of information, but the court noted that the General Body meeting minutes showed a majority …

DILEEP KUMAR PANDEY AND ORSversusJAG BUILDS REALTY PVT. LTD. AND ANR

Dismissed

The Rajyog Heights Co‑operative Housing Society resolved to demolish its 1987 building and appointed Jag Builds Realty Pvt Ltd to redevelop the premises. Four society members (Defendants 1‑4) obstructed the work, prompting the plaintiff to sue for a declaration that the society’s resolutions are …

NARENDRA CHADDA AND ANRversusTHE HONBLE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CS AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners purchased three auctioned units, including unit 1A, and sought membership in a co‑operative society. The Deputy Registrar, invoking Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, ordered the society to grant membership for unit 1A, which the society complied with. …

KASTURCHAND RAMINA AND ANRversusTHE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO OP AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Kasturchand Ramina and Anr, challenged the orders of the Divisional Joint Registrar dismissing their Revision Application No.86 of 2018 and Appeal No.10 of 2018, which contested an Inquiry Officer's report under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act concerning …

BALIRAM TOTARAM MISAL AND ORSversusSAUJANYA CO OP. HSG. SOC. LTD

Disposed Off

The petitioners, members of Saujanya Co-operative Housing Society, challenged the rejection of their dispute (CCT 201 of 2024) by the Cooperative Court and the Cooperative Appellate Court, which had dismissed the dispute under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC on the ground that it was barred by …

SATTVA NEW HEIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSHRI. MUKUND VAMAN PATANKAR AND OTHERS

Allowed

The Bombay High Court heard appeals by the co‑operative society, its developer and the project‑management consultant against an interim injunction that restrained the society from proceeding with its redevelopment plan. The plaintiffs, two senior members of the society, alleged that the land was …

SANJAY NARANGversusJOINT SUB-REGISTRAR CITY NO. 1 OF ASSURANCE MUMBAI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners sought a direction to the Collector to register a consent decree conveying a shop premises to them without requiring a No‑Objection certificate from the co‑operative society that owned the land. The decree, dated 16 December 2022, had been stamped and sealed, and the petitioners were …

CHIRAG SHETH AND ANRversusDEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES SRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged an order dated 10 August 2026 by the Assistant Registrar of Co‑operative Societies which disqualified the entire managing committee of a cooperative society under Section 82(4) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act for failing to submit audit rectification reports …

ED COOPER PREMISES CO OP. SOC. LTDversusDIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR AND ORS

Rejected

The petition challenged the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar dismissing a revision of an application for transmission of membership in a co‑operative society. Respondent No. 3 sought membership of Gala No. 37 after his father’s death, produced NOCs from his siblings, but one brother later …

GANESH KRISHNAJI VAZEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged the de‑registration of a cooperative society, contending that the number of genuine signatures on the registration proposal satisfied the statutory requirement. The High Court observed that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing a revision under Section 154 of …

NANDA TAKWANEversusSUB REGISTRAR COOPERTIVE SOCIETY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, led by Nanda Takwane, were personal guarantors for a loan taken by Siddheshwar Industries Pvt. Ltd. (SIPL) and faced recovery actions under the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960 (Section 101 and Section 156) including notices for attachment of mortgaged property. They …

MOHANBHAI KHANCHANDANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Mohanbhai Khanchandani, challenged the rejection of his application for membership in a cooperative society under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960, asserting that he had acquired ownership of Flat No. B‑3 through an agreement dated 17 September 2001. …

MOHAN KHANCHANDANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Mohanbhai Khanchandani, challenged the rejection of his application for membership in a cooperative society under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960, asserting that he had purchased Flat No. B‑3 through an agreement dated 17 September 2001. The …

DR. LALCHANDRA BADRIPRASAD TIWARIversusRAGHULEELA MEGAMALL KANDIVALI (WEST)

Disposed Off

The cooperative society Raghuleela Megamall filed a writ petition challenging the Deputy Registrar’s order dated 2 March 2019 that appointed an enquiry officer under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960, on the basis of a complaint by a single member, Mr. L.B. Tiwari. The …

MAHESH MADHUKAR BHARTIYAversusDIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO OP. MUMBAI AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, a member and former managing‑committee member of Lok Nisarg Co‑operative Housing Society, claimed the society failed to furnish a CD/video recording of the Special General Meeting (May 2023) and the Annual General Meeting (Sept 2023) despite his written complaints. Relying on …

MADHAVI VILAS GOSALVIversusRAJESH MISHRA

Allowed

The Padmavati Nagar Co‑operative Housing Society resolved to terminate its developer and, during a special meeting of its Managing Committee on 15 April 2026, passed a no‑confidence motion against its Chairman (Petitioner No.2). The motion was adopted by six votes out of nine members present, and …

JACK ROSARIO FERNANDESversusWEST AVENUE REALTORS PVT. LTD. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a member of a co‑operative housing society, claimed entitlement to a newly constructed flat (Flat No. 703) as permanent alternate accommodation after redevelopment, alleging that the developer and the society wrongfully handed possession of the flat to the petitioner's son, a …

MRS. ASHA ASHOK NABARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dismissed

The writ petition filed by Mrs. Asha Ashok Nabar had been pending for over twelve years. During this period, the petitioner applied separately to the competent authority for registration of Jagruti Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., Thane (East), and the authority, under the Maharashtra Co-operative …

JAGDAMBA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED THR. ITS CHAIRMAN SHRI. KAMLESH PALversusM/S. PARISPARSH PARTNERSHIP FIRM THR. ITS MANAGING PARTNER DHANASHREE RAJESH BHOSALE

Disposed Off

The Jagdamba Co-operative Housing Society (the Society) entered into negotiations with M/s Parisparsh (the Developer) for redevelopment of the Society's dilapidated building, issuing a Letter of Intent (LOI) on 29‑05‑2021 and obtaining individual consents from its members by April 2022. Although a …

JAGDAMBA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED THR. ITS CHAIRMAN SHRI. KAMLESH PALversusM/S. PARISPARSH PARTNERSHIP FIRM THR. ITS MANAGING PARTNER DHANASHREE RAJESH BHOSALE

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard an appeal by Jagdamba Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd (the appellant) against an order of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kalyan, which had granted a temporary injunction in favour of M/s Parisparsh (the plaintiff) restraining the society from creating development …

SHASHIN PATEL AND ANR.versusUDAY DALAL AND ORS.

2026 INSC 125Case Partly allowed

The appellants, Shashin Patel and Bhavini Patel, heirs of the original occupier of Flat No.7 in Malboro House Co‑operative Housing Society, sought admission as members of the Society by paying the required contribution many years after the Society’s formation. Their application was initially …

Rajesh Tansen KatweversusState of Maharashtra

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Rajesh Tansen Katwe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to pursue the matter under the Maharashtra Co-operative …

HEMANT JAGANNATH RAJWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Hemant Jagannath Rajwade, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. He later applied to the High Court for leave to withdraw the petition and to be permitted to pursue his grievance before the competent authority constituted under …

SAYUNKTA SANGARSH SAMITI & ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2023 INSC 1080Dismissed

The case concerned a slum rehabilitation project in Lower Parel, Mumbai, where a developer and a minority group of hutment dwellers (Sayunkta Sangharsh Samiti) entered into a private Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to allocate flats in towers D, E and F exclusively to the society members, …

DHANRAJ N ASAWANIversusAMARJEET SINGH MOHINDER SINGH BASI AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 710Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a shareholder and former director of Seva Vikas Co-operative Bank, filed FIR No. 806 of 2019 alleging financial fraud by the bank's chief executive and former chairperson based on a forensic audit report. The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR, holding that Section 81(5B) of the …

DEEPAK ANANDA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS

2023 INSC 11Appeal(s) allowed

The Maharashtra cooperative society, engaged in sugar production, sought to delete about 2,000 members under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, alleging they did not meet the bye‑law eligibility criteria. The Regional Joint Director (Sugar) issued an omnibus show‑cause …

DEENADAYAL NAGARI SAHAKARI BANK LTD. & ANOTHERversusMUNJAJI AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 191Appeal(s) allowed

The borrower, a director of Vaishnavi Hatcheries, defaulted on loans from two cooperative banks and mortgaged four properties. After a recovery certificate was issued, the appellant bank conducted a public auction, issuing a sale certificate and deed in favour of the highest bidder. The borrower …

GOA STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.versusKRISHNA NATH A. (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 920Appeal(s) allowed

The Goa State Cooperative Bank Ltd., appointed as liquidator of the Goa State Cooperative Fisheries Federation Ltd., filed 156 recovery suits against defaulting members for loans advanced by the Society. While many of these suits were stayed pending appeals, the Society’s winding‑up was deemed …

INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAIversusVENKATESH PREMISES COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.

2018 INSC 232Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether receipts such as non‑occupancy charges, transfer charges and common‑amenity‑fund contributions received by a premises cooperative society from its members are taxable as business income or exempt under the doctrine of mutuality. The Court held that the doctrine of …

PRATIBHA RAMESH PATELversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2016 INSC 254Dismissed

Petitioner Pratibha Ramesh Patel filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the constitutionality of sections 2, 12 and 15(a) of the Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2012, which incorporated cooperative societies within the …

KAMLESH C. SHAH & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2013 INSC 421Dismissed

The petitioners sought an interim order declaring that the acquisition of a "cessed" building by MHADA under Chapter VIII‑A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 was no longer necessary, as the landlord and tenants had entered into a development agreement while the substantive …

RAJENDRA PRATAPRAO MANE & ORS.versusSADASHIVRAO MANDALIK K.T.S.S.K. LTD. & ORS.

2012 INSC 142Disposed off

The appellants complained that the Karkhana sugar factory had enrolled 6,617 persons who did not meet the eligibility criteria under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. After the Commissioner of Sugar failed to act, a writ petition led to an inquiry by the Regional Joint Director, who …

SHAGUN MAHILA UDYOGIK SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADITversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2011 INSC 598Dismissed

The appellant, a Mahila cooperative society, challenged the award of a contract for supplying fortified blended food under the Integrated Child Development Scheme, arguing that the eligibility criteria in the Expression of Interest (EOI) were arbitrary and that the contract period should be limited …

KALABHARATI ADVERTISINGversusHEMANT VIMALNATH NARICHANIA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 571Appeal(s) allowed

Kalabharati Advertising, an advertising hoarding firm, had obtained permission from a society and the Municipal Corporation to erect a hoarding in Mumbai. A public interest litigation led the High Court to form a committee that found the hoarding violated certain guidelines, prompting the …