Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
119 judgments · newest first · showing 1–119
The petitioner challenged the District Cooperative Election Officer's order rejecting his objection to the inclusion of Respondent No.1 in the provisional voters list for the Aurangabad District Central Cooperative Bank election. He claimed that Respondent No.1, a co‑opted expert director of a …
The petitioners, a cooperative society that is a member of Aurangabad District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., challenged an order dated 18‑05‑2026 that deleted their name from the provisional voters list for the bank’s board election. The deletion was based on an objection from another cooperative …
The petitioners, a cooperative society that is a member of Aurangabad District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., challenged an order dated 18-05-2026 by the District Cooperative Election Officer that deleted their name from the provisional voters list for the bank's board election. The deletion was …
The petitioners, Devgiri Primary Grahak Sahakari Sanstha Ltd, a member of Aurangabad District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd, challenged an order dated 18-05-2026 that deleted their name from the provisional voters list for the bank's board election. The deletion was based on a claim that the society …
The petitioners, Balkrushna Tyres Employees Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd, a member of Aurangabad District Central Co‑operative Bank, were initially included in the provisional voters list for the bank's board election. The District Cooperative Election Officer later deleted their name, citing an interim …
The petitioners, a cooperative society that is a member of the Aurangabad District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., challenged an order dated 18‑05‑2026 by the District Cooperative Election Officer that deleted their name from the provisional voters list for the bank's board election. The deletion …
The Regional Forensic Science Laboratory Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd, a member of Aurangabad District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd, was initially listed as a voter in the bank's board election but was later removed by the District Cooperative Election Officer on the ground that the …
The petitioner, Nandkumar, challenged the nomination of respondent No.4 as a delegate to the Parbhani District Central Cooperative Bank election, alleging that he was a defaulter of Kawalgaon Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society and therefore disqualified under Section 73CA(1)(i) of the …
The petitioners, who were office bearers of a cooperative society, were exonerated in an enquiry under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, with liability placed on the ex‑chairman (respondent No.3). Respondent No.3 appealed the enquiry report under Section 152, and the …
The petitioner, Ashok Vishwanathrao Jagtap, challenged a 2015 order of the Additional Registrar and a 2019 order of the Minister for Cooperation, seeking recovery of Rs.16,000 incurred as cost of an inquiry under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. He argued that Section …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by an Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ …
The petitioners are forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Assistant Registrar ordered their liquidation and winding‑up under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without granting any hearing. …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
The petitioners are forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Assistant Registrar ordered their liquidation and winding‑up under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without giving the societies a …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
The petitioners, a group of 42 cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without being …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
The petitioners, 42 cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being afforded a hearing. …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies appealed under Section …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The societies …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by an Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1) based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed …
Forty‑two registered cooperative societies under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by an Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 challenged liquidation and winding‑up orders issued by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) of the Act. The societies argued that the orders were passed without any hearing, that the Assistant …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
The petitioners, forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a government circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies appealed under Section …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
The petitioners are forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar on the basis of a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a government circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies appealed under …
The petitioners are 42 cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 that were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without any …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up orders by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1), based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The societies …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by an Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1), based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without being afforded a hearing. The …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two registered cooperative societies under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by the Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1), based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The societies filed …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The societies …
The Bombay High Court examined a series of writ petitions concerning the jurisdiction of the Additional Registrar/Commissioner of the Fisheries Department to entertain revisions under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The State Government clarified, via affidavit, that the …
The petitioner, Narayan Balwant Patil, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the District Collector under Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961. The central issue was whether the petition could be entertained when an alternative remedy exists under the …
The Court considered six anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 of the CrPC by various directors, employees and managers of Adarsh Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha in connection with FIR No. 20 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and …
The Court considered six anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 of the CrPC by various directors, employees and managers of Adarsh Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha in connection with FIR No. 20 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and …
The Court considered six anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 of the CrPC by various directors, employees and managers of Adarsh Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha in connection with FIR No. 20 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and …
The petitioners, a group of cooperative dairy societies, filed multiple writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committees) Rule 2014. The High Court examined whether the societies were entitled to relief under Rule …
Several cooperative dairy societies filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committees) Rule 2014. The High Court examined whether the petitioners were entitled to relief under Rule 10(4) of that rule and whether …
Several cooperative dairy societies filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committees) Rule 2014. The High Court examined whether the petitioners were entitled to relief under Rule 10(4) of that rule and whether …
The petitioner, Late Tamma Tukaram Karade, sought inclusion in the voters list of a cooperative society, challenging a district authority's order that rejected the claim on the ground that membership was acquired after the statutory cut‑off date of 22‑11‑2023. The petitioner relied on bank …
The Court considered six anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 of the CrPC by various directors, employees and managers of Adarsh Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha in connection with FIR No. 20 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and …
The petitioners, who were elected as members of a cooperative society for the 2021‑2026 term, challenged the findings of the Cooperative Court and the Cooperative Appellate Court that their election was invalid due to the inclusion of 23 bogus voters and the exclusion of 11 eligible voters. They …
The Court considered six anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 of the CrPC by various directors, employees and managers of Adarsh Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha in connection with FIR No. 20 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and …
The Court considered six anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 of the CrPC by various directors, employees and managers of Adarsh Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha in connection with FIR No. 20 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and …
The petition filed by Sangli Urban Cooperative Bank challenged the appellate court’s decision that a dispute over the promotion of Dr. Madhav Gogate to Chief Executive Officer of the bank was maintainable under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Respondent 1 alleged …
The petitioners, who had resigned from the managing committee of Nashik District Government and Zilla Parishad Employees’ Cooperative Bank Ltd., challenged the Deputy Registrar’s order appointing two of them to the committee under Section 77A(1)(i) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr. Prathamesh Deshpande, sought a review of the order dated 17 November 2025 which allowed recovery based on a General Body Resolution of the cooperative society. The resolution was under challenge before the Court under Section 91 of the …
The petitioners, Smt. Lataben Sureshing Rana and another, challenged a show‑cause notice issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Maval‑Mulshi, under the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. The notice sought restoration of land that the petitioners had purchased on 10 March …
The petitioners challenged a ministerial order that dismissed their revision application and upheld earlier orders directing the cooperative society to treat certain flats as two separate units, as per the sanctioned development plan. The court noted that the flats, though marketed as 3 BHK, were …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court permitted such review of a judgment dated 17 October 2025. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the judgment left no clear formula for apportioning individual …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court permitted such review of a judgment dated 17 October 2025. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the judgment left no clear formula for apportioning individual …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court granted liberty to approach the Court. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment required a fixed formula for apportioning individual liability under Section …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court permitted such review. The petitioners argued that paragraph 68(vi) of the earlier judgment left no clear formula for apportioning individual liability under Section 88, and that mens …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The Bombay High Court considered multiple review petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited after the Supreme Court allowed them to seek review of the Court's October 17, 2025 judgment concerning liability under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The petitioners argued …
The Business Co-operative Bank dismissed Senior Executive Virendra Vijay Dani for refusing to obey a transfer order and alleged misconduct, without conducting a disciplinary enquiry. Dani challenged the dismissal before the Labour Court, which set aside the termination and ordered reinstatement …
The petitioners, descendants of the settlor of the Sanghvi Jagmohandas Bhagwandas Trust, filed an application under Section 41E of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 seeking injunctions to protect trust property from alleged misuse by the respondents. The Joint Charity Commissioner rejected the …
The petition challenged a order passed under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 that deemed respondent No.3 a member of a cooperative housing society after the society failed to decide on his membership application within the prescribed period. The society argued that …
The petitioners challenged the rejection of their interim relief application and a stay order against a disqualification order of the housing society's managing committee under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The High Court noted concerns about the procedure of the original order and …
The petitioners, members of Matsyaghandha Co‑operative Housing Society, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Minister dated 12 September 2014 that de‑registered their society, alleging that the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 21‑A of the Maharashtra …
The petitioners, owners of six commercial units in the Silver Utopia building, challenged the legality of orders passed by the District Registrar of Cooperative Societies and the Deputy Registrar, alleging that they had already paid maintenance charges to a private agency and that the cooperative …
The petition was filed challenging an interim order that stayed the Registrar's order issued under Section 75(5) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioners feared that the Society's Managing Committee was making policy decisions, specifically the appointment of a developer, …
The petitioner, Aalap Cooperative Housing Society, filed a writ petition under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, challenging an order passed against it. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by counsel. The society later informed the …
The petitioner, a housing developer, challenged a November 2023 order of the Competent Authority that granted deemed conveyance of 4,652.26 sq m of land, including a recreation ground, to a co‑operative society (respondent 2) under Section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963. The …
The petitioners, Sarita Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and Sheetal F Building Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged the registration of a separate cooperative society for ten shops within the same building that they already governed. The building, G‑Sarita, comprises 56 residential flats …
The petitioners, Sarita Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and Sheetal F Building Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged the registration of a separate cooperative society for ten shops within the same building that they already governed. The building, G‑Sarita, comprises 56 residential flats …
The petitioners, members of a cooperative society's Managing Committee, challenged a June 24, 2024 order by the Deputy Registrar that disqualified them and barred their appointment for six months under Section 75(5) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Registrar’s finding noted …
The petitioners, cooperative banks under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, challenged a finding of the Revisional Authority that Section 154(2A) of the Act does not bar a revision against an attachment order issued under sub‑rule 11 of Rule 107. They argued that such a finding, if treated …
The petitioners, cooperative banks under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, challenged a finding of the Revisional Authority that Section 154(2A) of the Act does not bar a revision against an attachment order issued under sub‑rule 11 of Rule 107. They argued that such a finding, if treated …
The petitioner, Shabnoor Ayub, sought membership in a cooperative housing society based on a conveyance deed for a basement and parking area. The Appellate Authority granted membership, but the Revisional Authority set aside that order, holding that the premises did not qualify as a “flat” under …
The Kohinoor Cooperative Housing Society challenged the order of the Appellate Authority that directed it to admit Shabnoor Ayub as a member under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The dispute arose because the deceased father of the respondent had been treated as a member and had …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order made under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which appointed an Administrator after the disqualification of office bearers under Section 79A(3). The court observed that the petition only contested the …
The Kohinoor Cooperative Housing Society challenged an order of the Appellate Authority that directed it to admit Shabnoor Ayub as a member and issue a share certificate, alleging that the applicant lacked a document of title and that the society’s rules required a registered agreement. The dispute …
The petitioners, a cooperative housing society, challenged an order by the Registrar under Section 79(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act directing the society to issue a no‑objection certificate to a member seeking to transfer leasehold rights. The society argued that the member could …
The dispute concerned a cooperative housing society for LIC employees where the respondent, Sujata Makhija, claimed to be a depositor who had paid Rs.4,750 and attended the 18‑December‑1988 meeting, opting for Plot No.2. The appellant, Shivkishan, was allotted the same plot despite an interim …
The respondent sued the appellants for specific performance of two agreements to sell a share of land, having paid earnest money but no deed was executed. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court set aside that decree and ordered specific performance. The appellants …
The Maharashtra State Cooperative Housing Finance Corporation, a cooperative society, dismissed its employee Prabhakar Sitaram Bhadange for alleged misconduct. Bhadange challenged the dismissal before the Cooperative Court, which the corporation contested on the ground that the Court lacked …
The respondent, Brijlal Sadashuk Modani, was a senior employee of Osmanabad Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., a multi‑state cooperative bank. While in service he received notices from the Anti‑Corruption Bureau demanding details of his assets, which he contested on the ground that the Prevention of …
The Bombay Catholic Co‑operative Housing Society resolved in 1966 to redevelop its Willingdon East land, allocating 161 flats to allottee‑members and 69 to tenant‑members. After decades of litigation, the Society passed a 2009 resolution and executed a conveyance to a developer for Rs 70 crore, …
Suresh, a clerk appointed in 1974, challenged the seniority list and the promotion of a Development Officer (Respondent No.2) to the post of Senior Manager in Yeotmal District Central Co‑op Bank. The dispute was first heard before the Cooperative Court, which held the promotion illegal, but the …
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) inspected Kalidasa Cooperative Bank and, after finding serious irregularities, requisitioned the Registrar of Cooperative Societies under s.30(5) of the Karnataka Co‑operative Societies Act, 1959 to supersede the bank’s Board of Directors and appoint an administrator. …
The Supreme Court examined a dispute where two firms (the appellants) were occupying rooms in a flat allotted to a member of a tenant co‑partnership housing society. The member had inducted the firms as tenants without the society’s consent, allegedly violating Section 29(2) of the Maharashtra …
The Sind Maharashtra Co‑operative Housing Society, a tenant‑co‑partnership society, sued its member (respondent 2) and the appellant who was occupying a flat as a licensee since December 1970, seeking vacant possession under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960. The society …
The appellants, a central specified cooperative society, challenged the order of the Collector that set the election schedule after the final electoral roll had been published, arguing that the preparation of the voters' list was not part of the election process and therefore could not be reviewed …
The Supreme Court examined appeals by several cooperative sugar factories and the State of Maharashtra against a Bombay High Court order that directed non‑member sugarcane growers to be paid the prevailing market price and to be allowed to sell to any factory. The Court held that the Maharashtra …
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 73A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which restricts designated officers (Chairman, President and other officers declared by the State) from holding office in more than one cooperative society and limits their …
Marine Times Publications Pvt. Ltd., a member of a Maharashtra cooperative society, agreed to sell its office premises to Shriram Transport and Finance Co. Ltd., a non‑member, subject to the society’s approval. The society refused approval, prompting the buyer to file a suit in the Cooperative Court …
The appellant, Sanwarml Kejriwal, occupied a flat in Vishwa Cooperative Housing Society under a leave‑and‑license agreement from 1957. After the member‑allottee transferred his interest, the society sought his eviction under Section 91(1) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that …
The elected directors of Sanjay Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. requisitioned a special meeting of the Board to consider a no‑confidence motion against the Chairman. The Registrar issued notice of the meeting only to the elected directors, omitting the nominees of financial institutions and the …
The Nibhana Co-operative Housing Society (Respondent No.2) sought possession of flat No. 62 allotted to Mrs. Maya (Respondent No.1) from Hindustan Thompson Associates Ltd. and others (Appellants), alleging they occupied the flat as licencees without the Society's written consent. The Appellants …
The dispute arose from a 1964 agreement whereby the tenant‑co‑partner member of the Shyam Cooperative Housing Society, Smt. Devibai H. Advani, allowed Rajpal Bhatia to occupy her flat on a leave‑and‑licence basis. After the licence was terminated, Advani sought eviction of Bhatia under Section 91 of …
The Fairfield Co‑operative Housing Society, a tenant‑partnership society, discovered that its member Smt. Vishni J. Kalwani had let flat No. 7 to A.V.R. & Co. and J.R. Enterprises as licencees without the society’s consent, violating its bye‑laws. The society filed a dispute under Section 91 of the …
The Supreme Court examined two appeals challenging the elections to the Boards of Directors of Nasik Merchants Co‑operative Bank Ltd. and Parbhani District Co‑operative Bank Ltd. The election programmes issued by the Collectors failed to specify that two seats were reserved under Section 73B of the …
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by N. Bhatnagar, who occupied flat No. 52 in Shyam Niwas under a leave‑and‑licence agreement with a co‑partner member of Shyam Cooperative Housing Society. After the licence was terminated in 1965, the society and the member sought his eviction under section …
