Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
162 judgments · newest first · showing 1–162
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Council had …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Examination Council was empowered to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering, and therefore upheld the cancellation. However, the Court set aside the order permanently debaring the …
The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates alleged to have been involved in mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates alleged to have been involved in mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for approximately 7,880 candidates on the basis of proven mark‑sheet tampering, finding that the State Council of Examinations had sufficient material to act. However, the Court set aside the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of the candidates. The Court found that the Maharashtra State Council of …
The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates alleged to have been involved in mark‑tampering. The court examined the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the State's order cancelling the TET 2018 and 2019 results of thousands of candidates after finding large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering, holding that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority to cancel certificates. …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The petitioners challenged a School Tribunal order that reinstated a Junior Clerk (Respondent No.1) in Varpudkar High School with back wages, arguing that his original appointment was illegal. Respondent No.1 claimed he was appointed on 20 June 1995 and terminated retrospectively in 2003, seeking …
Paras Babulal Barelikar, a long‑serving employee of Nagaon Education Society, was terminated after being absent without leave from 5 March 2019. He appealed the termination before the School Tribunal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Examination Council, through its Commissioner, had the statutory authority under the Maharashtra State Council of Examination Act, 1998 and the 2010 Regulations to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of 7,880 candidates after verifying …
The case involved two writ petitions concerning the interchange of appointment approvals between Pratibha Darade (petitioner) and Manjusha Mule (respondent no.7) by the School Management and the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Beed. The petitioner was originally appointed to a partially‑aided …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of approximately 7,880 candidates. The Court found that the examination …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a massive group of writ petitions filed by teachers and aspirants whose TET 2018 and 2019 results were cancelled after the Maharashtra State Examination Council discovered large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. The court held that the Council, …
The petitioners, lecturers at Maharani Ahilyabai Holkar College of Pharmacy, were terminated and appealed to the School Tribunal, which held it lacked jurisdiction under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The petitioners challenged this …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) scandal in which marks of about 7,880 candidates were tampered with. The State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations cancelled the results of the affected candidates and …
The High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results of thousands of candidates after finding that their mark‑sheets had been tampered with, confirming the authority of the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations to rescind …
The petitioners, lecturers at Maharani Ahilyabai Holkar College of Pharmacy, were terminated and appealed to the School Tribunal, which held it lacked jurisdiction under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The petitioners challenged this …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations, through its …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had sufficient authority …
The petitioners, including in-service teachers and aspiring teachers, appeared for the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 conducted by the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations. Their results were cancelled and they were permanently debarred from future TET exams, and their Shalarth …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority …
The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the State and the Maharashtra State …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results of the petitioners on the basis that their mark‑sheets had been tampered with, finding sufficient material to support the cancellation. However, the Court set aside the order that permanently …
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018‑19 results and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates alleged to have been involved in mark‑sheet tampering. The State and the Maharashtra …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates. The Court found that the examination …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates. The Court examined the statutory powers under the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Council had …
The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates alleged to have been involved in mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering, holding that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority to …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions filed by teachers and aspirants whose TET 2018 and 2019 results were cancelled after the Maharashtra State Examination Council discovered large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. The petitioners argued that the …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers of the Maharashtra …
The petitioner, Ujwala Uttamrao Phulware, challenged her supersession in an appointment to a Scheduled Caste reserved vacancy in an aided school, alleging that the person appointed in her place was not made a party to the proceedings. The High Court observed that the petitioner has an alternate and …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) upheld the cancellation of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results for about 7,880 candidates after finding substantial evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Examination Council and the State were within their statutory powers to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after finding substantial evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. The Court found the Commissioner, as authorized …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered under the 1998 Act and the 2010 Regulations to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering. The court found ample documentary and police evidence …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for about 7,880 candidates after finding that their mark‑sheets had been tampered with. The Court held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had statutory …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …
The Bombay High Court upheld the State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently debaring the petitioners from future …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates on grounds of alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the consequent permanent debarment of thousands of candidates. The Court examined the statutory powers …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered under the 1998 Act and the 2010 Regulations to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering. The court found ample documentary and police evidence …
The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations, through its …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner, under the 1998 Act and the 2010 …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority under the 1998 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners on the basis of proven mark‑sheet tampering, but set aside the order permanently debaring them from future TET exams for …
The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers of the Maharashtra …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results of thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that marks were tampered with, confirming the authority of the State Council and its Commissioner to cancel certificates. However, the Court set aside …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates alleged to have been involved in mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers of the Maharashtra State …
The Maharashtra State Council of Examination and the State cancelled the results of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) after discovering large‑scale tampering of marks affecting about 7,880 candidates. The petitioners, many of whom were in‑service teachers, challenged both the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations’ order cancelling the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results of about 7,880 candidates and permanently de‑baring them from future TETs on grounds …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions filed by teachers and aspirants whose TET 2018 and 2019 results were cancelled after the Maharashtra State Examination Council discovered large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. The petitioners argued that the …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had statutory authority under …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of the candidates. The Court found that the Maharashtra State Council of …
The petitioners, an ashram school and a tribal welfare organization, challenged a School Tribunal order that rejected their objection to the Tribunal's jurisdiction over an appeal filed by a terminated employee of the primary ashram school. The core issue was whether employees of primary ashram …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding substantial evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the State Council of Examinations and the Commissioner had statutory authority under the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The Maharashtra State Council of Examinations and the State cancelled the results of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) after discovering large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering affecting about 7,880 candidates. The petitioners, many of whom were in‑service teachers, challenged both the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results for about 7,880 candidates and their permanent debarment from future TET exams. The Court found that the examination …
The petitioner, Sachin Janaba, filed a writ petition challenging the denial of a compassionate appointment under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Respondents, including the State of Maharashtra, argued that a Government resolution dated 27 …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered under the 1998 Act and its 2010 Regulations to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering. The court found ample documentary and police evidence …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's cancellation of the TET 2018 and 2019 results for the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Council had statutory authority …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the cancellation of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates. The Court found that the examination …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority …
The petitioner, a permanent assistant teacher at a private school, challenged his termination under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. He argued that the School Tribunal rendered its judgment within a very short period after the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and TET 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates alleged to have been involved in mark‑sheet tampering. The Court found that the Maharashtra State …
Petitioners appeared for the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019, and their results were cancelled and they were permanently debarred from future TET exams due to large-scale tampering of marks by officials and a software company. Around 7,880 candidates in TET 2019 and about 1,700 in TET …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …
The petitioner, an assistant teacher appointed in 2013, claimed his appointment was lawful and that his oral termination on 10 March 2023 was illegal. The school, after becoming a grant‑in‑aid institution, disputed the validity of his appointment and denied any termination. The petitioner appealed …
The petitioner, an assistant teacher appointed in 2013, was allegedly terminated orally on 10 March 2023 after the school began receiving grant‑in‑aid, leading him to file an appeal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 before …
Atul Manik Kore was appointed as a Sevak in a private school in 2011 and later became a permanent employee. After the school began receiving grant‑in‑aid, a dispute arose and the petitioner was orally terminated on 10 March 2023 for protesting. He appealed the termination under Section 9 of the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results for about 7,880 candidates and their permanent debarment from future TET exams. The court held that the State and the …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered to cancel the TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering, and therefore upheld the cancellation orders. However, the Court set aside the orders …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results for thousands of candidates after finding large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority …
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of approximately 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑tampering. The court examined the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and 2019 results of thousands of candidates and their permanent debarment from future TET exams. The Court found that the examination authorities, acting under the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results of thousands of candidates after finding that their mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of the candidates. The Court found that the Maharashtra State Council of …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State's and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently debaring the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners on the basis of large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. The Court found that the Commissioner of the Council …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority under the 1998 Act to …
The High Court examined a massive tampering of marks in the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) in Maharashtra, where about 7,880 candidates had their answer sheets altered to inflate scores. The State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations cancelled the results of these …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the State and the Maharashtra State Council of …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had the statutory authority to …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates alleged to have been involved in mark‑sheet …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court found that the examination authorities had sufficient …
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018‑2019 results and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates alleged to have been involved in large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. The State and …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently …
The petitioner, a former employee of a private school, filed an appeal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, which he later withdrew in 1996 based on an oral assurance from the management that he would be re‑appointed. When the …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers of the Maharashtra State …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently …
Laxminarayan was convicted under Section 13(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and sentenced to imprisonment till the rising of the court and a fine of Rs.10,000, which he subsequently served and paid. He appealed the conviction, but both …
The petitioner, appointed as a peon on an ad‑hoc basis on 11‑08‑2010, served continuously but was never granted permanency or the pay‑scale salary stipulated for private‑school employees. He filed a complaint under Section 28(1) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair …
The petitioner, Sopan Namdeo Kale, was appointed as a teacher in 2003 to a clear, vacant permanent post but was issued yearly appointment orders that labelled his service as temporary. After serving continuously for fifteen years, the management refused to allow him to join duty in 2017 and …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and 2019 results of thousands of candidates and their permanent debarment from future exams. The court found that the Maharashtra State Examination Council, acting under …
Aruna Sega Gavit, a former Assistant Teacher appointed in 1996 and reinstated after a termination was set aside, retired and sought the forwarding of her pension proposal to the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar. Despite a directive from the Education Officer on 20 July 2025, the school …
The petitioner, an assistant teacher promoted to Assistant Head, was reverted to her former post by a management order dated 15‑Nov‑2025, which she challenged via a writ petition under Article 226. The petition sought to set aside the order, confirm her appointment as Assistant Head, and direct …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's order cancelling the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the Commissioner of the Council …
The petitioners, teachers appointed as Shikshan Sevak in minority‑run schools, challenged the State’s order rejecting their appointment on two grounds: lack of prior permission for advertising the vacancy and failure to verify the availability of a surplus teacher for absorption. The petitioners …
The Bombay High Court (Kolhapur Bench) heard two writ petitions challenging a September 2025 order that rejected the appointment of a Shikshan Sevak in a minority‑run school. The petitioners argued that the rejection was based on two grounds: (i) failure to obtain prior permission before advertising …
The petitioners, a private school society, sought a direction for the Education Officer to furnish a user ID and password to enable them to complete required information on the student portal while awaiting staffing pattern approval. The petitioners argued that a prior order dated 30 July 2026 had …
The petitioners, who were appointed as Assistant Teachers in unaided schools, sought to overturn an order that transferred them to aided posts with only a 20% grant‑in‑aid, arguing they were entitled to 100% grant‑in‑aid after completing five years of satisfactory service. The petition relied on a …
The Hind Education Society sought judicial review of a February 2020 order rejecting its proposal to appoint a teacher to an unaided Instructor post at its secondary school. The rejection was based on alleged non‑compliance with a 2010 Government Resolution requiring proposals to be submitted in …
The petitioner, Nishant Parashuram Mahalkari, challenged the Education Officer’s order rejecting approval of his appointment as junior clerk in a partially aided private school, alleging the rejection was based on a purported surplus of non‑teaching staff. The petitioner argued that his appointment …
The petitioner, Sumit Vilas Awatade, was appointed as a junior clerk in a grant‑in‑aid private school on 10 July 2024. The Education Officer rejected the approval of this appointment on the ground that surplus non‑teaching staff existed, relying on a communication dated 28 May 2025 and the …
The petitioners were appointed as peons in a Maharashtra school, but the Education Officer rejected the approval proposal despite the management having complied with previously identified deficiencies. The petitioners argued that the officer cited fresh deficiencies, some of which were vague or …
The petitioner, appointed as a Junior Clerk on an unaided post in 2003, was proposed for transfer to an aided Junior Clerk post in July 2019. The State of Maharashtra rejected the transfer, citing the absence of a government policy for transferring non‑teaching staff. The petitioner argued that Rule …
The petitioner, Sumitra Mallikarjun Pujari, challenged the Education Officer’s order dated 25 July 2023 which rejected her appointment as Peon on the ground that it violated Government Resolutions of 12 February 2015 and 28 January 2019 concerning the staing pattern. The Court examined precedents – …
The applicant, a former assistant teacher, was reinstated with back wages by a School Tribunal in 2012, but the management only reinstated him part‑time and failed to pay the full amount, leading to a contempt petition. The management later terminated the applicant again in 2016 on multiple …
The petitioners, a private school society, challenged the termination of a teacher (Respondent No.1) who had been suspended and later dismissed following allegations of sexual molestation of a minor. The teacher was arrested, placed in judicial custody, and suspended with a departmental enquiry that …
The petitioners, a private school management and its headmaster, challenged a School Tribunal order that reinstated an assistant teacher (Respondent No.1) and awarded back wages. The teacher had been appointed on probation in June 1997 without advertisement, interview, or compliance with the …
The petitioners, a private school society, challenged the termination of a teacher (Respondent No.1) who had been suspended and later dismissed following allegations of sexual molestation of a minor. The teacher was arrested, placed in judicial custody, and suspended with a departmental enquiry that …
The petitioner, a part‑time teacher appointed in 1992, challenged her dismissal in June 2008, alleging an "otherwise termination" of service under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. She claimed that a full‑time appointment made in 2005 was not …
The petitioners, a school management and its school, challenged a School Tribunal order that reinstated the former headmaster, Tanaji Madhav Gharge, and directed the management to pay back‑wages from 19 May 2010 to his reinstatement on 8 August 2012. The headmaster had resigned under alleged duress …
The Jai Hind Sindhu Education Trust, a public charitable trust that runs several schools and a college in Pune, sought a declaration that its premises are exempt from property tax under Section 132(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. The Pimpri‑Chinchwad Municipal Corporation …
The petitioners, teachers employed on temporary assistant‑teacher posts by Janta Shikshan Sanstha (a private management), sought a court direction that the management submit proposals to the Education Authorities for their regularisation as Assistant Teachers on aided posts with continuity of …
The petitioners, teachers employed on temporary assistant‑teacher posts by Janta Shikshan Sanstha (a private management), sought a court direction that the management submit proposals to the Education Authorities for their regularisation as Assistant Teachers on aided posts with continuity of …
The petitioners, teachers employed on temporary assistant‑teacher posts by Janta Shikshan Sanstha (a private management), sought a court direction that the management submit proposals to the Education Authorities for their regularisation as Assistant Teachers on aided posts with continuity of …
The petitioners, a peon and the managing society of a fully aided secondary school, sought a court direction to revise the 2011 order that approved the peon's appointment on an unaided basis to a fully aided basis and to release the corresponding grant‑in‑aid, including arrears. The school had …
The petitioners, an assistant teacher and a management representative, sought a direction for the Education Officer to decide a promotion proposal dated 20 November 2025 for the petitioner to be appointed Headmaster. The promotion was recommended by the school management on 30 October 2025, but the …
Shri Vijay Uttam Kotwal, a lecturer appointed on 1 October 2007, was terminated on 1 September 2012 from a permanently un‑aided division of Shivaji Maratha Society. He challenged the termination before the School Tribunal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of …
The petition filed by Sangita Ramanlal Solanki challenged a 2011 order that reinstated Reeta Dilip Choksi as Headmistress, alleging that Choksi's original appointment in 1989 was illegal because she lacked the requisite D.Ed qualification and the appointment was never approved by the Administrative …
The petitioners, a school management, challenged a School Tribunal order that had set aside an alleged "otherwise termination" of a handicapped employee (Respondent No.1) and directed payment of back‑wages from 5 April 2002 to 1 May 2003. The employee had been transferred in July 2000, challenged …
The petitioners, a private school and its headmaster, challenged the Additional School Tribunal’s order that set aside the termination of the former headmaster (Respondent No.1) and directed his reinstatement as headmaster with back wages. The termination stemmed from allegations that the headmaster …
Durgesh Pandit Hole, a retired part‑time assistant teacher, challenged the denial of pension under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS), arguing that 12 years of continuous, 100% aided part‑time service should be counted at 50% towards qualifying service. He contended that, under Note 1 to Rule 57 of the …
Pragati Vitthal Gawande, a former Shikshan Sevak, challenged her termination, arguing she had completed the required 30 months of service and was therefore a deemed confirmed teacher under Section 5(2A) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The …
The petitioners, who are peons employed at a private unaided school, filed several writ petitions under Article 226 seeking payment of salary and pay‑scale as prescribed under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The Court noted that earlier …
The petitioners, who work as peons in a private unaided school, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 seeking payment of salary and pay‑scale under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The Court noted that earlier proceedings had …
The petitioners, who work as peons in a private unaided school, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 seeking payment of salary and pay‑scale under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Earlier proceedings had resulted in a court‑ordered …
The petitioners, who work as peons in a private unaided school, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 seeking payment of salary and pay‑scale under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Earlier proceedings had resulted in a court‑ordered …
The petitioner, a part‑time craft teacher appointed on 20 September 1995, sought direction under Article 226 of the Constitution to be absorbed as a full‑time teacher with all attendant benefits, challenging a Grievance Redressal Committee order that rejected her claim on the basis of a circular …
The petitioner, a teacher appointed in 1986 with S.S.C. and D.Ed., obtained a B.A. degree in 1991 and sought placement in the graduate pay scale, alleging seniority over a junior colleague who had been granted that scale. The junior teacher had earlier obtained a writ order placing her in the …
The appellant, an educational society, dismissed its principal (the first respondent) after a departmental inquiry found several charges proved. The principal appealed to the School Tribunal, which set aside the dismissal on the ground that the Inquiry Committee was not constituted as required by …
Madhavi was appointed as a temporary teacher in a private secondary school on 16 July 1985, holding a BA and B.Ed., and was placed in Category ‘C’ of Schedule ‘F’. Chagan was appointed on 1 August 1985 as an assistant teacher with only a senior secondary certificate and a Diploma in Education, …
The parents of Deepak, a 29‑year‑old assistant teacher who died in a bus‑truck collision, filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs 61.20 million using a multiplier of 17 based on the deceased’s age, plus …
MIS. Yeshwant Gramin Shikshan Sanstha, a society that runs 29 grant‑in‑aid schools and colleges in Maharashtra, appointed 16 part‑time librarians with the permission of the State Government. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner claimed the society had defaulted on EPF contributions for those …
The appellant, Pragati Mahila Mahavidyalaya, challenged a High Court order that reinstated respondent No.1, a part‑time lecturer, on the ground that his appointment was permanent. The employee had been appointed twice on a temporary, fixed‑term basis as a part‑time lecturer, as reflected in the …
The appellant, a senior lecturer in a private polytechnic, claimed that the vacant post of Principal must be filled by promotion under Rule 3(3) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981. The Director of Technical Education rejected this claim, applying the …
Jeles Education Society (appellant) ran a private school and advertised a vacancy for a Trained Graduate Teacher of English and Sanskrit, reserving the post for backward classes. R.T. Bhitale (respondent), an Other Backward Class candidate, was appointed on a purely temporary basis from 7 December …
The appellant was appointed Headmaster of a private school in August 1996. The respondent, who was the acting Headmaster, waited nearly ten years before filing an application for condonation of delay before the School Tribunal, challenging the appointment under Section 9(1)(b) of the Maharashtra …
The Supreme Court examined the validity of the Grievance Redressal Committee created under Maharashtra's Shikshan Sevak Scheme, which had been reconstituted by the High Court to function as a quasi‑judicial tribunal headed by a retired judge. The petitioners, private schools, challenged the …
Shahu Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Anr. filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of an industrial tribunal, alleging arbitrariness, unreasonableness and perversity. The Bombay High Court Single Judge dismissed the petition as non‑maintainable, and the Division …
The Progressive Education Society appointed Rajendra as a teacher on a two‑year probation starting 9 August 1992. Before the probation period ended, the Society terminated his services on 1 August 1994, citing unsatisfactory performance and paid notice pay. Rajendra challenged the termination under …
The appellant, Secretary of Akola Taluka Education Society, runs a vocational training institute that saw a sharp decline in student enrolment. It terminated the services of several teachers without giving the three‑month notice required under Rule 26 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools …
The first respondent, M.R. Gavali, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on a temporary basis for two consecutive academic years to a post reserved for SC/ST/NT candidates because no such candidate was available. He belongs to the OBC (Hindu Mali) category. Under Rule 9(9)(a) of the Maharashtra …
