Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
23 judgments · newest first · showing 1–23
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State, arguing that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the subsequent award dated 29 …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award issued by the Land Acquisition Officer and the subsequent approval by the District Level Committee. Their claims centered on alleged procedural …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the role of the District Level Committee under the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. They argued that the Land Acquisition Officer’s determination of …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State. They argued that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the subsequent award dated 29 …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State, arguing that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the Collector’s direction on 10 …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists, challenged the compensation award for land acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, arguing that the District Level Committee’s minutes and the Collector’s direction to re‑determine compensation were illegal and that they were entitled to a …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists, challenged the acquisition of their lands for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, contending that the compensation process violated the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. They argued that the District Level Committee approved compensation without the …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State, arguing that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the subsequent award dated 29 …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award dated 29 September 2025 and the preceding administrative actions, alleging procedural violations, illegal involvement of the Collector and the Chief …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists, challenged the compensation award for lands acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, arguing that the District Level Committee’s minutes and a later award were illegal because they were passed without the statutory hearing required under …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State. They argued that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the subsequent award dated 29 …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State of Maharashtra, the MSRDC and various officials. Their main grievance was that the District Level Committee …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the role of the District Level Committee in the acquisition process. They argued that the Land Acquisition Officer’s determination of compensation …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State of Maharashtra, the MSRDC and various officials. They argued that the District Level Committee’s meeting on …
The petitioners in five writ petitions sought additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces that were acquired for the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway, alleging that the agreements executed under Section 19‑B(2) of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955 paid compensation …
The petitioners, Dharamendra Mahadev Gawade & Ors., filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Land Acquisition Officer made under the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955, and the subsequent award dated 2 June 2025 issued pursuant to Section 19-B(3) of the Act. They sought quashing of the award …
The Bombay High Court considered five writ petitions filed by original land owners, power‑of‑attorney holders and assignees seeking additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces under the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway project. The lands had been acquired by …
The Bombay High Court considered five writ petitions filed by original land owners, power‑of‑attorney holders and assignees seeking additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces under the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway project. The lands had been acquired by …
The petitioners filed five writ petitions seeking additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces that were acquired for the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway. The lands had been converted to non‑agricultural use and acquired under the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955, …
The Bombay High Court considered five writ petitions filed by original land owners, power‑of‑attorney holders and assignees seeking additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces under the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway project. The lands had been acquired by …
The petitioners challenged a notification under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955 for acquisition of their lands, having already filed objections under Section 17(1) which were pending before the Land Acquisition Officer. They filed an interim application alleging that the statutory …
The petitioners, Ganesh Shankar Dimble and others, objected under Section 17 of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955 to a notification issued under Section 15 proposing acquisition of their lands. Their objections are pending before the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO). They filed an interim application …
Petitioner Naveen Anant Gawali challenged an order dated 29 May 2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer under Section 19C(3) of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955, which rejected his objection to the disbursal of compensation and directed that the amount be paid to private respondents. The High …
