Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioners, heirs of an ex‑Army man, sought a court direction to enforce a 1976 Tahsildar order that allotted them five acres of government land in Ambhai village. They claimed possession had been taken and their name entered in the revenue records, but they could not cultivate the land due to …
The petitioners challenged a 2 January 2020 order that resumed land allotted to a deceased Project Affected Person (PAP) under the Veer Baji Pasalkar Dam project, alleging that the order was passed without hearing the legal heirs and without proper determination of entitlement under the 1973 …
The appellant, a partnership firm, paid Rs. 781.33 lacs for the purchase of land and buildings of a cooperative cotton mill that had been partially resumed by the State. The liquidator executed a sale agreement, but the State later cancelled it, claiming the price was far below market value and that …
