Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014

24 judgments · newest first · showing 1–24

PURUSHOTTAM RATANLAL TAPADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Purushottam Ratanlal Tapade, challenged an order dated 31.12.2018 issued by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Latur, in Appeal No. 102/2018. The High Court observed that the petitioner has an alternate and equally efficacious remedy by filing a revision before …

SHAKIL AHEMAD SIDDIQUI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Shakil Ahmed Siddiqui and Amir Shakil Siddiqui, were charged in Sessions Case No.26/2019 with offences under Sections 306, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC and Section 39 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014, stemming from an alleged loan of about Rs.1 crore and the subsequent …

ARVIND PANDURANG BAWAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Arvind Pandurang Bawake was arrested in Crime No.213 of 2026 for alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, stemming from his role as a special power of attorney in a land sale transaction. The prosecution alleged cheating and criminal …

AVINASH GENA PANDULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Avinash Gena Pandule, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction for a special independent investigating team to conduct investigation into Crime No.12/2026 under Section 108 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 39 of the Maharashtra Money Lending Regulation Act, 2014. The …

CHAMPALAL GANGADHAR PATILversusVIJAY RAVINDRANATH KABRA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a defendant in a 2014 suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, sought a stay of that suit on the ground that a parallel proceeding under the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 was pending before the District Deputy Registrar. The trial court rejected the stay …

SURAJ HINDURAO KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

Suraj Hindurao Kadam applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a suicide case (CR No.211 of 2026) where the deceased alleged that Kadam had given him a loan of Rs.5,00,000 and subsequently threatened and harassed him for repayment, also alleging possession of certain vehicles and a …

SAGAR ALIAS AKASH SANDIP SABALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The applicant, Sagar alias Akash Sandip Sabale, an employee of Mauli Finance Pvt. Ltd., faced charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 for allegedly threatening a loan borrower to recover a debt. He filed an …

ANKUSH RAM BIDKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Ankush Ram Bidkar, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide, criminal conspiracy, extortion and offences under the Maharashtra Money Lending Act. The trial court had earlier granted interim bail to the applicant's wife but conditioned the applicant to …

GANESH @ KEDAR NANASAHEB GAIKWADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Ganesh @ Kedar Nanasaheb Gaikwad, who had been in custody for 4 years and 9 months for alleged extortion and related offences under multiple IPC sections, the Arms Act and the …

SANJAY KASHIRAM MOHITEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered the bail application of Sanjay Kashiram Mohite, who was charged under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOC) and several provisions of the IPC for allegedly protecting a gang leader (A1) by filing a false police representation and receiving money. The …

PRALHAD PUNDALIKRAO KADAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay considered anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by three accused—Pralhad Pundalikrao Kadam, Amit Balasaheb Jadhav and Yogesh Gangadhar Bodake—arising from FIR No. 117 of 2026 alleging fraudulent sale of …

AMIT BALASAHEB JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay considered anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by three accused—Pralhad Pundalikrao Kadam, Amit Balasaheb Jadhav and Yogesh Gangadhar Bodake—arising from FIR No. 117 of 2026 alleging fraudulent sale of …

HARSHAL SUKDEO USHIRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay considered anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by three accused—Pralhad Pundalikrao Kadam, Amit Balasaheb Jadhav and Yogesh Gangadhar Bodake—arising from FIR No. 117 of 2026 alleging fraudulent sale of …

HARSHAL SUKDEO USHIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay considered anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by three accused—Pralhad Pundalikrao Kadam, Amit Balasaheb Jadhav and Yogesh Gangadhar Bodake—arising from FIR No. 117 of 2026 alleging fraudulent sale of …

YOGESH GANGADHAR BODAKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay considered anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by three accused—Pralhad Pundalikrao Kadam, Amit Balasaheb Jadhav and Yogesh Gangadhar Bodake—arising from FIR No. 117 of 2026 alleging fraudulent sale of …

HARSHAL S. USHIRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay considered anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by three accused—Pralhad Pundalikrao Kadam, Amit Balasaheb Jadhav and Yogesh Gangadhar Bodake—arising from FIR No. 117 of 2026 alleging fraudulent sale of …

AKSHAY DINESH SURAVKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court disposed a group of three bail applications filed by employees of F6 Capital & Finance Pvt. Ltd., who were accused of creating a parallel company, EXPNP Experty, and diverting 82 clients, causing a notional loss of Rs.16,40,003. The prosecution argued that the offences were …

VINOD MAHADEV MHATREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court disposed a group of three bail applications filed by employees of F6 Capital & Finance Pvt. Ltd., who were accused of creating a parallel company, EXPNP Experty, and diverting 82 clients, causing a notional loss of Rs.16,40,003. The prosecution argued that the offences were …

CHETAN RAVINDRA SAWANTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court disposed a group of three bail applications filed by employees of F6 Capital & Finance Pvt. Ltd., who were accused of creating a parallel company, EXPNP Experty, and diverting 82 clients, causing a notional loss of Rs.16,40,003. The prosecution argued the offences were …