Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S GARWARE NYLONS LTD.versusPIMPRI CHINCHWAD MAHANAGAR PALIKA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 22728 March 1995Dismissed

Mis Garware NyLons Ltd., a manufacturer of nylon and polyester yarn, imported goods that were subject to octroi. The municipal corporation valued the goods for octroi under Rule 17(a) of the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968 and included the customs duty paid on the imports. The appellant challenged this

AMRUTLAL CHUNILAL RAVALversusDATTATRAYA PANDURANG HAJARNIS & ORS.

1980 INSC 22520 November 1980Dismissed

Amrutlal Chunilal Raval was elected President of the Bhor Municipal Council in 1974, but a prior conviction on 26 December 1973 under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act rendered him disqualified under Section 16(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965, which imposes a five‑year bar unless the State Gover

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF CITY OF THANEversusM/S VIDYUT METALLICS LTD. AND ANR.

2007 INSC 91614 September 2007Dismissed

The Municipal Corporation of Thane claimed that Vidyut Metallics Ltd. had underpaid octroi by paying 0.5% under Item 71 of the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1974, instead of 1% under Item 77, and demanded the difference. The company had paid 1% from 1968‑1974, later corrected its classification of stainles

G.B. MAHAJAN AND ORSversusJALGAON MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS.

1990 INSC 27713 September 1990Dismissed

The Jalgaon Municipal Council, having received a gift of land, sought to develop it by constructing an administrative building, a vegetable market and a commercial complex on a self‑financing basis, appointing a private developer (Respondent No. 6) to execute the project and to dispose of occupancy rights for a fee. Re

M.G. PANDKE AND ORS.versusMUNICIPAL COUNCIL HINGANGHAT DISTRICT WARDHA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 2409 September 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, teachers employed by the Hinganghat Municipal Council before November 1956, claimed that their statutory retirement age was 60 years under the Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951 and the subsequent Maharashtra Secondary Schools Code, which provided an exception for Vidarbha teachers. The Munici

HASMUKHRAI V MEHTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 8283 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Hasmukhrai Mehta, owned land in Village Sheel, Raigad, which was originally included in a 1977 residential development plan. In 1999 the land was re‑designated for an Agricultural Produce Market Yard and a truck terminal, and the appellant served a purchase notice under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regi

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search