Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
7 judgments · newest first · showing 1–7
The petitioner, Beau Monde Plot No.1 Co‑operative Housing Society, sought a deemed conveyance of its proportionate share in a common layout comprising Plots 1, 2 and 3, after the District Deputy Registrar rejected its application. The original developer sold Plot 1 to the developer who built a …
The applicants, developers, sought quashing of FIR No. 69/2018 filed by the Economic Offence Wing under Sections 34, 406, 409, 420 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 13 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, arising from a flat‑purchase dispute with a complainant. After investigation, the complainant and …
The petitioner, Momin Zulfikar Kasam, challenged a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance granted by the Competent Authority to respondent No.1 (Apurva Lok Rachna Co‑op. Housing Society) for a portion of land under Wing C4 of Building No.3, alleging that the application was inconsistent with …
The petitioner, Momin Zulfikar Kasam, challenged a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance granted by the Competent Authority to respondent No.1 (Apurva Lok Rachna Co‑op. Housing Society) for a portion of land under Wing C4 of Building No.3, alleging that the application was inconsistent with …
The petitioner, a housing developer, challenged a November 2023 order of the Competent Authority that granted deemed conveyance of 4,652.26 sq m of land, including a recreation ground, to a co‑operative society (respondent 2) under Section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963. The …
Jawala Real Estate Pvt Ltd (later merged with Macrotech Developers) allotted a three‑bedroom flat to Haresh in 2013, who paid an advance but failed to pay the balance, leading the developer to cancel the allotment. Haresh filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission …
Homebuyers dissatisfied with the services of a builder erected a public banner listing various grievances, which the builder claimed was defamatory and filed a criminal complaint under Section 500 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The appellants argued that the banner was a peaceful protest made in …
