Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Maharashtra Police Act, 1951

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DEEPAK S/O LAXMAN DONGREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 11028 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Deepak Dongre, was ordered to leave District Jalna for two years under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, based on five offences (three dated 2013‑2018 and two from 2020) and confidential witness statements. He challenged the externment order through a statutory appeal and a writ pe

RAHMAT KHAN @ RAMMU BISMILLAHversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

2021 INSC 42425 August 2021Leave Granted & Allowed

Rahmat Khan, a journalist and social worker, exposed alleged misappropriation of government grants to madrasas in Amravati district and filed RTI applications and complaints against officials. In retaliation, three FIRs were lodged against him under various IPC sections, and the Deputy Commissioner of Police issued an

SOMNATHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2024 INSC 23218 March 2024Disposed off

The appellant was arrested for theft and granted bail, but a police officer (respondent No.2) allegedly paraded him half‑naked, verbally abused him on the basis of caste and physically assaulted him, illegally detaining him for four hours despite bail. An inquiry by the Sub‑Divisional Police Officer found the officer r

HOTEL PRIYA, A PROPRIETORSHIPversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 20618 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, owners of orchestra bars, challenged licence conditions imposed by the Maharashtra Police Commissioner that limited the number of performers to eight, with a gender cap of four women and four men on stage. The High Court upheld the conditions, but the Supreme Court held that the gender cap is unconstitu

INDIAN HOTEL AND RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION (AHAR) & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2019 INSC 5217 January 2019Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act, 2016 and its Rules, which regulate dance performances in hotels, restaurants and bar rooms. Petitioners argued that provisions defining "obscene dance", licensing restrictions, punitive measures for tips, and various licensing co

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search